> On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 1:26 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
>
> zram-generator has no service unit file at all. The zram.service unit
> file is part of Anaconda.
>
Good to know. I proceed to remove on my desktop which has 32 GB RAM.
>
> I'm not sure whose service this is but I don't have it.
>
On Sunday, June 7, 2020 11:51:38 AM MST Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:
> Hello! I see a proposal to enable zram by deafult¹. If I correctly
> understand this is the thread where it's being discussed. I have a few
> questions, answers to which probably would be nice to add to the
> proposal.
>
> 1.
On 6/7/20 5:22 AM, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
I tried with Fedora rawhide (which already uses SQLite for the rpm
database) and it works fine, but:
- Instead of saving the image, a container must be exported:
Right, you can export a container, or you can save an image and use the
layer tarball inside
On 6/7/20 12:47 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 07:15:57PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
The bad news, though, is that current versions of rpm (and dnf) won't work
under WSL if you're on a Windows version older than 2004, so you might be
stuck with CentOS 7 if you're on an
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200606.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200607.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 59
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.54 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/06/08/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.3-20200607git05e3407.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 7:31 PM David Kaufmann wrote:
>
> Yes, its a quite boring example, but I've included it for completeness
> as a border case. This is just the few megabytes it needs preallocated,
> whilst swap is not in use at all.
12KiB when not in use?
$ swapon
NAME TYPE SIZE
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020, at 9:30 PM, David Kaufmann wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 05:25:15PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> >> At 150% memory usage assuming a 2:1 compression ratio this would mean:
> >> - disk swap:
> >> has to write 4G to disk initially, and for reading swap another 4G
> >> (12G
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844008
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843862
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-6b3f655fb9 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 05:25:15PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> This is not generally true, only if RAM gets so tight that applications
>> start competing for swap.
>> This is why I've proposed test cases testing exactly that, as for
>> the case of persistent swap I'd expect the outcome to be a
By the way, shout out to Bastien Nocera. This feature was his idea
before I got around to picking it up and running with it.
https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/98
---
Chris Murphy
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 12:56 PM Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:
>
> Hello! I see a proposal to enable zram by deafult¹. If I correctly
> understand this is the thread where it's being discussed. I have a few
> questions, answers to which probably would be nice to add to the
> proposal.
>
> 1. It says
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841308
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 2:48 PM David Kaufmann wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 05:36:15PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > To me this sounds like too much dependency on swap.
>
> That's not what I meant, I wanted to emphasize the different values of
> disk storage vs. RAM. As said in another
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 1:26 PM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>
> Tested on HP Envy x360 Convertible Ryzen 2500u with 16 GB RAM and 1TB
> SSD on Fedora 32 Design Suite.
>
> Following the procedure to install zram-generator setting memory
> allocation to 0.50 (or 50%) and commenting out "resume=UUID"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844899
Bug ID: 1844899
Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200607 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843862
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
---
title: CPE Weekly status email
tags: CPE Weekly, email
---
# CPE Weekly: 2020-06-07
Background:
The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining
IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Our goal is to keep
core servers and services running and maintained,
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 05:36:15PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> To me this sounds like too much dependency on swap.
That's not what I meant, I wanted to emphasize the different values of
disk storage vs. RAM. As said in another email it doesn't matter at all
if there is 0% or 90% of disk swap
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:30:09 -0400
Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CompilerPolicy
> An obvious example is Firefox. Upstream, the Firefox project builds
> primarily with Clang/LLVM. Yet we force the Fedora package owner to
> find and fix issues building with GCC then
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844884
Bug ID: 1844884
Summary: perl-IO-Pager-1.02 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-IO-Pager
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Tested on HP Envy x360 Convertible Ryzen 2500u with 16 GB RAM and 1TB
SSD on Fedora 32 Design Suite.
Following the procedure to install zram-generator setting memory
allocation to 0.50 (or 50%) and commenting out "resume=UUID" line on
fstab and kernel parameter on boot via grubby, the
Hello! I see a proposal to enable zram by deafult¹. If I correctly
understand this is the thread where it's being discussed. I have a few
questions, answers to which probably would be nice to add to the
proposal.
1. It says ZRAM gets enabled on upgrade. What's gonna happen to systems
with ZSWAP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844866
Bug ID: 1844866
Summary: perl-CPAN-Uploader-0.103014 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CPAN-Uploader
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844844
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 02:43:49PM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 6/5/20 2:14 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > This has been bothering me for a while, it occurs quite often for
> > certain posters to the list, and since Jeff's replies reproduce this
> > issue, let me ask:
> >
> > Why is
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 08:04:38AM +0200, Igor Raits wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On fully updated rawhide,
>
> ● systemd-hostnamed.service - Hostname Service
> Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-hostnamed.service;
> static; vendor preset:
I'm trying to debug a segv in PyQt5 and I hit a problem with gdb
not finding debug info in f32.
I have installed python3.8 debug info.
$ dnf list installed | grep debug | grep python3
python3-debuginfo.x86_64 3.8.3-1.fc32
@updates-debuginfo
On Sat, 2020-06-06 at 07:58 +0200, Igor Raits wrote:
> The big problem then becomes getting packagers to address the
> > diagnostics. I've
> > been disappointed at how many packages are ignoring diagnostics
> > (particularly
> > those with security implications) and I'm actively looking at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844844
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Test-TrailingSpace-0.0600-1.fc30.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45515163
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844844
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1695845
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1695845=edit
[patch] Update to 0.0600 (#1844844)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844844
Bug ID: 1844844
Summary: perl-Test-TrailingSpace-0.0600 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-TrailingSpace
Keywords:
We are in the middle of the datacentre move where various services are
partially in our old site and some are in the new ones. One problem is that
our access to RHEL comes via a server which got moved to allow for us to
build out systems in the new site.. however the builders in the old
datacentre
On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 at 04:22, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> On 6/2/20 4:52 AM, Code Zombie wrote:
> > Is there an official branch of Fedora for WSL or a plan to create one?
>
>
> The good news is that it's reasonably straightforward to install an
> unpackaged distribution, you just need a tarball of
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 06:40:43 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 5:54 AM Andy Mender wrote:
>
> Hiya,
>
> As someone who is trying to get into packaging in Fedora, I would really
> really appreciate the docs being less dispersed:
> -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844743
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 612945 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/612945
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 07:15:57PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> It's not click and run by any means, but it's feasible.
>
> The bad news, though, is that current versions of rpm (and dnf) won't work
> under WSL if you're on a Windows version older than 2004, so you might be
> stuck with CentOS
On 6/6/20 4:55 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On Saturday, June 6, 2020 3:16:02 PM MST Samuel Sieb wrote:
Great, then it probably wouldn't benefit you, but it also would not harm
you at all either. In my case, my laptop was constantly thrashing the
swap and now it isn't, so I'm very happy about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On fully updated rawhide,
● systemd-hostnamed.service - Hostname Service
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-hostnamed.service;
static; vendor preset: disabled)
Drop-In: /usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-hostnamed.service.d
42 matches
Mail list logo
