On Friday, July 10, 2020 9:41:48 PM MST drago01 wrote:
> On Saturday, July 11, 2020, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> > On Friday, July 10, 2020 6:43:59 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:38 PM John M. Harris Jr
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Friday, July 10, 2020 6:31:08 PM MST
On Friday, July 10, 2020 7:12:50 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 10:05 PM John M. Harris Jr
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Friday, July 10, 2020 6:56:36 PM MST Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 1:50 AM John M. Harris Jr
> > >
> > > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> >
On Saturday, July 11, 2020, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Friday, July 10, 2020 6:43:59 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:38 PM John M. Harris Jr
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Friday, July 10, 2020 6:31:08 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/07/11/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.4-20200710git318a3ce.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 10:05 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Friday, July 10, 2020 6:56:36 PM MST Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 1:50 AM John M. Harris Jr
> > wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Why should I have to switch the system that's being used, and potentially
> > >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855333
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-1f18f358d0 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
On Friday, July 10, 2020 6:56:36 PM MST Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 1:50 AM John M. Harris Jr
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Why should I have to switch the system that's being used, and potentially
> > break these servers, just because a package isn't being compiled anymore?
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855334
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-1f18f358d0 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853570
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-0a45a95c41 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855332
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-1f18f358d0 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854754
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-1f18f358d0 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854753
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-1f18f358d0 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854752
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-1f18f358d0 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 1:50 AM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> Why should I have to switch the system that's being used, and potentially
> break these servers, just because a package isn't being compiled anymore? It
> still works, and it works very well. It has less overhead than php-fpm, even!
>
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting for Monday. I don't
have anything urgent new this week.
If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting.
Note on blocker meetings: we still have a very short
On Friday, July 10, 2020 6:43:59 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:38 PM John M. Harris Jr
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Friday, July 10, 2020 6:31:08 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:26 PM John M. Harris Jr
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:38 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Friday, July 10, 2020 6:31:08 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:26 PM John M. Harris Jr
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Friday, July 10, 2020 6:14:27 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853570
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-def6ad7f98 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
696 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
435 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-bc0182548b
bubblewrap-0.3.3-2.el7
145
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b1a8a3c29a
putty-0.74-1.el6
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-8c3e76982e
python-rsa-3.4.2-1.el6
5
On Friday, July 10, 2020 6:31:08 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:26 PM John M. Harris Jr
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Friday, July 10, 2020 6:14:27 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 8:59 PM John M. Harris Jr
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855333
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-43a6a0fdca has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855334
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-43a6a0fdca has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853570
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-abc8be6f6e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854754
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-43a6a0fdca has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855332
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-43a6a0fdca has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853574
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854753
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-43a6a0fdca has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854752
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-43a6a0fdca has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:26 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Friday, July 10, 2020 6:14:27 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 8:59 PM John M. Harris Jr
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Friday, July 10, 2020 5:56:31 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853720
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854753
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855333
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853570
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855332
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854752
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854754
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855334
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from
On Friday, July 10, 2020 6:14:27 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 8:59 PM John M. Harris Jr
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Friday, July 10, 2020 5:56:31 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 8:55 PM John M. Harris Jr
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850757
Bug 1850757 depends on bug 1850767, which changed state.
Bug 1850767 Summary: Add perl-DateTime-Set to EPEL8 / co-maintainer request
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850767
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850767
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 8:59 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Friday, July 10, 2020 5:56:31 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 8:55 PM John M. Harris Jr
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thursday, May 28, 2020 12:53:26 PM MST Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> https://paste.centos.org/view/f4165396
>
> Two workloads: install and update. It might seem like an update is
> both read and write dependent, but the rpms are already compressed and
> don't get compressed again. The differences, I expect, are mostly
> write performance. And this suggests it's
On Friday, July 10, 2020 5:56:31 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 8:55 PM John M. Harris Jr
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, May 28, 2020 12:53:26 PM MST Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/drop_mod_php
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > == Summary ==
> > >
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 8:55 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Thursday, May 28, 2020 12:53:26 PM MST Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/drop_mod_php
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > mod_php (apache2handler) is an optional httpd module to execute PHP
> > scripts, not used.
> >
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:16 PM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> On Fr, 10.07.20 09:34, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
>
> > > That makes things a lot more robust, as btrfs will then just work like
> > > any other fs even if you insert the root subvol in between like
> > > anaconda
On Thursday, May 28, 2020 12:53:26 PM MST Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/drop_mod_php
>
> == Summary ==
> mod_php (apache2handler) is an optional httpd module to execute PHP
> scripts, not used.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:Remi| Remi Collet]]
> * Email: remi at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754091
Bug 754091 depends on bug 757657, which changed state.
Bug 757657 Summary: Review Request: perl-Wx-Scintilla - Scintilla source code
editing component for wxWidgets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757657
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784252
Bug 784252 depends on bug 757657, which changed state.
Bug 757657 Summary: Review Request: perl-Wx-Scintilla - Scintilla source code
editing component for wxWidgets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757657
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815713
Bug 815713 depends on bug 757657, which changed state.
Bug 757657 Summary: Review Request: perl-Wx-Scintilla - Scintilla source code
editing component for wxWidgets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757657
What|Removed
On Friday, July 10, 2020 2:53:30 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 10. 07. 20 23:35, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> >>> DNF should perform "dnf mark install fedora-repos-rawhide-modular"
> >>> action
> >>> on a system upgrade, because we want that package to be prensented on
> >>> the system. However
Hi,
I've prepared rebase of poppler to 0.90.0 in the side tag
"f33-build-side-25167". I ask you to build your dependent packages in it
and I will ask to merge it to main branch next Friday (17th of July).
There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library
libpoppler.so.*.
On 10. 07. 20 23:35, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
DNF should perform "dnf mark install fedora-repos-rawhide-modular" action
on a system upgrade, because we want that package to be prensented on
the system. However I worry that DNF does not possess a capability for
doing it. (Except of injecting that
On Friday, July 10, 2020 4:39:21 AM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 09. 07. 20 14:24, Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 12:55:44PM +0200, Igor Raits wrote:
> >
> >> One just noticed that `dnf autoremove` is trying to remove `fedora-
> >> repos-modular` and
On Friday, July 10, 2020 5:05:51 AM MST Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
> Le vendredi 10 juillet 2020 à 07:51 -0400, Solomon Peachy a écrit :
>
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 01:37:14PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot via devel
> > wrote:
> >
> > > If you remove end users from the loop there is zero zip
On Friday, July 10, 2020 4:12:42 AM MST Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
> On 7/10/20 5:06 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> > The problem IOT side is not the security of the
> > software update chain. The problem is that manufacturers skimp on
> > software updates in the first place
>
>
> Yes,
On Thursday, July 9, 2020 2:19:27 PM MST Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
> On 7/9/20 8:44 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> > Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
> >
> >>* disk access is literally O(1) slower than RAM access
> >
> > This notation is meaningless. By the definition of the O
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853720
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
On Friday, July 10, 2020 2:27:02 AM MST Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> > I also don't see any reason to be required to keep unsolicited negative
> > "private" emails secret. There's no agreement that they should be.
> > However, I would request that you ignore them rather than
Maybe Workstation could provide Déjà Dup in the default system to make
it discoverable and encourage users to create backups.
It has to be an installed application (can’t be a website), and most
users would benefit from having backups.
___
devel mailing
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/XorgUtilityDeaggregation
== Summary ==
The collection packages
`xorg-x11-{apps,font-utils,server-utils,utils,xkb-utils}` will be
retired, and the individual utilities within them will be packaged
separately.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:ajax|Adam Jackson]]
*
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Reserve_resources_for_active_user_WS
== Summary ==
This proposal adds cgroup based resource protections for the active
graphical session. This is done by passing a memory protection of
250MiB to active users (capped at 10% of system memory) and by
enabling
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Reserve_resources_for_active_user_WS
== Summary ==
This proposal adds cgroup based resource protections for the active
graphical session. This is done by passing a memory protection of
250MiB to active users (capped at 10% of system memory) and by
enabling
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/XorgUtilityDeaggregation
== Summary ==
The collection packages
`xorg-x11-{apps,font-utils,server-utils,utils,xkb-utils}` will be
retired, and the individual utilities within them will be packaged
separately.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:ajax|Adam Jackson]]
*
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 07:14:09PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 26.06.2020 16:42, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > ** transparent compression: significantly reduces write amplification,
> > improves lifespan of storage hardware
>
> What can you say about this?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823368
Denis Fateyev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de...@fateyev.com
Doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149524
--- Comment #4 from Denis Fateyev ---
Well, I still use "perl-Digest-Whirlpool" in several legacy projects, so I
believe we could complete and finish this package review.
I need to prepare a patch that would allow to unbundle Whirlpool code.
On Fr, 10.07.20 09:34, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> > That makes things a lot more robust, as btrfs will then just work like
> > any other fs even if you insert the root subvol in between like
> > anaconda apparently does.
> >
> > I think there's big value in allowing short
> It doesn't use compression so not relevant to the cited statement?
Well the paper compares ext2, ext4, xfs, f2fs, and btrfs in terms of IO
amplification and states:
"In fact, in all our experiments, btrfs was an outlier, producing the highest
read, write, and space amplification."
The
On 7/10/20 10:14 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 26.06.2020 16:42, Ben Cotton wrote:
** transparent compression: significantly reduces write amplification,
improves lifespan of storage hardware
What can you say about this? https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.08514.pdf
I would say that it
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 06:15:54PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Jul 2020 21:11:31 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I am not sure what to tell you here. Perhaps you could describe the
> > reason you are working on the chromium debuginfo? Is it broken? Missing?
> > Less useful that normal?
On Friday, July 10, 2020, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 26.06.2020 16:42, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > ** transparent compression: significantly reduces write amplification,
> > improves lifespan of storage hardware
>
> What can you say about this?
On 26.06.2020 16:42, Ben Cotton wrote:
> ** transparent compression: significantly reduces write amplification,
> improves lifespan of storage hardware
What can you say about this? https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.08514.pdf
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
On 7/10/20 1:26 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le jeudi 09 juillet 2020 à 09:40 -0700, PGNet Dev a écrit :
I'm working on a spec, pulling source with forgemeta/scm
With known/supported scm sources (e.g., github), it works as
expected, with no issues.
involves writing the lua equivalent of
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 09:34:36AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020, 6:07 AM Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>
> > On Fr, 10.07.20 06:50, Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 6:45 AM Marek Suchánek
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I haven't seen any
On 10. 07. 20 17:22, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Right, upstream provided a patch which landed on Rawhide:
https://developer.blender.org/rB56d0df51a36fdce7ec2d1fbb7b47b1d95b591b5f
Could someone having python expertise check it please?
If it builds, ship it :)
(The changes look reasonable.)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855829
Bug ID: 1855829
Summary: perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect-3.28 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect
Keywords:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020, 6:07 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fr, 10.07.20 06:50, Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 6:45 AM Marek Suchánek
> wrote:
> > >
> > > I haven't seen any mention of Silverblue in the Btrfs discussions.
> Will Silverblue also switch to
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020, 8:37 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:59:37AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > https://paste.centos.org/view/f4165396
> >
> > Two workloads: install and update. It might seem like an update is
> > both read and write dependent, but the rpms are already
Right, upstream provided a patch which landed on Rawhide:
https://developer.blender.org/rB56d0df51a36fdce7ec2d1fbb7b47b1d95b591b5f
Could someone having python expertise check it please?
Thanks.
On 2020-07-09 1:34 a.m., Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 09. 07. 20 10:22, Dan Horák wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347333
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|tcall...@redhat.com
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:59:37AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> https://paste.centos.org/view/f4165396
>
> Two workloads: install and update. It might seem like an update is
> both read and write dependent, but the rpms are already compressed and
> don't get compressed again. The differences, I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853574
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853570
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-abc8be6f6e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-abc8be6f6e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853570
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853570
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
Note that this proposal was prepared prior to the deadline, but due to
an error in wiki formatting, it did not appear in the queue.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:40 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.15
>
> == Summary ==
> Rebase of Golang package to upcoming
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.15
== Summary ==
Rebase of Golang package to upcoming version 1.15 in Fedora 33,
including rebuild of all dependent packages(pre-release version of Go
will be used for rebuild, if released version will not be available at
the time of the mass
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.15
== Summary ==
Rebase of Golang package to upcoming version 1.15 in Fedora 33,
including rebuild of all dependent packages(pre-release version of Go
will be used for rebuild, if released version will not be available at
the time of the mass
Le vendredi 10 juillet 2020 à 14:59 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> Le vendredi 10 juillet 2020 à 13:22 +0200, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
> > On Wednesday, July 8, 2020 6:25:57 PM CEST Nicolas Mailhot via
> > devel
> > wrote:
> > > Le 2020-07-08 17:19, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
> > >
> > > > Small
Le vendredi 10 juillet 2020 à 13:22 +0200, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
> On Wednesday, July 8, 2020 6:25:57 PM CEST Nicolas Mailhot via devel
> wrote:
> > Le 2020-07-08 17:19, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
> >
> > > Small experiment (few-liner) for copr with "%bid, build system
> > > tag":
> > >
On 7/10/20 8:25 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le vendredi 10 juillet 2020 à 08:00 -0400, Przemek Klosowski a écrit :
Not quite---as I said in next sentence that you didn't include in
your quote, secure boot also tries to prevent unauthorized
modifications,
That does not work either, because if
Le vendredi 10 juillet 2020 à 08:00 -0400, Przemek Klosowski a écrit :
> >
> Not quite---as I said in next sentence that you didn't include in
> your quote, secure boot also tries to prevent unauthorized
> modifications,
That does not work either, because if your system is remotely
exploitable,
On Fr, 10.07.20 06:50, Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 6:45 AM Marek Suchánek wrote:
> >
> > I haven't seen any mention of Silverblue in the Btrfs discussions. Will
> > Silverblue also switch to Btrfs if the change is approved?
> >
> > I've tested installing
Le vendredi 10 juillet 2020 à 07:51 -0400, Solomon Peachy a écrit :
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 01:37:14PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot via devel
> wrote:
> > If you remove end users from the loop there is zero zip nada need
> > for
> > secure boot in the first place. The sole function of secure boot
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855333
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-87dd78b491 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-87dd78b491
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854753
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-87dd78b491 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-87dd78b491
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854752
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-87dd78b491 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-87dd78b491
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855334
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-87dd78b491 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-87dd78b491
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855334
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-87dd78b491 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-87dd78b491
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
