[rpms/perl-Razor-Agent] PR #1: Use make macros

tstellar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Razor-Agent` that you are following: `` Use make macros `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Razor-Agent/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-XML-Parser] PR #1: Use make macros

tstellar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-XML-Parser` that you are following: `` Use make macros `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-Parser/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Digest-MD5] PR #1: Use make macros

tstellar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Digest-MD5` that you are following: `` Use make macros `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Digest-MD5/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Unicode-Normalize] PR #1: Use make macros

tstellar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Unicode-Normalize` that you are following: `` Use make macros `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Unicode-Normalize/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel

[rpms/perl-MIME-Base64] PR #1: Use make macros

tstellar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-MIME-Base64` that you are following: `` Use make macros `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-MIME-Base64/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Params-Util] PR #1: Use make macros

tstellar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Params-Util` that you are following: `` Use make macros `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Params-Util/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma] PR #1: Use make macros

tstellar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma` that you are following: `` Use make macros `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel

[rpms/perl-BSD-Resource] PR #1: Use make macros

tstellar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-BSD-Resource` that you are following: `` Use make macros `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-BSD-Resource/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-07-21 - 95% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/07/21/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.4-20200720git22c5149.fc32.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1854753] perl-Sereal-4.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854753 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Sereal-4.015-1.fc33|perl-Sereal-4.015-1.fc33

[Bug 1854754] perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854754 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.015-1 |perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.015-1

[Bug 1855333] perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.017 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855333 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.017-1 |perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.017-1

[Bug 1855332] perl-Sereal-4.017 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855332 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Sereal-4.017-1.fc33|perl-Sereal-4.017-1.fc33

[Bug 1854752] perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854752 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.015-1 |perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.015-1

[Bug 1855334] perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.017 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855334 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.017-1 |perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.017-1

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ff58160b15 libslirp-4.3.1-1.el8 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-672e6676c7 seamonkey-2.53.3-1.el8 6

[Bug 1858528] perl-File-Path-2.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858528 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-1845580db2 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade

[Bug 1858476] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200717 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858476 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-85392ab421 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade

[Bug 1858467] perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858467 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-7483c5007e has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade

[Bug 1858481] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200717 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858481 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-c802fdad2e has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade

[Bug 1840363] perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.27 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840363 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-7483c5007e has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade

[Bug 1857787] perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857787 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-ca566ca0df has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade

[Bug 1858528] perl-File-Path-2.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858528 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1858481] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200717 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858481 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1857787] perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857787 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 1858467] perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858467 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1858476] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200717 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858476 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1854754] perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854754 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1854753] perl-Sereal-4.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854753 Bug 1854753 depends on bug 1854754, which changed state. Bug 1854754 Summary: perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.015 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854754 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1855332] perl-Sereal-4.017 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855332 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1854752] perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854752 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1855333] perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.017 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855333 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1854753] perl-Sereal-4.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854753 Bug 1854753 depends on bug 1854752, which changed state. Bug 1854752 Summary: perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.015 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854752 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1854753] perl-Sereal-4.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854753 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1855334] perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.017 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855334 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1858788] ddclient dependency missing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858788 --- Comment #5 from Scott Talbert --- This should be fixed whenever the next epel8-playground compose runs. Please check in a day or so. Sorry for my rush to close. I get a lot of bug reports for ddclient where people haven't enabled

[Bug 1850795] Add perl-DateTimeX-Easy to EPEL8 / co-maintainer request

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850795 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1850776] Add perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-MoreCoercions to EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850776 Bug 1850776 depends on bug 1850795, which changed state. Bug 1850795 Summary: Add perl-DateTimeX-Easy to EPEL8 / co-maintainer request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850795 What|Removed |Added

Re: gdb says "Unexpected size of section `.reg-xstate/...` in core file

On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 14:52:41 + Zbigniew J__drzejewski-Szmek wrote: > I'm not sure if this is a bug and if it is, where it is... > > $ coredumpctl gdb > ... > Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". > Core was generated by `/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-oomd'. > Program

Re: Unexpected package disappearance on Rawhide

On 21. 07. 20 1:36, Mohamed El Morabity wrote: Hello, I'm maintaining the python-azure-sdk package. I updated it 3 weeks ago to solve install dependencies issues on F32 and Rawhide. It built successfully for both these Fedora releases, the corresponding updates appeared on Bodhi

Unexpected package disappearance on Rawhide

Hello, I'm maintaining the python-azure-sdk package. I updated it 3 weeks ago to solve install dependencies issues on F32 and Rawhide. It built successfully for both these Fedora releases, the corresponding updates appeared on Bodhi (https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-db2801a270

Fedora 33 Mass Rebuild

Mohan Boddu 4:32 PM (1 hour ago) to devel-announce Hi all, Per the Fedora 33 schedule[1] we will start a mass rebuild for Fedora 33 on Jul 22nd 2020. We will run a mass rebuild for Fedora 33 for the changes listed in: https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild Mass rebuild will

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 33 approximately one week before branching (August 2020). Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ Note that

Fedora 33 Mass Rebuild

Mohan Boddu 4:32 PM (1 hour ago) to devel-announce Hi all, Per the Fedora 33 schedule[1] we will start a mass rebuild for Fedora 33 on Jul 22nd 2020. We will run a mass rebuild for Fedora 33 for the changes listed in: https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild Mass rebuild will

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 33 approximately one week before branching (August 2020). Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ Note that

Re: How do Fedora developers get access to devtoolset for testing.

On 21/07/20 00:00 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: Steven Munroe wrote: $ sudo dnf install devtoolset-9-gcc-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm devtoolset-9-gcc-c++-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm devtoolset-9-runtime-9.1-0.el7.ppc64le.rpm devtoolset-9-libstdc++-devel-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm Installing individual RPMs

Re: How do Fedora developers get access to devtoolset for testing.

On 20/07/20 16:01 -0500, Steven Munroe wrote: Jonathan Wakely wrote: Why are you asking fedpkg to build for f33 if you are trying to package something for el7 and el8? I am trying to get better turn around for myself as I have local access to a POWER8 machine. And I was having difficulty

Re: How do Fedora developers get access to devtoolset for testing.

Steven Munroe wrote: > $ sudo dnf install devtoolset-9-gcc-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm > devtoolset-9-gcc-c++-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm > devtoolset-9-runtime-9.1-0.el7.ppc64le.rpm > devtoolset-9-libstdc++-devel-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm Installing individual RPMs is a bad idea, because it means you have

Re: How do Fedora developers get access to devtoolset for testing.

Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Why are you asking fedpkg to build for f33 if you are trying to > package something for el7 and el8? I am trying to get better turn around for myself as I have local access to a POWER8 machine. And I was having difficulty debug the weird failure I was seeing. > That

F33 Change proposal: Stratis 2.1.0 (Self-Contained Change)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stratis_2.1.0 = Stratis 2.1.0 = == Summary == Stratis now supports per-pool encryption of the devices that form a pool's data tier. A pool may be encrypted, or its constituent encrypted devices may be activated, by means of a key stored in the kernel

[Bug 1858952] New: perl-IO-Compress-2.095 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858952 Bug ID: 1858952 Summary: perl-IO-Compress-2.095 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-IO-Compress Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1858951] New: perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0.022 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858951 Bug ID: 1858951 Summary: perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0.022 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler Keywords:

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CMake to do out-of-source builds

On Monday, 20 July 2020 at 21:39, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 3:32 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: [...] > > Sorry, but when you break other packagers workflows, the least you > > can do is provide a clean solution to make them work again. Making a > > change and

Re: cmake-3.18.0-2.fc33 (or 3.18.0-1.fc33.1) in rawhide is broken!

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 3:44 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 1:48 PM Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> >> >> Your spec file is a complete mess, so I have not yet touched it to fix it. > > > Not _my_ spec file. Is this another episode of whinging about %ifdef SUSE, > then I suggest

[Bug 1858942] New: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.095 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858942 Bug ID: 1858942 Summary: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.095 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2 Keywords:

Re: Help me bring AVIF to Fedora

On Sun, 19 Jul 2020 at 23:15, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like some help to review: > - libavif: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858419 > > - qt-avif-image-plugin: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858639 > > I can swap with anything. > > Took

Re: cmake-3.18.0-2.fc33 (or 3.18.0-1.fc33.1) in rawhide is broken!

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 1:48 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > Your spec file is a complete mess, so I have not yet touched it to fix it. > Not _my_ spec file. Is this another episode of whinging about %ifdef SUSE, then I suggest you direct your comments at

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CMake to do out-of-source builds

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 3:32 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Wednesday, 08 July 2020 at 15:19, Igor Raits wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-07-08 at 14:13 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > > On 07.07.2020 19:57, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > > What's the plan for EPEL8/7

Re: cmake-3.18.0-2.fc33 (or 3.18.0-1.fc33.1) in rawhide is broken!

On Monday, 20 July 2020 at 19:37, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 1:29 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > > > > On 2020-07-17 I built ceph-15.2.4-5 (and ceph-15.2.4-6 --target=f33-java11) > > with cmake-3.18.0-1.fc33 and the build(s) were successful. > > > > Today, with

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CMake to do out-of-source builds

On Wednesday, 08 July 2020 at 15:19, Igor Raits wrote: > On Wed, 2020-07-08 at 14:13 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 07.07.2020 19:57, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > What's the plan for EPEL8/7 compatibility? > > > > +1. The new Cmake macros behaviour must be backported to EPEL7/8. >

Re: cmake-3.18.0-2.fc33 (or 3.18.0-1.fc33.1) in rawhide is broken!

On Monday, 20 July 2020 at 20:46, Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Monday, July 20, 2020 8:35:37 PM CEST Neal Gompa wrote: > > Or you could just use "%global __cmake_in_source_build 1" which > > reverts to the previous behavior. > > That does not make any sense. The packages I talk about have used > out

Re: How do Fedora developers get access to devtoolset for testing.

On 20/07/20 13:09 -0500, Steven Munroe wrote: Then I would have to learn what a "EL7 mock chroot" is. And how it is man mock different from "rpmbuild " That builds the package on your local system, using the packages available on your local system. If that's Fedora, then you're not going

Re: cmake-3.18.0-2.fc33 (or 3.18.0-1.fc33.1) in rawhide is broken!

On Monday, July 20, 2020 8:35:37 PM CEST Neal Gompa wrote: > Or you could just use "%global __cmake_in_source_build 1" which > reverts to the previous behavior. That does not make any sense. The packages I talk about have used out of source builds since forever. > Or you could *actually* make

Re: cmake-3.18.0-2.fc33 (or 3.18.0-1.fc33.1) in rawhide is broken!

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 2:31 PM Kamil Dudka wrote: > > On Monday, July 20, 2020 7:37:25 PM CEST Neal Gompa wrote: > > This is because ceph is not adapted yet for > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CMake_to_do_out-of-source_builds > > Yes, this change broke a lot of builds as it had been

Re: cmake-3.18.0-2.fc33 (or 3.18.0-1.fc33.1) in rawhide is broken!

On Monday, July 20, 2020 7:37:25 PM CEST Neal Gompa wrote: > This is because ceph is not adapted yet for > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CMake_to_do_out-of-source_builds Yes, this change broke a lot of builds as it had been discussed on this list. > Your spec file is a complete mess, so

Re: How do Fedora developers get access to devtoolset for testing.

On 20/07/20 17:08 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: ... Why can't you install it in an On 20/07/20 17:08 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: ... Why can't you install it in an EL7 mock chroot, as suggested earlier? There's nothing special about devtoolset here, EL7 packages just aren't meant to work on F32.

Re: Enable EarlyOOM on Fedora KDE - Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal

> On 20 Jul 2020, at 15:40, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 at 05:04, Kevin Kofler > wrote: >> >> John M. Harris Jr wrote: >>> Userspace isn't dead when a system is thrashing. Your software is still >>> running. If it gets killed, you're

Re: cmake-3.18.0-2.fc33 (or 3.18.0-1.fc33.1) in rawhide is broken!

You can work around it for now with %global __cmake_in_source_build 1 --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On

Re: cmake-3.18.0-2.fc33 (or 3.18.0-1.fc33.1) in rawhide is broken!

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 1:29 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > On 2020-07-17 I built ceph-15.2.4-5 (and ceph-15.2.4-6 --target=f33-java11) > with cmake-3.18.0-1.fc33 and the build(s) were successful. > > Today, with cmake-3.18.0-2.fc33 (which I guess is a respin of cmake- > 3.18.0-1.fc33.1, a.k.a.

cmake-3.18.0-2.fc33 (or 3.18.0-1.fc33.1) in rawhide is broken!

On 2020-07-17 I built ceph-15.2.4-5 (and ceph-15.2.4-6 --target=f33-java11) with cmake-3.18.0-1.fc33 and the build(s) were successful. Today, with cmake-3.18.0-2.fc33 (which I guess is a respin of cmake- 3.18.0-1.fc33.1, a.k.a. 3.18.0-1.1) my scratch builds are failing with: ... + make -j5

Re: Remove all non UK/USA English spell checker variants from default Fedora installation

Germano Massullo writes: > All desktop oriented Fedora installers install on the system packages: > hunspell > hunspell-en > hunspell-en-GB > hunspell-en-US > > When a user opens the language list of the spell checker, is has ~24 > different English options, like English (Antigua and Barbuda),

[Bug 1856886] perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect-3.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856886 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect-3.2

Re: Removing packages from module

Petr and Daniel, thanks a lot for your replies. I hope some of mentioned limitations could be reflected in the modularity documentation. I read through most of it (including the drafts for f33 change) and I don't feel that the consequences of adding package to the module are clearly communicated.

Re: How do Fedora developers get access to devtoolset for testing.

On 20/07/20 17:08 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 20/07/20 10:54 -0500, Steven Munroe wrote: That looks like a more complete list. Still having problems with dependencies: $ sudo dnf install devtoolset-9-gcc-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm devtoolset-9-gcc-c++-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm

Re: [Fedora-packaging] RPM-level auto release and changelog bumping - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal

Le dimanche 19 juillet 2020 à 10:39 -0700, Kevin Fenzi a écrit : > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 10:17:11AM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot via devel > wrote: > > Tough it is a litteral key = value file with no fancy formatting > > nor > > even ini-like sections, and a handful of variables. Very boring > > KISS

Re: How do Fedora developers get access to devtoolset for testing.

On 20/07/20 10:54 -0500, Steven Munroe wrote: That looks like a more complete list. Still having problems with dependencies: $ sudo dnf install devtoolset-9-gcc-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm devtoolset-9-gcc-c++-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm devtoolset-9-runtime-9.1-0.el7.ppc64le.rpm

Re: How do Fedora developers get access to devtoolset for testing.

That looks like a more complete list. Still having problems with dependencies: $ sudo dnf install devtoolset-9-gcc-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm devtoolset-9-gcc-c++-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm devtoolset-9-runtime-9.1-0.el7.ppc64le.rpm devtoolset-9-libstdc++-devel-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm Last metadata

[Bug 1858528] perl-File-Path-2.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858528 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-2846760782 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-2846760782 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1858528] perl-File-Path-2.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858528 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-1845580db2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1845580db2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1858528] perl-File-Path-2.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858528 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1858481] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200717 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858481 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-c802fdad2e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c802fdad2e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1858481] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200717 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858481 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-20b70fc964 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-20b70fc964 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1858528] perl-File-Path-2.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858528 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Re: Enable EarlyOOM on Fedora KDE - Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal

On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 at 05:04, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > Userspace isn't dead when a system is thrashing. Your software is still > > running. If it gets killed, you're most likely going to lose your data. > > The thing is, there are various levels of thrashing. In some

[Bug 1858476] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200717 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858476 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-85392ab421 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-85392ab421 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

Re: Enable EarlyOOM on Fedora KDE - Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 10:55 am, Kevin Kofler wrote: That said, I do not see how the EarlyOOM heuristic, which allows, depending on the exact settings, something like 80-90% of swap to be used IN ADDITION to 90+% RAM (and will only start doing anything if BOTH RAM and swap are full) can

[Bug 1858481] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200717 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858481 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

[Bug 1858476] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200717 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858476 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-6327f493e8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6327f493e8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1858476] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200717 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858476 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1858467] perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858467 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-ccb3c84ade has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ccb3c84ade -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1858476] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200717 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858476 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1858467] perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858467 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1858467] perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858467 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 20. 07. 20 15:28, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: python3-mypy maintainer here, I took it. Thank you, Gwyn. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Serial port sniffing?

On 7/19/20 5:23 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: I would like to monitor serial port communications read only, but I haven't found a tool that makes that easy in the Fedora repos. I've done that with "socat" to monitor communications with an APC UPS. Here is my recipe: socat

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, July 20, 2020 3:56 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 20. 07. 20 10:35, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired... > > Depending on: python-typeshed (6), status change: 2020-07-13 (0 weeks ago) > > python3-mypy

[Bug 1858788] ddclient dependency missing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858788 Scott Talbert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora...@rule.lv, |

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200720.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200719.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200720.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 5 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:3 Upgraded packages: 36 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:276.87

Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 2:24 PM Mat Booth wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 09:34, Christian Heimes wrote: > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > toatal packages: 610 > > > passed: 427 > > > failed: 176 > > > > > > From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now > > > are thus

  1   2   >