On Mon, 2020-08-24 at 20:36 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-08-24 at 12:25 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > lua-
> > logging orphan 5
> > weeks ago
> >
> > lua-
> > sql orphan 5
>
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/08/25/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.4-20200824gitcbcdf05.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Mon, 2020-08-24 at 12:25 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> lua-logging orphan 5
> weeks ago
>
> lua-sql orphan 5
> weeks ago
>
> ...
>
> luadocorphan
Hi Eduardo,
Ah, thanks for the quick response! I'll close the non-responsive issue,
please build this for F31-F34 as the current build does not work with
Fedora's python-markdown at all.
Could you use some help with this package? I'm happy to comaintain -
I'm considering branching this for EPEL8
Hi Michael, I merged your pull request, I didn't see your message
before, I have been so busy the last weeks
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 8:17 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know how to reach Eduardo Echeverria? I have a pull request
> and a bug report for python-landslide
Will do!
\--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
\
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
\-d. bowie
Sent from ProtonMail mobile
\ Original Message
On Aug 24, 2020, 8:45 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim <
Hi Gwyn,
On Tue, 2020-08-25 at 01:23 +, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
> We're Facebook friends...
>
> https://www.facebook.com/echevemaster
>
Thanks, could you help ping him?
non-responsive check (I forgot to include the URL)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872078
mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831324
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870771
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
We're Facebook friends...
https://www.facebook.com/echevemaster
\--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
\
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
\-d. bowie
Sent from ProtonMail mobile
\ Original Message
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870763
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870751
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869060
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Test-Fake-HTTPD-0.09-1 |perl-Test-Fake-HTTPD-0.09-1
Hi,
Does anyone know how to reach Eduardo Echeverria? I have a pull request
and a bug report for python-landslide that has not been responded in
over two weeks.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-landslide/pull-request/1
Other bug reports:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869060
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
> I have decided to orphan nanomsg...
I've been working with a perspective package that leverages nanomsg. No
one else has claimed ownership of it, so I'm going to take ownership
now. Thanks, Troy, for maintaining it until now.
--scott
___
devel
- Original Message -
> From: "Simo Sorce"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2020 2:06:19 PM
> Subject: Re: RFC7919 Diffie-Hellman parameters in Fedora
>
> On Mon, 2020-08-24 at 19:29 +0200, Christopher Engelhard wrote:
> > On 24.08.20 18:43,
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 12:29 PM Brandon Nielsen wrote:
>
> On 8/23/20 10:24 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> [Snip]
> > -
> >
> > Communication:
> >
> > + Fedora Magazine article "Btrfs Coming to Fedora 33" will be
> > published Monday, 24 August.
> > -
> >
> > Documentation:
> >
> > + A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871984
Bug ID: 1871984
Summary: perl-Log-Dispatchouli-2.022 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Log-Dispatchouli
Keywords: FutureFeature,
On 8/24/20 1:29 PM, Brandon Nielsen wrote:
On 8/23/20 10:24 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
[Snip]
-
Communication:
+ Fedora Magazine article "Btrfs Coming to Fedora 33" will be
published Monday, 24 August.
-
Documentation:
+ A partial list of docs needing updates
On 8/23/20 10:24 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
[Snip]
-
Communication:
+ Fedora Magazine article "Btrfs Coming to Fedora 33" will be
published Monday, 24 August.
-
Documentation:
+ A partial list of docs needing updates
https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/158#comment-672898
On Mon, 2020-08-24 at 19:29 +0200, Christopher Engelhard wrote:
> On 24.08.20 18:43, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 16:13 +0200, Christopher Engelhard wrote:
> > We already are making it easier in some ways, but feel free to open a
> > bug if there are specific components you are
On 24.08.20 18:43, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 16:13 +0200, Christopher Engelhard wrote:
> We already are making it easier in some ways, but feel free to open a
> bug if there are specific components you are worried about.
What ways are that?
I'm not worried about any specific
On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 2:27 AM Kevin Kofler wrote:
> While I understand the motivation behind the RFC (interoperability, safety
> against intentionally or unintentionally bad parameters), hardcoded
> parameters sound suspicious to me.
I'll note that the RFC 7919 values were added
as available
On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 16:13 +0200, Christopher Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
> tl;dr should we make it easier/automatic for users to use the
> Diffie-Hellman parameters defined in RFC7919?
We already are making it easier in some ways, but feel free to open a
bug if there are specific components you are
On Sun, 2020-08-23 at 04:26 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Christopher Engelhard wrote:
> > tl;dr should we make it easier/automatic for users to use the
> > Diffie-Hellman parameters defined in RFC7919?
>
> While I understand the motivation behind the RFC (interoperability, safety
> against
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 18/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200823.n.0):
ID: 646580 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/646580
ID: 646602 Test: x86_64
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:17 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> We use fedora-obsolete-packages to remove packages from end-user systems.
> Users can opt-out of installation of fedora-obsolete-packages and retain
> packages that would be obsoleted [*].
>
> The same mechanism could be used
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:02:55AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 8:56 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 08:45:49AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 1:57 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 21.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 02:54:29PM +0200, Michal Ruprich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after a discussion with upstream, I will be moving tcpdump binary from
> /usr/sbin to /usr/bin, similar to how wireshark does this. If you can
> think of any reason why not to do this, please let me know.
Please provide a
OLD: Fedora-33-20200823.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20200824.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 15
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 58
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 116.61 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200821.0):
ID: 646510 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/646510
Soft failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64)
(Tests
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 3:04 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> No, something is definitely wrong, because last night's F33 compose
> also had the same problem. I literally released that to attempt to fix
> image builds yesterday and it wasn't even used.
Oh. Yeah then something is *definitely* wrong with
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 8:52 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 2:45 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 8:42 AM Fabio Valentini
> > wrote:
> > >
> > [...]
> > > - appliance-tools is newer in 32 than in 33:
> > > 0:010.1-1.fc32 > 0:010.0-3.fc33
> >
> >
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 8:56 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 08:45:49AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 1:57 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >
> > > On 21. 08. 20 10:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > >> Josh listed some of the
Hi,
after a discussion with upstream, I will be moving tcpdump binary from
/usr/sbin to /usr/bin, similar to how wireshark does this. If you can
think of any reason why not to do this, please let me know.
Thanks and regards,
--
Michal Ruprich
Software Engineer
Email: mrupr...@redhat.com
Web:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 08:45:49AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 1:57 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 21. 08. 20 10:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > >> Josh listed some of the key reasons behind default streams: that
> > >> enterprise customers don't like
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 2:45 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 8:42 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> [...]
> > - appliance-tools is newer in 32 than in 33:
> > 0:010.1-1.fc32 > 0:010.0-3.fc33
>
> Something is wrong here, as Bodhi automatically submitted it yesterday
> to stable:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 1:57 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 21. 08. 20 10:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >> Josh listed some of the key reasons behind default streams: that
> >> enterprise customers don't like to learn new commands. So default
> >> streams allowed us to package content
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 8:42 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
[...]
> - appliance-tools is newer in 32 than in 33:
> 0:010.1-1.fc32 > 0:010.0-3.fc33
Something is wrong here, as Bodhi automatically submitted it yesterday
to stable: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1f6a9b16a4
--
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 12:26 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> geronimo-parent-poms jjelen, mizdebsk, orphan 0 weeks ago
> glassfish-legal orphan 0 weeks ago
> glassfish-master-pom orphan 0 weeks ago
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 1:01 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> The following packages are downgrades when I attempt upgrade from Fedora 32 to
> Fedora 33:
>
> - containers-common (skopeo) 1:1.1.1 -> 1:1.0.1
> - fuse-overlayfs 1.1.2 -> 1.1.0
> - strace 5.8 -> 5.7.0.6.7ab6
> - thunderbird
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870463
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870457
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64)
ID: 646493 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/646493
ID: 646494 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870456
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On 24.08.20 12:25, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> numix-gtk-theme mymindstorm, orphan 0 weeks ago
> numix-icon-theme mymindstorm, orphan 0 weeks ago
> numix-icon-theme-circle mymindstorm, orphan 0 weeks ago
If Brendan / mymindstorm isn't interested, I can
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870763
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
Thanks very much Miro,
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 12:25:45 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> neuro-sig: PEGTL
Since upstream looks active, and this is needed by ITK, I've added it to
the neuro-sig's packages. It already had @rsroka listed as a
co-maintainer, and more co-maintainers are also always welcome.
Hello.
The following packages are downgrades when I attempt upgrade from Fedora 32 to
Fedora 33:
- containers-common (skopeo) 1:1.1.1 -> 1:1.0.1
- fuse-overlayfs 1.1.2 -> 1.1.0
- strace 5.8 -> 5.7.0.6.7ab6
- thunderbird 668.11.0 -> 8.10.0
Is this expected?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone:
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Dne 20. 08. 20 v 20:17 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
>
> However, ELN has a mission to be a bridge to future RHEL and that
> distribution has committed to default streams as a business necessity
> for multiple reasons (among them support lifecycle which is much
> harder to address via non-modular
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831324
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
Hello,
I've just got this rawhide bugzilla for prusa-slicer:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871589
can't install prusa-slicer:
- nothing provides libopenvdb.so.7.0()(64bit) needed by
prusa-slicer-2.2.0-4.fc33.x86_64
It was updated in
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200823.0):
ID: 646431 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 07:55:57PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 21. 08. 20 10:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > Josh listed some of the key reasons behind default streams: that
> > > enterprise customers don't like to learn new commands. So default
> > > streams allowed us to package
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
5 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 15/181 (x86_64)
ID: 646258 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870751
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-9b6e480672 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-9b6e480672
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870751
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Class-Unload-0.11-12.e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871716
Bug ID: 1871716
Summary: perl-Mail-DKIM-1.20200824 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mail-DKIM
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
62 matches
Mail list logo
