On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 05:21:33PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
> Thanks you for your rapid reply!
>
> On 2/21/21 4:57 PM, Michael Young wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Feb 2021, Steve Dickson wrote:
> >
> >> I apologies if I missed something... If there is a
> >> thread that talks about this please
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210221.0):
ID: 785429 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 05:21:33PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
> Thanks you for your rapid reply!
>
> On 2/21/21 4:57 PM, Michael Young wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Feb 2021, Steve Dickson wrote:
> >
> >> I apologies if I missed something... If there is a
> >> thread that talks about this please
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931125
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Updated and add tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/02/22/report-389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210222git66b92a3fd.fc33.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases` that you are following:
``
Updated and add tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases/pull-request/1
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931125
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 7:19 PM Tom Seewald wrote:
>
> > I understand it's bad UI/UX and I agree. But what I'm asking is *what
> > criterion*, i.e.
>
> I would argue that it fits best in the shutdown category [1], specifically
> that the system must cleanly shutdown such that "storage volumes
> I understand it's bad UI/UX and I agree. But what I'm asking is *what
> criterion*, i.e.
I would argue that it fits best in the shutdown category [1], specifically that
the system must cleanly shutdown such that "storage volumes (e.g. simple
partitions, LVs and PVs, RAID arrays) are taken
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-01679b76db
chromium-88.0.4324.150-1.el7
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-3cc28d5469
php-horde-Horde-Text-Filter-2.3.7-1.el7
5
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-87e6bb3010
chromium-88.0.4324.150-1.el8
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-610589457a
prosody-0.11.8-1.el8
3
On Sun, 2021-02-21 at 17:24 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> during the last winter holidays I've started to write a new flask app
> to
> automatize the new package submission process. The goals of this app
> would be:
>
> - Get rid of manually open and manage Bugzilla
On Sun, 2021-02-21 at 10:47 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I need to lighten my packaging load as I no longer have free cycles
> at $DAYJOB like I used to.
> Here's round one:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qastools
> Desktop toolset for the Linux sound system ALSA.
> * Fully up to date
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 2:55 PM Tom Seewald wrote:
>
> > Under what criterion would it be a blocker?
>
> This affects (all?) users of Workstation running 34 or rawhide and causes
> users to unsafely force power off their machine due to the 2 minute timeout.
> Many will be led to think that
Hi Richard,
Richard Shaw writes:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fdupes
> program for identifying duplicate files residing within specified
> directories
> * I have emailed the EPEL maintainer to see if they want it first...
I can take it as the main admin if the EPEL maintainer does not
I recently took ownership of Radare2 after it was orphaned,
unfortunately unknowing of the current turmult in the Radare2 project.
Now realizing that it has a dependent Fedora package Cutter (cutter-re)
which is at the edge of this turmult. And pushing an update of Radare2
will break Cutter.
It
I recently took ownership of Radare2 after it was orphaned,
unfortunately unknowing of the current turmult in the Radare2 project.
Now realizing that it has a dependent Fedora package Cutter (cutter-re)
which is at the edge of this turmult. And pushing an update of Radare2
will break Cutter.
It
On 19. 02. 21 22:57, Matthew Miller wrote:
Hi! I'm using this https://github.com/gyli/PyWaffle for some visualizations for
Fedora Project stats.
I'm kind of out of the loop on the state of the art of python packaging, and
wondered if some kind Python SIG person would like to take it on for
Hi,
I have been trying to get Gajim updated using PRs for the last couple
of months but the maintainer seems to be inactive at the moment.
The version in Fedora is outdated and plugin functionality is broken
(see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884903), so it would
be nice to get it
Hi there, I've filed https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2580 due to
non-responsive maintainer who owns a number of sugar activity packages
within Fedora, which are important to us at Sugar Labs.
Eleven days ago, I e-mailed Kalpa Welivitigoda, whose fas username is
'callkalpa' and have had no
Thanks you for your rapid reply!
On 2/21/21 4:57 PM, Michael Young wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Feb 2021, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
>> I apologies if I missed something... If there is a
>> thread that talks about this please point me at it
>> but...
>>
>> when I do a git push on the master branch I get:
>
People occasionally drop by bugzilla, but don't know what component to
file a bug against. For some reason, they tend to pick the very first
component on the list, "0ad", which is a game. That doesn't help
anybody, of course. Could we add a component, "" perhaps, that
will always show up as
On Sun, 21 Feb 2021, Steve Dickson wrote:
I apologies if I missed something... If there is a
thread that talks about this please point me at it
but...
when I do a git push on the master branch I get:
...
You missed the branch renaming - master has been replaced by rawhide with
alias main.
> Under what criterion would it be a blocker?
This affects (all?) users of Workstation running 34 or rawhide and causes users
to unsafely force power off their machine due to the 2 minute timeout. Many
will be led to think that their Fedora install or hardware is broken. Shipping
a release of
Hello,
I apologies if I missed something... If there is a
thread that talks about this please point me at it
but...
when I do a git push on the master branch I get:
$ git push
Enumerating objects: 9, done.
Counting objects: 100% (9/9), done.
Delta compression using up to 12 threads
Compressing
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 10:13 AM Mamoru TASAKA
wrote:
>
> Hello, all:
>
> Now I've decided to write to devel@ mailing list to ask for help.
>
> Currently, 5 Live spins:
> * Fedora-Astronomy_KDE-Live-34-20210221.n.0
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?ta
> A lot of graphical application and other applications will be uninstallable.
Sorry, i meant you can't install them.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
Mate-compiz spin is also affected after this PR
https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/621
But it's not only a problem for spins.
A lot of graphical application and other applications will be uninstallable.
```
[root@mother rave]# dnf repoquery --whatrequires
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 12:24 PM Tom Seewald wrote:
>
> If Gnome is still hanging for 2 minutes on reboot [1] then I think we may
> want to consider that a blocking bug for F34. I can at least confirm that
> this bug is still affecting Rawhide.
>
> [1]
If Gnome is still hanging for 2 minutes on reboot [1] then I think we may want
to consider that a blocking bug for F34. I can at least confirm that this bug
is still affecting Rawhide.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909556
___
devel
Not sure if it's something weird with my system, but running that exact
command I get
Error: Unknown repo: 'updates-testing-modular'
Dropping the reference to updates-testing-modular gets me a couple of
removed packages (obviously the kernel modules are not an issue, but I
don't know what the
# F34 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2021-02-22
# Time: 17:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have 3 proposed Beta blockers and 2 proposed Final
blockers to review (as of now), so we'll have a Fedora 34 blocker
review meeting tomorrow.
If you have time
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2021-02-22
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
We didn't meet for a couple of weeks, and we're getting to F34 Beta
release time, so let's meet up
This comps PR will fix the cinnamon spin
https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/622
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931090
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Hello folks,
during the last winter holidays I've started to write a new flask app to
automatize the new package submission process. The goals of this app
would be:
- Get rid of manually open and manage Bugzilla tickets. Have the ticket
filed in a web form (or maybe by CLI), and have the ticket
I need to lighten my packaging load as I no longer have free cycles at
$DAYJOB like I used to.
Here's round one:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qastools
Desktop toolset for the Linux sound system ALSA.
* Fully up to date after the last mass rebuild
Error:
Problem 1: libnghttp2-1.41.0-3.fc33.i686 has inferior architecture
- libnghttp2-1.41.0-3.fc33.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- problem with installed package libnghttp2-1.41.0-3.fc33.i686
Problem 2: rdma-core-33.0-2.fc33.i686 has inferior architecture
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931090
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Looks like the epel7 branch needs to be retired...
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4a9fc09599
It's also in the appstream repo for epel8.
Should both be retired?
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931094
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931093
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Hello, all:
Now I've decided to write to devel@ mailing list to ask for help.
Currently, 5 Live spins:
* Fedora-Astronomy_KDE-Live-34-20210221.n.0
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=62419350
* Fedora-Scientific_KDE-Live-34-20210221.n.0
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931094
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931093
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 18/124 (aarch64), 18/183 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210220.n.0):
ID: 785252 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785252
ID: 785346 Test:
On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 09:49, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 34 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> and try to run:
>
># Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
># next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled
> again
>sudo dnf
OLD: Fedora-34-20210220.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210221.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 90
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 23.54 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 22/183 (x86_64), 19/124 (aarch64)
New failures
Am 19.02.21 um 16:13 schrieb Harsh Mangal:
I am Harsh having intermediate experience working with Python and I am interested in
contributing to this SIG can anyone help me out on "How to get started".
I could use some help e.g. with WeasyPrint/cairo: The latest cairo in Fedora 34+
did
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210220.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210221.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 99
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 23.72 MiB
Size of dropped packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929447
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210220.0):
ID: 784643 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
I think I found it, and someone recently submitted a fix.
1915790 – F34FailsToInstall: @audio starting from 20210113.n.0 compose
(redhat.com)<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1915790>
The rawhide live image build passed Fedora-Jam_KDE-Live-Rawhide-20210221.n.0 |
Build Info
55 matches
Mail list logo
