Re: How to build RISC-V Fedora disk image by muself

* Matthew Miller: > I really, really, really suggest focusing on either > anaconda/livemedia-creator or osbuild (aka composer, aka weldr). Isn't the original weldr gone (as in, last commit in mid-2018)? And it's lorax once more? Thanks, Florian ___

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210302.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210301.0): ID: 794899 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: Building custom kernels

Am 01.03.21 um 22:37 schrieb Justin Forbes: On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 12:00 PM Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 27.02.2021 o 20:59, Julian Sikorski pisze: Hi, I am trying to test some Renoir s2idle patches [1]. It appears that Fedora kernel source is now maintained on gitlab as kernel-ark [2].

[Bug 1932429] Please add perl-Nmap-Parser to epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932429 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 1933836] perl-Sys-Virt-7.1.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933836 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2021-03-02 - 95% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/02/report-389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210302gite9b4eb594.fc33.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1933477] perl-IO-Compress-2.102 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933477 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1933398] perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933398 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-95cae9f155 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 1933502] perl-URI-5.08 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933502 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

Re: How to build RISC-V Fedora disk image by muself

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 09:28:40PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > I am not sure how the image is actually built, but I have tried to > > > build an image with appliance-creator on a RISC-V VM, and the built > > > image is bootable. In my case: > > > > I'm curious to know if anaconda and

[Bug 1933914] New: perl-Data-Printer-1.000002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933914 Bug ID: 1933914 Summary: perl-Data-Printer-1.02 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Data-Printer Keywords: FutureFeature,

Re: split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora (OpenVPN related issues)

Petr Menšík wrote: > I don't think it is so easy. It can add facl on resolv.conf file before > it drops privileges. But Any other process might remove the file again > and write a new one, preventing openvpn to update it later. Because > openvpn is not supposed to be owner of /etc/resolv.conf, it

Re: ELN SIG First Meeting

On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 15:49 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > That would require a lot of changes in both EPEL and in Fedora. In > Fedora there is a general expectation that if a 'branch' is active > then it is maintained by someone.. usually the primary maintainer.  > Many Fedora maintainers

Re: Policy proposal (draft): Don't push knowingly broken or work-in-progress work to dist git

On 01. 03. 21 21:29, Michael J Gruber wrote: But (if this hasn't changed lately) I cannot fork my own dist-git repo and file a PR, so I cannot use that to communicate my intentions to a provenpackager nor to my co-maintainers. You can. Not just lately, you always could, since Pull Requests

Re: ELN SIG First Meeting

On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 12:47 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I'm not sure exactly what you mean here... > > I think (please correct me if I'm wrong) you are wanting "all EPEL > packages" to also be built as part of ELN and shipped as some sort of > 'EPEL-ELN' ? Yes, the idea I had in mind was that

Re: Orphaned Telegram packages

On Mon, 1 Mar 2021, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > I decided to retire and orphan all Telegram packages from Fedora and RPM > Fusion for the following reasons: [1]. > Sad to read this. Thanks for the work of these years, I have used the telegram-desktop package for years. -- Francisco J.

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 11:03 pm, Lennart Poettering wrote: Hmm, cloud-init has no direct support for resolved.conf? But how is it then that that file is modified? I don't get it? I think they've deployed something entirely custom. ___ devel mailing

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

On 02/03/2021 06:03, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Fr, 26.02.21 21:01, Alexander Bokovoy (aboko...@redhat.com) wrote: Digital Ocean updates pushed with cloud-init use. Cloud-init does not have any native support for systemd-resolved. It means it writes something that systemd-resolved imports

[Bug 1933868] New: perl-Date-Manip-6.85 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933868 Bug ID: 1933868 Summary: perl-Date-Manip-6.85 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Date-Manip Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

On Fr, 26.02.21 21:01, Alexander Bokovoy (aboko...@redhat.com) wrote: > > 1. Dots (".") for separating IPV4 address bytes > > 2. Colons (":") for separating IPv6 address parts, as well as separating > > port numbers from the IP addres > > 3. Brackets ("[]") for separating ipv6 addresses from

Re: split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora (OpenVPN related issues)

I don't think it is so easy. It can add facl on resolv.conf file before it drops privileges. But Any other process might remove the file again and write a new one, preventing openvpn to update it later. Because openvpn is not supposed to be owner of /etc/resolv.conf, it should not dictate what

Re: Building custom kernels

On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 12:00 PM Julian Sikorski wrote: > > W dniu 27.02.2021 o 20:59, Julian Sikorski pisze: > > Hi, > > > > I am trying to test some Renoir s2idle patches [1]. It appears that > > Fedora kernel source is now maintained on gitlab as kernel-ark [2]. What > > I tried is adding the

Re: How to build RISC-V Fedora disk image by muself

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 11:12:25AM -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 07:28:49PM +0900, Takayuki Nagata wrote: > > I am not sure how the image is actually built, but I have tried to > > build an image with appliance-creator on a RISC-V VM, and the built > > image is bootable. In

Does Koji cancel builds when a new build is submitted?

And if so it this a new behaviour? I'm only wondering, not because I think this is bad, but because I've seen a bunch of builds today being cancelled and I wonder why it is happening. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming

[Bug 1933852] New: perl-Locale-Codes-3.67 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933852 Bug ID: 1933852 Summary: perl-Locale-Codes-3.67 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Locale-Codes Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: ELN SIG First Meeting

On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 14:46, Davide Cavalca via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 09:26 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > I'd like to encourage anyone interested in this meeting to submit > > agenda topics by replying to this email. Currently the agenda > >

Re: ELN SIG First Meeting

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 07:45:09PM +, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote: > On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 09:26 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > I'd like to encourage anyone interested in this meeting to submit > > agenda topics by replying to this email. Currently the agenda > > One thing I'd be

FedoraRespin-33-updates-20210301.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 5/37 (x86_64) ID: 794467 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/794467 ID: 794484 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL:

[Bug 1933843] New: Please add perl-Net-SMTPS to epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933843 Bug ID: 1933843 Summary: Please add perl-Net-SMTPS to epel8 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-SMTPS Severity: low Assignee:

Re: Policy proposal (draft): Don't push knowingly broken or work-in-progress work to dist git

So, you list 3 typical reasons why packages in rawhide FTBFS and 2 existing policies which are meant to prevent 2 of these 3 reasons if packagers followed these policies. And you want these policies to be enforced technically What I am missing is: - A viable suggestion on how to prevent the

Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present

Hi, On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 9:46 AM Hans de Goede wrote: > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1683 > > > > seems like this is already in updates. you definitely have the gnome-shell > > 40.beta

[Bug 1933836] New: perl-Sys-Virt-7.1.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933836 Bug ID: 1933836 Summary: perl-Sys-Virt-7.1.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Sys-Virt Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1933833] New: perl-Mojolicious-9.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933833 Bug ID: 1933833 Summary: perl-Mojolicious-9.02 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Mojolicious Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: ELN SIG First Meeting

On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 09:26 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I'd like to encourage anyone interested in this meeting to submit > agenda topics by replying to this email. Currently the agenda One thing I'd be interested in exploring is the feasibility of extending ELN to cover EPEL as well. This

Re: How to build RISC-V Fedora disk image by muself

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 07:28:49PM +0900, Takayuki Nagata wrote: > I am not sure how the image is actually built, but I have tried to > build an image with appliance-creator on a RISC-V VM, and the built > image is bootable. In my case: I'm curious to know if anaconda and livemedia-creator will

Re: Self Introduction: Phil

On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 05:43:08PM -0800, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > Hi I'm Phil, a new Fedora packager! Some of you may know me from > devconf (both CZ and US) during my time at Facebook or as one of the > co-founders of the Southern California Linux Expo (SCALE) > conference. For the rest of you,

[Bug 1933398] perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933398 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-e427bda1b4 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 1933398] perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933398 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-41bd0e0860 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:47:25PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > == Contingency Plan == > * Contingency mechanism: moving this change to Fedora 36, if not > successfully finished until Fedora 35 branching from Rawhide > * Contingency deadline: Fedora 35 branching from Rawhide (2021-08-10) > * Blocks

Re: OCaml 4.12

z3 build was cancelled, unclear why: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6206 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-p2v converts physical machines

[Bug 1933398] perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933398 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-610589457a prosody-0.11.8-1.el8 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-bfa4482ae0 libmysofa-1.2-4.el8 4

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-3cc28d5469 php-horde-Horde-Text-Filter-2.3.7-1.el7 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-bb1731457c prosody-0.11.8-1.el7 11

[Bug 1927876] perl-Search-Elasticsearch-7.711001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927876 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Search-Elasticsearch-7

Re: Building custom kernels

On 2/28/21 12:00 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 27.02.2021 o 20:59, Julian Sikorski pisze: Hi, I am trying to test some Renoir s2idle patches [1]. It appears that Fedora kernel source is now maintained on gitlab as kernel-ark [2]. What I tried is adding the patches to the fedora-5.11

Re: OCaml 4.12

On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 9:26 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > No worries! We really need a better way to visualise these > dependencies. At the moment I'm trying builds and breaking the deps > as I find them. I agree. The OCaml world is chock full of circular dependencies. I actually started

Re: OCaml 4.12

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 09:18:31AM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 7:02 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Thinking about this more, rather than remove the subpackage(s) (there > > are several more), I've decided to make them conditional instead, so > > we have the choice to

Fedora-IoT-35-20210301.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 7/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210227.0): ID: 794426 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/794426

Re: OCaml 4.12

On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 7:02 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Thinking about this more, rather than remove the subpackage(s) (there > are several more), I've decided to make them conditional instead, so > we have the choice to still build them in future. Sorry about that. I thought I had broken

[rpms/perl-IO-Compress] PR #1: Package tests

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-IO-Compress` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Package tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-Compress/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: Dilemma: -source repository data randomized by koji builder arch

On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 6:58 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 8:38 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > Neal is correct that you only need to **query** on different architecture. > > That is correct. > > However, querying all 25000+ .spec files from fedora every day is more >

Re: Dilemma: -source repository data randomized by koji builder arch

Dne 01. 03. 21 v 12:57 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): trouble than I asked for (and I don't even know how to "query on a different architecture" (do I need qemu-static for that?), and all mock -r fedora-33-ppc64le shell https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Feature-forcearch --

[rpms/perl-IO-Compress] PR #1: Package tests

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-IO-Compress` that you are following: `` Package tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-Compress/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Orphaning the cura-lulzbot package set

This fork of cura has basically been abandoned by upstream, and the new company that acquired Lulzbot has gone out of compliance with the source code for the firmware. They have made it very clear that they have no real interest in working with the community to improve this situation, and I no

ELN SIG First Meeting

Thank you to everyone who responded to the WhenIsGood. While no time was available for all respondents, I selected the time with the greatest availability. We will hold the inaugural ELN SIG meeting on Friday, March 12th at noon EST (1700 UTC). We will hold this meeting on Freenode IRC in

Orphaned Telegram packages

Hello all. I decided to retire and orphan all Telegram packages from Fedora and RPM Fusion for the following reasons: [1]. Orphaned from Fedora: rpms/tdlib Orphaned from RPM Fusion: free/libtgvoip free/tg_owt free/telegram-desktop If someone interested, feel free to take them, but please

Logs from Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 1st March

Hi everyone, Please find the logs from today's meeting below. We will meet again in 2 weeks. Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-neuro/2021-03-01/neurofedora.2021-03-01-13.00.html Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-neuro/2021-03-01/neurofedora.2021-03-01-13.00.log.html

shigofumi-0.9 license change

shigofumi-0.9 changed license from "GPLv3+ and GPLv2+" to "GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+" because of a bundled gettext.h. -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: OCaml 4.12

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 11:59:22AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 11:47:41AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > We might need to remove a dependency somewhere to break the cycle, as > > we did with dune. > > I've removed the -doc subpackage from ocaml-integers.

Re: split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora (OpenVPN related issues)

Petr Menšík wrote: > It is about 2 years when we were removing CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE from our > services, because selinux-policy does not grant it anymore. I think it > is a good thing. Running as openvpn user, but requiring then > CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE is insecure! It gives it more rights than just root >

[Bug 1933398] perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933398 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-41bd0e0860 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-41bd0e0860 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1933398] perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933398 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-3343b6fb00 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-3343b6fb00 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1933398] perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933398 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-e427bda1b4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e427bda1b4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1933398] perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933398 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-95cae9f155 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-95cae9f155 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1933398] perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933398 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Re: OCaml 4.12

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 11:47:41AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > We might need to remove a dependency somewhere to break the cycle, as > we did with dune. I've removed the -doc subpackage from ocaml-integers. (Also possibly not related, but debuginfo generation was broken for this package

Re: Dilemma: -source repository data randomized by koji builder arch

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 8:38 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Neal is correct that you only need to **query** on different architecture. That is correct. However, querying all 25000+ .spec files from fedora every day is more trouble than I asked for (and I don't even know how to "query on a

Re: OCaml 4.12

Another problem is there is a circular dependency going through ocaml-odoc. I believe it's this (although there could be others): ocaml-odoc -> BR: ocaml-markup -> BR: ocaml-lwt -> BR: ocaml-luv -> BR: ocaml-ctypes -> BR: ocaml-integers -> BR: ocaml-odoc I broke it by excluding ocaml-odoc,

[Bug 1933398] perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-99 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933398 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[rpms/perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp] PR #1: Tests

ppisar closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora (OpenVPN related issues)

On 2/25/21 4:50 PM, David Sommerseth wrote: > Hi! > > On 25/02/2021 14:39, Petr Menšík wrote: > [..snip...] >> >> This case is exactly what I am trying to prevent. There is multiple >> implementations of dns cache, most of them can support split-DNS by some >> configuration. If openvpn supports

[rpms/perl-CGI] PR #1: Added FMF tests

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-CGI` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Added FMF tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CGI/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp] PR #1: Tests

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp` that you are following: `` Tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-CGI] PR #1: Added FMF tests

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-CGI` that you are following: `` Added FMF tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CGI/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: How to build RISC-V Fedora disk image by muself

I am not sure how the image is actually built, but I have tried to build an image with appliance-creator on a RISC-V VM, and the built image is bootable. In my case: # dnf install appliance-tools # wget

Re: Dilemma: -source repository data randomized by koji builder arch

Dne 25. 02. 21 v 16:34 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): Hello everybody, There's a problem that's been puzzling me for months, since I started writing the repochecker service (which provides the backend FTI/FTBFS data for the new packager-dashboard): There is no correct "source of truth" for

Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 1st March (Today)

Hello everyone, Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 15 February at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Freenode). The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us over: IRC: https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#fedora-neuro or

Re: Self Introduction: Phil

Le 3/1/21 à 2:43 AM, Phil Dibowitz a écrit : Hey all, Hi I'm Phil, a new Fedora packager! Some of you may know me from devconf (both CZ and US) during my time at Facebook or as one of the co-founders of the Southern California Linux Expo (SCALE) conference. For the rest of you, hi, I'm

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210301.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210228.0): ID: 793765 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Non-responsive maintainer: sabbaka

Good Morning Everyone, Since February 7th the packager sabbaka has been receiving a daily email asking them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS matches an existing bugzilla account. Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per: