jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-Netmask` that
you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-Netmask/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 6/189 (x86_64), 17/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210329.n.0):
ID: 837333 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL:
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 5/178 (x86_64), 40/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210329.n.0):
ID: 837005 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/837005
ID: 837031
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210329.0):
ID: 836923 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:56 PM Zdenek Pytela wrote:
> We do not expect any impact to end users neither to developers unless the
> exact version was used somewhere. If there are no objections, we will make
> the change in a week time.
Final freeze begins a week from today. Even though the
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210329.0):
ID: 836946 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_system_logging@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/836946
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941280
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-d2bbd86f06 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928387
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-d2bbd86f06 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941280
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-36caf59de1 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928387
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-36caf59de1 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928387
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-1c0b6fab46 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 Modular stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941280
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-1c0b6fab46 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 Modular stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210329.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210330.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 9
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 131
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.80 MiB
Size of dropped packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943595
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
OLD: Fedora-34-20210329.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210330.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 21
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 63
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 7.88 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021, at 2:06 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:51:56PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 26. 03. 21 18:24, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> > >python2.7churchyard cstratak torsava vstinner
> >
> > I was curious. The error is:
> >
> >
Hi,
Jonathan Wakely writes:
> Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
> start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
> references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do not work as
> intended, and so will not be present in the final
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 09:30:33AM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>
> Could you please explain where you want to do it? Noggin (Fedora
> Accounts app) does handle the login itself, not FreeIPA. In the context
> of what Fedora contributors interact with, FreeIPA is only directly
> exposed via
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021, at 3:56 PM, Zdenek Pytela wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:45 PM justina colmena ~biz
> wrote:
> > I'm still a little bit confused about the SELinux targeted policy
> > "development" process versus the actual "roll-out," implementation, and
> > deployment not
It says all the pull request checks have passed but they haven't done them yet.
Unfortunately.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 19:35 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 06:54:25PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:18 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> >
> > > There is no good way to do this.
> >
> > This is one of those cases where
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:45 PM justina colmena ~biz
wrote:
> I'm still a little bit confused about the SELinux targeted policy
> "development" process versus the actual "roll-out," implementation, and
> deployment not only to Fedora on the deskop, but to various distributions
> of
> "CentOS"
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 06:54:25PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:18 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>
> > There is no good way to do this.
>
> This is one of those cases where I occasionally
> miss a mainframe fix update feature to prevent
> certain bad
There will be an outage starting at 2021-04-01 19:00 UTC,
which will last approximately 5 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2021-04-01 19:00UTC'
Reason for outage:
We will be updating and rebooting
On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 19:11 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Following a change in the config file of a program, I'd like to display
> a message to my users to indicate they need to update the config file
> with the new one. I try "echo" in the update scriptlet:
>
> %postun
> if
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:18 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> There is no good way to do this.
This is one of those cases where I occasionally
miss a mainframe fix update feature to prevent
certain bad automated results.
In SMP/E, there was the concept of HOLD's for
a fix. There were a
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 07:11:16PM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Following a change in the config file of a program, I'd like to
> display a message to my users to indicate they need to update the
> config file with the new one. I try "echo" in the update scriptlet:
>
> %postun
Hello,
I am posting to gather if there is enough support to provide python39 in EPEL.
Currently, EL7 users wanting to run modern python apps under uwsgi can only use
uwsgi-plugin-pyton36@epel. New Django releases are expected to require 3.8 or
higher. There is a rh-python38 SCL, but this
On 3/30/21 1:17 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 3/30/21 1:11 PM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
Hello,
Following a change in the config file of a program, I'd like to
display a message to my users to indicate they need to update the
config file with the new one. I try "echo" in the update
On 3/30/21 1:11 PM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
Hello,
Following a change in the config file of a program, I'd like to display
a message to my users to indicate they need to update the config file
with the new one. I try "echo" in the update scriptlet:
%postun
if [ "$1" -ge "1" ] ; then #
Hello,
Following a change in the config file of a program, I'd like to display
a message to my users to indicate they need to update the config file
with the new one. I try "echo" in the update scriptlet:
%postun
if [ "$1" -ge "1" ] ; then # Upgrade
dnscrypt-proxy -service install --config
Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do not work as
intended, and so will not be present in the final gcc-11.1.0 release.
See
Il 30/03/21 17:07, Ian McInerney ha scritto:
> Is there a way I can disable the creation of updates automatically in
> Bodhi for builds I submit to rawhide?
Short answer: no.
> I find it very inconvenient because it means I can't add the
> appropriate bugzilla references/description to the update
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-03-31 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname
On 30/03/2021 16:17, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 02:36:05AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> Looking at what people post, I think I can summarize it concisely:
>> people either love him or they hate him.
>
> That is certainly not the case; I neither love nor hate him, although
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941319
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-22d4054b32 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.28-1 |perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.28-1
FYI: A second review is needed on that one (as most of the changes reviewed
by Mark the first time have been removed)
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4665
--
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943227
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-22d4054b32 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943227
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-cefcaa82a2 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941319
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-cefcaa82a2 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
On ti, 30 maalis 2021, Ian McInerney wrote:
Is there a way I can disable the creation of updates automatically in Bodhi
for builds I submit to rawhide? I find it very inconvenient because it
means I can't add the appropriate bugzilla references/description to the
update when I submit package
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:08 AM Ian McInerney wrote:
>
> Is there a way I can disable the creation of updates automatically in Bodhi
> for builds I submit to rawhide? I find it very inconvenient because it means
> I can't add the appropriate bugzilla references/description to the update
>
Is there a way I can disable the creation of updates automatically in Bodhi
for builds I submit to rawhide? I find it very inconvenient because it
means I can't add the appropriate bugzilla references/description to the
update when I submit package updates that need them. I would prefer the
> We already have several Linux distros available and more are incoming weekly,
> and we want
> to have a polished Fedora experience as well. While we have Fedora on the
> list, we
> submitted our trademark request and are working through the details and would
> like to
> invite you for further
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-7f38c5da36
lib3mf-2.0.1-1.el7
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-7f980da66e
tor-0.3.5.14-1.el7
4
On 30/03/2021 16:11, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 01:37:48AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> As I noted in the original email, "I will not speculate that this is any
>> more than a coincidence". I don't want to make either assumptions or
>> accusations, you do a huge amount of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943227
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-2573e42852 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941319
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-2573e42852 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 2:36 PM Charalampos Stratakis
wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Alexander Bokovoy"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 10:06:28 PM
> > Subject: Re: Proposal to fail
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 02:36:05AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Looking at what people post, I think I can summarize it concisely:
> people either love him or they hate him.
That is certainly not the case; I neither love nor hate him, although I do
try to make an effort to love all human beings,
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 01:37:48AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> As I noted in the original email, "I will not speculate that this is any
> more than a coincidence". I don't want to make either assumptions or
> accusations, you do a huge amount of work and everybody here understands
> that.
Oh
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 21:33:14 +0200
Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> On 29/03/2021 11:49, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:13:08 +0100
> > Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 22/02/2021 22:43, Dan Horák wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 21:19:26 -
> >>> "Tom Seewald" wrote:
>
Hi Odinaka,
thanks for showing interest in our project. There are tips for Outreachy
applicants in readme [1] of the project. If anything is unclear feel free
to ping me on IRC or send me an email.
L.
[1] https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/landingpage
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:40 PM Joy Odinaka
Hi,
I am Odinaka Joy, an outreachy applicant for the 2021 session. I am a web
developer based in Nigeria.
I would love to join the Fedora team and contribute to the project - Improve
Fedora QA Dashboard.
I have experience with JavaScript, React and Redux and would love to
improve my skills by
On 3/30/21 12:43 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:46 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 3/29/21 8:17 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Hi again,
On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 17:29 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
[snip]
Right now I'm just overriding _smp_build_ncpus to 1,
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:46 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> On 3/29/21 8:17 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 17:29 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> >>
> > [snip]
> >> Right now I'm just overriding _smp_build_ncpus to 1, but there is a
> >> more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838000
--- Comment #26 from errata-xmlrpc ---
This issue has been addressed in the following products:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7 Extended Update Support
Via RHSA-2021:1032 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:1032
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837988
--- Comment #27 from errata-xmlrpc ---
This issue has been addressed in the following products:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7 Extended Update Support
Via RHSA-2021:1032 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:1032
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837975
--- Comment #25 from errata-xmlrpc ---
This issue has been addressed in the following products:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7 Extended Update Support
Via RHSA-2021:1032 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:1032
--
You are
Dnia Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 10:56:32AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi napisał(a):
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 11:08:19AM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > >
> > > Notification via sms is... not too secure. ;(
> > > https://www.vice.com/en/article/y3g8wb/hacker-got-my-texts-16-dollars-sakari-netnumber
> >
> > I
Hi Kunal,
thanks for showing interest in our project, I see you already found our
pagure repo and an issue you like to work on. I'll assign that issue to
you. For any more questions feel free to post here or contact me directly
via email lbra...@redhat.com
L.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 7:36 AM
On 3/29/21 8:17 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Hi again,
On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 17:29 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
[snip]
Right now I'm just overriding _smp_build_ncpus to 1, but there is a
more elegant solution I'd like to propose:
What if one can declaratively set the required
Hi,
My name is Michal Josef Spacek.
I am a Perl programmer and Red Hat employee.
I have been supporting Perl packaging in Red Hat.
I am interested in Perl programming, Wikidata, projects of Wikimedia
Foundation, data processing.
CPAN account: https://metacpan.org/author/SKIM
personal homepage:
On ma, 29 maalis 2021, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 11:02:58PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I'd like us to add security query/respond pairs.
Those can very easily weaken security, as the answers are often public
and easy for an attacker to look up, especially
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/30/report-389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210330gited4773408.fc33.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
66 matches
Mail list logo
