[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-615589a3ad zarafa-7.1.14-4.el7 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a650134f4f exim-4.94-2.el7 10

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-eb1a7d918d atasm-1.09-1.el8 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-9222415f70 exim-4.94-2.el8 5

Fedora-34-20210404.n.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/189 (x86_64), 7/127 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210403.n.0): ID: 842288 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/842288 ID: 842340 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso

Fedora-IoT-34-20210404.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210331.0): ID: 842540 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/842540 ID: 842546 Test: aarch64

Fedora 34 compose report: 20210404.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-34-20210403.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210404.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 67 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.74 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: gnome boxes image folder should be marked nodatacow?

On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 5:40 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 11:40 PM Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 10:42 AM Richard Shaw wrote: >> > >> > Before I submit a BZ I figured maybe some discussion was in order. >> > >> > As the default fs is now btrfs and it's

Re: memleax spec file and review

On Sun, 4 Apr 2021, 21:53 Germano Massullo, wrote: > Good day, I am creating a spec file [0] for memleax memory leaks > analyzer [1], but during build [2] I am getting error "invalid option: > --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu.". Where can be the problem? > Thank you > > [0]:

memleax spec file and review

Good day, I am creating a spec file [0] for memleax memory leaks analyzer [1], but during build [2] I am getting error "invalid option: --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu.". Where can be the problem? Thank you [0]: https://pagure.io/memleax/blob/master/f/memleax.spec [1]:

Re: Multiple snapshots and versioning

On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 11:19 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote: > > I thought about it some more and realised that using just the date allows me > to stick everything in one package. Basically, the idea is: > > %global branch1_date 20210101 > %global branch2_date 20210202 > %global branch3_date

very slow boot process with F33 caused by mysql entry in nssswitch.conf

Hi, #        worked in F31 # caused problems in F33 I upgraded a system from F31 to F33 via dnf distro-sync and it did boot extrem slow. A systemd.debug-shell=1 && strace of systemd-tmpfiles later, it looked like a massive resolve problem, as next to any step from  the tmpfiles

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2021-04-05 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow. We do have things we could discuss, but I don't think they're quite urgent, and tomorrow's a vacation day for me so I won't be around to run that meeting (I am gonna do the blocker meeting). If you really do want to have a meeting this

[Test-Announce] 2021-04-05 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 34 Blocker Review Meeting

# F34 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2021-04-05 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 2 proposed Final blockers to review (as of now), so we'll have a Fedora 34 blocker review meeting tomorrow. Hopefully a quick one! If you have time today,

Fedora-Rawhide-20210404.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 3 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 14/189 (x86_64), 15/127 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in

Fedora-IoT-35-20210404.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 6/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210403.0): ID: 842139 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/842139 ID:

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210404.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210403.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210404.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 55 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 275.43 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: gnome boxes image folder should be marked nodatacow?

On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 11:40 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 10:42 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > Before I submit a BZ I figured maybe some discussion was in order. > > > > As the default fs is now btrfs and it's well known to be bad for VMs, > I'm surprised this wasn't already

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210404.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210403.0): ID: 841797 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: Multiple snapshots and versioning

I thought about it some more and realised that using just the date allows me to stick everything in one package. Basically, the idea is: %global branch1_date 20210101 %global branch2_date 20210202 %global branch3_date 20210303 %global package_date %( bash scriptlet that picks max value from