While trying to collect a backtrace for org.gnome.Tetravex, I got this in gdb:
===
Downloading separate debug info for /lib64/liblzma.so.5...
Download failed: Timer expired. Continuing without debug info for
/lib64/libbrotlicommon.so.1.
Missing separate debuginfo for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950637
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950578
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-958f634819 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950700
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-e9797584a7 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950616
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-00c5e3447d has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949332
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-00c5e3447d has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
Hi,
I'm trying to help someone package a GUI in Python that is using
Pyproject. The project needs to add a desktop file, an appdata file
and also a "binary" to launch the GUI.
So far I have managed to drop the library files in %python3_sitelib.
But how should upstream deal with the extra files
= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
#2595 F35 Change: Erlang 24
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2595
APPROVED (+5, 0, 0)
= Meeting
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2021-04-20/fesco.2021-04-20-17.01.html
Minutes (text):
Congratulations, this change impacted tons of packages! That's also a
nice step towards more explicit build dependencies. I understood that
it's also the purpose of the pyproject.toml file ;-)
Victor
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 2:39 PM Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> we successfully
Congratulations, this change impacted tons of packages! That's also a
nice step towards more explicit build dependencies. I understood that
it's also the purpose of the pyproject.toml file ;-)
Victor
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 2:39 PM Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> we successfully
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-PPIx-Regexp` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
0.080 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PPIx-Regexp/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950294
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-PPIx-Regexp` that
you are following:
``
0.080 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PPIx-Regexp/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210418.0):
ID: 863382 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/863382
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 2/189 (x86_64), 2/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210419.n.0):
ID: 862944 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/862944
ID: 863002 Test:
Rebuilt :)! Thank you for the update!
Le 19/04/2021 à 19:01, Aleksei Bavshin a écrit :
wlroots-0.13 is now available in rawhide.
The compatibility issues are resolved via `wlroots0.12` package which
will be installed on update if there is anything that depends on
`libwlroots.so.7`. No
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 04:57:34AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> GNOME Software uses it:
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/blob/master/plugins/fedora-pkgdb-collections/gs-plugin-fedora-pkgdb-collections.c
>
> Absent of something better, Plasma Discover will too.
Thats actually
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20210406.0):
ID: 863282 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/863282
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-04-21 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-aa018d2e2a
clamav-0.103.2-1.el8
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-d8aad094e9
singularity-3.7.3-1.el8
9
Thank you for update. 'labwc' built
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=66343993
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948301
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Graphics-TIFF-10-1.fc3 |perl-Graphics-TIFF-10-1.fc3
Hi -
Björn Persson writes:
> · How is it verified that files received from debuginfo servers have not
> been tampered with?
Following up further to this, we're planning to add optional client-side
hash-verification of cached content, to provide some protection against
tampering:
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-DAVTalk` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
test package, FMF and CI
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-DAVTalk/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948301
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:06 AM wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-04-21 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
>
The following bugs are on the agenda for tomorrow's meeting:
*
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-DAVTalk` that
you are following:
``
test package, FMF and CI
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-DAVTalk/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 10/189 (x86_64), 10/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in
On 20/04/2021 08:05, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Kairui Song schrieb am 19.04.2021 um 12:00 in
> Nachricht
> :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm currently trying to add kdump support for systemd with full‑disk
>> LUKS encryption. vmcores contain sensitive data so they should also be
>> protected, and network
On 4/19/21 11:13 AM, Adam Saleh wrote:
Hi everyone,
ARC team - that is me, Vipul and Mark, are looking to figure out
possible ways how we could replace our current PDC [0] whose project
has gone unmaintained for years [1].
We plan to share what we find out in our
OLD: Fedora-34-20210419.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210420.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 4
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.37 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838000
--- Comment #27 from errata-xmlrpc ---
This issue has been addressed in the following products:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 Advanced Update Support
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 Update Services for SAP Solutions
Red Hat Enterprise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837988
--- Comment #28 from errata-xmlrpc ---
This issue has been addressed in the following products:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 Advanced Update Support
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 Update Services for SAP Solutions
Red Hat Enterprise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837975
--- Comment #26 from errata-xmlrpc ---
This issue has been addressed in the following products:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 Advanced Update Support
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 Update Services for SAP Solutions
Red Hat Enterprise
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2021-04-20 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210419.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210420.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 11
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 140
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 25.97 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi,
Thanks a lot, these info are very helpful.
Better to keep it for debugging for now, and ask users to use it very carefully.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 3:54 PM Milan Broz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> TL;DR what you are trying to do is to actually reverse many security measures
> we added. It is perhaps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950798
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1951479
Referenced Bugs:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 5:13 AM Adam Saleh wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> ARC team - that is me, Vipul and Mark, are looking to figure out
> possible ways how we could replace our current PDC [0] whose project
> has gone unmaintained for years [1].
>
> We plan to share what we find out in our
>
Hi!
> - fedora messaging - https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-messaging
Hmm, I don't think we're using PDC in fedora messaging, but I might be wrong.
Where did you find it?
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949641
--- Comment #1 from Michal Josef Spacek ---
Minor upgrade to perl-Net-DAVTalk-0.20-1.fc35
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1736444
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Hi,
TL;DR what you are trying to do is to actually reverse many security measures
we added. It is perhaps acceptable for debugging but hardly for real generic
system.
- using memory-hard function increases cost of dictionary and brute-force
attacks
You can always decrease amount of memory
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210419.0):
ID: 862272 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:51:35AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 19. 04. 21 10:52, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 03:12:34PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > Good Morning Everyone,
> > >
> > > The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/04/20/report-389-ds-base-2.0.4-20210420gitf0ef03f6f.fc33.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
45 matches
Mail list logo
