The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
63 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1f259a45ef
openjpeg2-2.3.1-11.el7
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-edab6b43f2
seamonkey-2.53.8.1-1.el7
The following builds have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814107
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981927
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|mod_perl-2.0.11-9.fc35 |mod_perl-2.0.11-9.fc35
Update: the appears to only be an issue with the aarch64 build so that explains
why I can't duplicate it on my x86_64 machine.
Looking closer at the aarch64 build output, reveals the rpath is being inserted
via libtool:
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -O2 -flto=auto
The fgci package I maintain is failing the rpath check:
ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/libfcgi++.so.0.0.0' contains a standard
'/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
ERROR 0001: file '/usr/bin/cgi-fcgi' contains a standard '/usr/lib64' in
[/usr/lib64]
New policy change is documented well here:
Am 29.07.21 um 12:42 schrieb Sandro Mani:
mingw packages are dedicated like any other packages, with a respecitve
maintainer.
Though there was some initiative in March 2021 of building (some?) mingw
packages directly from the regular linux specs. Not sure if something happened
there:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210728.0):
ID: 937902 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/937902
Soft failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 1/15
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987801
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Release Engineering ---
Created attachment 1808296
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1808296=edit
root.log
file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987801
Bug ID: 1987801
Summary: perl-POE: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f35
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-POE
Assignee: mspa...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987798
Bug ID: 1987798
Summary: perl-GnuPG-Interface: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f35
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-GnuPG-Interface
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987798
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Release Engineering ---
Created attachment 1808286
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1808286=edit
build.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
related: systemd-oomd kills the whole session if it's started from
console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933494
ср, 28 июл. 2021 г. в 10:28, David Airlie :
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been using f34 with gnome/wayland session on a 16MB machine which
> has 8GB zram swap configured.
>
> If I
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required test results missing
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud
Failed openQA tests: 9/203
On Thursday, 29 July 2021 at 12:42, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> mingw packages are dedicated like any other packages, with a respecitve
> maintainer. If something is not packaged yet it's because well no-one did it
> yet. If you want to package them, I'll happily review them.
They can also be
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 18:06:28 +0200, Marek Kasik wrote:
> Hi,
Hello,
> I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.07.0 in the side tag
> "f35-build-side-43960". I'm asking you to build your dependent packages in
> it and I will ask to merge it to main branch next Monday (2nd of August).
>
> There
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210728.n.3
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210729.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 262
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 49.15 MiB
Size of dropped packages
It was a long time ago - but thank you for the welcome :)
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 7:56 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 15:31, Pete Savage wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I was a MOTU for Ubuntu in the past, recently I've become
Hello Richard,
we're currently evaluating a proper approach with the Packit team, to
deduplicate (and optimize) the work, as I've written a set of tools
for such automation:
https://github.com/pvalena/theprototype
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUjwSj6iypw_channel=DevConf
Currently does not
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 09:07:58AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> Note from the change owner: I'm submitting this as very-very-late
> change for F35. The implementation in systemd is mostly done, so it'll
> become available in rawhide pretty soon. To actually make use of the
> new functionality,
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 1:58 AM Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> Hi Zbigniew, Justin,
>
> I assume you are familiar with $subject, also see e.g. :
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976653
>
> I have just come back from a week vacation and I see that this is
> still not resolved, what is
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2021-07-30 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9920/
___
devel
On 7/29/21 11:51 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 09:37:53AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 07:04:03PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>> So... personally I think we should restart many more things than
>> we currently do. Even in systemd
Hi,
On 7/29/21 12:57 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 09:16:48AM +0200, drago01 wrote:
>> On Thursday, July 29, 2021, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Zbigniew, Justin,
>>>
>>> I assume you are familiar with $subject, also see e.g. :
>>>
>>>
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 09:16:48AM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Thursday, July 29, 2021, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> > Hi Zbigniew, Justin,
> >
> > I assume you are familiar with $subject, also see e.g. :
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976653
> >
> > I have just come back from a
Hi
mingw packages are dedicated like any other packages, with a respecitve
maintainer. If something is not packaged yet it's because well no-one
did it yet. If you want to package them, I'll happily review them.
Sandro
On 29.07.21 12:33, Marián Konček wrote:
As a hobbyist developer it is
As a hobbyist developer it is very convenient to use Fedora even for
building for Windows. In dnf i see a huge array of mingw-* libraries but
glfw is missing. The upstream project https://www.glfw.org/ provides
them so it is probably simple enough. So my first question is related to
this:
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210728.0):
ID: 937461 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 09:37:53AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 07:04:03PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> So... personally I think we should restart many more things than
> we currently do. Even in systemd itself we fall short of this
> goal: systemd-logind
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 07:04:03PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 28. 07. 21 v 15:07 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> == Benefit to Fedora ==
> >This fixes a long-standing missing feature. We certainly wanted to
> >have this, but the technical implementation is not trivial, because we
> >need to
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 05:35:08PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 5:28 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > On 28/07/2021 15:07, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > Updates of user services take effect immediately (if so configured in
> > > the providing packages).
> >
> >
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210728.0):
ID: 937387 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Thursday, July 29, 2021, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Zbigniew, Justin,
>
> I assume you are familiar with $subject, also see e.g. :
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976653
>
> I have just come back from a week vacation and I see that this is
> still not resolved, what is the
Hi Zbigniew, Justin,
I assume you are familiar with $subject, also see e.g. :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976653
I have just come back from a week vacation and I see that this is
still not resolved, what is the current status of this ?
This is really making Fedora look bad,
33 matches
Mail list logo
