The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
15 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1b74f2e3ca
tor-0.4.5.9-1.el8
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-3c32bc85f8
putty-0.76-1.el8
3
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 04:04:33PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 30. 06. 21 v 15:04 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
> > In unrelated news, what happened to the -ow...@fedoraproject.org
> > email addresses? They seem to be bouncing for me.
>
>
> Please see the "package maintainer email
On 8/7/21 6:19 PM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
So, I still haven't seen anything posted in gitlab or mailing lists, so I've
posted to the FPC forums:
https://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,55723.0.html
The gitlab repository was supposed to go public today, but yet another
* Mattia Verga via devel:
> So, I still haven't seen anything posted in gitlab or mailing lists, so I've
> posted to the FPC forums:
> https://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,55723.0.html
You left out the most useful piece of advice (the .quad 0 suggestion).
Would you please add a
So, I still haven't seen anything posted in gitlab or mailing lists, so I've
posted to the FPC forums:
https://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,55723.0.html
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989862
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
15 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1b74f2e3ca
tor-0.4.5.9-1.el8
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-3c32bc85f8
putty-0.76-1.el8
2
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210803.0):
ID: 943078 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/943078
ID: 943089 Test: x86_64
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210806.0):
ID: 943062 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On 06. 08. 21 21:19, Sérgio wrote:
Hey (IMO) the packages should be orphan first , to know the impact of the
retirement , no ?
At this point, all of them are orphaned except:
eclipse
eclipse-m2e-core
eclipse-mpc
Those were unorphaned by @akurtakov, but the bugzillas are still in NEW:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 05:26:49PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 06. 08. 21 v 12:56 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> >On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 11:43:52AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>Dne 05. 08. 21 v 18:47 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> >>>On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 04:45:31PM
Sure, it would contain some files on almost every system anyway.
If it contains already /usr/lib64/pm-utils/power.d, I guess it can
(co)own few directories of systemd. Much more used in my opinion.
Opened pull request for it:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/filesystem/pull-request/6
On
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210806.0):
ID: 943046 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
13 matches
Mail list logo