Any recent changes to the arm builders?

Have there been any recent changes to the arm (32bit) builders? It seems like I'm having much more issues there with builds likely running out of memory or similar. -- Orion Poplawski he/him/his - surely the least important thing about me Manager of NWRA Technical Systems

[Bug 1991693] perl-Mojolicious-9.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991693 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Mojolicious-9.20 is|perl-Mojolicious-9.21 is

Re: Stepping down as Fedora Jam maintainer

On Fri, 2021-08-13 at 14:21 -0400, JT wrote: > They should have been picked up by me. I thought Eric transferred them to > me. Was there something I didn't do that I needed to do after that? I'm not sure what happened there, I'm afraid. But now they're orphaned, they need to be unorphaned.

Re: Stepping down as Fedora Jam maintainer

They should have been picked up by me. I thought Eric transferred them to me. Was there something I didn't do that I needed to do after that? On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 2:16 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 17:26 -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > > On Monday, April 12, 2021

Re: Stepping down as Fedora Jam maintainer

On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 17:26 -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > On Monday, April 12, 2021 7:52:24 AM PDT Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 11:38:40PM -, JT Pennington wrote: > > > > > I'd like to volunteer to pick up the Fedora Jam project and maintain it. > > > > > > Awesome --

Fedora-35-20210813.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 22/202 (x86_64), 19/130 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210811.n.0): ID: 947213 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso mediakit_repoclosure URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/947213 ID: 947294 Test: x86_64

[Bug 1993507] New: perl-PDL-2.057 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993507 Bug ID: 1993507 Summary: perl-PDL-2.057 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-PDL Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Fedora-Rawhide-20210813.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 8 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MISSING:

Re: [heads-up] evolution-data-server soname version bump in rawhide

On Fri, 2021-08-13 at 12:52 +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Both builds are finished already.  [1,2] Hi, thanks, I created updates in bodhi for both of them (f35/rawhide). Bye, Milan ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Kernel thermal configuration issues in laptop

On 8/11/21 6:31 AM, Iñaki Ucar wrote: Hi, This is so annoying. Recently, I've been experimenting software-initiated shutdowns in my laptop (LG Gram) due to sudden temperature rises in which the fan doesn't catch up and doesn't reach maximum speed. In the journal, I see: kernel: thermal

Fedora 35 compose report: 20210813.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-35-20210811.n.0 NEW: Fedora-35-20210813.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:5 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 10 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 181 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 143.97 MiB Size of dropped packages:140.72 MiB

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

On 13/08/2021 13:37, Stephen Snow wrote: I have built RPM's and SRPM's according to RedHat specifications, I think using their tutorials. Fedora has its own RPM packaging guidelines: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ Even if the barriers are only perceived ones. The

Re: Non-responsive maintainer tc01 (Ben Rosser)

On Wed, 2021-08-11 at 14:06 +0200, Mattias Ellert wrote: > Hi! > > I filed a bugzilla request 2021-04-18 (almost 4 month ago) asking for > the uglify-js package to be updated: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950780 > Hi,  JFYI and avoid deductions ... I will update

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

Hello Dan, Thank you for reaching out with your response. I have to admit, I was in a provocotive mood the other day. I had solved a problem for a customer that had been worked on unsuccessfully by a local competitor for three weeks. I was at that moment the master of my trade craft and in fully

Re: [heads-up] evolution-data-server soname version bump in rawhide

Am Freitag, dem 13.08.2021 um 12:44 +0200 schrieb Milan Crha: > On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 16:05 +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > Just give me short heads up, and I'll rebuild pidgin-chime using my > > proven-packager powers. > > Hi, > thanks for the offer. There are two side tags, due

Re: [heads-up] evolution-data-server soname version bump in rawhide

On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 16:05 +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Just give me short heads up, and I'll rebuild pidgin-chime using my > proven-packager powers. Hi, thanks for the offer. There are two side tags, due to the f35 branching: f35-build-side-44568 f36-build-side-44566 Both

Re: [heads-up] evolution-data-server soname version bump in rawhide

Am Donnerstag, dem 05.08.2021 um 16:05 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Am Donnerstag, dem 05.08.2021 um 11:14 +0200 schrieb Milan Crha: > > Hi, > > the upcoming 3.41.2 release of the evolution-data-server next week > > will > > contain a soname version bump of a libcamel library

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210813.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210812.0): ID: 946842 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: