Re: Blender failure to build on all repos

2021-08-21 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
> ~~~ > diff -Naur > blender-2.93.3-original/source/blender/io/usd/intern/usd_writer_abstract.cc > blender-2.93.3/source/blender/io/usd/intern/usd_writer_abstract.cc > --- > blender-2.93.3-original/source/blender/io/usd/intern/usd_writer_abstract.cc > 2021-04-20 22:02:39.0 -0400 > +++

Re: Updated hdf5/netcdf/octave coming to rawhide

2021-08-21 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 21:42, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > I'm starting to build packages and all dependencies for an updated > hdf5/netcdf/octave stack in a side tag. Please use: > > fedpkg build --target=f35-build-side-44365 > > to build dependent packages until the side tag is merged back. > >

[Bug 1996229] perl-Test-Compile-3.0.1 is available

2021-08-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996229 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Test-Compile-3.0.0 is |perl-Test-Compile-3.0.1

Copr: fail to build on fedora-eln-i386

2021-08-21 Thread Iago Rubio
I have been fiddling with the rarian package, and I can't get the rpm to build on fedora-eln-i386. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/iago/rarian/builds/ It's a weird error as it's a dependency problem. Lack of go-srpm-macros needed by redhat-rpm-config-197-1.eln112.noarch.

Re: Updated hdf5/netcdf/octave coming to rawhide

2021-08-21 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 21:42, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > I'm starting to build packages and all dependencies for an updated > hdf5/netcdf/octave stack in a side tag. Please use: > > fedpkg build --target=f35-build-side-44365 > > to build dependent packages until the side tag is merged back. > Is

Re: Blender failure to build on all repos

2021-08-21 Thread Ben Beasley
The errors are not the same across releases. The complete error on F34 is: ~~~ Error: Problem: package OpenColorIO-devel-2.0.1-1.fc34.x86_64 requires libOpenColorIO.so.2.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package OpenColorIO-devel-2.0.1-1.fc34.x86_64 requires

Fedora-Rawhide-20210821.n.0 compose check report

2021-08-21 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required test results missing Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud Failed openQA tests: 12/207

Obsoleting extras subpackages

2021-08-21 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
In Dask, they have some extras that have effectively been removed, but they kept them in their config for backwards compatibility. In Fedora, I would like to remove the meta-subpackages, as they don't provide any additional Requires. As such, I would like to Obsolete them from the main package,

Re: LLD compatibility package

2021-08-21 Thread Jan Drögehoff
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 7:55 PM Jan Drögehoff wrote: > > tstellar already answered in a different thread: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o... I can understand if there is no compatibility package because there hasn't been a use for one though I

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210821.n.0 changes

2021-08-21 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210820.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210821.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 99 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 2.65 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Re: LLD compatibility package

2021-08-21 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 7:55 PM Jan Drögehoff wrote: > > I've been wondering for a while but I haven't had time to ask this, why is > there no lld compatibility package? > clang and llvm have them and only lld seems to lack it. > I'd understand it if lld was just a linker but it also provides

LLD compatibility package

2021-08-21 Thread Jan Drögehoff
I've been wondering for a while but I haven't had time to ask this, why is there no lld compatibility package? clang and llvm have them and only lld seems to lack it. I'd understand it if lld was just a linker but it also provides many libraries and development files that can have brekaing

Re: New maintainer experience

2021-08-21 Thread Iago Rubio
On Fri, 2021-08-20 at 23:29 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 8/20/21 9:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:03:27PM +0200, Iago Rubio wrote: > > > Right now, I was aiming for rarian. > > > ... > > > Should I go fot it or I'd rather search for other package on the > > > wish > >

Re: New maintainer experience

2021-08-21 Thread Iago Rubio
On Fri, 2021-08-20 at 12:32 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:03:27PM +0200, Iago Rubio wrote: > > I checked out the wishlist and the first entry is the orphans page, > > that leads to the link I edited to the packager dashboard orphans. > > > > So I am now a bit confused on

[Bug 1996284] New: perl-Unicode-Collate-1.31 is available

2021-08-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996284 Bug ID: 1996284 Summary: perl-Unicode-Collate-1.31 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Unicode-Collate Keywords: FutureFeature,

[Bug 1996273] New: perl-CPANPLUS-0.9912 is available

2021-08-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996273 Bug ID: 1996273 Summary: perl-CPANPLUS-0.9912 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-CPANPLUS Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1996268] New: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20210820 is available

2021-08-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996268 Bug ID: 1996268 Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20210820 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Module-CoreList Keywords:

[Bug 1996267] New: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20210821 is available

2021-08-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996267 Bug ID: 1996267 Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20210821 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases Keywords:

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210821.0 compose check report

2021-08-21 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210819.0): ID: 953209 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/953209 Soft failed openQA tests:

Re: New RPM submission (dovecot-fts-xapian)

2021-08-21 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 21/08/2021 10:57, Ankur Sinha wrote: So, if we can do anything to make it easier for developers to just maintain their one or two tools for the Fedora community, that'll be good. And we will get a lot of low-quality packages with bundled a lot of libraries, ignoring Fedora build flags,

Re: New RPM submission (dovecot-fts-xapian)

2021-08-21 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 17:22:59 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Ankur Sinha [20/08/2021 12:27] : > > > > I totally understand the point of the system we have in place, but I do > > see how it doesn't quite address the case of upstream developers or > > individuals who'd just like to maintain their

Packager docs on docs.fp.o (Was: Re: New maintainer experience)

2021-08-21 Thread Ankur Sinha
> > > > For some time already, I have all of the package maintainer docs already > rewritten and improved at package-maintainer-docs [1], with the intent to > keep improving them. They remain unpublished because, despite my pleas, the > main docs page maintainers keep ignoring two oneliner pull

Re: New maintainer experience

2021-08-21 Thread Iago Rubio
Great tío thank you En 21 ago. 2021 9:30, en 9:30, Otto Urpelainen escribió: >Iago Rubio kirjoitti 20.8.2021 klo 0.03: >> >> [iago@rawhide]$ dnf repoquery --releasever rawhide --whatrequires >> "rarian*" >> Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:26 ago on Thu 19 Aug 2021 >10:34:56 >> PM CEST. >>

Re: New maintainer experience

2021-08-21 Thread Otto Urpelainen
Kevin Fenzi kirjoitti 20.8.2021 klo 22.32: On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:03:27PM +0200, Iago Rubio wrote: On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 08:56 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 08:15:36PM +0700, Didik Supriadi wrote: I think ppl now can go to

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210821.0 compose check report

2021-08-21 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210819.0): ID: 953182 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: New maintainer experience

2021-08-21 Thread Otto Urpelainen
Iago Rubio kirjoitti 20.8.2021 klo 0.03: [iago@rawhide]$ dnf repoquery --releasever rawhide --whatrequires "rarian*" Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:26 ago on Thu 19 Aug 2021 10:34:56 PM CEST. alleyoop-0:0.9.8-18.fc35.x86_64 etherape-0:0.9.18-8.fc35.x86_64