On 2021-10-15 21:38, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
@Luya, apologies for not providing you with a little more knowledge of
the package. It isn't a simple package to maintain. Upgrades require
great, great care and lots of rebuilds and alignment with other
packages on every update.
@Michael,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017183
Bug ID: 2017183
Summary: perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.06 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-WWW-Mechanize
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017180
Bug ID: 2017180
Summary: perl-URI-5.10 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-URI
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017178
Bug ID: 2017178
Summary: package should be patched to use
Monitoring::Plugin::Functions
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component:
On Mon, 2021-10-25 at 08:48 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 11:34:29PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> ...snip...
> >
> > The correct configuration is for pipewire to be enabled in the system
> > session and wireplumber or pipewire-media-session to be enable in the
> > user
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017168
Bug ID: 2017168
Summary: perl-libwww-perl-6.58 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-libwww-perl
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On 10/25/21 2:02 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 10/25/21 2:00 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21 2021 at 05:15:37 PM -0700, Tom Stellard
wrote:
To do this, you need to add -fuse-ld=lld -Wl,--build-id=sha1 to the linker
flags.
Good news: ld.lld does not run out of memory.
Bad news:
On 10/25/21 2:00 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21 2021 at 05:15:37 PM -0700, Tom Stellard
wrote:
To do this, you need to add -fuse-ld=lld -Wl,--build-id=sha1 to the linker
flags.
Good news: ld.lld does not run out of memory.
Bad news: because it crashes. There is a low-quality
On Thu, Oct 21 2021 at 05:15:37 PM -0700, Tom Stellard
wrote:
To do this, you need to add -fuse-ld=lld -Wl,--build-id=sha1 to the
linker flags.
Good news: ld.lld does not run out of memory.
Bad news: because it crashes. There is a low-quality backtrace here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017154
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017154
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017154
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-10d5b10539 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-10d5b10539
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017154
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-fe48819943 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-fe48819943
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017154
Bug ID: 2017154
Summary: perl-Spreadsheet-XLSX-0.16 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Spreadsheet-XLSX
Keywords: FutureFeature,
With the upcoming update to version 20211012
(https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pdfminer/pull-request/5), the
python-pdfminer License field gains yet another term due to some new
SASL code based on pyHanko and ultimately derived from python-pymongo
(mongo-python-driver).
Instead of
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 03:09:00PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Package_information_on_ELF_objects
>
> == Summary ==
> All binaries (executables and shared libraries) are annotated with an
> ELF note that identifies the rpm for which this file was built. This
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Package_information_on_ELF_objects
== Summary ==
All binaries (executables and shared libraries) are annotated with an
ELF note that identifies the rpm for which this file was built. This
allows binaries to be identified when they are distributed without any
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Package_information_on_ELF_objects
== Summary ==
All binaries (executables and shared libraries) are annotated with an
ELF note that identifies the rpm for which this file was built. This
allows binaries to be identified when they are distributed without any
On Mon, Oct 25 2021 at 08:33:42 AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
I'll try this one as a last-ditch effort, but I don't think it will
work. We'll find out. I expect this will reduce the memory required
*during* linking, but I think the problem here is the *resulting
executable* is just too
There is nothing on the agenda, so I'm cancelling the meeting.
I'll chair the next one too.
= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
#2677 F37 Change: Python 3.11
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2677
APPROVED (+7,0,-0)
#2676 F36 Change: Setuptools 58+
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2676
APPROVED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016582
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-2db1655d26 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016725
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-e74f7a005e has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016538
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-1c81564bf4 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016542
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-25617f77f7 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 11:34:29PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
...snip...
>
> The correct configuration is for pipewire to be enabled in the system
> session and wireplumber or pipewire-media-session to be enable in the
> user session (wireplumber should be the default). Either of those not
>
The License field of the python-fastavro package has been corrected from
“ASL 2.0” to “MIT and ASL 2.0”.
The primary upstream license is MIT
(https://github.com/fastavro/fastavro/blob/1.4.6/LICENSE), but the
project is derived from Apache Avro, which is under the ASL 2.0 license
On 21. 10. 21 22:37, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/retire_NIS_user_space_utils
== Summary ==
This change is about retiring the ypbind, yp-tools, and ypserv
packages, and removal of the {nis,yp}domainname user-space utility
programs from the hostname package...
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
38 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f005e1b879
debmirror-2.35-1.el7
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-73042a5f27
stb-0-0.7.20211022gitaf1a5bc.el7
The following
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-d2e987a67b
python-django-filter-21.1-1.el8
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-61671327d7
chromium-94.0.4606.81-1.el8
3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014714
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.50 |perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.50
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012019
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Encode-3.15-482.fc36 |perl-Encode-3.15-482.fc36
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Encode-3.13-481.fc36 |perl-Encode-3.13-481.fc36
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014714
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.50 |perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.50
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Encode-3.13-481.fc36 |perl-Encode-3.13-481.fc36
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012019
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016223
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-19d258aad2 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016582
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016725
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016731
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016542
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016538
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
V Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 11:40:25PM +0200, Peter Boy napsal(a):
> I just tested the dnf upgrade procedure on one of our standby backup systems
> which happens to have the F34 postgresql module version 9.6 installed.
>
> The module was overwritten with version 13 without warning.
I guess DNF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016731
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-19d258aad2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-19d258aad2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016731
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-78dbcbb5a5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-78dbcbb5a5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016725
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-e74f7a005e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e74f7a005e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Mon, Oct 25 2021 at 01:14:31 PM +0200, Petr Pisar
wrote:
--reduce-memory-overheads
I'll try this one as a last-ditch effort, but I don't think it will
work. We'll find out. I expect this will reduce the memory required
*during* linking, but I think the problem here is the
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016725
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-306d1d3920 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-306d1d3920
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016725
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-23c4b14727 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-23c4b14727
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016731
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-CBOR-XS-1.85-1.fc36
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016731
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016725
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016725
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
|ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013579
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Encode-3.16-483.fc36
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 10:41:44 +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
>
> I've unpushed the package so far, so it won't be pushed to stable. Please
> open a bugzilla with KCM logs attached. Also please, provide output of
> failing klist with krb5 tracing enabled (KRB5_TRACE=/dev/stderr).
Thanks very much. I
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 6:43 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> ghc-HStringTemplate orphan 2 weeks
> ago
> ghc-filestore orphan 2 weeks
> ago
> ghc-hoauth2 orphan 2 weeks
>
V Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 04:58:35PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro napsal(a):
> I've tried almost everything I can think of: -g0, -Os, disabled LTO. None of
> this worked.
bfd linker has these options:
--no-keep-memory
ld normally optimizes for speed over memory usage by caching the
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
> Am 24.10.2021 um 04:55 schrieb Samuel Sieb :
>
> On 10/23/21 14:40, Peter Boy wrote:
>> I just tested the dnf upgrade procedure on one of our standby backup systems
>> which happens to have the F34 postgresql module version 9.6 installed.
>> The module was overwritten with version 13 without
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 25th
October (today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Libera.chat) or
Matrix. The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to
attend. You can join us over:
Matrix:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016696
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|ASSIGNED
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211024.0):
ID: 1039185 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016648
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-PPIx-Regexp` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
0.081 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PPIx-Regexp/pull-request/4
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-PPIx-Regexp` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
0.081 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PPIx-Regexp/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 10:33 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 2021-10-25 01:21, Jun Aruga wrote:
> > I might find the issues about installation with the Fedora 35 64-bit
> > network install image. How and where can I report it?
> > Is the beta installation too old to test now? Thanks.
> >
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-PPIx-Regexp` that
you are following:
``
0.081 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PPIx-Regexp/pull-request/4
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-PPIx-Regexp` that
you are following:
``
0.081 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PPIx-Regexp/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On 10/22/21 16:56, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hi folks,
I just updated two F35 systems with updates-testing enabled and then
`klist` etc. stopped working for me. Some investigation seems to
indicate that the sssd-2.6.0 update may be involved---downgrading back
to 2.5.2 immediately fixes the issue on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016648
--- Comment #1 from Michal Josef Spacek ---
Changes:
* Any use of the postderef argument is now fatal.
Removing of the postderef argument is planned and notice about deprecation is
on place for long time.
For Fedora 35 and rawhide.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016582
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-2db1655d26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-2db1655d26
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016582
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-db97d4f1ed has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-db97d4f1ed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On 2021-10-25 01:21, Jun Aruga wrote:
I might find the issues about installation with the Fedora 35 64-bit
network install image. How and where can I report it?
Is the beta installation too old to test now? Thanks.
https://getfedora.org/en/workstation/download/
The test list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016648
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016696
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
I might find the issues about installation with the Fedora 35 64-bit
network install image. How and where can I report it?
Is the beta installation too old to test now? Thanks.
https://getfedora.org/en/workstation/download/
Jun
--
Jun | He - Him
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016582
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.51
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016582
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016542
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-25617f77f7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-25617f77f7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016542
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-c6f031d14a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c6f031d14a
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016542
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-c6f031d14a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c6f031d14a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 1:42 AM Reon Beon via devel
wrote:
>
> I don't know if it did by default on rawhide (gnome). As far as I remember.
Why would we want that? Was there a previous discussion on the
$SUBJECT that I might not be aware of?
> ___
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016542
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|iarn...@gmail.com, |
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211024.0):
ID: 1039169 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016538
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-af8d377abe has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-af8d377abe
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016538
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-a1907df133 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-a1907df133
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016538
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-1c81564bf4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-1c81564bf4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016538
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jose.p.oliveira.oss@gmail.c |
|om,
# F35 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2021-10-25
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
Hi folks! We have 2 proposed Final blockers and 4 proposed Final freeze
exceptions to review, so let's have a review meeting today (sorry for
the late notice, just realized I
Sorry for the late notice - just realized I forgot to send these.
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting today. It's been a
while, but we're still in F35 crunch mode this week, so nothing else
really to talk about, I don't think. There will be a blocker meeting.
If you're aware of
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 8:52 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 2:24 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, I think the upstream renaming of ansible and ansible-core is something
> > that we just have to accept. But we have some flexibility in how this is
> >
On Wed, 2021-10-20 at 14:31 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 19. 10. 21 v 18:30 Micah Shennum napsal(a):
> > > and when I manually run "wireplumber" it shows:
> > >
> > > Default Sink: alsa_output.pci-_00_1b.0.analog-stereo
> > > Default Source: alsa_input.pci-_00_1b.0.analog-stereo
> > >
92 matches
Mail list logo
