Florian Weimer wrote:
> That's not actually true, though, and it does not make much sense. If
> upstream commits to an ABI, versioning is not even required technically.
Hardly any upstream actually commits to an ABI *forever*. Even if the ABI
has not changed for 10 years, that does not mean
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 8:09 PM Maxwell G wrote:
>
> On Monday, December 6, 2021 6:43:57 PM CST Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 3:59 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 05/12/2021 04:07, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > > > This breaks building RPMs for EPEL 8 or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009895
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029100
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
On Monday, December 6, 2021 6:43:57 PM CST Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 3:59 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > On 05/12/2021 04:07, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > > This breaks building RPMs for EPEL 8 or Fedora, because the '%doc' and
> > > '%license' macros strip
Dec 4, 2021 9:09:24 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia :
> I've been trying to bundle the current ansible-5.0.1 release as an RPM
> for Fedora and EPEL use. Leaving aside the peculiar decisions to
> replace the pypi.org "ansible" tarball with a tarball of roughly 150
> modules from the "ansiblee-collections"
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 3:59 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 05/12/2021 04:07, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > This breaks building RPMs for EPEL 8 or Fedora, because the '%doc' and
> > '%license' macros strip off the subdirectories of the files and
> > install them directly at the top of
On 06/12/2021 23:53, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/6/21 09:47, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 12:12 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:59:05AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Correct me, if I'm wrong, people to avoid put password in every
sudo
command, modify sudo to not
On 12/6/21 09:47, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 12:12 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:59:05AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Correct me, if I'm wrong, people to avoid put password in every
sudo
command, modify sudo to not ask password . And this behavior is a
On 12/1/21 08:13, mkol...@redhat.com wrote:
AFAIK it always added the user to the wheel group. AFAIK there is just
one special root account and you can't change its username.
You can change the root username. Some people have done that for
security purposes. However, it's possible that some
Dec 6, 2021 4:08:02 PM Mikel Olasagasti :
> [...]
> Just updated linode-cli to use the new v4 client that changed the
> license to BSD.
> [...]
For the record, the previous license was `Artistic or GPLv2`, which is less
permissive. Here is a link to the commit:
Hi all,
Just updated linode-cli to use the new v4 client that changed the
license to BSD.
Kind regards,
Mikel Olasagasti (mikelo2)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211205.0):
ID: 1078849 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2
base_service_manipulation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1078849
Soft failed openQA tests:
On 06. 12. 21 20:52, Ben Beasley wrote:
Interestingly, I’m able to do local EPEL9 builds on F35 by using “fedpkg
--release epel9 mockbuild”, which seems to use an environment called
“epel9-candidate-${ARCH}”. I haven’t looked into where that comes from. It
doesn’t correspond to anything in
Interestingly, I’m able to do local EPEL9 builds on F35 by using “fedpkg
--release epel9 mockbuild”, which seems to use an environment called
“epel9-candidate-${ARCH}”. I haven’t looked into where that comes from.
It doesn’t correspond to anything in /etc/mock.
– Ben
On 12/6/21 12:36,
On 06. 12. 21 12:00, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 06. 12. 21 11:42, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Could we get rid of the limit
"Too many dependencies for wsdl4j, not all listed here"
in the long reports? I don't really care how big that text file is in
my browser.
I can try, but the report might
People,
I cloned this:
https://github.com/discourse/discourse_docker
and did a "podman build" on the Dockerfile and it made it to step 39 (of
59) before stopping with a complaint about a missing dir . .
It would be great to get a Fedora Podman Discourse container going (in a
separate
Once upon a time, Ben Cotton said:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FixRescueMode
>
> == Summary ==
> Fedora defaults to locking the root account, which is needed by
> single-user mode. This Change uses `sulogin --force` so the password
> request is bypassed under this circumstance.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027884
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-HTML-Template-Pro-0.95
On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 12:12 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:59:05AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Correct me, if I'm wrong, people to avoid put password in every
> > sudo
> > command, modify sudo to not ask password . And this behavior is a
> > big
> > hole of security
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 11:32 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 01:30:38PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > Is this a known issue or is there a package I need to update? I'm on F35.
>
> It's sadly expected... we need to get fedpkg-minimal pushed out into
> epel9. There's a bug on it:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FixRescueMode
== Summary ==
Fedora defaults to locking the root account, which is needed by
single-user mode. This Change uses `sulogin --force` so the password
request is bypassed under this circumstance.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Salimma|Michel Alexandre
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FixRescueMode
== Summary ==
Fedora defaults to locking the root account, which is needed by
single-user mode. This Change uses `sulogin --force` so the password
request is bypassed under this circumstance.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Salimma|Michel Alexandre
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 01:30:38PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Is this a known issue or is there a package I need to update? I'm on F35.
It's sadly expected... we need to get fedpkg-minimal pushed out into
epel9. There's a bug on it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007051
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:59:05AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Correct me, if I'm wrong, people to avoid put password in every sudo
> command, modify sudo to not ask password . And this behavior is a big
> hole of security , if user is compromised, attacker will have root
> access for free.
I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029516
Bug ID: 2029516
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Any-URI-Escape in epel9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Any-URI-Escape
Assignee:
* Otto Urpelainen:
> Vitaly Zaitsev via devel kirjoitti 6.12.2021 klo 11.01:
>> On 06/12/2021 03:39, Bernie Innocenti via devel wrote:
>>> What are the current Fedora packaging guideline regarding ABI
>>> stability of shared libraries?
>> The package maintainer should ask upstream to bump the
It's also deprecated as of I believe 3.11, so I've made sure there are upstream
bugs filed to migrate to berkeleydb for both consumers, gramps and exaile.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
This is your final reminder that voting closes promptly at 23:59 UTC
on Thursday 9 December.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 7:08 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> Voting in the Fedora Linux 35 elections is now open. Go to the
> Elections app[1] to cast your vote. Voting closes at 23:59 UTC on
> Thursday 9
This is your final reminder that voting closes promptly at 23:59 UTC
on Thursday 9 December.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 7:08 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> Voting in the Fedora Linux 35 elections is now open. Go to the
> Elections app[1] to cast your vote. Voting closes at 23:59 UTC on
> Thursday 9
On 06. 12. 21 15:50, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
python-bsddb3 orphan 1 weeks ago
Taken.
Thanks.
Note that ti was orphaned because of:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019310
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 4/208 (x86_64), 8/142 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in
> python-bsddb3 orphan 1 weeks ago
Taken.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211205.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211206.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 48
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.12 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 21:40 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:29:43AM -0600, Brandon Nielsen wrote:
> > On 11/29/21 1:33 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Users_are_admins_by_default_in_Anaconda
> > >
> > > = Users are
Hi folks,
we have nothing on the agenda, so I'm cancelling today's meeting.
See you next week.
#2700 F36 Change: ELN-Extras
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2700
Thank you,
I have added feedback from this discussion to the Change page.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Users_are_admins_by_default_in_Anaconda#Feedback
(This does not mean the discussion is over, just that there was enough to
go and edit the page.)
Best,
VS
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at
On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 11:17 +, Mat Booth wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 10:43, Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:21:34AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > Full report available at:
> > > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-12-06.txt
> > > grep it for
Thanks, I have edited the release note on the proposal page.
VS
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 5:23 PM Jiri Konecny wrote:
>
> Dne 01. 12. 21 v 16:16 Jonathan Wakely napsal(a):
> > On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 19:36, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >> == Release Notes ==
> >>
> >> In the User spoke, the "Make this user
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 10:43, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:21:34AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Full report available at:
> > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-12-06.txt
> > grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.
>
> Could we get
Dne 03. 12. 21 v 19:07 Tom Hughes via devel napsal(a):
On 03/12/2021 17:48, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2021-12-03 at 17:25 +, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
On 03/12/2021 17:16, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 03/12/2021 17:41, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The bundled openssl in opae worries me
On 06. 12. 21 11:42, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Could we get rid of the limit
"Too many dependencies for wsdl4j, not all listed here"
in the long reports? I don't really care how big that text file is in
my browser.
I can try, but the report might run for a long time. Will check.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029100
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-954d818d4e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-954d818d4e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 10:42:37AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:21:34AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Full report available at:
> > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-12-06.txt
> > grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029100
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:21:34AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Full report available at:
> https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-12-06.txt
> grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.
Could we get rid of the limit
"Too many dependencies for wsdl4j, not all
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211205.0):
ID: 1077905 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029100
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029042
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|ASSIGNED
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel kirjoitti 6.12.2021 klo 11.01:
On 06/12/2021 03:39, Bernie Innocenti via devel wrote:
What are the current Fedora packaging guideline regarding ABI
stability of shared libraries?
The package maintainer should ask upstream to bump the soversion field
and if it is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029042
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 08:22:19PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 8:15 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > openssh 8.8p1 (just released in Rawhide) cannot connect to older
> > servers. The error is:
> >
> > Unable to negotiate with [server] port 22: no matching host
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 07:23:50PM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 12/5/21 05:15, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >openssh 8.8p1 (just released in Rawhide) cannot connect to older
> >servers.
> ...
> >or the equivalent on the command line:
> > ssh -o HostKeyAlgorithms=+ssh-rsa -o
On 06/12/2021 03:39, Bernie Innocenti via devel wrote:
What are the current Fedora packaging guideline regarding ABI stability
of shared libraries?
The package maintainer should ask upstream to bump the soversion field
and if it is rejected, bump it manually in downstream.
--
Sincerely,
On 05/12/2021 04:07, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
This breaks building RPMs for EPEL 8 or Fedora, because the '%doc' and
'%license' macros strip off the subdirectories of the files and
install them directly at the top of the docdir.
You should deal with them manually.
Example:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211205.0):
ID: 1077896 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2
base_service_manipulation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1077896
Soft failed openQA tests:
58 matches
Mail list logo
