https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033196
Bug ID: 2033196
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Task-Weaken for EPEL-9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Task-Weaken
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032454
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
I don't want to run MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1 firefox from the command line forever.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 09:27:51PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 12/15/21 16:57, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 11:03:14PM +0100, Volker Fröhlich wrote:
> > > I don't want to be a package maintainer anymore.
> > >
> > > All of my packages are up for grabs.
> > >
>
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:57:14PM +0100, chedi toueiti wrote:
> fair enough, will this be also the case for EPEL9?
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:47 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2021-12-14 at 22:24 +0100, chedi toueiti wrote:
> > > I noticed that pyproject-rpm-macros is not
Volker Fröhlich wrote:
> I don't want to be a package maintainer anymore.
Too bad! Thank you for your contributions so far!
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * routino
That one has actually been maintained by Dan Horák for a while. Volker
is/was only co-admin. (I am still co-admin, too. I used to be the primary
maintainer, Dan picked it up from me a few years ago.)
Kevin Kofler
On 12/15/21 16:57, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 11:03:14PM +0100, Volker Fröhlich wrote:
I don't want to be a package maintainer anymore.
All of my packages are up for grabs.
To help people get started, here's the URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032104
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-3018d9bda1 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
On Friday, December 10, 2021 8:29:10 AM CST Kamil Paral wrote:
> Hey Maxwell,
> can you please file a new bug in bugzilla against dnf and copy the problem
> description into it? Then make your new bug block bug 2013327 [1], which is
> the tracker for this Change. This way you'll make sure that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032104
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032872
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032261
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031754
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031819
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031079
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031862
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032511
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031541
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032209
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029201
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.99-1.f |perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.99-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028912
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 11:03:14PM +0100, Volker Fröhlich wrote:
> I don't want to be a package maintainer anymore.
>
> All of my packages are up for grabs.
>
To help people get started, here's the URL:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/volter/projects
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033110
Bug ID: 2033110
Summary: perl-IO-Async-0.801 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-IO-Async
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:58:24PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'd need mingw-qt6-qtshadertools reviewed:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009221
>
> mingw-qt6-qtdeclarative, which is currently FailsToInstall, grew a
> dependency on it.
>
Happy to take this!
> Happy to
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 12:49:51PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 02:29:58PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Neal Gompa and I have been reviving the effort to get our mailing list
> > server infrastructure (currently running on RHEL 7 with
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021, at 5:21 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
>
> Did you test the impact this has on package build times? Particularly
> packages like llvm, clang, webkit2gtk3, etc. that have very large
> debuginfo files?
I think far too often the culture here is "make $change for all RPMs". But
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
14 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 85/228 (x86_64), 65/159 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021, at 1:45 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 10:47:52AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>> Any file covered by fs-verity is immutable after installation. So you
>> cannot modify the contents, the kernel refuses. But you can just
>> replace the file (like during
Hi,
if the packages is using yarn, you can simply use its caching mechanism for
bundling the needed node modules. You will have an offline cache where you can
install the modules from!
Example: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs-bash-language-server
Take a look at prepare_vendor.sh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032104
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
Hi
I'd need mingw-qt6-qtshadertools reviewed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009221
mingw-qt6-qtdeclarative, which is currently FailsToInstall, grew a
dependency on it.
Happy to review in exchange!
Sandro
___
devel mailing list --
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:26 PM Michel Alexandre Salim <
sali...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:20:27PM +0100, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:03 PM Miro Hrončok
> wrote:
> >
> > > On 15. 12. 21 21:49, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > > > (I
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:26 PM Michel Alexandre Salim <
sali...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:20:27PM +0100, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:03 PM Miro Hrončok
> wrote:
> >
> > > On 15. 12. 21 21:49, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > > > (I
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:20:27PM +0100, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:03 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > On 15. 12. 21 21:49, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > > (I haven't built python-mock in EPEL9 yet, and am not going to unless we
> > > really need it for something
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:20:27PM +0100, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:03 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > On 15. 12. 21 21:49, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > > (I haven't built python-mock in EPEL9 yet, and am not going to unless we
> > > really need it for something
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032104
Denis Fateyev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |de...@fateyev.com
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:03:29PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 15. 12. 21 21:49, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > (I haven't built python-mock in EPEL9 yet, and am not going to unless we
> > really need it for something - but I'll hold off on retiring the branch)
>
> Please, retire it for
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:03 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 15. 12. 21 21:49, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > (I haven't built python-mock in EPEL9 yet, and am not going to unless we
> > really need it for something - but I'll hold off on retiring the branch)
>
> Please, retire it for EPEL9. It
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:03 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 15. 12. 21 21:49, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > (I haven't built python-mock in EPEL9 yet, and am not going to unless we
> > really need it for something - but I'll hold off on retiring the branch)
>
> Please, retire it for EPEL9. It
On 15. 12. 21 21:49, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
(I haven't built python-mock in EPEL9 yet, and am not going to unless we
really need it for something - but I'll hold off on retiring the branch)
Please, retire it for EPEL9. It should never be needed.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 02:29:58PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Neal Gompa and I have been reviving the effort to get our mailing list
> server infrastructure (currently running on RHEL 7 with missing packages
> provided in an unofficial repo) hostable on RHEL 9 + EPEL.
>
>
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 02:29:58PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Neal Gompa and I have been reviving the effort to get our mailing list
> server infrastructure (currently running on RHEL 7 with missing packages
> provided in an unofficial repo) hostable on RHEL 9 + EPEL.
>
>
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211212.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211215.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:8
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 23
Dropped packages:47
Upgraded packages: 235
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 26.64 MiB
Size of dropped packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033073
Bug ID: 2033073
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Test-MemoryGrowth for
EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033063
Bug ID: 2033063
Summary: [RFE:EPEL9] EPEL9 branch for perl-Test-Kwalitee
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-Kwalitee
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032872
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 09:27:42AM +, Roberto Sassu via devel wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
> I have done some work in the integrity subsystem, called
> Digest Lists Integrity Module (DIGLIM).
>
> It simplifies the effort necessary to do IMA appraisal, by
> reusing the digests included in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031079
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 05:46:18PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 14. 12. 21 v 17:12 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> > > > But it seems like "request an EPEL branch" should generally be either
> > > > "Okay!
> > > > Doing that automatically now" or "Oh, this is in EL, sorry"*. What are
> > > >
Hello,
beginning with version 2.5.0, the license for the package scummvm-tools has
been changed to
"GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and MIT"
Best regards,
Christian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 36 Rawhide 20211215.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
> We don't have a proof of concept for the LSM module. I agree with you that in
> practice
> it would probably need to implement some kind of "list of files we care
> about",
> but I do not have an intelligent opinion about that.
>
> Based on Roberto's comment in a different sub-thread, there
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 10:47:52AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Any file covered by fs-verity is immutable after installation. So you
> cannot modify the contents, the kernel refuses. But you can just
> replace the file (like during an upgrade), and of course copy and edit
> in a different
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031541
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2021-12-15/fedora_coreos_meeting.2021-12-15-16.28.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2021-12-15/fedora_coreos_meeting.2021-12-15-16.28.txt
Log:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 05:21:43PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 05:50:46PM -0500, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> > >
> > > ❯ sudo dnf repoquery --enablerepo=fedora-source,rawhide,rawhide-source
> > > --whatrequires python3-flufl-lock
> > >
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 11:53:02AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 15. 12. 21 11:51, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 14. 12. 21 23:29, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > > In particular, python-nbconvert specifically requires mistune < 2, and
> > > upstream doesn't seem to have a newer release yet.
> >
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 4:20 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 08:08:19PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > I thought fsverity was about determining at runtime that the system
> > has not been tampered with? But if somebody who has (physical) access
> > to the
On 15. 12. 21 17:49, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 03. 12. 21 v 19:06 Troy Dawson napsal(a):
Instructions to enable the EPEL repository are available in our
documentation.[1] If there is a Fedora package you would like to see added to
EPEL 9, please let the relevant package maintainer know with a
Dne 03. 12. 21 v 19:06 Troy Dawson napsal(a):
Instructions to enable the EPEL repository are available in our documentation.[1] If there is a Fedora package you
would like to see added to EPEL 9, please let the relevant package maintainer know with a package request.[2]
For new builds, should
Dne 14. 12. 21 v 17:12 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
But it seems like "request an EPEL branch" should generally be either "Okay!
Doing that automatically now" or "Oh, this is in EL, sorry"*. What are the
other cases?
As far as I know this isn't about requesting EPEL branches, as much as
requesting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033001
Bug ID: 2033001
Summary: perl-Module-Install-CheckLib-0.14 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Module-Install-CheckLib
Keywords:
On Tuesday, 14 December 2021 20.11.54 WET Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello Pythonistas,
> the pyproject-rpm-macros-0-51 update (available in Rawhide+ELN and updates
> ready for 33 and 34) introduces a new provisional %{pyproject_build_lib}
> macro.
"ready for 33 and 34"
This is a proof, not that it
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 09:18:20PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> My understanding it the following: fs-verity originated in the Android
> world where you can have an unprivileged process downloading a file,
> e.g. a jar. This unprivileged process manages the download, but the
> file
On 12/1/21 14:07, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 29. 11. 21 23:32, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 08:04, Tomáš Orsava wrote:
The downside is that we will have a few thousand (est. 3624 [1])
additional Obsoletes tags in the Fedora repos that are mostly useless.
Does anyone see
On 12/3/21 19:11, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:06:41PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Seehttps://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/2OCCFIKT7LZ7IPO3OKIEH3TDTGERSORM/
Would adding automatically generated obsoletes to 3624 Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032872
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Paul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031079
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032799
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Paul
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 07:13:49AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 5:43 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 05:03:45PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 07:34:42AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > > wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031079
Jan Pazdziora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744782
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jplesnik@redhat.c |
|om)
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 4:50 PM Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>
> I have not seen any Fedora-specific customization for sos (the package e.g.
> sos.spec)
> but it should be possible to do that.
>
> I could file a bug asking for a Fedora-specific customization to default to
> collecting less
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032874
Bug ID: 2032874
Summary: perl-Module-Runtime-Conflicts for EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Module-Runtime-Conflicts
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032450
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2032874
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032450
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2032872
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032872
Bug ID: 2032872
Summary: perl-Safe-Isa for EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Safe-Isa
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032440
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2032450
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032425
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2032450
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032450
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2032425, 2031812, 2032440
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031812
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2032450
Referenced Bugs:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 5:43 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 05:03:45PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 07:34:42AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > Also, I moved more stuff into the -udev subpackage:
> > >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032857
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031819
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031862
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032857
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032799
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2032857
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032857
Bug ID: 2032857
Summary: please branch and build perl-Module-Install-CheckLib
for EPEL-9
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component:
On 15.12.21 11:11, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Are you planning to bring these to F35, as well?
Tesseract-5.0.0 appears to be mostly a bugfix release along with some other
improvements, so I dunno (and haven't tested so far - the heads up was a few
hours before the push).
Since it brings along
On 15. 12. 21 11:51, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 14. 12. 21 23:29, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
In particular, python-nbconvert specifically requires mistune < 2, and
upstream doesn't seem to have a newer release yet.
This is the biggest blocker. If nbconvert figures it out in git, we can
On 14. 12. 21 23:29, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Hi all,
Neal Gompa and I have been reviving the effort to get our mailing list
server infrastructure (currently running on RHEL 7 with missing packages
provided in an unofficial repo) hostable on RHEL 9 + EPEL.
Pagure issue:
On 14. 12. 21 23:29, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Hi all,
Neal Gompa and I have been reviving the effort to get our mailing list
server infrastructure (currently running on RHEL 7 with missing packages
provided in an unofficial repo) hostable on RHEL 9 + EPEL.
Pagure issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032838
Bug ID: 2032838
Summary: perl-HTML-Template-Pro-0.9523 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTML-Template-Pro
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031829
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from
Are you planning to bring these to F35, as well?
Tesseract-5.0.0 appears to be mostly a bugfix release along with some other
improvements, so I dunno (and haven't tested so far - the heads up was a few
hours before the push).
___
devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032454
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211214.0):
ID: 1086510 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Hello everyone
I have done some work in the integrity subsystem, called
Digest Lists Integrity Module (DIGLIM).
It simplifies the effort necessary to do IMA appraisal, by
reusing the digests included in the header of existing
RPM packages as reference values. It wouldn't require
any change in
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211214.0):
ID: 1086493 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
