https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031447
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Lingua-Preferred-0.2.4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031237
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031451
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031463
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031878
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031444
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032425
Bug 2032425 depends on bug 2031690, which changed state.
Bug 2031690 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Test-Needs in epel9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031690
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031761
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-Format-RFC333
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031829
Bug 2031829 depends on bug 2031878, which changed state.
Bug 2031878 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Test-TCP for EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031878
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031449
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031440
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-URI-Encode-1.1.1-17.el
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031756
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031690
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031539
Bug 2031539 depends on bug 2031690, which changed state.
Bug 2031690 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Test-Needs in epel9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031690
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031236
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-LWP-UserAgent-Determin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031755
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031445
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-PerlIO-gzip-0.20-10.el
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034443
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-7bcbfef712 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034440
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-8a66d13dea has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034440
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034443
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
I am orphaning the following packages that contain a NodeJS “production”
dependency bundle:
- fkill-cli
- fx (along with fx-completion, which depends on it)
- nodejs-svgo
- npm-name-cli
- topojson-client
- topojson-server
- topojson-simplify
Considering recent and ongoing discussion over the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034738
Bug ID: 2034738
Summary: perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.47 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Text-CSV_XS
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On 12/21/21 01:42, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi Tom,
Since you are digging into this and AFAIK you are involved with toolchains,
this reminds me this dreaded issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284684
In short, various languages, such as Ruby embeds the build time options and
reuse
Hi all,
Let it be known that starting with version 0.5.5 of the rust-num_enum
and rust-num_enum_derive packages, their license will be "BSD or MIT
or ASL 2.0", whereas it was just "BSD" before. Since this change just
adds more choices, I do not expect it to cause problems.
Fabio
On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 8:22:55 AM CST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 19. 12. 21 22:39, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Sunday, December 19, 2021 10:22:57 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >> So it seems that fedpkg doesn't (yet) know there's ~/.config/mock* at all.
> >
> > Proposed fix:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 8:45 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 8:04 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > capnproto 0.9.1 has been pushed into Rawhide, and with it, a soname
> > bump from 0.8.0 to 0.9.1 has occurred.
> >
> > Based on the repoquery, only three packages are
Just a reminder, that there will not be a EPEL Steering Committee Meeting
this week, or next week.
We will talk to ya'll in the new year on January 5, 2022
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 10:00 AM wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-12-22
Dne 21. 12. 21 v 16:33 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden napsal(a):
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 02:47:10PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 21. 12. 21 v 13:13 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden napsal(a):
Thanks for that. It looks like Fedora 32 added the new
%sysusers_create_compat macro. That means the
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-12-22 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname
Hello folks,
as I previously announced [1] in the astronomy mailing list, I've
decided to orphan Siril and focus my spare time on other things, as I'm
already only using the flatpak provided by Flathub (which comes with all
the codecs needed to get all program functionalities).
If anyone is
Remi Collet wrote on 2021/12/21 23:42:
Hi,
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for kaigai
I've been maintaining php-pecl-selinux for a while
and I've also taken upstream lead developement for it
See https://pecl.php.net/package/selinux
Filed a bug for EPEL-9 branch
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 02:47:10PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 21. 12. 21 v 13:13 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden napsal(a):
Thanks for that. It looks like Fedora 32 added the new
%sysusers_create_compat macro. That means the guidelines apply to
all supported Fedora versions but not to EL7 & EL8.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034639
Bug ID: 2034639
Summary: Upgrade perl-Template-Toolkit to 3.010
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Template-Toolkit
Assignee: spo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034632
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Email-MIME-1.952-1.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034634
Bug ID: 2034634
Summary: Upgrade perl-HTML-Selector-XPath to 0.26
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTML-Selector-XPath
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034632
Bug ID: 2034632
Summary: Upgrade perl-Email-MIME to 1.952
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Email-MIME
Assignee: spo...@gmail.com
On ti, 21 joulu 2021, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 21. 12. 21 15:33, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
wsdl4j akurtakov, mizdebsk, orphan 2 weeks ago
I picked up wsdl4j to prevent actions which would lead to tomcat, Dogtag, and
FreeIPA being orphaned over Christmas break.
Hi,
Pavel is non responsive for a while
Already managed 4 years ago
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1758
I've been maintaining for a while
- php-pecl-gmagick
- php-pecl-imagick
- php-pecl-xmldiff
Do you I need to follow the full workflow,
or a fesco ticket is enough ?
Regards,
Remi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034443
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-7bcbfef712 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-7bcbfef712
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034443
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-1fdd440e82 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-1fdd440e82
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
I've taken libgda.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 21. 12. 21 15:33, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
wsdl4j akurtakov, mizdebsk, orphan 2 weeks ago
I picked up wsdl4j to prevent actions which would lead to tomcat, Dogtag, and
FreeIPA being orphaned over Christmas break.
There was no orphaning going to happen over
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034443
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Fixed
Hi,
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for kaigai
I've been maintaining php-pecl-selinux for a while
and I've also taken upstream lead developement for it
See https://pecl.php.net/package/selinux
Filed a bug for EPEL-9 branch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030545
Filed a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034440
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-f1dcc59128 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f1dcc59128
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On ti, 21 joulu 2021, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034420
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034440
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jose.p.oliveira.oss@gmail.c |
|om,
On 19. 12. 21 22:39, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
On Sunday, December 19, 2021 10:22:57 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
So it seems that fedpkg doesn't (yet) know there's ~/.config/mock* at all.
Proposed fix: https://pagure.io/rpkg/pull-request/595
It seems that this would only fix the issue if the
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Scope-Upper` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Scope-Upper/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
Dne 21. 12. 21 v 13:13 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden napsal(a):
Thanks for that. It looks like Fedora 32 added the new
%sysusers_create_compat macro. That means the guidelines apply to all
supported Fedora versions but not to EL7 & EL8. Is this something that
would normally be noted in the docs
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 8:04 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> capnproto 0.9.1 has been pushed into Rawhide, and with it, a soname
> bump from 0.8.0 to 0.9.1 has occurred.
>
> Based on the repoquery, only three packages are dependent on it:
>
> * mir (drops dependency with 2.6.0 update I'm
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Scope-Upper` that
you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Scope-Upper/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Hey all,
capnproto 0.9.1 has been pushed into Rawhide, and with it, a soname
bump from 0.8.0 to 0.9.1 has occurred.
Based on the repoquery, only three packages are dependent on it:
* mir (drops dependency with 2.6.0 update I'm working on)
* rr
* sonic-visualiser
I'm taking care of the rebuilds
Thanks for that. It looks like Fedora 32 added the new
%sysusers_create_compat macro. That means the guidelines apply to all
supported Fedora versions but not to EL7 & EL8. Is this something that
would normally be noted in the docs or are the docs intended as purely
Fedora? As a packager I
Dne 21. 12. 21 v 11:01 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
* Vít Ondruch:
Since you are digging into this and AFAIK you are involved with
toolchains, this reminds me this dreaded issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284684
In short, various languages, such as Ruby embeds the build time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034420
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|iarn...@gmail.com, |
I don't have direct answer to your question, but if I wanted to have an
answer to this question, I'd try to go back in history, so this would be
my start:
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/history/guidelines/modules/ROOT/pages/UsersAndGroups.adoc
And this is the place where the guidelines
* Vít Ondruch:
> Since you are digging into this and AFAIK you are involved with
> toolchains, this reminds me this dreaded issue:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284684
>
> In short, various languages, such as Ruby embeds the build time
> options and reuse them for build of
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211220.0):
ID: 1090222 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Hi Tom,
Since you are digging into this and AFAIK you are involved with
toolchains, this reminds me this dreaded issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284684
In short, various languages, such as Ruby embeds the build time options
and reuse them for build of extensions. And I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034404
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 12:35 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 9:35 AM Alejandro Saez Morollon
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:14 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Will there be a separate go 1.18 mass rebuild in rawhide?
> >> Or will the f36 mass
On 12/9/21 10:12 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 09/12/2021 14:17, Sandro Mani wrote:
>> Is this in any way acceptable?
>
> All packages must be built completely from sources.
>
>> Is this compatible with
>
> You must remove all pre-built artifacts and minified sources before
>
On 12/18/21 3:04 AM, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> On Thursday, 16 December 2021 23:59:23 CET Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> On 12/10/21 6:56 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>>> On 10.12.21 01:54, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
On 12/9/21 1:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> On 09.12.21 17:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211220.0):
ID: 1090206 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
69 matches
Mail list logo
