On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 01:32:14PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > > Does anyone know how to contact them? Direct email and bug reports have
> > > had no response.
> >
> > His twitter profile points at a few contact options as a last resort.
> >
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 02:35:56PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> ocaml-atdorphan1 weeks ago
Mea culpa, this is one that slips through the crack while I was on
parental leave. I've reclaimed it (and the associated bug) - it's a
dependency of Infer
> Dear Reon,
>
> Could you please provide just a little bit more context in you emails?
>
> Sometimes, I appreciate this game where one have to gather several more
> bits and pieces to understand what one want to say and this might be
> especially entertaining in smaller group which has some
> Dear Reon,
>
> Could you please provide just a little bit more context in you emails?
>
> Sometimes, I appreciate this game where one have to gather several more
> bits and pieces to understand what one want to say and this might be
> especially entertaining in smaller group which has some
On 12/13/21 08:56, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GHC_parallel_version_installs
== Summary ==
Introduce ghcX.Y packages to Fedora which can be parallel installed,
in addition to the main ghc package.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Petersen|Jens Petersen]]
* Email:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032857
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031541
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Mail-Sendmail-0.80-13.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034401
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032799
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032104
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-IO-Pipely-0.006-1.el9 |perl-IO-Pipely-0.006-1.el9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032872
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031079
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032425
Bug 2032425 depends on bug 2031819, which changed state.
Bug 2031819 Summary: perl-Test-Output for EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031819
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031819
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Output-1.03.3-3.e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031814
Bug 2031814 depends on bug 2031862, which changed state.
Bug 2031862 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Test-File-Contents for EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031862
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031539
Bug 2031539 depends on bug 2031541, which changed state.
Bug 2031541 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Mail-Sendmail in epel9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031541
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032104
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-IO-Pipely-0.006-1.el9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032450
Bug 2032450 depends on bug 2032872, which changed state.
Bug 2032872 Summary: perl-Safe-Isa for EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032872
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031862
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032511
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032232
Bug 2032232 depends on bug 2032261, which changed state.
Bug 2032261 Summary: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP for EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032261
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032261
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032209
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Crypt-Cracklib-1.7-29.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031754
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035430
Bug ID: 2035430
Summary: perl-DateTime-1.55 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DateTime
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035430
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed. Details bellow:
GenericError: File upload failed:
cli-build/1640306810.368616.wAAQZuQE/perl-DateTime-1.55-1.fc34.src.rpm
Traceback:
File
On 23. 12. 21 23:31, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 04:51:36PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
Top posting because replying from my phone, but I think it'd be great to
have in EPEL 9 because it's essential for some packages to build. The same
goes for Poetry, which is now used
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 04:51:36PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Top posting because replying from my phone, but I think it'd be great to
> have in EPEL 9 because it's essential for some packages to build. The same
> goes for Poetry, which is now used for software made by Fedora
> Infrastructure
On 23. 12. 21 21:10, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
I'm starting to try and grok pyproject.toml and its assorted PEPs in
more details, and it looks like flit is one of the more straightforward
way to build compliant wheels out there.
So is setuptools BTW.
Should we get it into EPEL9? I filed
Top posting because replying from my phone, but I think it'd be great to
have in EPEL 9 because it's essential for some packages to build. The same
goes for Poetry, which is now used for software made by Fedora
Infrastructure these days.
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021, 3:10 PM Michel Alexandre Salim <
Almost three years ago, we moved the existing Ask Fedora site from an
engine which attempted to replicate Stack Exchange to a new system (the
current [Ask Fedora]) based on [Discourse], a modern open source web
forum platform. We had some frustrations with the software, and the
Stack-Exchange-like
Almost three years ago, we moved the existing Ask Fedora site from an
engine which attempted to replicate Stack Exchange to a new system (the
current [Ask Fedora]) based on [Discourse], a modern open source web
forum platform. We had some frustrations with the software, and the
Stack-Exchange-like
On 23. 12. 21 21:34, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
On 12/23/21 18:41, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 23. 12. 21 18:25, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
Hello,
Are the new Python guidelines mandatory or optional?
Optional.
From https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/
"""Older
I'm starting to try and grok pyproject.toml and its assorted PEPs in
more details, and it looks like flit is one of the more straightforward
way to build compliant wheels out there.
Should we get it into EPEL9? I filed a tracking bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035376
looks
I will review these.
– Ben
On 12/23/21 05:54, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I have the following packages pending review:
python-flask-gravatar - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033804
python-flask-paranoid -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2033803
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 10:41 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
> > 3. I want to become a Fedora packager but I don't work on an upstream
> >project that is not already in the Fedora repositories.
> > 4. I am bored and feeling altruistic
>
> Yeah, I'd love to try to encourage these things. So _maybe_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034401
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
Hello Pavel,
I am good with co-maintaining of pluntuml.
I have raised my sponsorship ticket #508.
Regards
Sumit
> On 23-Dec-2021, at 8:30 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> Hello Sumit, Blaise,
>
> you both seem to be interested in maintaining plantuml, I believe you
> could co-maintain that
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 12:47:01AM +0100, Jakub Kadlčík wrote:
> I haven't seen almost any distribution having a package wishlist so it
> is either a bad idea (and doesn't have any real value) or everybody
> else missed a good opportunity. Or possibly they (maybe even Fedora)
> have it, but it is
Hello,
Are the new Python guidelines mandatory or optional? I mean the whole:
%build
%pyproject_wheel
%install
%pyproject_install
%pyproject_save_files
Or can packagers still use py3_build and py3_install?
Best regards,
Robert-André
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035342
Marian Rehak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2035341 (CVE-2020-16154)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035341
Marian Rehak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2035342
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035342
--- Comment #1 from Marian Rehak ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an
update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as
this tracking bug. This will ensure that all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035342
Bug ID: 2035342
Summary: CVE-2020-16154 perl-App-cpanminus: signature
verification bypass [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 35
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035341
Marian Rehak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2035343
--- Comment #1 from Marian
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035341
Bug ID: 2035341
Summary: CVE-2020-16154 perl-App-cpanminus: signature
verification bypass
Product: Security Response
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
On 12/22/21 03:12, Barry Scott wrote:
I can raise a PR if that helps, but I have not done that before
so pointers to the work flow would be welcomed.
https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/quickstart/github-flow
The workflow is largely similar to other Git interfaces, such as
GitHub. From
I was just seeing if other people were interested in a gaming group and just
found out there is one. See: the games list on fedora.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hello Sumit, Blaise,
you both seem to be interested in maintaining plantuml, I believe you
could co-maintain that package together? We use the package in our team
to automatically generate some diagrams, so it would be awesome if you
could take care it.
Per docs [1] I think you should go to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033196
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031806
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2033349
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032425
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2033349
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033349
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2032425, 2031806
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035273
Marian Rehak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2035276
--
You are receiving this
Hi,
I don't have any use for rubygem-rsolr, therefore I have orphaned the
package.
Vít
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035273
Marian Rehak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2035274
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035274
Marian Rehak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2035273 (CVE-2020-16156)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035274
Bug ID: 2035274
Summary: CVE-2020-16156 perl-CPAN: allows Signature
Verification Bypass [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 35
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035273
--- Comment #1 from Marian Rehak ---
Created perl-CPAN tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 2035274]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035274
--- Comment #1 from Marian Rehak ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an
update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as
this tracking bug. This will ensure that all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035273
Bug ID: 2035273
Summary: CVE-2020-16156 perl-CPAN: allows Signature
Verification Bypass
Product: Security Response
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 5:56 AM Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> If you decide to package it, I'd be happy to review it, and I'd like to
> package the mingw counterpart.
>
> Sandro
>
> On 22.12.21 12:20, Barry Scott wrote:
> > I see that there are packages for qt6, but no python-qt6 yet.
> >
> >
On 13. 12. 21 13:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello.
Considering that EPEL 9 Next repo is an **additional** repo to EPEL 9 (is that
still the case?), should EPEL 9 overrides be visible for EPEL 9 Next builds?
They are currently not.
Also, consider 2 different builds of package foo:
-
Let me hand them over to you!
Volker
Am 22.12.21 um 16:07 schrieb Ben Beasley:
I have taken freexl.
I am willing to take pyshp, python-OWSLib, and readosm, but they have
not been orphaned.
Co-maintainers are (always) welcome.
- Ben Beasley (FAS music)
On 12/12/21 17:18, Emmanuel Seyman
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007259
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032799
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
Hi
If you decide to package it, I'd be happy to review it, and I'd like to
package the mingw counterpart.
Sandro
On 22.12.21 12:20, Barry Scott wrote:
I see that there are packages for qt6, but no python-qt6 yet.
What is the plan for this please?
I have built PyQt5 in the past and, time
Hi
I have the following packages pending review:
python-flask-gravatar - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033804
python-flask-paranoid -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2033803
python-flask-principal -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033569
--- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth ---
The NEVR of this build appears to clash with a build in the rhel-base repo,
which is confusing koji.
A workaround that seems to work is to bump and rebuild the EPEL 9 package.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034013
--- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth ---
The NEVR of this build appears to clash with a build in the rhel-base repo,
which is confusing koji.
A workaround that seems to work is to bump and rebuild the EPEL 9 package.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032857
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1b91dd50ff has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1b91dd50ff
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
Hello,
I have this python-djangoql [1] package that I've maintain. The upstream has
decided to split the JavaScript code to a separate repository [2] available
also on NPM as djangoql-completion [3]. However they bundle the JS in their
Python package [4] as a minified JS file.
According to
There used to be Wishlist on Ruby SIG page, but I have remove it [1] for
several reasons:
1) It was not maintained, only occasionally somebody added something
2) Nobody really looked at it.
And also, one thing is to add package into Fedora, but maintain it long
term is completely different
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211221.0):
ID: 1090992 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Dear Reon,
Could you please provide just a little bit more context in you emails?
Sometimes, I appreciate this game where one have to gather several more
bits and pieces to understand what one want to say and this might be
especially entertaining in smaller group which has some tribal
Dne 22. 12. 21 v 18:44 Tom Stellard napsal(a):
On 12/22/21 01:56, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 21. 12. 21 v 21:56 Tom Stellard napsal(a):
On 12/21/21 01:42, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi Tom,
Since you are digging into this and AFAIK you are involved with
toolchains, this reminds me this dreaded issue:
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211222.0):
ID: 1090976 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
77 matches
Mail list logo
