Hi,
eccodes will need to be adapted upstream. I filed an issue there and
they will try to fix this a.s.a.p. Untill then, if needed, I could
remove use of libjasper since it is an optional feature.
grib_api is no longer maintained upstream, so not much can be done there.
Jos.
On 2/13/22
# F36 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2022-02-14
# Time: 17:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
Hi folks! We have 2 proposed Beta blockers and 4 proposed Final blockers
to review, so let's have a review meeting tomorrow (Monday).
If you have time tonight, you can take a
Hi folks! Sorry for the short notice, but I'm proposing we cancel the
QA meeting tomorrow (Monday). I don't have anything urgent for this
week.
If you're aware of anything it would be useful to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting.
Thanks!
--
On 13/02/22, Ben Beasley wrote:
> Does anybody know how to contact Kushal Das (FAS kushal), or whether he
> wants to remain active in Fedora?
Yes, this works, and I still want to remain active in Fedora.
>
>
> I have initiated a non-reponsive maintainer check for by filing the required
> bug on
Hi,
Ron Olson wrote:
> Sorry if I missed something, but under Rawhide I
> discovered when I tried to “more somefile.txt” I got
> “less” behavior, while Fedora 35 still runs more like, uh,
> more.
I'm not quite sure what "less" behavior you mean, so I'm
only guessing.
If you mean that more
I suppose we can try this address as well: fdeut...@redhat.com
(I hope it's correct)
Dmitrij Kryzhevich
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 20:22:46 -0500
Noah Palmer wrote:
> Hello,
> I am starting the non-responsive maintainer process for fabiand. He is the
> listed maintainer for 20 packages and as far as
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e04f53ab00
python-rencode-1.0.6-17.el8
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a079d34eaa
xrdp-0.9.18-5.el8
1
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-dadb629ab0
xrdp-0.9.18-5.el7
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f762e66b0d
nodejs-16.14.0-2.el7
0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031753
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1545750d21
xrdp-0.9.18-5.el9
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a03cedb859
phpMyAdmin-5.1.3-1.el9
The following builds have been
Hello,
I am starting the non-responsive maintainer process for fabiand. He is the
listed maintainer for 20 packages and as far as I can tell has been
unresponsive for a long time
fedora-active-user lists the last email on a mailing list in 2013 and I
can't find any actively within the past few
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043170
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> kdelibs
>> kdelibs3
>
> So they both hit this error:
>
> /usr/include/jasper/jas_log.h:122:46: error: expected primary-expression
> before 'int'
> 122 | static inline jas_logtype_t jas_logtype_init(int class, int
> priority)
> |
On 2/13/22 15:29, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 05:46:49PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 09:43:38AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>>> On Sun, Feb 13 2022 at 02:26:46 PM +0100, Miro Hrončok
>>> wrote:
Considering most of the dependent
On Sun, 2022-02-13 at 20:05 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 08:01:45PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I did some quick'n'dirty statistics of how many ELF files
> > successfully gained
> > a .package.note section.
> >
> > packages:
On 2/13/22 13:40, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 13. 02. 22 21:19, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 2/13/22 06:26, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Still in progress:
gdal (already succeeded on some architectures)
Failed twice (13):
LibRaw
OpenSceneGraph
digikam
eccodes
gegl04
grads
grib_api
kdelibs
kdelibs3
ncl
Hey all-
Sorry if I missed something, but under Rawhide I discovered when I tried to
“more somefile.txt” I got “less” behavior, while Fedora 35 still runs more
like, uh, more.
I like less, but sometimes I need to use more, so having more act like less
breaks some workflows. Is this the
Does anybody know how to contact Kushal Das (FAS kushal), or whether he
wants to remain active in Fedora?
I have initiated a non-reponsive maintainer check for by filing the
required bug on python-ujson[1]. This is the required email for the
non-responsive maintainer process[2].
The
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 11:47 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 09:43:38AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 13 2022 at 02:26:46 PM +0100, Miro Hrončok
> > wrote:
> > > Considering most of the dependent packages failed to rebuild in this
> > > case,
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> kdelibs
> kdelibs3
So they both hit this error:
/usr/include/jasper/jas_log.h:122:46: error: expected primary-expression before
'int'
122 | static inline jas_logtype_t jas_logtype_init(int class, int priority)
| ^~~
On 2/13/22 13:51, devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 2/13/22 13:19, devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 2/13/22 06:26, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Still in progress:
gdal (already succeeded on some architectures)
Failed twice (13):
LibRaw
OpenSceneGraph
digikam
eccodes
gegl04
grads
grib_api
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 22/229 (x86_64), 10/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220212.n.0):
ID: 1127776 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1127776
ID: 1127796 Test: x86_64
On 2/13/22 13:19, devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 2/13/22 06:26, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Still in progress:
gdal (already succeeded on some architectures)
Failed twice (13):
LibRaw
OpenSceneGraph
digikam
eccodes
gegl04
grads
grib_api
kdelibs
kdelibs3
ncl
qt5-qtimageformats
On 13. 02. 22 21:40, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 13. 02. 22 21:19, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 2/13/22 06:26, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Still in progress:
gdal (already succeeded on some architectures)
Failed twice (13):
LibRaw
OpenSceneGraph
digikam
eccodes
gegl04
grads
grib_api
kdelibs
kdelibs3
ncl
On 13. 02. 22 21:19, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 2/13/22 06:26, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Still in progress:
gdal (already succeeded on some architectures)
Failed twice (13):
LibRaw
OpenSceneGraph
digikam
eccodes
gegl04
grads
grib_api
kdelibs
kdelibs3
ncl
qt5-qtimageformats
qt6-qtimageformats
wgrib2
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 05:46:49PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 09:43:38AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 13 2022 at 02:26:46 PM +0100, Miro Hrončok
> > wrote:
> > > Considering most of the dependent packages failed to rebuild in this
> > >
I think this will be my last reply on the topic...I think people know my
view and Kevin's here (but if other folks have more questions, happy to answer
them).
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 08:09:34PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > As a release engineer trying to get a
On 2/13/22 06:26, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Still in progress:
gdal (already succeeded on some architectures)
Failed twice (13):
LibRaw
OpenSceneGraph
digikam
eccodes
gegl04
grads
grib_api
kdelibs
kdelibs3
ncl
qt5-qtimageformats
qt6-qtimageformats
wgrib2
If somebody wants to help, build in
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 11:41:22AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Are the changelogs for packages supposed to be ordered newest-to-latest
> or the reverse? Some packages have the changelog one way, some the other…
>
> I find this confusing, because I always start thinking "is the
Here is a proof-of-concept one-liner (split up a bit for readability purposes):
```fish
#!/usr/bin/fish
function get_dependent_pkgs
dnf -q repoquery --repo=koji --qf='%{sourcerpm}' --whatrequires $argv[1]
end
function parse_names
get_dependent_pkgs | rev | cut -d/ -f1 | cut -d- -f3- |
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 08:01:45PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I did some quick'n'dirty statistics of how many ELF files successfully gained
> a .package.note section.
>
> packages: 28742, see [1] for the list (*)
> ELF files: 72464, see [2]
> ELF files with
OLD: Fedora-36-20220212.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220213.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 44
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 39.08 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 09:43:38AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13 2022 at 02:26:46 PM +0100, Miro Hrončok
> wrote:
> > Considering most of the dependent packages failed to rebuild in this
> > case, I am
> > not sure how a robot would be supposed to deal with this :(
>
> If the
On Sun, Feb 13 2022 at 02:26:46 PM +0100, Miro Hrončok
wrote:
Considering most of the dependent packages failed to rebuild in this
case, I am
not sure how a robot would be supposed to deal with this :(
If the bot can handle everything that doesn't require manual
intervention, that's still a
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
7 of 43 required tests failed, 13 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 23/231 (x86_64), 19/161 (aarch64)
New failures
On 13. 02. 22 13:32, Josef Řídký wrote:
Hi,
first of all, I would like to apologize for the mess I've caused by the jasper
.so name bump in Rawhide. I entirely forgot the side-tag option and had the old
mindset of having rawhide as a "sandbox for new features". I wrote to Miro
already as I
Hey,
apparently some ELF files are identical between Fedora's pypy3.7-libs and
pypy3.8-libs packages.
On Fedora 34, this leads to installation conflict:
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/lib/.build-id/39/208b4f57aa4d5cfcbed13cf6c5ec428de27264 from
install of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053941
Bug ID: 2053941
Summary: The Fedora BuildRequires is missing an the license
files are listed as %doc
Product: Fedora
Version: 34
Status: NEW
Component:
Hi,
first of all, I would like to apologize for the mess I've caused by the
jasper .so name bump in Rawhide. I entirely forgot the side-tag option and
had the old mindset of having rawhide as a "sandbox for new features". I
wrote to Miro already as I am not part of the proven packager group to
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220212.0):
ID: 1127637 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031753
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220211.n.3
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220213.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 12
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 91
Downgraded packages: 2
Size of added packages: 37.43 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220212.0):
ID: 1127229 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
43 matches
Mail list logo
