Failure of the backup software which is in the utilities folder of a standard
Fedora 35 Workstation install does not seem to have left any trace in the
journal of why it failed to restore but further tests are ongoing
___
devel mailing list --
This is the error log from the journal for Evolution
Feb 18 07:36:03 fedora evolution-alarm[2197]: Error reading events from
display: Broken pipe
Feb 18 07:36:04 fedora systemd[1705]: evolution-calendar-factory.service:
Consumed 2.446s CPU time.
Feb 18 07:36:04 fedora systemd[1705]:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055936
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-XML-Generator-1.08 is |perl-XML-Generator-1.09
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051729
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-PDL-2.074 is available |perl-PDL-2.075 is
Supplied for those that may be interested.
Due to hardware failure Fedora backup was used to reinstate on another machine
1) Fedora 35 had been backed up consistency every week. - Backup failed to
restore correctly - multiple failures
2) Evolution was also backed up regularly - although the
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-93154093e5
radare2-5.6.0-2.el7
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-5af404a521
varnish-4.0.5-2.el7
0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052745
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.13-1.fc3 |perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.13-1.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052745
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.13-1.fc3
Right, that is the issue; I was surprised to find `more` clearing the
screen. I use `less` a lot, but what I like `more` for is that it
essentially works like a teletypewriter of yore where I can pipe it to
other things.
On 18 Feb 2022, at 14:22, przemek klosowski via devel wrote:
On
On 2/13/22 22:08, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Ron Olson wrote:
Sorry if I missed something, but under Rawhide I
discovered when I tried to “more somefile.txt” I got
“less” behavior, while Fedora 35 still runs more like, uh,
more.
I'm not quite sure what "less" behavior you mean, so I'm
only
On 2/18/22 09:21, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 3:14 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>>
>> What kind of issues? Aren't they MIT licensed?
>
> Some of them are MIT licensed, some are not, but many do not correctly
> contain license files. I tried listing all the ones that don't in the
>
On Wed, 2022-02-16 at 17:57 -0300, Diego Herrera wrote:
> Hi. I was checking if the scrcpy software [1] could get packaged, but
> to continue I need to know how to package an APK package file. For
> context, this project consists on a Linux client and an Android
> server app that is uploaded as an
Honestly didn't thought that it could be an option. I'll check that path and
see how it goes.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 4:27 PM Roberto Sassu via devel
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone
>
> I have very exciting news to share.
>
> Given the difficulty to have the DIGLIM kernel patches
> accepted, I checked if I could achieve the same goals
> with an eBPF program.
>
> I focused only on the functionality
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 18/161 (aarch64), 10/229 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220217.n.1):
ID: 1135889 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1135889
ID: 1135928
Hi everyone
I have very exciting news to share.
Given the difficulty to have the DIGLIM kernel patches
accepted, I checked if I could achieve the same goals
with an eBPF program.
I focused only on the functionality side, it is probably
required some support from the kernel to have the
same
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220216.0):
ID: 1136256 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1136256
ID: 1136258 Test:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 3:21 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 3:14 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> >
> > What kind of issues? Aren't they MIT licensed?
>
> Some of them are MIT licensed, some are not, but many do not correctly
> contain license files. I tried listing all the ones
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 3:14 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> What kind of issues? Aren't they MIT licensed?
Some of them are MIT licensed, some are not, but many do not correctly
contain license files. I tried listing all the ones that don't in the
TODO section on the GitHub repo I linked above.
> And
Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering)
Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this
report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat
(https://libera.chat/).
If you wish to read this in form of a blog post, check the
On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 at 14:39, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 1:36 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The new version of RStudio [1] now bundles quarto [2], a publishing
> > system written in JavaScript and TypeScript that in turn bundles Deno
> > [3] (runtime written in
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
21 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 97/231 (x86_64), 57/152 (aarch64)
New failures
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 2:30 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 1:36 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The new version of RStudio [1] now bundles quarto [2], a publishing
> > system written in JavaScript and TypeScript that in turn bundles Deno
> > [3] (runtime written
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 1:36 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The new version of RStudio [1] now bundles quarto [2], a publishing
> system written in JavaScript and TypeScript that in turn bundles Deno
> [3] (runtime written in Rust) and its standard library (this is not
> binary, but it's tagged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055228
Jan Pazdziora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-37-20220217.1):
ID: 1136176 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1136176
ID: 1136192
OLD: Fedora-36-20220217.n.1
NEW: Fedora-36-20220218.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 52
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 752.37 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On Mi, 16.02.22 15:01, Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
> > > hence I am not against the feature but please tone down the wording
> > > regarding pkexec, it's misleading. Say you want to split it out to
> > > reduce the attack surface, but don't use the word "legacy" in its
> >
Hi,
The new version of RStudio [1] now bundles quarto [2], a publishing
system written in JavaScript and TypeScript that in turn bundles Deno
[3] (runtime written in Rust) and its standard library (this is not
binary, but it's tagged independently of Deno at the moment),
deno_dom, and Dart Sass
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 36 Branched 20220218.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055977
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|NEW
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220217.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220218.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 25
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 608.79 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055982
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Doc Type|---
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220217.0):
ID: 1135037 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Am 18.02.22 um 07:40 schrieb Yunmei LI:
We are looking to contribute Milvus to the fedora community to help more users
with their AI applications.
I have already filled out a Milvus package review request in bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055596
Welcome to Fedora.
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220217.0):
ID: 1135021 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
36 matches
Mail list logo
