https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2059740
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2059740
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 07:45:26PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> And just for the record, this is the current list of packages that FTBFS at
> least since Fedora 35:
>
> perl-Crypt-PWSafe3
>
> If they continue to fail, they will be included in my report in ~5 months.
Upstream has fixed the issue
On 3/1/22 22:44, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> Me too. I am surprised that the answer is not to automatically
>> download and install Canonical’s Snap package; they seem to have
>> figured out everything already. Arch manages to do it by having very
>> few patches
On 3/1/22 23:14, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-03-01 at 19:21 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> On 3/1/22 16:02, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> It looks like Chromium on Fedora is not receiving timely updates. It
>>> hasn't been updated in over a month and there were many
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939424
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-2fa03c4f5d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-2fa03c4f5d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964646
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-2fa03c4f5d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-2fa03c4f5d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964646
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-9af00d105b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-9af00d105b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939424
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-9af00d105b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-9af00d105b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964646
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939424
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-e541fc8d0d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-e541fc8d0d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Tue, 2022-03-01 at 19:21 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 3/1/22 16:02, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > It looks like Chromium on Fedora is not receiving timely updates. It
> > hasn't been updated in over a month and there were many bugs fixed
> > upstream. At the very least,
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> (Well, technically, I suppose I could attempt to backport them from 90-
> based, i.e., from QtWebengine 6.2:
> https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine-chromium.git/log/?h=90-based
> or even directly from Chromium upstream, but that is extremely time-
> consuming and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964646
Bug 1964646 depends on bug 1939424, which changed state.
Bug 1939424 Summary: perl-Crypt-PWSafe3-1.22-17.fc35 FTBFS: Failed test 'open a
pwsafe3 database ('blocksize' is not a recognized argument at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Crypt/CBC.pm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939424
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Crypt-PWSafe3-1.23~202
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939424
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> Me too. I am surprised that the answer is not to automatically
> download and install Canonical’s Snap package; they seem to have
> figured out everything already. Arch manages to do it by having very
> few patches and using the upstream source tarball.
If you think
On 2022-03-01 01:14, Neal Gompa wrote:
Thanks! Next step is to remove libavdevice.h from Blender as ffmpeg-free
excluded it.
Scratch result with applied patch so
far:https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=83502291
Scratch result with removed
On 3/1/22 19:42, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1 2022 at 07:21:14 PM -0500, Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
>> Tom Callaway, what is the hardest part for you?
>
> Keep in mind Tom is a volunteer and Chromium packaging is not fun. I'm
> impressed that anybody is willing to attempt it tbh.
On Tue, Mar 1 2022 at 07:21:14 PM -0500, Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
Tom Callaway, what is the hardest part for you?
Keep in mind Tom is a volunteer and Chromium packaging is not fun. I'm
impressed that anybody is willing to attempt it tbh.
Michael
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/48 (x86_64)
ID: 1155330 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1155330
ID: 1155355 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1155355
ID:
On 3/1/22 16:02, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It looks like Chromium on Fedora is not receiving timely updates. It
> hasn't been updated in over a month and there were many bugs fixed
> upstream. At the very least, Chromium on Fedora is vulnerable to the
> following:
>
> CVE-2022-0452:
Hi all,
The subject of setuid came up in a private conversation recently, and to my
surprise we don't seem to have it documented in the packaging guidelines:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
Per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RemoveSETUID#Documentation
"We
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058963
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-App-cpm-0.997008 is|perl-App-cpm-0.997009 is
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 3:24 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
> I am surprised that the rescue kernel would give an indefinite hang or
> even just a dracut prompt within a release.
The latter case is trivially reproducible on UEFI, with the failure
being that mounting /boot/efi comes *after* switchroot.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 3:38 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> Summary--
> Most all Fedora variants (except Cloud) have a GRUB menu entry
> containing the word "rescue". This kernel+initramfs pair are never
> updated for the life of a Fedora installation. And they quickly become
> stale as a
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 14:37:38 -0700
Chris Murphy wrote:
> Summary--
> Most all Fedora variants (except Cloud) have a GRUB menu entry
> containing the word "rescue". This kernel+initramfs pair are never
> updated for the life of a Fedora installation. And they quickly become
> stale as a
Summary--
Most all Fedora variants (except Cloud) have a GRUB menu entry
containing the word "rescue". This kernel+initramfs pair are never
updated for the life of a Fedora installation. And they quickly become
stale as a Fedora installation ages. This kernel's modules are
eventually
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2059740
Bug ID: 2059740
Summary: perl-Sys-Virt-8.1.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sys-Virt
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Hi!
It looks like Chromium on Fedora is not receiving timely updates. It
hasn't been updated in over a month and there were many bugs fixed
upstream. At the very least, Chromium on Fedora is vulnerable to the
following:
CVE-2022-0452: Use after free in Safe Browsing.
CVE-2022-0453: Use
Hello all,
I'm looking for a sponsor for package I created based on hpnssh. That's
a set of patches against openssh to improve throughput performance and
add some features (see https://psc.edu/hpn-ssh-home). It's been around
for about 15 years now and it's in moderately wide usage. I've
> I almost wrote this a week ago but decided not to as it's been recently
> discussed but this is really annoying. 6 days later is more than useless.
> ...
> Is there really nothing we can do about this?
I think getting https://github.com/fedora-infra/fmn/pull/294 merged would help
a little,
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2022-03-01)
===
Meeting started by Eighth_Doctor at 18:03:35 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-03-01/fesco.2022-03-01-18.03.log.html
.
Meeting
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-333b5cbf08
barrier-2.4.0-1.el8
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b2015c9ac8
seamonkey-2.53.11-1.el8
4
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-18ac3af1c8
varnish-4.0.5-3.el7
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-af77a11507
seamonkey-2.53.11-1.el7
The following builds have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055942
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.29-1 |perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.29-1
On 01. 03. 22 19:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 28. 02. 22 20:33, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 36 approximately one week before branching.
However, 5 weekly reminders are required
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056253
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2022 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2022
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053474
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055942
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.29-1 |perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.29-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053474
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-User-Identity-1.01-1.f |perl-User-Identity-1.01-1.f
On 28. 02. 22 20:33, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 36 approximately one week before branching.
However, 5 weekly reminders are required and I forgot to start this sooner,
hence
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056250
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056250
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2059504
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mspa...@redhat.com |p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055942
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.29-1 |perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.29-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056253
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058507
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042867
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|spo...@gmail.com|p...@city-fan.org
I plan to update the libsemigroups package from version 1.3.7 to
version 2.1.3, which entails an soname bump. The only consumer of
this package (anywhere, not just in Fedora) is gap-pkg-semigroups,
which I will update to version 4.0.0 at the same time. This will be
done in about a week. If all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2059502
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858048
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
In one week (2022-03-08), or slightly later, we plan to update
abseil-cpp[1] to version 20211102.0 in Rawhide by merging this PR[2] and
coordinating rebuilds of dependent packages into a side tag. This
includes a new .so version, “2111.0.0”.
The following packages will therefore need to be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058812
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-fe28746755 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2059502
--- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot ---
This fixes the build. Is that what you had in mind ?
'''
diff --git a/perl-Crypt-SMIME.spec b/perl-Crypt-SMIME.spec
index dfffa89..d1daf08 100644
--- a/perl-Crypt-SMIME.spec
+++ b/perl-Crypt-SMIME.spec
On 01. 03. 22 17:49, Major Hayden wrote:
On 3/1/22 10:44, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Do you think we should make /usr/bin/pypy3 PyPy 3.9 in Fedora 36? It is
rather late in the release cycle, but considering this is essentially a leaf
package I think this might be a good idea.
That sounds like a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053493
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2059504
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-45495fdb32 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-45495fdb32
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058962
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
On 3/1/22 10:44, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Do you think we should make /usr/bin/pypy3 PyPy 3.9 in Fedora 36? It is
rather late in the release cycle, but considering this is essentially a
leaf package I think this might be a good idea.
That sounds like a good plan to me. Thanks for doing the work on
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2022-03-01 18:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 05:44:56PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello Pythonistas.
>
> Do you think we should make /usr/bin/pypy3 PyPy 3.9 in Fedora 36? It is
> rather late in the release cycle, but considering this is essentially a leaf
> package I think this might be a good idea.
+1
Zbyszek
Hello Pythonistas.
Do you think we should make /usr/bin/pypy3 PyPy 3.9 in Fedora 36? It is rather
late in the release cycle, but considering this is essentially a leaf package I
think this might be a good idea.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053493
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2059504
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Test-DistManifest-1.01
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858048
Bug 1858048 depends on bug 2039193, which changed state.
Bug 2039193 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Gumbo - HTML5 parser based on
gumbo C library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039193
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058812
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-6ba3f4c2ba has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6ba3f4c2ba
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053493
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Mail-Message-3.012-1.f
In the coming months, the Podman container runtime will be upgraded
from v3 to v4. This is a major release [1] that introduces backward
incompatible changes to configuration files and APIs.
The full release notes for Podman v4 are available at [2]. Here is a
brief summary of how this will impact
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 8:45 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 at 08:19, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 04:21:56AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 3:07 AM Richard W.M. Jones
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2059504
Bug ID: 2059504
Summary: perl-Test-DistManifest-1.014-22.fc37 FTBFS
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-DistManifest
Assignee:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 14/229 (x86_64), 15/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220228.n.0):
ID: 1153935 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1153935
ID: 1153947
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora Source-git SIG on 2022-03-02 from 14:30:00 to 15:30:00 GMT
At meet.google.com/mic-otnv-kse
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Fedora source-git SIG
Agenda:
https://pagure.io/fedora-source-git/sig/issues?tags=meeting=Open
SIG
Il 24/02/22 00:25, Germano Massullo ha scritto:
This problem should have been fixed with commit
https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/commit/?id=dda7dab8274991e4a61a97c352d4367f8f815bb9
after checking which Qt version includes such commit, I will remove
xcb.patch [1] and release a new
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 at 08:19, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 04:21:56AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 3:07 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058274
> > >
> > > fails to build with:
> > >
> >
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 12:37 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> So, uh, we sorta forgot about this. Kamil approved this draft, but
> nobody else gave any feedback on it. This topic is still relevant and
> we have a proposed VPN blocker today, so...any more feedback on this
> draft?
I think it's
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 7:44 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Christoph Erhardt:
>
> > Hi Florian,
> >
> >> Yes, I understood that. x86_64 buildroots only have x86_64 packages in
> >> Koji. You cannot build and run 32-bit binaries (unless you put them
> >> together completely from scratch, without
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 8:20 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 04:21:56AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 3:07 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058274
> > >
> > > fails to build with:
> > >
> >
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 04:21:56AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 3:07 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058274
> >
> > fails to build with:
> >
> > DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'ocaml-dune >= 1.0'
>
On 3/1/22 07:06, Ben Beasley wrote:
I’d like to find some reviewers to clear out my backlog of mostly-Python
packages. These vary from near-trivial to moderately complicated.
I’m happy to review packages in exchange. I’m particularly comfortable
with C, C++, and Python, but reviewing other
I’d like to find some reviewers to clear out my backlog of mostly-Python
packages. These vary from near-trivial to moderately complicated.
I’m happy to review packages in exchange. I’m particularly comfortable
with C, C++, and Python, but reviewing other kinds of packages is a
possibility. It
* Christoph Erhardt:
> Hi Florian,
>
>> Yes, I understood that. x86_64 buildroots only have x86_64 packages in
>> Koji. You cannot build and run 32-bit binaries (unless you put them
>> together completely from scratch, without help from i686 RPM packages).
> alright, thank you for clarifying!
>
OLD: Fedora-36-20220228.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220301.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2059502
Bug ID: 2059502
Summary: perl-Crypt-SMIME-0.28-2.fc37 FTBFS: Failed test 'No
extra files that aren't in MANIFEST'
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053493
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2059502
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2045102
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058507
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 23/231 (x86_64), 20/161 (aarch64)
New failures
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 at 03:06, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058274
>
> fails to build with:
>
> DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'ocaml-dune >= 1.0'
>
> This package is in RHEL 9 buildroot (ocaml-dune-2.8.5-5.el9.x86_64).
>
> I
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220228.0):
ID: 1153628 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220228.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220301.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 114
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.91 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Dne 28. 02. 22 v 18:24 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 07:45:27AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
I almost wrote this a week ago but decided not to as it's been recently
discussed but this is really annoying. 6 days later is more than useless.
Previously it was blamed, at least
Dne 28. 02. 22 v 22:43 Otto Urpelainen napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch kirjoitti 25.2.2022 klo 21.08:
Is that intentional that i get some random notifications from
Discourse or what is going on? In past month, I was notified about
following topics:
* Join us for the EPEL office hours every month
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 3:07 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058274
>
> fails to build with:
>
> DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'ocaml-dune >= 1.0'
>
> This package is in RHEL 9 buildroot (ocaml-dune-2.8.5-5.el9.x86_64).
>
>
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 4:10 AM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>
>
> On 2022-02-28 22:23, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
>
> Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2022/03/01 15:11:
>
> Hello team,
>
> Blender failed to build with enabled FFMPEG support using ffmpeg-free-devel
> at the following line:
>
> '''
>
>
On 2022-02-28 22:23, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2022/03/01 15:11:
Hello team,
Blender failed to build with enabled FFMPEG support using
ffmpeg-free-devel at the following line:
'''
/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-3.0.1/extern/audaspace/plugins/ffmpeg/FFMPEGReader.cpp:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058274
fails to build with:
DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'ocaml-dune >= 1.0'
This package is in RHEL 9 buildroot (ocaml-dune-2.8.5-5.el9.x86_64).
I read an earlier thread ("Subject: [EPEL-devel] Re: Packages
disappearing
97 matches
Mail list logo
