https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070025
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2065018
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.52 |perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.52
Hey all,
Earlier this week, the Fedora Workstation WG discussed a ticket
brought to us asking for a GUI-based rescue/recovery environment[1].
While we all agreed in principle that such a thing would be a very
good thing to have, we don't really know how to achieve such a thing.
Additionally,
Ankur Sinha kirjoitti 31.3.2022 klo 12.51:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 12:16:43 +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
Otto Urpelainen kirjoitti 31.3.2022 klo 11.22:
Nathanael D. Noblet kirjoitti 31.3.2022 klo 5.26:
Hello,
Just wondering if this is a bug and what to report against. I
upgraded from F35
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061468
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061468
Denis Fateyev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|lkund...@v3.sk |de...@fateyev.com
Following
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/#end_users
Are there are any packagers who would like to package and maintain tinyproxy on
EPEL-8 ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885155
___
epel-devel mailing
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 9:10 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> With ipp-usb, my printer has six options: color, grayscale, deep gray,
> device gray, device RGB, and deep color. I have no idea what the last
> four of these mean. I also don't know whether the grayscale setting
> corresponds to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069471
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-e3cee53228 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069748
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
Hi
I've got two more mingw-qt6-* packages which are up for review, both are
straight forward mingw/c++ packages.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009269 -
mingw-qt6-qtwebchannel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2070708 -
mingw-qt6-qttranslations
Hi Kamil,
On 3/31/22 14:19, Kamil Paral wrote:
I very much like how Chris summarized the problem in a more
user-friendly language in test list [1]:
The very rudimentary summary is:
1. When upgrading (does not apply to clean installs);
2. with a printer that supports ipp-usb
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070684
Bug ID: 2070684
Summary: perl-Chart-2.400.5 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Chart
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On 3/31/22 04:56, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 3/30/22 11:04 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
$ x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -c test.c -v
.. snip ..
#include <...> search starts here:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/11.2.1/include
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/11.2.1/include-fixed
This path is the
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-Smoke` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-Smoke/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-Smoke` that
you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-Smoke/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
This is just a heads-up that I am retiring python-typer-cli in
F37/Rawhide due to an ongoing lack of upstream support. It is a leaf
package.
Important functionality has been patched out downstream[1] for about six
months due to incompatibility with click version 8.x and typer version
0.4.0
On Thu, Mar 31 2022 at 02:19:35 PM +0200, Kamil Paral
wrote:
10. Can it happen that the IPP-over-USB approach offers less printing
options than its real driver counterpart? E.g. paper types, color
adjustments, etc.
With hplip my printer had three color mode options: color, high-quality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069285
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-4a0449327e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-4a0449327e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069285
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-d64cc63744 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-d64cc63744
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069285
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-3a6a242e46 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-3a6a242e46
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070025
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069285
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Poco upstream finally committed OpenSSL 3 in the next release branch.
And Carl George helped to finish rawhide/f36 builds with a snapshot
source.
There is also a soname bump. Poco bumps soname at every release.
After all, nothing else in Fedora depends on Poco.
-robin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069285
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
On 3/31/22 7:43 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Actually it seems --target=foo, not -target foo
Both argument types work. I had just ignored the "ignoring..." text.
I'll have to use the bundled libs on only ARM arches. We don't have MinGW for ARM in
Fedora.
I think this will get us a working
Hi,
On Wed, 2022-03-30 at 15:55 +0200, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> On 3/30/22 03:26, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > (removing us...@lists.fedoraproject.org)...
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 23 2022 at 01:58:33 PM +0100, Zdenek Dohnal
> > wrote:
> > > Unfortunately there is no clean upgrade path to solve the
Michael Cronenworth wrote on 2022/03/31 20:56:
On 3/30/22 11:04 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
$ x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -c test.c -v
.. snip ..
#include <...> search starts here:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/11.2.1/include
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/11.2.1/include-fixed
This path is the
Hi Zdenek,
a QA person here. This sounds like it's going to be a major headache for us
(and our users), I hope I'm wrong. I initially skipped your message,
because it was too technical (seemed targeted at system admins, not regular
users) and I don't know half of the printer-related abbreviations
On 3/30/22 11:04 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
$ x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -c test.c -v
.. snip ..
#include <...> search starts here:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/11.2.1/include
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/11.2.1/include-fixed
This path is the Fedora MinGW path:
I submitted some builds yesterday and didn’t get any emails, and at least as of
6:18 CDT every link I click on the main webpage replies with “server is
offline”.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 3/31/22 02:35, Carmelo Sarta wrote:
Hello there!
I've never seen this error before
`error: Plugin selinux: hook fsm_file_prepare failed`
but I would try
`dnf reinstall container-selinux`
and maybe
`dnf reinstall podman`
There seems to be an error appening when people are installing
On Wed, 2022-03-30 at 21:54 -0500, Carl George wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 6:23 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > ImageMagick 6.9.12.x have a bunch security fixes since 6.9.10.x .
> > I'd like update ImageMagick (IM) on epel8 with soname bump .
> > ImageMagick-6.9.10 last
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 12:16:43 +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> Otto Urpelainen kirjoitti 31.3.2022 klo 11.22:
> > Nathanael D. Noblet kirjoitti 31.3.2022 klo 5.26:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Just wondering if this is a bug and what to report against. I
> > > upgraded from F35 to F36Beta last
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220330.0):
ID: 1204329 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Otto Urpelainen kirjoitti 31.3.2022 klo 11.22:
Nathanael D. Noblet kirjoitti 31.3.2022 klo 5.26:
Hello,
Just wondering if this is a bug and what to report against. I
upgraded from F35 to F36Beta last night. Today I ran `sudo dnf update`
and saw some odd output. Not sure if its a bug with
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220330.0):
ID: 1204312 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Hey All,
The Fedora Design team is hosting a test day today. We will be testing
the Light/Dark theme
and Wallpaper for Fedora Linux 36.
If you have some cycles, these resources[0] will give you some context
of how to test and submit results[1]
For a little bit of history about the test day can
Nathanael D. Noblet kirjoitti 31.3.2022 klo 5.26:
Hello,
Just wondering if this is a bug and what to report against. I
upgraded from F35 to F36Beta last night. Today I ran `sudo dnf update`
and saw some odd output. Not sure if its a bug with dnf or selinux or
the packages being installed.
Hello there!
I've never seen this error before
`error: Plugin selinux: hook fsm_file_prepare failed`
but I would try
`dnf reinstall container-selinux`
and maybe
`dnf reinstall podman`
Hope this helps
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 4:27 AM Nathanael D. Noblet
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just wondering if
40 matches
Mail list logo
