Re: Possible regression in GNOME in Fedora 36 Branched 20220401.n.0

On 4/4/22 10:09, Brandon Nielsen via devel wrote: On 4/3/22 6:45 PM, Ian Laurie wrote: I noticed in VirtualBox with GNOME and 20220401.n.0 that if I resized the VM window when logged into GNOME it slammed me back to the greeter, apparently without killing my login session. I still had a VM

Re: dist-git force push

On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 12:52 PM Michael J Gruber wrote: > In particular, this would allow to avoid the many "commit missing patch", > "actually commit the change", > "duh" commits which happen after a successful `fedpkg build --scratch --srpm` > followed by a half-(how do you say this nicely)ed

Re: Possible regression in GNOME in Fedora 36 Branched 20220401.n.0

On 4/4/22 10:00, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/3/22 16:45, Ian Laurie wrote: I noticed in VirtualBox with GNOME and 20220401.n.0 that if I resized the VM window when logged into GNOME it slammed me back to the greeter, apparently without killing my login session. What video device does VirtualBox

Re: Possible regression in GNOME in Fedora 36 Branched 20220401.n.0

On 4/3/22 6:45 PM, Ian Laurie wrote: I noticed in VirtualBox with GNOME and 20220401.n.0 that if I resized the VM window when logged into GNOME it slammed me back to the  greeter, apparently without killing my login session. I still had a VM from a week ago based on the 1.2 cut, but it was

Re: Possible regression in GNOME in Fedora 36 Branched 20220401.n.0

On 4/3/22 16:45, Ian Laurie wrote: I noticed in VirtualBox with GNOME and 20220401.n.0 that if I resized the VM window when logged into GNOME it slammed me back to the  greeter, apparently without killing my login session. What video device does VirtualBox provide to the OS?

Possible regression in GNOME in Fedora 36 Branched 20220401.n.0

I noticed in VirtualBox with GNOME and 20220401.n.0 that if I resized the VM window when logged into GNOME it slammed me back to the  greeter, apparently without killing my login session. I still had a VM from a week ago based on the 1.2 cut, but it was fully updated about a week ago.  This

Re: Update for fedora-obsolete-packages

On Sun, Apr 03, 2022 at 10:47:45PM +0100, Ian McInerney via devel wrote: There hasn't been an update to the fedora-obsolete-packages package after the upgrade testing that was done last month in preparation for the release of F36. There are currently 3 open bugs that are targetted against F36

[Bug 2071454] New: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.103 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071454 Bug ID: 2071454 Summary: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.103 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2 Keywords:

[Bug 2071455] New: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.103 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071455 Bug ID: 2071455 Summary: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.103 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib Keywords:

Update for fedora-obsolete-packages

There hasn't been an update to the fedora-obsolete-packages package after the upgrade testing that was done last month in preparation for the release of F36. There are currently 3 open bugs that are targetted against F36 [1, 2, 3]. Since we are entering the final freeze this week, can someone make

[Bug 2071438] New: perl-IO-Compress-2.103 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071438 Bug ID: 2071438 Summary: perl-IO-Compress-2.103 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-IO-Compress Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: swtpm Fails to Upgrade After system-upgrade F36

3. huhtikuuta 2022 20.38.52 GMT+03:00 "Garry T. Williams" kirjoitti: >After upgrading to f36, a dnf upgrade resulted in 156 packages to >upgrade, including swtpm. This resulted in the following errors: > >... >Upgrading: swtpm-0.7.2-1.20220307git21c90c1.fc36.x86_64 >159/315

swtpm Fails to Upgrade After system-upgrade F36

After upgrading to f36, a dnf upgrade resulted in 156 packages to upgrade, including swtpm. This resulted in the following errors: ... Upgrading: swtpm-0.7.2-1.20220307git21c90c1.fc36.x86_64 159/315 error: lsetfilecon: (/usr/bin/swtpm;6249a295, system_u:object_r:swtpm_exec_t:s0)

Fedora-36-20220403.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 10/229 (x86_64), 7/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220402.n.0): ID: 1208670 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1208670 ID:

Fedora-Rawhide-20220403.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 12/231 (x86_64), 21/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220401.n.1): ID: 1208263 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso

Fedora-IoT-36-20220403.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220402.0): ID: 1209094 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1209094 Passed openQA tests: 15/15 (x86_64), 14/15 (aarch64)

Fedora-IoT-37-20220403.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 4/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-37-20220402.0): ID: 1209064 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1209064 ID: 1209066 Test:

Fedora 36 compose report: 20220403.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-36-20220402.n.0 NEW: Fedora-36-20220403.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 33 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 48.94 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: F37 Change: Signed RPM Contents (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 11:04 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 01/04/2022 15:33, Ben Cotton wrote: > > We want to add signatures to individual files that are part of shipped RPMs. > > Third attempt to push it through again? It was already rejected by FESCo. Actually only the second

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220403.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220401.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220403.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 44 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 48.93 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: F37 Change: Signed RPM Contents (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 01/04/2022 15:33, Ben Cotton wrote: We want to add signatures to individual files that are part of shipped RPMs. Third attempt to push it through again? It was already rejected by FESCo. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220403.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220402.0): ID: 1208230 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Fedora-Cloud-35-20220403.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220402.0): ID: 1208214 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: