Dne 29. 11. 22 v 0:00 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
On Mon, 2022-11-28 at 19:24 +, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
- rpms/fpc
- rpms/lazarus
I've been a co-admin on those, so I took 'em.
Several of the orphaned packages are dependencies of stuff I
currently maintain.
I'll wait a week or two to
Dne 29. 11. 22 v 10:46 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
I don't think that this went completely correct. I have just claimed
ownership of rubygem-em-socksify (so far so good). However, I noticed,
that mmorsi, while removed from packager group (at least being on the
list)
Just checked that he is
Dne 28. 11. 22 v 19:20 Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a):
Il 28/11/22 18:36, Nick Bebout ha scritto:
I've removed a lot of ACLs. See attached log file.
Thanks Nick.
From your output I made a list of the orphaned packages which I think
it's a bit more readable:
- rpms/rubygem-chronic
-
I don't think that this went completely correct. I have just claimed
ownership of rubygem-em-socksify (so far so good). However, I noticed,
that mmorsi, while removed from packager group (at least being on the
list) is still comaintainer of the package. I would assume that these
people should
I don't see anything depending on it in the RPM specs file archive.
It looks like the configure script might get confused when building with
future C compilers which do not accept implicit function declarations,
and it's probably not worth porting this to C99.
Thanks,
Florian
On 29/11/2022 09:24, Bob Hepple wrote:
"... Arch supports signed git tags. I'm hoping Fedora does too.
On Fedora you must upload source tarball, its signature and public key
to the Fedora look-aside cache, because builders have no network access
for security reasons.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly
Notification time stamped 2022-11-29 08:52:52 UTC
From 284d013bbd068d7a01ac9c479069a5fe0b6c1ab5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Nov 29 2022 08:51:16 +
Subject: Modernize spec.
Convert license to SPDX.
Update sources to sha512.
---
diff --git a/perl-Net-LDAP-SID.spec
Here's a question from one of my upstream devels. Not sure I understand
exactly what he's asking but I thought I'd post here in the hope that
someone can enlighten him (and me!).
"... Arch supports signed git tags. I'm hoping Fedora does too.
I'm thinking of dropping this cumbersome process
101 - 108 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
