Howdy Python SIG and python-lockfile maintainers,
I recently noticed that pylockfile (packaged as python-lockfile in
Fedora and EPEL) is no longer maintained upstream (since 2017).
https://github.com/openstack-archive/pylockfile
I see 10 packages that still (build)require this, so retirement is
There's a python-mysql and python-mysqlclient packages and it's been an
issue for a while but now causing upgrade issues.
Can we get some help in BZ:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929101
Please make sure I have not mis-spoken.
Thanks,
Richard
Based on upstream clarification[1], the license of python-keyring is
“MIT OR Python-2.0.1” rather than “MIT AND Python-2.0.1”, and the
License field of the package has been adjusted accordingly[2].
In future upstream releases, the license will simply be “MIT”.
[1]
> On Dec 9, 2022, at 8:29 AM, Timothée Ravier wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> I've started the non-responsive maintainer procedure for pjp
> (https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/user/pjp/) with
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152159
>
> I currently have a pull request that has been
Hi all,
With the update to the regex-syntax crate package that I'm building
right now, the license will change from "MIT OR Apache-2.0" to "(MIT
OR Apache-2.0) AND Unicode-DFS-2016".
The project includes code that is derived from Unicode data files, and
it already shipped a license text for the
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on 2022-12-26. This is
the quiet time of year when most folks are enjoying the holidays.
Today's meeting we gave up on as only three of us showed up, I don't
expect better turnout on Boxing Day and I don't have anything important
for the agenda. If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144909
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Log-Any-1.712 is |perl-Log-Any-1.713 is
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 3:35 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 9:20 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 3:16 PM Stephen Gallagher
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I have now submitted
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2150093 and
> > >
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 9:20 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 3:16 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > I have now submitted
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2150093 and
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2150094 for the
> >
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 3:16 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> I have now submitted
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2150093 and
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2150094 for the
> `nodejs16` and `nodejs18` packages for Fedora.
>
> You can test them with
Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2022-12-13)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Importer` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Importer/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Importer` that you
are following:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Importer/pull-request/1
___
Hi.
I have just orphaned python-gzipstream.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-gzipstream
If you want to keep it running then feel free to take it.
I have not used this library for ages. This was part of Spacewalk project
On Mon, 2022-12-12 at 10:57 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImageMagick7
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only be
On Mon, 2022-12-12 at 13:05 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 12/12/2022 11:48, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > The way I read it, Adam is removing firmware files that current Fedora
> > kernels won't load, ever.
>
> Are you sure that that firmware is not needed at all?
Yes. I've
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraBudgie
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImageMagick7
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraBudgie
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImageMagick7
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
On Mon, 2022-12-12 at 10:02 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 9:53 AM Nils Philippsen
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > the python-sqlalchemy package has been added to RHEL 9.1 lately
> > [1][2]
> > and therefore I'll remove it from EPEL 9, as per policy [3].
> >
> > Mind
* Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
> On 12/12/2022 13:35, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
>> So newer linux-firmware can support older kernels, which isn't
>> relevant for Fedora (to a degree that might be relevant upstream).
>
> Thanks for the info. I thought they were used by older hardware revisions.
>
>
Hello,
would anyone be able to take over the build of 'perl-Net-Domain-TLD'
package for EPEL9 as per
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144550 ?
Thanks
Best regards
--
Vladimír Páchnik
___
epel-devel mailing list --
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 9:53 AM Nils Philippsen wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> the python-sqlalchemy package has been added to RHEL 9.1 lately [1][2]
> and therefore I'll remove it from EPEL 9, as per policy [3].
>
> Mind that the latest version of the package in EPEL 9 has a higher
> version than that
Hi there,
the python-sqlalchemy package has been added to RHEL 9.1 lately [1][2]
and therefore I'll remove it from EPEL 9, as per policy [3].
Mind that the latest version of the package in EPEL 9 has a higher
version than that available in RHEL, so you’d have to downgrade it in
order to get the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037408
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|35 |36
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035342
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|35 |36
--
You are receiving this
This is the mail system at host mailman01.iad2.fedoraproject.org.
Your message was successfully delivered to the destination(s)
listed below. If the message was delivered to mailbox you will
receive no further notifications. Otherwise you may still receive
notifications of mail delivery errors
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Inline-Files` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Inline-Files/pull-request/1
___
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221211.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221212.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 52
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 26.98 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Inline-Files` that
you are following:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Inline-Files/pull-request/1
Hello all,
Fedora 35 will go end of life for updates and support on 2022-12-13
No further updates, including security updates, will be
available for Fedora 35 after the said date. All the updates of Fedora
35 being pushed to stable will be stopped as well.
Fedora 36 will continue to receive
On 12/12/2022 13:35, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
So newer linux-firmware can support older kernels, which isn't relevant
for Fedora (to a degree that might be relevant upstream).
Thanks for the info. I thought they were used by older hardware revisions.
Sorry for the noise.
--
Sincerely,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 1:25 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> If Intel ships all these blobs in linux-firmware, then they have a good
> reason for this, don't they?
>
So newer linux-firmware can support older kernels, which isn't relevant for
Fedora (to a
On 12/12/2022 11:48, Florian Weimer wrote:
The way I read it, Adam is removing firmware files that current Fedora
kernels won't load, ever.
Are you sure that that firmware is not needed at all?
If Intel ships all these blobs in linux-firmware, then they have a good
reason for this, don't
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Encode-Locale` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Encode-Locale/pull-request/1
___
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 10:58 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I how solved this ? [1]
> Thank you
I suggest that you take a look at the Rust packaging guidelines, or at
how other packages in similar situations have handled this.
You need to configure the cargo build system correctly, i.e.
1.
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Encode-Locale`
that you are following:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Encode-Locale/pull-request/1
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-DAVTalk` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-DAVTalk/pull-request/5
___
perl-devel mailing list --
* Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
> On 11/12/2022 20:53, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> There's a PR at
>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/linux-firmware/pull-request/9 , and
>> Intel folks seem receptive to the idea of removing at least some of the
>> older ones upstream too.
>
> So, you want the
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-DAVTalk` that
you are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-DAVTalk/pull-request/5
___
perl-devel
Hi,
I how solved this ? [1]
Thank you
[1]
cd /builddir/build/BUILD/ddnet-16.6 && /usr/bin/cmake -E env
CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/builddir/build/BUILD/ddnet-16.6/redhat-linux-build
DDNET_TEST_NO_LINK=1 /usr/bin/cargo build --release
Updating crates.io index
warning: spurious network error (2 tries
Hello all,
Fedora 35 will go end of life for updates and support on 2022-12-13
No further updates, including security updates, will be
available for Fedora 35 after the said date. All the updates of Fedora
35 being pushed to stable will be stopped as well.
Fedora 36 will continue to receive
On Monday, December 12, 2022, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 11/12/2022 20:53, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> There's a PR at
>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/linux-firmware/pull-request/9 , and
>> Intel folks seem receptive to the idea of removing at
On 11/12/2022 20:53, Adam Williamson wrote:
There's a PR at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/linux-firmware/pull-request/9 , and
Intel folks seem receptive to the idea of removing at least some of the
older ones upstream too.
So, you want the still-working Wi-Fi chipsets to stop working?
45 matches
Mail list logo
