Re: RISC-V -- are we ready for more, and what do we need to do it?

On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 2:28 AM Jeff Law wrote: > > > > On 1/6/23 23:41, David Abdurachmanov wrote: > > > > Summary from multi-year discussions/feedback on this: > > - We don't have proper hardware to put into the data center that holds > > servers used by Fedora infrastructure. > Right. dev

[Bug 2159015] perl-Test-Deep-1.204 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159015 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Test-Deep-1.203 is |perl-Test-Deep-1.204 is

[Bug 2159041] perl-Perl-Critic-1.148 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159041 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Perl-Critic-1.148-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95862785 -- You are

[Bug 2159041] New: perl-Perl-Critic-1.148 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159041 Bug ID: 2159041 Summary: perl-Perl-Critic-1.148 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Perl-Critic Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 2159041] perl-Perl-Critic-1.148 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159041 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1936498 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1936498=edit Update to 1.148 (#2159041) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e9a9c081af novnc-1.3.0-5.el7 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-afa80a1455 cacti-1.2.23-1.el7 cacti-spine-1.2.23-1.el7 2

Re: ispc fails to build with llvm 15

On 2023-01-07 3:08 a.m., Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2023/01/07 15:57: > Hello team, > Could someone investigate the failure to build ispc [1] with the > recent LLVM[2] ? > > > References: > [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ispc > [2]

Help with Rust packaging

Hi. I'm working on packaging new version of Juyter Notebook and Lab into Fedora and I have a problem with one Rust/Python package - y-py. The problem is that when I'm building python-y-py in COPR https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lbalhar/notebook/builds/ I'm getting error: no

Re: Rawhide with kernel-6.2 requires VBox SVGA video mode to boot in VirtualBox

On 1/7/23 09:04, Alain Vigne wrote: I sympathize On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 4:51 AM Ian Laurie > wrote: The old setting produces a configuration alert with Linux systems (although it does work).  This feels like a kernel problem to me rather than a

[Bug 2159015] New: perl-Test-Deep-1.203 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159015 Bug ID: 2159015 Summary: perl-Test-Deep-1.203 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Test-Deep Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: ImageMagick 7 is landing in Rawhide

Hello! I'll address autotrace compatibility asap. Meanwhile I'll build it against less functional (but close enough) Graphicsmagick. On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 10:35 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > Hey all, > > The initial rebase of ImageMagick to v7 is landing in Rawhide now: >

Re: bodhi-server tests started to fail when building package in Koji

Il 07/01/23 09:31, Mattia Verga ha scritto: > I've attempted to build an updated bodhi-server release for testing it > into staging, just a few more commits which fixes some glitches in the > web UI. However, running the tests in Koji fail both on F36 and F37: > > E  

Re: Rawhide with kernel-6.2 requires VBox SVGA video mode to boot in VirtualBox

I sympathize On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 4:51 AM Ian Laurie wrote: > I've not been able to boot Rawhide in VirtualBox with any 6.2 kernel. > I am using VirtualBox to test rawhide Workstation (20230107) and the system is not displaying the welcome screen (stuck with black screen). I am able

[EPEL-devel] Re: Forcing Python minor version in EPEL builds

Thank you very much - I'll try that On January 7, 2023 5:44:00 PM GMT+02:00, Orion Poplawski wrote: >On 1/7/23 06:04, Mark E. Fuller wrote: >> Hi Folks, >> >> I am looking to update one of my packages in EPEL 8 and Python3.6 was >> dropped. >> Can anyone point me in the right direction as to

Re: TeXLive 2022 landing in rawhide today

On 1/4/23 17:52, Tom Callaway wrote: Hi Fedora, TeXLive 2022 (composed of texlive-base and texlive SRPMs) is landing in rawhide today. I've done extensive local testing in mock to try to make sure it doesn't break anything obvious... but the size and scope of TL means that there are probably

Re: TeXLive 2022 landing in rawhide today

On 1/6/23 13:50, Jerry James wrote: On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 1:41 PM Michael J Gruber wrote: First breakage seems to be here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95811080 Related to lua loading of otf fonts See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158837 Thanks.

[EPEL-devel] Re: Forcing Python minor version in EPEL builds

On 1/7/23 06:04, Mark E. Fuller wrote: Hi Folks, I am looking to update one of my packages in EPEL 8 and Python3.6 was dropped. Can anyone point me in the right direction as to how to edit my spec file `buildrequires` and the macros to enforce Python 3.7 (or higher) instead of Python 3.6

[Bug 2158940] perl-IO-Zlib-1.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158940 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-IO-Zlib-1.13-1.fc38

[Bug 2158940] perl-IO-Zlib-1.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158940 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 2158940] perl-IO-Zlib-1.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158940 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

[EPEL-devel] Forcing Python minor version in EPEL builds

Hi Folks, I am looking to update one of my packages in EPEL 8 and Python3.6 was dropped. Can anyone point me in the right direction as to how to edit my spec file `buildrequires` and the macros to enforce Python 3.7 (or higher) instead of Python 3.6 anto do it "the right way", not a kludge?

Forcing Python minor version in EPEL builds

Hi Folks, I am looking to update one of my packages in EPEL 8 and Python3.6 was dropped. Can anyone point me in the right direction as to how to edit my spec file `buildrequires` and the macros to enforce Python 3.7 (or higher) instead of Python 3.6 anto do it "the right way", not a kludge?

Re: ispc fails to build with llvm 15

Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2023/01/07 15:57: Hello team, Could someone investigate the failure to build ispc [1] with the recent LLVM[2] ? References: [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ispc [2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95826442 In file included from

[Test-Announce] Fedora 38 Rawhide 20230107.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 38 Rawhide 20230107.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

bodhi-server tests started to fail when building package in Koji

I've attempted to build an updated bodhi-server release for testing it into staging, just a few more commits which fixes some glitches in the web UI. However, running the tests in Koji fail both on F36 and F37: E   subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['dnf', '--disablerepo=*',