V Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 11:50:45AM -0700, Jerry James napsal(a):
> Hi everyone,
>
> I built an update for libmpc in Rawhide a few weeks ago, then didn't
> have time to follow up due to holiday-related travel. (I'm one of
> those people you saw on TV sitting around in airports due to canceled
>
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 11:53:17PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Am Montag, 9. Jänner 2023 23:06:17 CET schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 06:06:47PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > > Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > > PS: The impression I get is
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 09:37:44PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Now I'm getting bit by the rpmautospec and COPR issue.
Please be more precise. How are you building the rpms?
If rpmautospec is used in COPR, and the build is started in a
compatible way, the release field should be the same as in
Now I'm getting bit by the rpmautospec and COPR issue.
I'm trying to test rebuilds of all dependent packages for a new OpenColorIO
release, but usd uses rpmautospec and in Fedora it's usd--16 but
COPR is calculating it as usd--9 so the Fedora version has a
higher NEVR.
Now what am I supposed to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159571
Bug ID: 2159571
Summary: perl-Email-Stuffer-0.019 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Email-Stuffer
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159570
Bug ID: 2159570
Summary: perl-Email-MIME-Kit-3.07 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Email-MIME-Kit
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159569
Bug ID: 2159569
Summary: perl-Email-Address-1.913 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Email-Address
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159569
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1936967
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1936967=edit
Update to 1.913 (#2159569)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-afa80a1455
cacti-1.2.23-1.el7 cacti-spine-1.2.23-1.el7
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-96ef72f1b2
viewvc-1.1.30-1.el7
3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158853
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 5:53 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
> * It made wrong assumptions about the performance impact of
> _FORTIFY_SOURCE=3, which, compared to the already existing (!)
> _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2, appears to actually have NO performance impact at all
> (!), only compared to no
Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 1/6/23 20:35, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>> (There are exist other profiling tools and techniques that do not
>> require frame pointer recompilation, but whatever.)
>
> Which ones? I would love for them to exist, and I believe there is
> work being done in that
The license of python-cryptography was changed to SPDX and also fixed after
clarification from upstream from "ASL 2.0 or BSD" to "(Apache-2.0 OR
BSD-3-Clause) AND PSF-2.0"
--
Regards,
Charalampos Stratakis
Senior Software Engineer
Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Considering the mass rebuild is happening really soon, I feel like
> repeating the vote later is not helpful, but if people want to, we can
> surely run the vote again. However, I am confident the result will be the
> same.
With all this talk about the mass rebuild being
Am Montag, 9. Jänner 2023 23:06:17 CET schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 06:06:47PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
PS: The impression I get is that everything was deliberately
rigged so that
the vote would end up the way it did:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 06:06:47PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > Still, it gives an extremely bad impression of rushing this through
> > without giving anybody the chance to object.
> >
> > I also do not see why this needed to be approved for F38 on such
Hi Matthew,
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 11:47:54AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 06:06:47PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > Therefore, I hereby request that the vote be annulled as having happened
> > in violation of the Change policy.
>
> So, from a purely "what
On 1/9/23 12:27, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Am Montag, 9. Jänner 2023 21:02:48 CET schrieb Tom Stellard:
I think a good solution would be to move the proposal submission deadlines
a month earlier in the schedule. There's only 3 weeks between the
"Changes Requiring Mass Rebuild" deadline and
On 1/9/23 08:47, Matthew Miller wrote:
It might be useful to improve both the documented policies. The Changes
policy has nothing about reconsidering Changes in the current cycle that I
can see. (Or, actually, for that matter, for resubmitting in future cycles
either, unless i'm missing
On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 12:59:26AM +0100, Peter Boy wrote:
>
> > Am 06.01.2023 um 18:06 schrieb Michael Catanzaro :
> >
> > ...
> >
> > I think most of the feedback on this change can be summarized as:
> >
> > (a) Specific services want longer timeouts.
> >
> > This can already be configured
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 11:04:11AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fr, 06.01.23 11:06, Michael Catanzaro (mcatanz...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > Maybe instead of SIGKILL, we should send SIGQUIT instead. That way abrt
> > should complain next time you boot and users will have an opportunity to
Am Montag, 9. Jänner 2023 21:02:48 CET schrieb Tom Stellard:
I think a good solution would be to move the proposal submission deadlines
a month earlier in the schedule. There's only 3 weeks between the
"Changes Requiring Mass Rebuild" deadline and the mass rebuild.
I don't think 3 weeks is
On Fri, 2023-01-06 at 18:21 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fr, 06.01.23 10:10, Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Friday, January 6, 2023 9:33:12 AM EST Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Do, 05.01.23 20:17, Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > > I work
On 1/9/23 11:18, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 2:11 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 11:47:54AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 06:06:47PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
PS: The impression I get is that everything was deliberately
> I think it would save everyone a bit of time if we restricted the change
> to x86-64. We do not have much experience with the -mbackchain flag
> that was added at the last minute on s390x. The change owners have
> stated that they aren't interested in s390x. IBM doesn't want this.
> Platform
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 2:11 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 11:47:54AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 06:06:47PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > > PS: The impression I get is that everything was deliberately rigged so
> > > that
> > >
Am Montag, 9. Jänner 2023 20:10:53 CET schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé:
Holding a FESCo meeting and vote on the very first working day after
the long xmas / new year holiday is not exactly good timing if you
want contributors to be broadly aware it is happening[1]. I might
humbly suggest that next
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 11:47:54AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 06:06:47PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > PS: The impression I get is that everything was deliberately rigged so that
> > the vote would end up the way it did:
> >
> > 1. A new ticket was filed,
Hi everyone,
I built an update for libmpc in Rawhide a few weeks ago, then didn't
have time to follow up due to holiday-related travel. (I'm one of
those people you saw on TV sitting around in airports due to canceled
flights.) One test failed: fedora-ci.koji-build.tier0.functional. I
have
On 1/6/23 20:35, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
>> The thing is that perf + flamegraphs makes your whole system much more
>> visible and so it's much easier to find these kind of gains in
>> specific scenarios.
>
> (There are exist other profiling tools and techniques that do not
> require
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Noto_CJK_Variable_Fonts
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Noto_CJK_Variable_Fonts
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
* Matthew Miller:
> BUT, I do not think it was done with malice, as "deliberately rigged"
> implies. I don't see that at all -- I see excitement and interest in moving
> forward on something that already has taken a long time, and looming
> practical deadlines.
No one spoke out when the tools
On 09. 01. 23 17:47, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 06:06:47PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
PS: The impression I get is that everything was deliberately rigged so that
the vote would end up the way it did:
1. A new ticket was filed, in order to exclude the participants
Am Montag, 9. Jänner 2023 17:47:54 CET schrieb Matthew Miller:
And, from a practical point of view, since this passed with six +1 votes,
I'm not sure what benefit canceling and re-voting would really add.
Canceling the vote and requiring that the Change Policy be followed would
mean that the
Matthew Miller writes:
> So, from a purely "what are the rules?" view, the Change process says:
> FESCo will vote to approve or deny a change proposal in accordance with
> the FESCo ticket policy.
>
> ... and I won't quote all of that, but looking at
>
Working on having a better Firefox shipped as a Flatpak by default will please
a lot of people that as asking for Firefox to be removed from the base image:
https://github.com/fedora-silverblue/issue-tracker/issues/288
If we can have Cisco host a container image with openh264 as a Flatpak
On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 06:06:47PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> PS: The impression I get is that everything was deliberately rigged so that
> the vote would end up the way it did:
>
> 1. A new ticket was filed, in order to exclude the participants of the
> previous discussion.
> 2.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 9:31 AM Giuseppe Scrivano
wrote:
>
> I've just opened a PR upstream for Podman to kill -9 all the remaining
> exec sessions when the container process terminates, so both --pid=host
> and --pid=private behaves in the same way. It would solve the issue we
> are seeing.
>
>
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 9:15 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 8:47 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 2:42 AM David Abdurachmanov
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 2:28 AM Jeff Law wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 1/6/23 23:41, David
On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 10:55 AM Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Hopefully most people are back from vacations now so I think we can go on
> with organizing the first Flatpak SIG meeting.
>
> I have created a whenisgood poll for the next week:
> https://whenisgood.net/s3rzh5h
> Please put your
I'm hoping to start updating libharu to 2.4.3, mathgl to 8.0.1, and vtk
to 9.2.5 at the end of this week. Builds will be done in a side tag.
Test builds are being done here:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/orion/libharu2.4/builds/
--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his - surely the least
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 3:25 PM Maxwell G via devel
wrote:
>
>
> Jan 7, 2023 4:41:29 PM Lumír Balhar :
>
> > y-py upstream uses maturin as a build backend which is not available in
> > Fedora yet so I had to add some metadata manually to port it to
> > setuptools-rust
> Why not package maturin? Is
Jan 7, 2023 4:41:29 PM Lumír Balhar :
y-py upstream uses maturin as a build backend which is not available in
Fedora yet so I had to add some metadata manually to port it to
setuptools-rust
Why not package maturin? Is there something particularly problematic
about maturin (e.g. lots of
On 1/9/23 07:14, Neal Gompa wrote:
It is very unlikely that CentOS Stream 10 will include RISC-V as a
fully included architecture. Perhaps via a CentOS Stream SIG.
I believe that was the implication in the first place, hence
mentioning CentOS Stream rather than RHEL.
The Alternative
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 8:47 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 2:42 AM David Abdurachmanov
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 2:28 AM Jeff Law wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1/6/23 23:41, David Abdurachmanov wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Summary from multi-year
On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 2:42 AM David Abdurachmanov
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 2:28 AM Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 1/6/23 23:41, David Abdurachmanov wrote:
> > >
> > > Summary from multi-year discussions/feedback on this:
> > > - We don't have proper hardware to put into the data
Hello everyone!
Does anyone know how to contact Andrey Matyukov (amatyuko)? I have tried to
reach out via email but have not received a response.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159390
--
Ali Erdinc Koroglu
Linux OS Systems Engineering
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 06:46:59 -0500
Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 6:42 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 6:30 AM Dan Horák wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 16:34:29 -0500
> > > Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > The initial rebase of
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 6:42 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 6:30 AM Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 16:34:29 -0500
> > Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > The initial rebase of ImageMagick to v7 is landing in Rawhide now:
> > >
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 6:30 AM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 16:34:29 -0500
> Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > The initial rebase of ImageMagick to v7 is landing in Rawhide now:
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-9d3e9afbfd
> >
> > Most packages in the
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 16:34:29 -0500
Neal Gompa wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> The initial rebase of ImageMagick to v7 is landing in Rawhide now:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-9d3e9afbfd
>
> Most packages in the reverse dependency chain were rebuilt, though a
> few are still left
Hi Philip,
I added a Ruby SiG mailing list to TO.
Folks at Ruby SiG,
Could you take a look at the message below? Philip is trying to create
a RPM package including WASM built Ruby binaries. Your feedback is
helpful.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 11:00 AM Philip Rhoades wrote:
>
> Jun,
>
>
> On
On 9/01/2023 10:09, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Honestly saying, I cannot understand this context, why native English
speaker or not is relevant here, especially because I am also
non-native.
I don't think Fedora committers change their attitude against
between native or non-native English speakers.
On 07. 01. 23 23:41, Lumír Balhar wrote:
Hi.
I'm working on packaging new version of Juyter Notebook and Lab into Fedora and
I have a problem with one Rust/Python package - y-py.
The problem is that when I'm building python-y-py in COPR
Hi Neal,
On Wed, 2023-01-04 at 08:44 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 8:30 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > Already rejected proposal was submitted because big corporations
> > weren't
> > happy with the results. This is a VERY BAD precedent for Fedora.
> >
>
>
On Fr, 06.01.23 11:06, Michael Catanzaro (mcatanz...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Maybe instead of SIGKILL, we should send SIGQUIT instead. That way abrt
> should complain next time you boot and users will have an opportunity to
> report bugs to the package maintainer, instead of the problem being
Jun,
On 2023-01-09 00:36, Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 11:51 AM Philip Rhoades via devel
wrote:
People,
Over the holidays we had our irregular Family Lightning Chess
competition (10 seconds per move) - I have not found an online web
site
that will work exactly with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158853
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-5dcad355f2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-5dcad355f2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
Neal Gompa wrote on 2023/01/09 11:58:
I'm extremely tired of how you communicate on this mailing list. I've
been quiet about it for years and years. But people leave Fedora
because of you. Once again, I'm having discussions with people trying
to convince them Fedora isn't a bad place because of
On 09/01/2023 03:58, Neal Gompa wrote:
I'm extremely tired of how you communicate on this mailing list. I've
been quiet about it for years and years. But people leave Fedora
because of you. Once again, I'm having discussions with people trying
to convince them Fedora isn't a bad place because of
61 matches
Mail list logo
