https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149095
Scott Talbert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
So, I'm wondering if we should have some kind of (at least
semi-)coordinated plan for updating ansible collections in EPEL?
My initial thought is we would sort of piggy back on to what the
"ansible" community collection bundles on top of the ansible-core
package provided by RedHat. So,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165792
Bug ID: 2165792
Summary: perl-HTML-Parser-3.81 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTML-Parser
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 09:42:10AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 06:52:30PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:26:18PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > >
> > > I found more 5 with
> > >
Hi everyone,
I want to get feedback before I make a change to how Fedora Linux
schedules are generated. As reported in schedule#91[1], the current
ics files include very long tasks that aren't particularly useful. I
have a plan for how to address that, but first I want to check that it
won't
Dne 30. 01. 23 v 17:21 Ron Olson napsal(a):
Sorry if I missed it, but what is your script running against; are you checking the spec files in
src.fedoraproject.org? I ask because I updated swift-lang to Apache-2.0[1] on Jan 23, but I see it’s still on the list
of packages to be converted.
On 30. 01. 23 21:39, Miro Hrončok wrote:
When it does change I plan to rebuild the package in EPEL 8.
The following packages FTBFS:
kwin
It failed because it has an %if-%rhel-defined Patch :(
Trying again from a patched spec.
The following packages still build after an hour and I need to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165678
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Doc Type|---
On 30. 01. 23 20:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 11. 12. 22 15:48, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 21. 11. 22 12:56, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 09. 11. 22 20:07, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 08. 11. 22 22:36, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hi Miro,
You have explained the problem very well, and a possible solution.
But I'm a
On 11. 12. 22 15:48, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 21. 11. 22 12:56, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 09. 11. 22 20:07, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 08. 11. 22 22:36, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hi Miro,
You have explained the problem very well, and a possible solution.
But I'm a bit confused as to what you want to happen.
On 1/30/23 02:17, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Demi Marie Obenour:
>
>> What about the new SFrame unwind info?
>
> It has the same limitation as DWARF: there's no mainline kernel
> implementation for profiling or bpftrace.
>
> Thanks,
> Florian
Have you considered writing such an implementation,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165678
Bug ID: 2165678
Summary: perl-autodie-2.36 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-autodie
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230129.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230130.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 41
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 815.38 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Sorry if I missed it, but what is your script running against; are you
checking the spec files in src.fedoraproject.org? I ask because I
updated swift-lang to Apache-2.0[1] on Jan 23, but I see it’s still on
the list of packages to be converted.
[1]
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 02:09:18PM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 06:12:11PM -0800, Gordon Messmer napsal(a):
> >
> > I don't think convincing hundreds or thousands of developers to add symbol
> > versioning to their libraries is a viable solution. I'd love to see it
> >
* Petr Pisar:
> V Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 06:12:11PM -0800, Gordon Messmer napsal(a):
>>
>> I don't think convincing hundreds or thousands of developers to add symbol
>> versioning to their libraries is a viable solution. I'd love to see it
>> happen, but rpm/dnf should be more reliable in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165567
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Ralf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165210
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165210
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.087-1.fc
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165590
Bug ID: 2165590
Summary: Upgrade perl-Type-Tiny to 2.002001
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Type-Tiny
Status: NEW
Component:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 1:27 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 02:14:58AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 18:43:56 -0800,
> > Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > >
> > >Second, I'd like to suggest that in the future, at least in
> > >Fedora, for any
V Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 06:12:11PM -0800, Gordon Messmer napsal(a):
>
> I don't think convincing hundreds or thousands of developers to add symbol
> versioning to their libraries is a viable solution. I'd love to see it
> happen, but rpm/dnf should be more reliable in the meantime.
>
Is symbol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165567
Bug ID: 2165567
Summary: Upgrade perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical to 0.10
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Sub-Exporter-Lexical
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165558
Bug ID: 2165558
Summary: Upgrade perl-Net-OpenSSH to 0.83
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Net-OpenSSH
Status: NEW
Component:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 02:14:58AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 18:43:56 -0800,
> Gordon Messmer wrote:
> >
> >Second, I'd like to suggest that in the future, at least in
> >Fedora, for any "install" or "update" operation that dnf performs,
> >dnf's default behavior
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 06:50:55PM -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 1/28/23 18:43, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > On 1/28/23 18:06, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 8:31 PM Reon Beon via devel
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Are there still some outstanding bugs preventing this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165095
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-autodie` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
2.35 bump; Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-autodie/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Monday, 30 January 2023 at 06:16, Jens Petersen wrote:
> Thanks for this feedback.
>
> Not sure what happened :-( but I am rebuilding them now (mkvtoolnix was
> expected).
Feel free to fix mkvtoolnix using the upstream patch I mentioned.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://getfedora.org
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-PPIx-Regexp` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
0.087 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PPIx-Regexp/pull-request/15
___
perl-devel mailing list --
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-autodie` that you
are following:
``
2.35 bump; Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-autodie/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-PPIx-Regexp` that
you are following:
``
0.087 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PPIx-Regexp/pull-request/15
___
perl-devel mailing list --
* Jens-Ulrik Petersen:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:56 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> If you see a package that should be exempted from the process,
> please let me know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for that.
>
> I would like to request exemptions for:
>
> llvm11
On Sun, 2023-01-29 at 10:26 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> The python-qt5 package in RHEL 8 does not ship the webkit package.
> I'm
> assuming that this is unlikely to be changed since qt5-qtwebkit isn't
> in
> RHEL but is in EPEL.
>
> I think I'm close to producing a python-qt5-epel package
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165302
Fedora Fails To Install changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Dne 30. 01. 23 v 9:21 Roberto Ragusa napsal(a):
2. Ship a single container that only needs to be QA’d once, works
everywhere, and has no dependencies except for the Linux kernel.
I get to update dependencies when *I* want to, and don’t have
to worry about breaking user’s systems. I
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 30th
January at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on Matrix or IRC
(Libera.chat). The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone
to attend. You can join us over:
Matrix:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165210
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165095
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
On 1/29/23 00:50, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
2. Ship a single container that only needs to be QA’d once, works
everywhere, and has no dependencies except for the Linux kernel.
I get to update dependencies when *I* want to, and don’t have
to worry about breaking user’s systems. I can
42 matches
Mail list logo
