tl;dr - you converted 892 tags in 14 days, statistics script now does not mention recently introduced packages and you
can put your package on ignore list
Two weeks ago we had:
* 23060 spec files in Fedora
* 29449license tags in all spec files
* 21194 tags have not been converted to SPDX
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172819
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174484
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175432
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175585
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Class-Method-Modifiers |perl-Class-Method-Modifiers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173292
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Prima-1.68-1.fc39 |perl-Prima-1.68-1.fc39
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142502
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174891
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Prima-1.68.2-1.fc39|perl-Prima-1.68.2-1.fc39
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175591
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174261
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175475
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Perl-Critic-1.150-1.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175305
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175125
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174457
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Config-Perl-V-0.36-1.f |perl-Config-Perl-V-0.36-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174402
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.50-1.fc3 |perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.50-1.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174023
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Rose-DB-0.785-2.fc38
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173731
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72-1. |perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72-1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173461
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Test-Directory-0.052-1 |perl-Test-Directory-0.052-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173116
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-SQL-Translator-1.63-1. |perl-SQL-Translator-1.63-1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172742
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144909
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173127
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.16-1.fc3 |perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.16-1.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172670
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.16-1.fc3 |perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.16-1.fc3
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 2:16 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Some user-facing applications will be able to display the latest
> > versions of the FontAwesome icons, which have undergone a number of
> > updates and cleanups to provide a more pleasing look. In addition,
> > many new icons have been
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 05:49:24AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
>> So basically we are stuck with the status quo. Meaning that there is
>> still nothing preventing an already rejected feature from being
>> surprisingly reconsidered after the change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177338
Bug ID: 2177338
Summary: perl-Lexical-SealRequireHints-0.012 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Lexical-SealRequireHints
Keywords:
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 11:41:09AM -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > I am doing the conversion of license tags in my projects and i have a
> > project where some files are under the GPL-2.0-or-later license and other
> > under the GPL-3.0-or-later license. Perhaps this has been mentioned
> >
> Some user-facing applications will be able to display the latest
> versions of the FontAwesome icons, which have undergone a number of
> updates and cleanups to provide a more pleasing look. In addition,
> many new icons have been added in the 5.x and 6.x versions. For
> example, version 6.x
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 10:59:32AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Note that at least 2 of us voted for this proposal with a note that it's
> better than status quo and hence not worth rejecting, but we'd rather see a
> better solution.
I think there's a desire to try and prevent surprises, but
OLD: Fedora-38-20230309.n.0
NEW: Fedora-38-20230310.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 61
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 08:54:06AM +, Chris Kelley wrote:
> >
> > The above is done by about 2.5 people (counting multiple volunteers as 1
> > person). This goes up at times and goes down but for the last year has been
> > about that.
>
> An aside - how/where does one volunteer to help
F38 Beta is go, so it's time to look at final blockers. The current
target is the early target date (18 April).
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. fcoe-utils — anaconda failed to detect the fcoe target(only affects
ixgbe) — NEW
ACTION: Maintainer to
perl-SDL-2.548-17.fc39 will correct a license tag from (LGPL-2.1-or-later) to
(LGPL-2.1-or-later AND (GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl)).
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-SDL-2.548-17.fc39
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175955
Bug 2175955 depends on bug 2176089, which changed state.
Bug 2176089 Summary: Upgrade biblatex to 3.19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176089
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175955
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|MODIFIED
Here's another "surprise for the new user" that I suggest being added.
What does the % character mean?
Sometimes it's the beginning of a section. Sometimes it's a macro.
I see now that the web page color codes the two differently,
but that's not obvious.
It would be helpful to explain that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173510
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2177189
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2173510
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189
--- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #2)
> Yes, please add me as a comaintainer. My account is ppisar.
Done, you are a co-admin of the package now, thank you for your help with this!
Note both for now
Thanks all for the input.
Maybe there was some issue in COPR and/or rawhide at the
> time those packages were signed which caused them to fail
> verification now? It may be worth trying to rebuild them to
> see if they can be properly signed?
>
I resubmitted the affected packages and now
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173510
--- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar ---
s/test/patch/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173510
___
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173510
--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ---
I confirm the upstream test fixes this problem. If you don't have time, I can
apply the patch to the Fedora sdl12-compat package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ---
Yes, please add me as a comaintainer. My account is ppisar.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189
--- Comment #1 from Hans de Goede ---
Petr, thank you for the pointer to the fix and also thank you for your work on
bug 2173510 (the tests hang).
I could really use a co-maintainer for perl-SDL, shall I add you as a
co-maintainer?
If yes,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173510
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Github
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173510
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|perl-SDL|sdl12-compat
QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173510
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ---
Plain "perl -Iblib/{lib,arch} t/core_video.t" without an X server also hangs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177189
Bug ID: 2177189
Summary: perl-SDL will fail to build with GCC 14 because of an
implicit _calc_offset() declaration
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230309.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230310.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 96
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.12 MiB
Size of dropped packages:4.03
On 10. 03. 23 9:59, Hunor Csomortáni wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 8:46 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 05:49:24AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
* #2951 Proposal: policy for resubmitting rejected proposals (zbyszek,
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 8:46 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 05:49:24AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > * #2951 Proposal: policy for resubmitting rejected proposals (zbyszek,
> > > 17:07:47)
> > > * AGREED:
>
> The above is done by about 2.5 people (counting multiple volunteers as 1
> person). This goes up at times and goes down but for the last year has been
> about that.
An aside - how/where does one volunteer to help releng?
On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 at 21:22, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175955
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
55 matches
Mail list logo
