[Bug 2236101] perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks for EL8 and EL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2236101 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-31bf677b99 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 2236101] perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks for EL8 and EL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2236101 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 2232889] perl-ORLite-2.00 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232889 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-ORLite-2.00-1.fc39 |perl-ORLite-2.00-1.fc39

[Bug 2231692] perl-Test-Harness-3.47 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231692 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Test-Harness-3.47-1.fc |perl-Test-Harness-3.47-1.fc

[Bug 2233000] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20230820 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233000 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023

[Bug 2232889] perl-ORLite-2.00 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232889 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

Just realized: - using avahi for local peer discovery, how does this compare to good ole bittorrent with Protocol/Message Stream Encryption turned on, and DHT instead of a tracker? - I guess the "self-signed certificate" discussion stems from the fact that TLS assumes you have certificates –

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 22:05, Björn Persson wrote: > The document doesn't say what design decisions were made based on the > assumption of a friendly network. Well, I can certainly add them -- this discussion was started so I can add any missing information. > All of those design decisions need

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

Richard Hughes wrote: > I was thinking of adding Passim as a default-installed and > default-enabled dep of fwupd in the Fedora 40 release. Before I create > lots of unnecessary drama, is there any early feedback on what's > described in https://github.com/hughsie/passim/blob/main/README.md >

Re: Manual step in upgrade process for a FSWC

On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 11:24 AM Iker Pedrosa wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 8:46 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 11:59:18AM +0200, Iker Pedrosa wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I intend to switch pam_userdb's database provider from BerkeleyDB to GDBM >> > and I'm

Monitizing Desktop/Workstation Linux

It would be nice if there was that but not just flatpak but rpm, etc as well. Any thoughts on this topic? Thanks for all the work, hopefully I can pay for it so we can have nice things. Free as in freedom(libre) not free as in (free) beer. ___ devel

Re: firefox builds seem stuck on the farm - pls check

On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 09:56:53AM +0200, Marius Schwarz wrote: > Hi all, > > Am 30.08.23 um 20:54 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: > > > > Perhaps some folks could try building on an x86_64 vm and see if it > > happens outside of koji? > > > > The updates are not in the testing repo. They are now "just

Re: Inactive packager policy for the F39 cycle

On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 06:45:25AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Il 30/08/23 22:02, Ben Cotton ha scritto: > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 2:47 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> Might you be willing to also do the provenpackager one? > >> (

Re: Manual step in upgrade process for a FSWC

On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 5:59:18 AM EDT Iker Pedrosa wrote: > Hi, > > I intend to switch pam_userdb's database provider from BerkeleyDB to GDBM > and I'm writing a Fedora System-Wide Change > for Fedora 40. > The upgrade process

Re: Non-schedule for Thursday's FESCo meeting (2023-08-31)

On 8/31/23 11:19, Neal Gompa wrote: There is nothing new with the "meeting" tag and no progress on the existing one on incomplete changes. I'll chair the next meeting next week. There's also nothing to announce either. Thanks, Neal. -- David Cantrell Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT

Non-schedule for Thursday's FESCo meeting (2023-08-31)

There is nothing new with the "meeting" tag and no progress on the existing one on incomplete changes. I'll chair the next meeting next week. There's also nothing to announce either. -- Neal Gompa (FAS: ngompa) ___ devel mailing list --

Inactive provenpackagers policy for the f39 cycle

This is a bit late on schedule, but... In accordance with FESCo policy[1], the following provenpackagers will be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of Koji builds submitted in the last six months. If you received this directly, you can reply off-list to indicate you should still

Inactive provenpackagers policy for the f39 cycle

This is a bit late on schedule, but... In accordance with FESCo policy[1], the following provenpackagers will be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of Koji builds submitted in the last six months. If you received this directly, you can reply off-list to indicate you should still

Fedora 39 compose report: 20230831.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-39-20230830.n.0 NEW: Fedora-39-20230831.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:9 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 13 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: Can we squeeze coreutils-9.4 into Fedora 39?

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 6:11 PM David Cantrell wrote: > I personally agree that this is enough of a change to warrant > consideration for Fedora 39, but I want Fedora QA to weigh in. At this > point we have beta and final blockers and you can use this form to > propose one: > >

Re: Can we squeeze coreutils-9.4 into Fedora 39?

On 8/30/23 15:45, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2023-08-30 at 12:11 -0400, David Cantrell wrote: On 8/29/23 23:13, Ian Laurie wrote: coreutils-9.3 brought changes to the behavior of the -v option which broke some of my automation scripts. Because of this I have been blocking updates to

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230831.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230830.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230831.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 10 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 78 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 12.21 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

[Test-Announce] Fedora 39 Branched 20230831.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 39 Branched 20230831.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: zlib-ng as a compat replacement for zlib

* Richard W. M. Jones: > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 11:05:55AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> Unfortunately, we seem to build the RHEL packages with --disable-zstd >> (I suppose just because we tend to disable everything nobody explicitly >> asked for). Maybe we should check other distros. If zstd is

Re: Manual step in upgrade process for a FSWC

Hi, On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 8:46 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 11:59:18AM +0200, Iker Pedrosa wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I intend to switch pam_userdb's database provider from BerkeleyDB to GDBM > > and I'm writing a Fedora System-Wide Change > >

Re: zlib-ng as a compat replacement for zlib

On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 11:05:55AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: > [ Cc: qemu-block ] > > Am 30.08.2023 um 20:26 hat Richard W.M. Jones geschrieben: > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 05:49:24PM -, Daniel Alley wrote: > > > > The background to this is I've spent far too long trying to optimize > > > >

Re: firefox builds seem stuck on the farm - pls check

Hi all, Am 30.08.23 um 20:54 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: Perhaps some folks could try building on an x86_64 vm and see if it happens outside of koji? The updates are not in the testing repo. They are now "just build". The usual workflow seems to be interrupted somehow. best regards, Marius

Re: CVE: Python-twisted a.o. needs update for F37 due to matrix-synapse security issue

Am 30.08.23 um 20:44 schrieb Jonathan Steffan: On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 3:45 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 26/05/2023 16:22, Marius Schwarz wrote: > This brings me to the question: whats the main issue for twisted here? 1. Contact python-twisted maintainers. Marius,

[Bug 2236101] perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks for EL8 and EL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2236101 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

Re: Inactive packager policy for the F39 cycle

Il 30/08/23 22:02, Ben Cotton ha scritto: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 2:47 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Might you be willing to also do the provenpackager one? >> ( https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Provenpackager_policy/ ) >> > For Mattia (or anyone else who wants to pick this up), you can