Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F38 to F39

On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 2:23 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: : > dnf --releasever=39 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f39 \ > > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ > --assumeno distro-sync > So are the F39M

[Test-Announce] Fedora Linux 39 Beta is NO-GO

Due to outstanding blocker bugs[1], we do not have a release candidate for Fedora Linux 39 Beta. Tomorrow's Go/No-Go meeting is cancelled. The next Fedora Linux 39 Beta Go/No-Go meeting will be held at 1700 UTC on Thursday 14 September in #fedora-meeting-1. We will aim for the "target date #1"

Exclude i686 builders for noarch packages

I'm running into an issue where python-rpds-py excludes i686: # https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval # Also rust-rpds is not available on i686 ExcludeArch:%{ix86} but then my python-nbformat build gets sent to an i686 builder and fails because python3-rpds-py is

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-2a8f8b189e clamav-0.103.10-1.el7 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-0640e2bbd1 xrdp-0.9.23-1.el7 3

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing: Age URL 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-c2aea8a27e xrdp-0.9.23-1.el9 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1e3b2a7b2f libtommath-1.2.0-10.el9 1

Re: [PATCH] fedora: Replace pasta hard links by copies, mangle Build-IDs

On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 15:31:46 +0100 "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 03:59:39PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 14:53:27 +0100 > > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 03:48:44PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote: > > > > The hard

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Wed, 2023-09-06 at 22:33 +0100, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > On Fri, 2023-08-25 at 12:42 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > The tl;dr: is I want to add a mDNS server that reshares the public > > firmware update metadata from the LVFS on your LAN. The idea is that > > rather than 25 users in an office

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Fri, 2023-08-25 at 12:42 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > The tl;dr: is I want to add a mDNS server that reshares the public > firmware update metadata from the LVFS on your LAN. The idea is that > rather than 25 users in an office downloading the same ~2MB file from > the CDN every day, the

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Wed, 2023-09-06 at 21:09 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 19:12, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > This message says you're "thinking of adding Passim", but in point of > > fact, it appears to have been added to the package set already, and as > > of fwupd-1.9.5-2.fc40 (built

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 18:36, Adam Williamson wrote: > NetworkManager has the same concept, but of course it depends on apps > that use data *caring* about it. It sounds like passimd should be a thing that cares too -- https://github.com/hughsie/passim/issues/13 Richard.

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 19:12, Adam Williamson wrote: > This message says you're "thinking of adding Passim", but in point of > fact, it appears to have been added to the package set already, and as > of fwupd-1.9.5-2.fc40 (built two days ago), fwupd hard requires it, It hard requires the -lib --

Unretire golly

Hello, According to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/ I'd like to announce that I'm going to unretire the package "golly". It was retired because it was FTBFS for too long: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675048 Probably because

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Fri, 2023-08-25 at 12:42 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > Hi all, > > I was thinking of adding Passim as a default-installed and > default-enabled dep of fwupd in the Fedora 40 release. Before I create > lots of unnecessary drama, is there any early feedback on what's > described in

compilation of vdr-skindesigner fails with allocator.h:184:7: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

Hi, when compiling vdr-skindesigner-1.2.21 [1] on fc38 it fails with this error message: g++ -O3 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Wed, 2023-09-06 at 07:58 -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 13:31, Richard Hughes wrote: > > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 16:27, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > It depends on the scanning from ports open to unknown shared files to > > 'why did our network costs go up so much?' >

Fedora 39 compose report: 20230906.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-39-20230905.n.0 NEW: Fedora-39-20230906.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 35 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 606.99 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Need help with build failure

python-calcephpy builds were FTB since between the F39 mass rebuild (which completed fine) and the Cython 3.x change (which started to fail). While I was waiting for upstream to fix the package for compatibility with Cython 3.x I tried to rebuild it forcing cython < 3.0, but I got an odd build

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 12:58 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 13:31, Richard Hughes wrote: >> >> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 16:27, Stephen Smoogen wrote: >> > It depends on the scanning from ports open to unknown shared files to 'why >> > did our network costs go up so

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 13:31, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 16:27, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > It depends on the scanning from ports open to unknown shared files to > 'why did our network costs go up so much?' > > Surely if you're on a local network with bandwidth costs you'd

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230906.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230905.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230906.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:5 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:4 Upgraded packages: 79 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 1.84 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Intent to orphan vpnc

Hi Christian, Hau idatzi du Christian Krause (c...@fedoraproject.org) erabiltzaileak (2023 ira. 6(a), az. (00:08)): > > There is no active upstream for vpnc. However, according to the bug reports > for NetworkManager-vpnc, there might be still a few users. It seems there is an active fork

Re: PDC replacement proposal

On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 11:35:19AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 04:51:22PM +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote: > > Hello all, it took us a few years but we are finally getting rid of the PDC > > project. Thanks to the ARC research we identified use cases in our tooling > > and

Re: Intent to orphan vpnc

On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 12:02 PM Leon Fauster via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Am 06.09.23 um 00:08 schrieb Christian Krause: > > Hello, > > > > vpnc is a VPN client which can be used with certain VPN devices: > > https://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~massar/vpnc/ > >

Re: Intent to orphan vpnc

Am 06.09.23 um 00:08 schrieb Christian Krause: Hello, vpnc is a VPN client which can be used with certain VPN devices: https://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~massar/vpnc/ The last co-maintainer who actively maintained the package for the last few years

Re: PDC replacement proposal

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 04:51:22PM +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote: > Hello all, it took us a few years but we are finally getting rid of the PDC > project. Thanks to the ARC research we identified use cases in our tooling > and proposed solution. > > The essential functionalities currently provided by

[Bug 2237636] Upgrade perl-Prima to 1.70

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237636 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2237636] Upgrade perl-Prima to 1.70

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237636 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Prima-1.70-1.fc40

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

--- Original Message --- On Wednesday, September 6th, 2023 at 09:21, František Šumšal wrote: > > Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: {"status": > > "error", "errors": [{"location": "body", "name": "builds", "description": > > "Update for

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 9/6/23 09:02, Christiano Anderson wrote: --- Original Message --- On Tuesday, September 5th, 2023 at 13:54, Miro Hrončok wrote: I got an error while running fedpkg update Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: {"status": "error", "errors": [{"location":

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

--- Original Message --- On Tuesday, September 5th, 2023 at 13:54, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > I pushed the change only to rawhide branch, should I do the same for f39? > > > Yes please. But also build the package for both rawhide and Fedora 39 to make > it installable: > >

Re: KDE and GNOME Join Hands To Add Payments To Turn Flathub Into a Store for the Linux Desktop

On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 12:07:39PM +0100, Liam Proven wrote: > On Tue, 5 Sept 2023 at 11:51, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > (Everyone, it's best to not feed the troll) > > Since you don't quote any part of any message, we have no idea who you > consider to be a troll and so who we are not

[Bug 2237636] New: Upgrade perl-Prima to 1.70

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237636 Bug ID: 2237636 Summary: Upgrade perl-Prima to 1.70 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Prima Status: NEW Component: perl-Prima