The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-27c714a6a4
xrdp-0.9.23.1-1.el8
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-bfde2b0c7c
libspf2-1.2.11-11.20210922git4915c308.el8
1
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-97dd2d11b6
xrdp-0.9.23.1-1.el7
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-3ee7f851c6
composer-1.10.27-1.el7
4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241802
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-d26b9cbdf5 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-93ac846983
xrdp-0.9.23.1-1.el9
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-9791f0b66c
composer-2.6.4-1.el9
2
OLD: Fedora-39-20231002.n.0
NEW: Fedora-39-20231003.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 92
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 12.22 MiB
Size of dropped packages:317.38 KiB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241802
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-6931cf2dcd has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241705
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-b41e31fe3b has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238816
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(spo...@gmail.com) |
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241969
--- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
I made the branch, but there are missing dependencies in EPEL-9:
DEBUG util.py:446: No matching package to install: 'perl(File::FcntlLock)'
DEBUG util.py:446: No matching package to install:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238816
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149109
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241969
--- Comment #1 from Sergio Basto ---
I just have commit permissions in this package , can't request a new branch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 20:55 +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
> Am 03.10.23 um 20:46 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> > On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 13:13 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 01:19:20 PM -0400, Simo Sorce
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > Additionally *all* of the code is
Because when they ask “where is the code?”, they are asking a different
question than yours :)
Regards,
Carlos
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 2:30 PM Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 23:13 +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
> > Am 03.10.23 um 21:29 schrieb Simo Sorce:
> > > On Tue,
Leon,
I don't think this has ever been about whether a piece of code is
present in version 8 (using your example), but about the free (gratis)
availability of the combination of version 7 with selected backports
from version 8 that has been thoroughly tested by RedHat teams and their
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 23:13 +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
> Am 03.10.23 um 21:29 schrieb Simo Sorce:
> > On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 20:55 +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
> > > Am 03.10.23 um 20:46 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> > > > On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 13:13 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> >
Am 03.10.23 um 21:29 schrieb Simo Sorce:
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 20:55 +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
Am 03.10.23 um 20:46 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 13:13 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 01:19:20 PM -0400, Simo Sorce
wrote:
Additionally *all* of
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 04:36:20PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Thank you for all the effort you have put into maintaining these
> packages so far, for the benefit of all of Fedora, and consequently
> its downstream!
Indeed -- thank you Todd.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
Hi all,
Today, 2023-10-03, is an important day on the Fedora Linux 39 schedule
[1], with significant cut-offs.
Today we have the Final Freeze [2] which starts at 14:00 UTC. This means
that only packages that fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs
[3][4][5] will be marked as 'stable' and
Hi all,
Today, 2023-10-03, is an important day on the Fedora Linux 39 schedule
[1], with significant cut-offs.
Today we have the Final Freeze [2] which starts at 14:00 UTC. This means
that only packages that fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs
[3][4][5] will be marked as 'stable' and
On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 03:32:36 PM -0400, Solomon Peachy via devel
wrote:
However, this has _always_ been the situation for RHEL. Only the
sources for the _latest_ point release (eg RHEL 7.4) were ever made
available to the general public; updates/fixes backported to prior
versions (eg RHEL
On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 02:23:34 PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
The *exact* set of source code that the package was built for is
included in the Source RPM and all of the individual changes that
comprised it are part of the c9s branch in CentOS Stream (or the
maintainer has been regressing
On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 07:46:58 PM +0100, Sérgio Basto
wrote:
it is here :
https://git.centos.org/rpms/webkit2gtk3/c/2d1b790baa97d14849e56ed21d3f0145268283c2?branch=c9
Well OK yes, but that only worked because my example was from before we
stopped publishing sources to git.centos.org.
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 10:30:45AM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> Well, in what shape is our "layered image" build system? Aren't we able
Terrible, and going to be decomissioned after f39 release. ;)
But if you mean base images... those are fine.
> to create a new official image say
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 08:50:53PM +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
> If a bumped version of a package fixes an issue (stream variant of
> CentOS) e.g 2.2, and a released package (rhel variant) has a
> backported fix for e.g. 2.1, that doesn't mean that the code is also
> in the stream git
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 20:55 +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
> Am 03.10.23 um 20:46 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> > On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 13:13 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 01:19:20 PM -0400, Simo Sorce
> > > wrote:
> > > > Additionally *all* of the code is fully
Hi list,
just a heads up: because we're talking about how to validate appstream metadata: When
validating metadata, one of the "default" warnings you get is:
> In the past, mailto: URL schemas to link to email addresses were also supported for
this URL type. It is recommended to not use them
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231002.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231003.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 89
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 5.95 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Am 03.10.23 um 20:46 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 13:13 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 01:19:20 PM -0400, Simo Sorce
wrote:
Additionally *all* of the code is fully available in git form on
gitlab
as part of CentOS Stream.
We all know or should know that
Am 03.10.23 um 20:23 schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 2:14 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 01:19:20 PM -0400, Simo Sorce
wrote:
Additionally *all* of the code is fully available in git form on
gitlab
as part of CentOS Stream.
We all know or should know
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 13:13 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 01:19:20 PM -0400, Simo Sorce
> wrote:
> > Additionally *all* of the code is fully available in git form on
> > gitlab
> > as part of CentOS Stream.
>
> We all know or should know that this is false. It's easy
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 2:14 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 01:19:20 PM -0400, Simo Sorce
> wrote:
> > Additionally *all* of the code is fully available in git form on
> > gitlab
> > as part of CentOS Stream.
>
> We all know or should know that this is false. It's easy
On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 01:19:20 PM -0400, Simo Sorce
wrote:
Additionally *all* of the code is fully available in git form on
gitlab
as part of CentOS Stream.
We all know or should know that this is false. It's easy enough to
disprove with a counterexample:
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 11:33 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 10:25 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > > a project
> > > where the primary sponsor and downstream no longer provides
> > > source code freely and openly
> >
> > what you are talking about ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241969
Michael J Gruber changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241969
Bug ID: 2241969
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Mail-Box in epel9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mail-Box
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241845
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2023-10-04 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#topic aloha
Am 03.10.23 um 17:33 schrieb Todd Zullinger:
Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 10:25 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
a project
where the primary sponsor and downstream no longer provides
source code freely and openly
what you are talking about ? all RHEL Source are freely available on
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 10:25 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> a project
>> where the primary sponsor and downstream no longer provides
>> source code freely and openly
>
> what you are talking about ? all RHEL Source are freely available on
> Centos Stream , and RHEL never was
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 9:32:17 AM CDT Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
> I've picked up git and paperkey.
>
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 9:25 AM Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm orphaning all my packages (which I effectively did
> > months ago). It's been fun being a maintainer since
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 10:25 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> a project
> where the primary sponsor and downstream no longer provides
> source code freely and openly
what you are talking about ? all RHEL Source are freely available on
Centos Stream , and RHEL never was free .
--
Sérgio M. B.
Hi Todd Zullinger
Got your message!
Leslie Satenstein
PS.
I share your views. I am a senior, age 82.7 (Born Jan 1941), and while I did a
great deal of QA / Testing,I am very disappointed in the direction that both
the Europeans and Americans are heading.
There is, underway now, a
Hi,
Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Thank you for all the effort you have put into maintaining these
> packages so far, for the benefit of all of Fedora, and consequently
> its downstream!
Thanks!
> Your reasons resonate with me, though I'm not taking the same
> conclusions. Have you arranged
Am Di., 3. Okt. 2023 um 16:25 Uhr schrieb Todd Zullinger :
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm orphaning all my packages (which I effectively did
> months ago). It's been fun being a maintainer since 2006.
>
> However, I am not interested in contributing to a project
> where the primary sponsor and downstream no
I've picked up git and paperkey.
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 9:25 AM Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm orphaning all my packages (which I effectively did
> months ago). It's been fun being a maintainer since 2006.
>
> However, I am not interested in contributing to a project
> where the primary
Hi,
I'm orphaning all my packages (which I effectively did
months ago). It's been fun being a maintainer since 2006.
However, I am not interested in contributing to a project
where the primary sponsor and downstream no longer provides
source code freely and openly. It's simply not consistent
Please, if you have not received this email directly from me (not through the
mailing list) and you are not listed in the affected username, there's no need
to reply.
Thank you.
Mattia
Il 03/10/23 13:57, Adam Piasecki ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> Yes - I would like my account to continue being
Dne 03. 10. 23 v 9:31 John Reiser napsal(a):
Especially because texlive was such an outlier, then any linear estimate
should state the starting and ending dates that were used for the projection.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QVMEzXWML-6_Mrlln02axFAaRKCQ8zE807rpCjus-8s/edit#gid=0
Hello,
Yes - I would like my account to continue being listed in the `*packager*`
group, as I am eager to contribute to Fedora.
Regards,
Adam Piasecki.
On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 at 04:23, jeff stewart wrote:
> Yes still interested in contributing to fedora
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023, 9:06 AM Mattia
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241845
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
Le 03/10/2023 à 07:39, Remi Collet a écrit :
Hi,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php83
Mass rebuild is started in f40-build-side-74920
Mass rebuild is done and update pushed in stable:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-246a5cdcbe
Single FTBFS (already reported, not
Hi,
I'm orphaning the scalacheck package.
Best,
Christiano
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On neděle 20. srpna 2023 11:27:44 CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 14. 08. 23 v 21:30 Michael J Gruber napsal(a):
> > Is this supposed to work now?
> >
> > With mock-5.0-1.fc38.noarch and after scrubbing, the image is pulled but
> > then not used because it is "not marked ready" (rawhide, f39,
Dear Fedora Community,
We're excited to announce the Fedora 39 Cloud Test Day[0], and we need
your help! Before the official release of Fedora 39, we're seeking
community members to participate in a focused testing event. By
contributing, you'll be helping to ensure the stability and quality of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241802
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-6931cf2dcd has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-6931cf2dcd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241802
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-d26b9cbdf5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-d26b9cbdf5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
New projection when we will be finished is 2024-08-06. Pure linear
approximation.
Especially because texlive was such an outlier, then any linear estimate
should state the starting and ending dates that were used for the projection.
Similar to financial statistics, it might be better
to use a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241802
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241802
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241705
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-b41e31fe3b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-b41e31fe3b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241705
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241705
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
63 matches
Mail list logo
