On 10/16/23 00:20, Peter Boy wrote:
Sorry for top posting. But my question doesn’t fit to a specific post. And I
don’t like to contribute to getting off-topic. But ...
I followed the thread and various similar discussions closely. My question is:
Who is really suffering from the famous „June
Sorry for top posting. But my question doesn’t fit to a specific post. And I
don’t like to contribute to getting off-topic. But ...
I followed the thread and various similar discussions closely. My question is:
Who is really suffering from the famous „June decision“ of Red Hat? I don’t get
it.
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-d499e96867
trafficserver-9.2.3-1.el7
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b5d558ab14
libcue-2.2.1-13.el7
3
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-18e8d4f55b
mbedtls-2.28.5-1.el8
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e2dd7ffa65
trafficserver-9.2.3-1.el8
3
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-61870984c8
mbedtls-2.28.5-1.el9
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-834ef33019
trafficserver-9.2.3-1.el9
3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231739
--- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1994101
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1994101=edit
Update to 0.25 (#2231739)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231739
--- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed. Details below:
BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs',
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231739
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10-0
14 Oct version Everything.iso anaconda failed on my system at the step where it
has to create the network setup for the target Gnome system.
Up to that point, installation went well.
Same place for workstation setup.
Sorry, can't seem to post elsewhere, Someone please
Leslie Satenstein
Hi Priscila,
On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 6:48 PM Priscila Gutierres wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to patch pymemcache/test-requirements.txt to unpin all the build
> requirements.
>
> I created this patch using git format-patch:
> https://paste.centos.org/view/46800819
This patch is wrong. The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239043
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.16
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239043
--- Comment #25 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed. Details below:
BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs',
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239043
--- Comment #26 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1994096
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1994096=edit
Update to 0.17 (#2239043)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 5:13 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm doing a MR on an old package that contains firmware data.
>
> I wanna convert to SPDX, what is the equivalent to "Redistributable, no
> modification
> permitted" in SPDX.
>
> The license is:
>
> The files in the
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 4:26 PM Jerry James wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 3:13 AM Robert-André Mauchin
> wrote:
> > I'm doing a MR on an old package that contains firmware data.
> >
> > I wanna convert to SPDX, what is the equivalent to "Redistributable, no
> > modification
> > permitted"
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 3:13 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> I'm doing a MR on an old package that contains firmware data.
>
> I wanna convert to SPDX, what is the equivalent to "Redistributable, no
> modification
> permitted" in SPDX.
[snip]
> What can I use for SPDX?
According to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239043
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.15
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239043
--- Comment #23 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1994077
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1994077=edit
Update to 0.16 (#2239043)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239043
--- Comment #22 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed. Details below:
BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs',
OLD: Fedora-39-20231014.n.0
NEW: Fedora-39-20231015.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231014.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231015.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 38
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 1.43 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On 10/13/23 08:15, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Hot news:
There was new release of SPDX License list. If you want to see impact of Fedora work you can
check number of new licenses in recent releases and compare
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/releases
and compare it with content of the
On 10/13/23 2:46 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Fri, Oct 13 2023 at 08:15:39 AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý
wrote:
> Scancode-toolkit is not yet in Fedora, but you can instal it form PyPI:
>
> $ pip install scancode-toolkit
> $ ~/.local/bin/scancode --license --html /tmp/spdx.html .
>
I
Soy, this is the right spec: https://paste.centos.org/view/4777a5e7
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 7:00 AM Priscila Gutierres
wrote:
> Yes, the package is listed in the specfile:
> https://paste.centos.org/view/cd69e93f
> Also, this is my development branch:
>
Yes, the package is listed in the specfile:
https://paste.centos.org/view/cd69e93f
Also, this is my development branch:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/prgutier/rpms/python-pymemcache
On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 11:50 PM Otto Liljalaakso
wrote:
> 15. lokakuuta 2023 1.47.49 GMT+03:00 Priscila
Hi,
I'm doing a MR on an old package that contains firmware data.
I wanna convert to SPDX, what is the equivalent to "Redistributable, no modification
permitted" in SPDX.
The license is:
The files in the directory src/miniloader are provided pursuant to the
following license agreement:
26 matches
Mail list logo