The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-bdf128f5d3
audiofile-0.3.6-36.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
libtbox-1.7.5-1.el8
Details about builds:
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-c9409db037
audiofile-0.3.6-36.el9
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-03f6b44faf
chromium-119.0.6045.159-1.el9
The following builds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030311
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|si...@sxw.org.uk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241294
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|si...@sxw.org.uk
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> rpms/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew
This is a Plasma 4 package and completely useless under Plasma 5 or
6. (There is not even a "cashew" to remove in current Plasma 5.) I am
surprised this package even builds at all, we are probably shipping too much
of the old
I pickled up the theme and background packages since I'm already doing
those for Fedora Jam.
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 5:12 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-11-18 at 21:57 +0100, Sandro wrote:
> > On 18-11-2023 21:08, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > After 6 weeks, the package will be retired.
> > >
On Sat, 2023-11-18 at 21:57 +0100, Sandro wrote:
> On 18-11-2023 21:08, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > After 6 weeks, the package will be retired.
> > After another 8 weeks, a new review is needed to unretire it.
> > see
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_orphan_and_re
> >
I picked up cairo and gtksourceview5.
--
Kalev
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Just noticed that the current chromium in epel-testing can not be
installed on E9 with rpmfusion repo enabled. All versions before did not
have this problem. It seems the build pulls a new dep (libavformat-free)
that conflicts with ffmpeg-libs of rpmfusion. This results in an
incompatibility
On 18-11-2023 21:08, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
After 6 weeks, the package will be retired.
After another 8 weeks, a new review is needed to unretire it.
seehttps://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_orphan_and_retired_packages/
for more details.
I'm wondering if there shouldn't be some
Hi all,
Today, 2023-11-18, we have removed inactive packagers
from the packager group.
This is in accordance with the FESCo policy on inactive packagers:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_inactive_packagers/
If the removed user is 'main admin' for a package, this package
Hi all,
Today, 2023-11-18, we have removed inactive packagers
from the packager group.
This is in accordance with the FESCo policy on inactive packagers:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_inactive_packagers/
If the removed user is 'main admin' for a package, this package
On 11/18/23 12:39 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:30:04 -0500
Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello,
When building an nfs-utils rpm in rawhide
I get the following errors:
xml.c: In function ‘junction_parse_xml_buf’:
xml.c:293:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘xmlParseMemory’
On Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:30:04 -0500
Steve Dickson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When building an nfs-utils rpm in rawhide
> I get the following errors:
>
> xml.c: In function ‘junction_parse_xml_buf’:
> xml.c:293:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘xmlParseMemory’
>
Hello,
When building an nfs-utils rpm in rawhide
I get the following errors:
xml.c: In function ‘junction_parse_xml_buf’:
xml.c:293:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘xmlParseMemory’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
293 | tmp = xmlParseMemory(buf, (int)len);
|
Hi Kai,
I'll take care of them.
Regards,
Mikel
Hau idatzi du Kai A. Hiller (v02...@gmail.com) erabiltzaileak (2023
aza. 18(a), lr. (09:48)):
>
> Hello,
>
> I’m currently adding Go-based parts of the Matrix ecosystem to Fedora. For
> that I need reviews of quite a few, but mostly small and
On Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:40:19 +
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-11-18 at 09:35 +0200, Tuomo Soini wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 21:31:37 +
> > Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > Is not an negative feedback, is a side note but I realize some
> > > time ago that version with
On Sat, 2023-11-18 at 09:35 +0200, Tuomo Soini wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 21:31:37 +
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Is not an negative feedback, is a side note but I realize some time
> > ago that version with next is bigger than version without next [1]
> > therefore we should find
Resurrecting this thread ...
On Tuesday, March 1, 2022 6:43:57 PM EST Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> The subject of setuid came up in a private conversation recently, and to my
> surprise we don't seem to have it documented in the packaging guidelines:
>
>
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 02:52:23PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-11-16 at 23:41 +0100, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> > >
> > > I think an upstream only wants to adhere to the language specification
> > > (groff_char(7)). These small differences became prominent with the advent
> > > of
>
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231117.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231118.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 5
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:7
Upgraded packages: 30
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:276.01
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250416
Bug ID: 2250416
Summary: perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20231118.001 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Business-ISBN-Data
Keywords:
* John Reiser:
> For instance, I have a recipe for an "embedded" Docker
> that will have to add the symlink.
Interesting. Do you have public reference for it?
Thanks,
Florian
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
Hello,
I’m currently adding Go-based parts of the Matrix ecosystem to Fedora.
For that I need reviews of quite a few, but mostly small and
auto-generated packages. Help is appreciated, please tell me what you
need from me in return.
List of package dependencies and bugzilla links:
24 matches
Mail list logo
