On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 04:38:55AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Florian Weimer wrote:
> > The final patches for GCC 14 are currently under upstream review and
> > should land very soon. Earlier, I had received feedback that the larger
> > community desires just one transition, so we end
> Kevin Kofler via devel writes:
> My pet peeve is provenpackagers or comaintainers who add unwanted
> automagic (autorelease, autosetup, autochangelog) to my packages.
That really shouldn't be happening for anything which wasn't officially
made mandatory or forbidden or whatnot. Sure, I
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 3:48 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
> My pet peeve is provenpackagers or comaintainers who add unwanted automagic
> (autorelease, autosetup, autochangelog) to my packages. I do not want any of
> that in my packages, it just makes my work harder (or in practice, just
>
Michael J Gruber wrote:
> I am sick of this. Really. I am so sick of this way of stomping on each
> others' feet.
My pet peeve is provenpackagers or comaintainers who add unwanted automagic
(autorelease, autosetup, autochangelog) to my packages. I do not want any of
that in my packages, it just
Florian Weimer wrote:
> The final patches for GCC 14 are currently under upstream review and
> should land very soon. Earlier, I had received feedback that the larger
> community desires just one transition, so we end up with the following
> warnings which turn into errors by default:
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252645
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-715630ea6f has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-d47bce8e4e
chromium-119.0.6045.199-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
calceph-3.5.4-1.el8
Also the `minizip-compat` subpackage will be removed as it's part of the
zlib.
There are only two packages that couldn't build with the minizip-ng-compat:
chromium
libdigidocpp
Than, please switch chromium to bundled minizip as we agreed in BZ#2242271.
The change for Minizip is here:
On 11/30/23 04:23, Jan Horak wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to make the sandboxing using the wasi available for the Firefox and
for that I need the wasi-sdk [1] in the build root.
Currently there's wasi-libc [2] available which is fine and it almost contains
all the headers and libraries needed by the
Re-sending to binutils, openexr and python3.12 maintainers.
Sorry, I messed up your email aliases in my first message.
--
Tulio Magno
Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho writes:
> Following the recent approval from Fesco, I'm planning to distribute
> zlib-ng-compat packages for Rawhide later
Following the recent approval from Fesco, I'm planning to distribute
zlib-ng-compat packages for Rawhide later this week.
I hope this will give us enough time to work on the issues before
Fedora 40 is released. 爛
So, keep in mind this will *obsolete zlib in Rawhide*.
This update is also known
Greetings,
I'm planning to update wlroots in rawhide and f39 to 0.17.0[1] by the
end of the week. As usual, the update contains API/ABI breaking changes
and soname will be bumped to libwlroots.so.12. wlroots0.16 compatibility
package will be introduced in the same update.
No breakages are
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 02:28:03PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Richard W. M. Jones:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 09:15:28PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 06:09:55PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> > nbdkit rjones
> >>
> >> Can you help me to
* Richard W. M. Jones:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 09:15:28PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 06:09:55PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> > nbdkit rjones
>>
>> Can you help me to understand the build error in this log?
>>
>>
On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 09:15:28PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 06:09:55PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > nbdkit rjones
>
> Can you help me to understand the build error in this log?
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252479
Jan Pazdziora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Doc Type|---
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 at 14:46, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>
> Hello, all.
>
> Wanting to promote RPM packages, I'm trying to use mock on an RHEL8 VM
> that does not have unrestricted access to the internet. This fails
> miserably, as you would expect it to.
>
> I've already established that I need
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252645
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-715630ea6f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-715630ea6f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252645
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-File-MimeInfo-0.34-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252645
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
Dne 02. 12. 23 v 17:42 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
* Vít Ondruch:
Dne 01. 12. 23 v 11:40 Milan Crha napsal(a):
On Thu, 2023-11-30 at 18:09 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
Again, some of these are false positives.
Hi,
I think the errors from the configure time of the script are not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252645
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252728
Bug ID: 2252728
Summary: Upgrade perl-Net-DNS-SEC to 1.23
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Net-DNS-SEC
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252605
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252605
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252727
Bug ID: 2252727
Summary: Upgrade perl-DBIx-SearchBuilder to 1.79
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/DBIx-SearchBuilder
Status: NEW
Updated some of the Swedish on your webpage earlier today
Den mån 4 dec. 2023 kl 10:54 skrev Ankur Sinha :
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 04
> December at 1300UTC in the NeuroFedora channel on Matrix. The meeting
> is a public meeting,
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 04
December at 1300UTC in the NeuroFedora channel on Matrix. The meeting
is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us
over:
Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/%23neuro:fedoraproject.org
You can
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252546
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252546
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252605
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
On Mon, 2023-12-04 at 09:01 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> No, that's actually not changing, this is already an error and will
> remain an error.
Hi,
right, the "check-compile" test is supposed to fail, thus it's fine.
> Only the -Wincompatible-pointer-types warning above is
> upgraded
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252546
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
* Milan Crha:
> The a), an expected failure, is this one:
> .../TryCompile-0C2YRH/src.c: In function ‘main’:
> .../TryCompile-0C2YRH/src.c:11:37: warning: redundant redeclaration of
> ‘__h_errno_location’ [-Wredundant-decls]
> 11 | int h_errno;
>
34 matches
Mail list logo
