https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253383
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-d47bce8e4e
chromium-119.0.6045.199-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-46696cc30b
chromium-119.0.6045.199-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
wsdd-0.7.1-1.el7
Details about builds:
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-2537ccf8b5
chromium-119.0.6045.199-1.el9
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-3d9a822df5
rust-pore-0.1.8-5.el9
The following builds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253383
Bug ID: 2253383
Summary: perl-DBD-Pg-3.18.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DBD-Pg
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On 12/2/23 19:32, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I have a number of packages needing review that are required for the
latest round of updates to the conda package manager:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2025802_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=13378412#
I'm particularly excited by libmamba
Florian Weimer wrote:
> Although the critical type size mismatch happens on 32-bit architectures
> and Windows only. Problems like these are the reason why I don't think
> the Clang approach of restricting to incompatible-function-pointer-types
> only makes much sense.
Uhm, yeah, there are
Kevin Kofler noted about a year ago [1] that new versions of the solvers
SoPlex [2] and SCIP [3] were released under free software licenses. Over the
last year, I've been working little by little on building them in a COPR [4]
and rebuilding various Fedora packages with SoPlex and SCIP support.
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 8:37 AM Ben Beasley wrote:
> This email proposes upgrading the llhttp package in EPEL9 from 8.1.1 to
> 9.1.3, which would break the ABI and bump the SONAME version, under the
> EPEL Incompatible Upgrades Policy[1].
>
> The llhttp package is a C library (transpiled from
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 10:13:35AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> I'd like to start writing a script to synch users/groups from Fedora IPA
> to pagure.io and src.fp.o: both pagure.io and src.fp.o logins are based
> on Fedora accounts, but the Pagure user database is only updated when a
Text Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2023-12-06/fedora-coreos-meeting.2023-12-06-16.31.log.txt
HTML Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2023-12-06/fedora-coreos-meeting.2023-12-06-16.31.log.html
Text Minutes:
> Gerd Hoffmann this AFAIU means that we also need shim in the boot chain if we want to
> support these addons.
Only if you want to use certs in MOK to verify them, otherwise it's not
necessary. The protocol is just LoadImage which every firmware also provides
and checks against DB.
--
Gerd Hoffmann writes:
> Hi,
>
>> Does that mean that the Linux EFI boot code knows how to call back to
>> shim to get the certificates instead of reading the firmware directly?
>
> No. The linux efi stub doesn't need that.
>
> shim.efi does:
>
> (a) Set efi variables, where the linux kernel
> Except that it's not 100% compatible, since all those packages aren't
> building/working with zlib-ng-compat. At a minimum, you should be able
> to show that everything zlib-dependent successfully rebuilds with this,
> and since you've already identified some that don't, IMO they should be
>
Dne 06. 12. 23 v 12:52 František Šumšal napsal(a):
Hey,
Thanks to Packit I noticed that a lot of our jobs are running longer than usual, and a quick glance at the Copr task
queue[0] tells me there's something fishy going on. I opened a couple of jobs[1][2][3] and all of
...
Looks like the
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl` that you are
following:
``
Add reverse test for perl-Devel-Cover
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/9
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl` that
you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Add reverse test for perl-Devel-Cover
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/8
--
___
perl-devel mailing list
Hi,
> Does that mean that the Linux EFI boot code knows how to call back to
> shim to get the certificates instead of reading the firmware directly?
No. The linux efi stub doesn't need that.
shim.efi does:
(a) Set efi variables, where the linux kernel can read the
certificates from.
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl` that you are
following:
``
Add reverse test for perl-Devel-Cover
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/8
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl` that
you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Add reverse test for perl-Devel-Cover
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/7
--
___
perl-devel mailing list
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 1:19 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 11:16:44AM +0100, Ondrej Pohorelsky wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > For F40 I would like to change file permissions of few files that are
> > provided by cronie and crontabs and swap deny list for allow list. I'm
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 1:02 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 11:53:26AM +, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> > On 06/12/2023 11:08, Ondrej Pohorelsky wrote:
> >
> > > The only difference is that if you have populated the cron.deny list,
> > > after update it gets saved as
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 5:15 AM Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > What is the point of using shim in this path? We're not having UKIs
> > signed by Microsoft, and unless the Linux kernel knows how to call
> > shim for certificates, I don't see how this is supposed to be useful
> > for the
Yaakov Selkowitz writes:
> Except that it's not 100% compatible, since all those packages aren't
> building/working with zlib-ng-compat. At a minimum, you should be able
> to show that everything zlib-dependent successfully rebuilds with this,
I'm afraid I was not clear enough.
Packages built
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 1:19 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 11:16:44AM +0100, Ondrej Pohorelsky wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > For F40 I would like to change file permissions of few files that are
> > provided by cronie and crontabs and swap deny list for allow list. I'm
Hello Pythonistas.
Every other Wednesday at 14:00 Europe/Prague the Red Hat Python Maint team has
a meeting at https://meet.google.com/xuj-jswy-hat
The next meeting is in a week.
We go trough the open Fedora Bugzillas, PRs etc. assigned to our members.
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 11:16:44AM +0100, Ondrej Pohorelsky wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> For F40 I would like to change file permissions of few files that are
> provided by cronie and crontabs and swap deny list for allow list. I'm not
> really sure if I should make a change proposal. I figured I'll
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 at 06:49, Ondrej Pohorelsky wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:39 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 11:17 AM Ondrej Pohorelsky
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > For F40 I would like to change file permissions of few files that are
>>
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 11:53:26AM +, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> On 06/12/2023 11:08, Ondrej Pohorelsky wrote:
>
> > The only difference is that if you have populated the cron.deny list,
> > after update it gets saved as .rpmsave and cron.allow is created.
> > If the cron.deny is blank, it
On 06/12/2023 11:08, Ondrej Pohorelsky wrote:
The only difference is that if you have populated the cron.deny list,
after update it gets saved as .rpmsave and cron.allow is created.
If the cron.deny is blank, it will get replaced.
Also, if you had cron.allow populated before, it will stay this
Hey,
Thanks to Packit I noticed that a lot of our jobs are running longer than
usual, and a quick glance at the Copr task queue[0] tells me there's something
fishy going on. I opened a couple of jobs[1][2][3] and all of them seem to be
stuck in the same step - signing the build RPMs:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:39 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 11:17 AM Ondrej Pohorelsky
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > For F40 I would like to change file permissions of few files that are
> provided by cronie and crontabs and swap deny list for allow list. I'm not
>
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 12:39:02PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 11:17 AM Ondrej Pohorelsky wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > For F40 I would like to change file permissions of few files that are
> > provided by cronie and crontabs and swap deny list for allow list.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154738
Aoife Moloney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |EOL
Status|NEW
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:32 PM Michael J Gruber
wrote:
>
> Thanks, that sounds like the typical things to expect during an upgrade.
> We typically don't even have release notes mentioning this, but it would be
> nice, since it's even a "plus" for F40 (compliance, hardening).
>
> Does that mean
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 11:17 AM Ondrej Pohorelsky wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> For F40 I would like to change file permissions of few files that are
> provided by cronie and crontabs and swap deny list for allow list. I'm not
> really sure if I should make a change proposal. I figured I'll send
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231205.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231206.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 7
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:18
Upgraded packages: 67
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 5.42 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Am Mi., 6. Dez. 2023 um 12:09 Uhr schrieb Ondrej Pohorelsky <
opoho...@redhat.com>:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 11:26 AM Michael J Gruber
> wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> what is the impact of these changes:
>> - Do default installs work the same way as before?
>> - Do existing setups (crontabs)
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Sub-Override` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
0.10 bump; Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Override/pull-request/1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 11:26 AM Michael J Gruber
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> what is the impact of these changes:
> - Do default installs work the same way as before?
> - Do existing setups (crontabs) keep working?
>
> If yes then I'd consider the permission changes to be fixes, or at least
>
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Sub-Override`
that you are following:
``
0.10 bump; Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Override/pull-request/1
--
___
perl-devel
Am Mi., 6. Dez. 2023 um 11:17 Uhr schrieb Ondrej Pohorelsky <
opoho...@redhat.com>:
> Hi everyone,
>
> For F40 I would like to change file permissions of few files that are
> provided by cronie and crontabs and swap deny list for allow list. I'm not
> really sure if I should make a change
Hi everyone,
For F40 I would like to change file permissions of few files that are
provided by cronie and crontabs and swap deny list for allow list. I'm not
really sure if I should make a change proposal. I figured I'll send an
email first and see the feedback.
The driving force of this change
Hi,
> What is the point of using shim in this path? We're not having UKIs
> signed by Microsoft, and unless the Linux kernel knows how to call
> shim for certificates, I don't see how this is supposed to be useful
> for the Microsoft->Fedora->OS boot chain.
Booting without shim.efi would work
On 06. 12. 23 0:09, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
Except that it's not 100% compatible, since all those packages aren't
building/working with zlib-ng-compat. At a minimum, you should be able
to show that everything zlib-dependent successfully rebuilds with this,
and since you've already identified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252999
Fedora Fails To Install changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 03:01:04PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Aoife Moloney said:
> > * UKIs need this to find the root filesystem without root=... on the
> > kernel command line.
>
> How does this work in system with more than one Linux install? Or any
> more-complicated
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl` that you are
following:
``
Add reverse test for perl-Devel-Cover
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/7
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Hi,
this email is part of the non-responsive maintainer policy for the wsdd
package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253133
It would be nice to update the package to the latest upstream:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175523
I proposed a pull request for it two months
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 40 Rawhide 20231206.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 04:14:00PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 3:47 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
> >
> > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> > process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> > community feedback. This proposal will
53 matches
Mail list logo
