> Thanks Fabio!
>
> I presume the CMakeLists.txt of the project I'm working on needs some rebase.
> But first, I would like to see what is recommended before taking any action.
I assume this is about ProcDump-for-Linux[1]?
Yeah, their CMakeLists.txt really shouldn't be importing libbpf as an
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ad7d095358
rdiff-backup-2.2.6-3.el8
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-a79d31df77
chromium-120.0.6099.109-1.el8
The following
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-5418332424
chromium-120.0.6099.109-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
unrealircd-6.1.4-1.el7
Details about
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7a05e8decc
rdiff-backup-2.2.6-3.el9
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4b1b8b8b25
llhttp-9.1.3-1.el9 python-aiohttp-3.9.1-1.el9
2
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231216.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231217.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:7
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 45
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.01 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Jeremy Linton wrote:
> This is IMHO a mistake, the systemd-boot and UKI paths are the perfect
> time to break with shim and require some form of actual fedora/whatever
> secure boot key enrollment on the machine. Shim's fundamentally
> backdooring the UEFI security infrastructure, and frankly some
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 12:18 PM Jerry James wrote:
> With some architecture/gcc combinations, you have to link with
> -latomic to get access to the 128-bit atomic functions. Upstream's
> configure script assumes those functions are builtin or not present at
> all. They need to check for a 3rd
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 3:20 PM W. Michael Petullo wrote:
> I maintain Fedora's unicorn package. This package will not presently
> build on s390x, and I am not certain why. The problem seems to have to
> do with 128-bit instructions.
With some architecture/gcc combinations, you have to link with
Hey Mike,
I've forwarded this over to the Linux Distros working group [1] at the Open
Mainframe Project and am also going to take
a look to see what the deal is.
Best,
Neil
[1]
https://openmainframeproject.org/our-projects/working-groups/linux-distributions/
On 16.12.2023 16:20, W. Michael
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test
> builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign currently do
> not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've prepared a
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254783
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254783
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254117
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254072
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215065
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
15 matches
Mail list logo
