Hot news:
We added new license LicenseRef-Fedora-Firmware that we use for firmware that does not have clear license declarations
and only "Redistributable..."-like declarations.
https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/merge_requests/460/diffs
The process of adding the licenses
Hi Frank!
This is awesome!
I can review your PR because ProcDump is not so friendly in systems
that are rpm based.
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 3:49 PM Frank R Dana Jr. wrote:
>
> I just submitted that PR I mentioned, to support use of a system libbpf
> instead of immediately diving into
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 02:13:26PM -0600, Michel Lind wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'm happy to be able to provide this holiday present to the infra team
> (and other interested parties) - after chasing through tens of
> dependencies, going through multiple stalled EPEL requests, and evolving
> ebranch
Dear all,
I'm happy to be able to provide this holiday present to the infra team
(and other interested parties) - after chasing through tens of
dependencies, going through multiple stalled EPEL requests, and evolving
ebranch to automate some of these pain points, the `mailman3` web
components are
I just submitted that PR I mentioned, to support use of a system libbpf instead
of immediately diving into ExternalProject_Add():
https://github.com/Sysinternals/ProcDump-for-Linux/pull/225
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 01:59:59PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Based on my records, all issues that can lead to silent miscompilation
> because of altered configure probes (autoconf/CMake and a few others)
> have been addressed, or there are at least Bugzilla bugs filed for them.
> There could
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 06:58:37PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Aoife Moloney:
>
> > == Detailed Description ==
> > The split between `/bin` and `/sbin` is not useful, and also unused.
>
> Programs in /usr/bin have their documentation in section 1 of the
> manual, while programs /usr/sbin
Hi,
On Thu, 2023-12-21 at 16:08 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 2:49 PM Tom Hughes via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > On 21/12/2023 14:33, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> > > On 12/21/23 08:53 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 8:52 AM Leigh Scott
> > > >
> > > >
* Aoife Moloney:
> == Detailed Description ==
> The split between `/bin` and `/sbin` is not useful, and also unused.
Programs in /usr/bin have their documentation in section 1 of the
manual, while programs /usr/sbin are documented in section 8. (In
general, I deliberately used /usr/bin/ld.so
I have pushed this update to stable.
This is the final announcement prescribed by the EPEL Incompatible
Upgrades Policy,
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades/
On 12/13/23 08:43, Ben Beasley wrote:
I have just submitted for testing
I have just submitted for testing
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4b1b8b8b25,
which updates llhttp from 8.1.1 to 9.1.3 in EPEL9. This is an
ABI-incompatible update, and the SONAME version changes. There are also
some minor API changes.
The only package in EPEL9 that
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 7:51 PM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Aoife Moloney said:
> > Enable IPv4 Address Conflict Detection by default in NetworkManager.
>
> Huh, I didn't realize NM didn't already do this... ye olde
> network-scripts did.
>
As I recall, depending on
Once upon a time, Beniamino Galvani said:
> network-scripts do [1]:
>
> /sbin/arping -c 2 -w ${ARPING_WAIT:-3} -D -I ${REALDEVICE} ${ipaddr[$idx]}
>
> which waits 2 seconds by default.
Ahh, sorry, that's what I get for depending on memory. :)
> In the original RFC, the duration of the ACD
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 01:51:01PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Aoife Moloney said:
> > Enable IPv4 Address Conflict Detection by default in NetworkManager.
>
> Huh, I didn't realize NM didn't already do this... ye olde
> network-scripts did.
>
> > To the rescue comes
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 2:49 PM Tom Hughes via devel
wrote:
>
> On 21/12/2023 14:33, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> > On 12/21/23 08:53 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 8:52 AM Leigh Scott
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm -1 for this change, it shouldn't be enabled by default as it will
>
On 21/12/2023 14:33, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 12/21/23 08:53 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 8:52 AM Leigh Scott
wrote:
I'm -1 for this change, it shouldn't be enabled by default as it will
cause issues for users using router mac filtering.
What this seems to state is that
On 12/21/23 08:53 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 8:52 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
I'm -1 for this change, it shouldn't be enabled by default as it will cause
issues for users using router mac filtering.
What this seems to state is that the MAC address would be unique for
each
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 8:52 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> I'm -1 for this change, it shouldn't be enabled by default as it will cause
> issues for users using router mac filtering.
What this seems to state is that the MAC address would be unique for
each SSID, but once it's picked, it would be
I'm -1 for this change, it shouldn't be enabled by default as it will cause
issues for users using router mac filtering.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255477
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251622
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2255476 (CVE-2023-47100)
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251625
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2255476 (CVE-2023-47100)
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255479
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251624
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2255476 (CVE-2023-47100)
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255478
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
Based on my records, all issues that can lead to silent miscompilation
because of altered configure probes (autoconf/CMake and a few others)
have been addressed, or there are at least Bugzilla bugs filed for them.
There could be some gaps due to lack of architecture capture, general
rawhide churn,
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231220.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231221.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 8
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 96
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 180.73 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Hi all,
Today is the last day to vote in the F39 elections. Please make sure you do
so, in particular for FESCo where the number of candidates exceed the open
seats.
To vote please visit the Elections App https://elections.fedoraproject.org/
Kind regards,
Aoife
Aoife Moloney
Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255496
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255496
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255496
Bug ID: 2255496
Summary: perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20231220.001 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Business-ISBN-Data
Keywords:
Dne 21. 12. 23 v 10:20 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 20. 12. 23 v 20:53 Aoife Moloney napsal(a):
** Adjust `%_sbindir` in `/usr/lib/rpm/macros` (part of `rpm`
package). Packages will be updated automatically during the mass
rebuild.
Isn't the ultimate goal to drop the `%_sbindir` all
Dne 20. 12. 23 v 20:53 Aoife Moloney napsal(a):
** Adjust `%_sbindir` in `/usr/lib/rpm/macros` (part of `rpm`
package). Packages will be updated automatically during the mass
rebuild.
Isn't the ultimate goal to drop the `%_sbindir` all together? Shouldn't
at minimum the packaging guidelines
33 matches
Mail list logo
