Dne 05. 01. 24 v 7:38 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
Hot news:
I forgot to mention one thing:
To ease the migration I created a scantool-tookit reports for remaining
packages. It is available here
http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spdx-reports/
Right now there are missing packages from ELN set
Hot news:
The process of adding licenses is back on track.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_3 has been submitted.
Now lets dive into numbers:
Two weeks ago we had:
* 23562 spec files in Fedora
* 30067license tags in all spec files
* 11907 tags have not been
Hello everyone,
I would like to become the owner of python-pyngus[1]. This package was retired
half a year ago as a FTBFS/FTI bugs[2]. python-qpid-proton, which is a
dependent package of python-pyngus and was the reason for the installation
failure, is now provided in Fedora39 and Rawhide,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256688
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-a53d80f917 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 06:27:01PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> The pcb-rnd package contains a call:
>
> XRenderCreatePicture(display, lpm->img_scaled,
> XRenderFindVisualFormat(display, DefaultVisual(display, screen)), 0, 0);
>
> The issue here is that lpm->img_scaled is an XImage *, but
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256688
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
I would like to apologize if it seems that I’m being rude asking for a
review in this thread.
My point of view is that if the package is a dependency and no one is
looking on it, it would be a priority to keep it up to date.
I don’t know if merging it would be possible, since the maintainer is not
On 04-01-2024 23:05, Priscila Gutierres wrote:
I bumped python-pebble to the latest version.
Can someone please review this PR?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pebble/pull-request/3
Reviewing the PR is not a problem. However, who would merge it, once
approved? That needs a proven
I bumped python-pebble to the latest version.
Can someone please review this PR?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pebble/pull-request/3
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 5:05 PM Sandro wrote:
> On 02-01-2024 20:28, Priscila Gutierres wrote:
> > Does any package depend on python-pebble?
> > I
On 1/4/24 16:10, Jarek Prokop wrote:
On 1/4/24 10:47, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jarek Prokop:
This spawns a few questions for me:
1. Since [1] the `-mbranch-protection=pac-ret` is needed in both
CFLAGS and ASFLAGS, I am unsure how it interacts with the Fedora
defaults,
I see default CFLAGS
On středa 3. ledna 2024 8:46:22 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> I just wanted to give you a quick heads-up that I plan to enable the
> BuildWithDNF5 change in Fedora Copr as soon as the new Rawhide compose
> gets distributed to mirrors.
This has happened now. Fedora Copr builds F40 (Rawhide) with
=
#fedora-meeting-2: FESCO (2024-01-04)
=
Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:00:18 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2024-01-04/fesco.2024-01-04-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting
Am Do., 4. Jan. 2024 um 18:29 Uhr schrieb Martin Gansser
:
>
> Hi,
>
> when compiling vdr-extrecmenung for rawhide fc40 the error message [1]
> "/bin/sh: line 1: xgettext: command not found" appears
>
> [1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6182/111296182/build.log
>
> How can i
Hi,
when compiling vdr-extrecmenung for rawhide fc40 the error message [1]
"/bin/sh: line 1: xgettext: command not found" appears
[1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6182/111296182/build.log
How can i solve this ?
Regards
Martin
--
The pcb-rnd package contains a call:
XRenderCreatePicture(display, lpm->img_scaled, XRenderFindVisualFormat(display,
DefaultVisual(display, screen)), 0, 0);
The issue here is that lpm->img_scaled is an XImage *, but
XRenderCreatePicture expected a Drawable as its second argument.
Any idea how
Hi all,
I am planning to push the update for dav1d v1.3.0 to rawhide. It
involves an soname bump from libdav1d.so.6 to libdav1d.so.7 due to
minor ABI changes. According to the release notes, there are were no
actual breaking changes to existing APIs, so the update should be
safe:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256825
Bug ID: 2256825
Summary: perl-App-cpm-0.997015 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-App-cpm
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256688
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-a53d80f917 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-a53d80f917
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256688
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
On 1/4/24 10:47, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jarek Prokop:
This spawns a few questions for me:
1. Since [1] the `-mbranch-protection=pac-ret` is needed in both
CFLAGS and ASFLAGS, I am unsure how it interacts with the Fedora
defaults,
I see default CFLAGS contain `-mbranch-protection=standard`
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 4:07 PM Nick Clifton wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> > binutils-2.31-18.fc40 didn't land in f40 as Bodhi CI gating marked it
> > as failed. The failures don't seem to be related to binutils package
> > itself. Seems like CI test is/was broken, or maybe a temporary network
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256784
Bug ID: 2256784
Summary: perl-Math-BigInt-FastCalc-0.5017 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Math-BigInt-FastCalc
Keywords:
Hi David,
binutils-2.31-18.fc40 didn't land in f40 as Bodhi CI gating marked it
as failed. The failures don't seem to be related to binutils package
itself. Seems like CI test is/was broken, or maybe a temporary network
issue, or something else.
It looks like rpminspect does not like two of
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 7:50 AM Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> Oron Peled writes:
>
> > • I.e: a developer that need cross-compilation, install the wanted
> > toolchain(s) and all library packages are immediately available from
> > standard
> > repositories.
> >
> > I guess Fedora people that work on
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Pod-Parser` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
1.67 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-Parser/pull-request/11
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Oron Peled writes:
• I.e: a developer that need cross-compilation, install the wanted
toolchain(s) and all library packages are immediately available from standard
repositories.
I guess Fedora people that work on ARM/ARM64/RISC-V would love such a
support.
There are a number deb
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Pod-Parser` that
you are following:
``
1.67 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-Parser/pull-request/11
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Wednesday, 3 January 2024 10:07:02 IST Marián Konček wrote:
> Note that mingw-* packages currently in Fedora install into the
> /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/ or /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/ directories.
>
> This is a different topic but if each archful package installed its
> files into a directory
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Pod-Parser` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
1.67 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-Parser/pull-request/10
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 11:20 AM Nick Clifton wrote:
>
> Hi David, Hi Florian,
>
> Here's the bug:
>
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31179
> RISC-V: The SET/ADD/SUB fix breaks ABI compatibility with 2.41 objects
>
> It refers to this change in
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Pod-Parser` that
you are following:
``
1.67 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-Parser/pull-request/10
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
* Alessandro Astone:
> It also appears for aarch64.
> It is an issue because software may use `-Wl,--fatal-warnings` so this
> warning breaks the build.
> As an example, pretty much the entire KDE software collection now fails to
> compile on aarch64 and s390x:
>
* Jarek Prokop:
> This spawns a few questions for me:
> 1. Since [1] the `-mbranch-protection=pac-ret` is needed in both
> CFLAGS and ASFLAGS, I am unsure how it interacts with the Fedora
> defaults,
> I see default CFLAGS contain `-mbranch-protection=standard` and the
> flag with pac-ret seems
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 9:08 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 15:01, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>>
>> Dne 03. 01. 24 v 14:46 Jarek Prokop napsal(a):
>>
>> 4. Why do koji and copr have CPU flag set that differs so much? Is our koji
>> infra OK?
>>
>> For convenience of readers:
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Pod-Parser` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
1.67 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-Parser/pull-request/9
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Hi David, Hi Florian,
Here's the bug:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31179
RISC-V: The SET/ADD/SUB fix breaks ABI compatibility with 2.41 objects
It refers to this change in binutils 2.41:
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Pod-Parser` that
you are following:
``
1.67 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-Parser/pull-request/9
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256688
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
On 2024-01-04 00:20, Peter Boy wrote:
Just started to update one of our Fedora Servers (F38)
I got the message:
Executed scriptlet: libvirt-dbus-1.4.1-1.fc38.x86_64 124/132
Cleaning up : libvirt-dbus-1.4.1-1.fc38.x86_64 124/132
Executed scriptlet:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 04:51:37PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 7:51 PM Chris Adams wrote:
> >
> > Once upon a time, Aoife Moloney said:
> > > Enable IPv4 Address Conflict Detection by default in NetworkManager.
> >
> > Huh, I didn't realize NM didn't already do
Just started to update one of our Fedora Servers (F38)
I got the message:
> Executed scriptlet: libvirt-dbus-1.4.1-1.fc38.x86_64 124/132
> Cleaning up : libvirt-dbus-1.4.1-1.fc38.x86_64 124/132
> Executed scriptlet: libvirt-dbus-1.4.1-1.fc38.x86_64
41 matches
Mail list logo
