Package OpenSnitch

2018-05-07 Thread rugk
OpenSnitch is a new firewall client for Linux (https://www.opensnitch.io/). written in Go. It would be nice if this can be packaged, so users can get it. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Package Joplin - FLOSS todo/notes app with NextCloud integration

2018-04-11 Thread rugk
Hi, I saw Joplin[1], which recently got NextCloud integration[2], is not packaged in Fedora. Maybe one could do so? Best regards, rugk [1] https://joplin.cozic.net/ [2] https://nextcloud.com/blog/mobile-note-taking-with-your-private-cloud-announcing-joplinnextcloud-integration

Package VeraCrypt

2018-04-01 Thread rugk
Maybe one could package VeraCrypt? https://www.veracrypt.fr/en/Home.html It is a quite popular application AFAIK and it is likely to be used by many users. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Get stubby into Fedora to provide safe DNS resolution via DNS-over-TLS

2018-01-09 Thread rugk
Providing privacy and security for DNS! (especially after dnscrypt is discontinued now). It would be nice to have this in Fedora. https://dnsprivacy.org/wiki/display/DP/DNS+Privacy+Daemon+-+Stubby GitHub: https://github.com/getdnsapi/stubby For distro status see:

Re: Package suggestions

2017-07-03 Thread rugk
Ah, thanks. Indeed. It's a bit old, but nice… :) Thanks for packaging it. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Package suggestions

2017-07-03 Thread rugk
Aha, so the discussion is about the "(not so) free" level packs already. Did not know that, indeed. If so, everything is all right. And in any case, you can still package it without these level packs. :) ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Package suggestions

2017-07-03 Thread rugk
Oh, nice. In this case I'll take everything back… I just got the impression, because of the prices list on the main website (https://askbot.com/plans/) and on askbot.com I did not find a link to the repo… ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Package suggestions

2017-06-24 Thread rugk
> (Game engines which are open source and which work with redistributable but > non-free content are a different special case.) Actually that's the case here, as explained in another post. It does *not require* the non-FLOSS binaries. ___ devel

Re: Package suggestions

2017-06-24 Thread rugk
FYI, the game's name I could not remember was "Which way is up". See https://packages.debian.org/stretch/whichwayisup. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Package suggestions

2017-06-24 Thread rugk
Actually, BTW, one basic assumption you do is wrong: The game can be played completely without the maybe-proprietary binary. There are FLOSS levels inside/bundled IIRC. Playing the original levels is just an "extra feature" and if you don't use it, you don't use it. Not allowing the software,

Re: Package suggestions

2017-06-15 Thread rugk
Personally, I'd like such a system very much. It would make it possible for regular users to participate… And such participation can be the first step to becoming deeper involved into the project and becoming a packager, e.g. I don't know phpback, but uservoice is a popular software. It is

Re: Package suggestions

2017-06-15 Thread rugk
> I searched for tworld, is that the "Tile World" game recreating "Chip's > Challenge"? Yes. > wonder what Legal's opinion on that would be. It worked in Debian. ;) Basically they did not package the original game files. I think they are even not included in the upstream project. They just

Package suggestions

2017-06-14 Thread rugk
st regards, rugk ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org