Re: Rust Stack Spring Cleaning - 2024 Edition

On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 15:26 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > - alciregi (1): rust-backoff > Hello. This is required by a package still under review (waiting for a reviewer actually). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268499 Thank you

Intent to retire python-bluepy

I'm going to retire python-bluepy from Rawhide. It was an interesting Python interface to Bluetooth LE on Linux; I was some interests on it when I had time to tinker with Raspberry and Micro:bit boards. Currently there are problems building it with Python 3.12 (actually there were issues also

Unresponsive maintainer for timeshift

Hello. Is someone in contact with *srakitnican*? I started the n*on-responsive maintainer* process [0], because timeshift doesn't work since Fedora Linux 35 was released. In the meanwhile upstream released various new versions, and bugs were reported [1]. Someone created a COPR repository with

Timeshift maintainer

I would like to ping srakitnican, the Timeshift maintainer (someone is in touch with them?). Timeshift is a graphical tool to manage BTRFS snapshots. I don't use it personally, but I know a bunch of people that rely on it. Thimeshift coming from the Fedora repository, doesn't work on Fedora

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed from their packages

On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 15:25 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > When we rolled out the new AAA solution a few weeks ago, some > accounts have not > been migrated: OT Out of curiosity: what happens if I register a new account on the new AAA with one of these usernames?

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > > redir orphan 2 weeks ago While redir (version 2.2.1) [0] is a stale project (as far as I

Re: [retitled] Fedora wiki and code tags

On Aug 4, 2020 8:31 AM, "John M. Harris Jr" wrote: > > That somebody doesn't like something doesn't mean that they don't respect > those who made it. Ok. Maybe we are going OT. But excuse me John: words matter. Saying "it sucks" is not equal to "I don't like it". A.

Re: Self Introduction: Stefano Figura (returntrip)

Hello Stefano. Welcome! Ciao, A. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List

Re: Bodhi: "how to install" is supposed to work?

On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 10:54 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 02. 06. 20 v 9:32 Alessio napsal(a): > > In Bodhi there is a dnf command in the "How to install" section, in > > order to install the package to test. Something like: > > > > sudo dnf upgrade --

Bodhi: "how to install" is supposed to work?

In Bodhi there is a dnf command in the "How to install" section, in order to install the package to test. Something like: sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020- 81a3b3df7d Is it supposed to work? Because every time I tried it, it didn't work. In addition a package

Re: How to determine maintainer of a package en mass?

On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 01:34 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > This shows all the packages for which you are "owner" / "main admin": > https://src.fedoraproject.org/dashboard/projects?acl=main+admin There is also a way to get the packages for wich another user is the owner? Ciao, A.

Re: orphaning bleachbit

On Tue, 2019-12-31 at 10:09 +0300, Silvia Sánchez wrote: > > I'm perfectly fine with Fedora's policy regarding Python2. When > upstream updates to 3, I'll be happy to comaintain together with > Alessio. For the record, bleachbit 4 supporting python 3 was released a couple of weeks

Re: orphaning bleachbit

On Sun, Dec 22, 2019, 8:59 PM stan via devel wrote: > > I have never used bleachbit, but I took a look at this program to see if > it would be a simple matter to convert it to python3. It won't. > As I wrote in another e-mail, upstream is working to port the program to python3. There is a

Re: orphaning bleachbit

Hello Lailah, are you still interested in maintaining that? A. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Regarding Adam Miller (maxamillion) packager status

FYI I took ophcrack. Ciao, A. On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 9:48 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 09. 12. 19 18:38, Adam Miller wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 11:15 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> On 09. 12. 19 18:04, Richard Shaw wrote: > >>> I had a short email conversation with Adam and he

Re: Regarding Adam Miller (maxamillion) packager status

I would like to take http_ping, since it is a simple spec file :-) and I am still learning packaging. On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 7:31 AM Clement Verna wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019, 21:49 Miro Hrončok wrote: >> >> On 09. 12. 19 18:38, Adam Miller wrote: >> > On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 11:15 AM

Re: A new workflow for newcomers

On Wed, Oct 23, 2019, 7:01 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > > [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Welcome > > can we get this onto the docs site? > Sure. In which section does it need to be? Maybe here? https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/join/ A. >

Re: Way to visualize where Fedora contributors are around the world?

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019, 8:48 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > That got me thinking it would be pretty neat if a map could be > automagically creating showing where everyone is. Wouldn't need exact > addresses for privacy reasons but something that gets you close like a zip > code (or equivalent). > >

No More i686 Kernels, No i686 Repositories

I read the change set for F31 [1] and I read the threads in this list, but now I'm a bit lost and a bit confused. So I don't want to reply to the already existent thread, because I would like some clarifications. I don't want to open a new endless thread. :-) Could someone explain in simple words

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019, 5:16 PM Dario Lesca wrote: > > After few minutes almost everything work well, except for a thing ... > all windows PC cannot access to others windows PC. > Wait. I'm not an expert. Said that, are we sure that the cause is krb MIT? Also on the samba ml it seems a

Re: Google Chrome Flash doesn't seem to work in F30

On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 14:39 +0200, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed that Flash doesn't seem to work in F30 in the upstream > Google Chrome. It works in F29. As a test, I installed an F29 and It seems to me that, even if the default option for Flash is "Always ask", when you

Re: Translating the banner text

On Wed, Oct 31, 2018, 6:55 PM wrote: > > Just want to add: the banners don't really look great, and it'd be nice > to see them removed from the installer (or replaced). First there's the > +1 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Testing / feedback request: DNF 3 crashes

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 9:26 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > Can anyone who is still struggling with DNF crashes on *basic* > operations on F29 or Rawhide please reply, and provide a few details on > what you're seeing and any workarounds or fixes you've found? FWIW, I never hit such problem. The

Re: Starting a Container SIG

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018, 9:13 PM Eduard Lucena wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not familiar with the container technology, but I will love to learn > it. I would like to help with this SIG. > Well, I'm not an expert at all, but like Eduard I would like to learn something related to containers. Ciao, A.

Re: Red Hat bugzilla upgrade coming -- test now!

2018-06-25 12:15 GMT+02:00 Vít Ondruch : > > From the notification on the top of the BZ page: Whoops. :-) Thank you. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code

Re: Red Hat bugzilla upgrade coming -- test now!

2018-06-21 17:26 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller : > Red Hat is planning on upgrading Bugzilla to BZ5 in September. There's > a test instance running now at http://bugzilla5.redhat.com/ > > Since Fedora is a major user and stakeholder here, it'd be helpful if > we make sure everything works for us. If

Re: Problem: package fwupdate-libs-10-6.fc28.x86_64 requires shim

On Sat, Mar 10, 2018, 19:58 Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > I've getting the following error when I try to update from f27 to f28: > > > Any ideas? > Same issue here: <

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

On Oct 13, 2017 19:00, "Simo Sorce" wrote: We are Fedora and we are First, even when it is painful IMHO. I count for little in the Fedora community, but this is exactly my opinion in this discussion. A. ___ devel mailing list --