orphaning ooolatex + maintainership of my other packages up for grabs

ooolatex needs to be replaced by TeXMaths anyway, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018515 In general, going forward at least for the immediate future, I will have to ramp down some of my Fedora efforts. In the meantime feel free to update any of my packages if you're

Re: orphaning ooolatex + maintainership of my other packages up for grabs

Thanks, Luis. I just orphaned both python-biopython and sqlite2 so you can go ahead and take ownership via PkgDB (I added myself as a co-maintainer for both packages before orphaning). Cheers, Alex Luis Enrique Bazán De León wrote: I can take part of this work :-) Regards! - Original

orphaning/retiring perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene

This package is currently causing broken deps in any case. It's not very useful without perl-bioperl, see my previous post, which has seen been removed: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-November/174435.html Hopefully somebody else can pick these packages up (including

Re: orphaning/retiring perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene

Note that I'm retiring from F-19 onwards. - Original Message - This package is currently causing broken deps in any case. It's not very useful without perl-bioperl, see my previous post, which has seen been removed:

orphaning dblatex to allow a new maintainer

Hi there, As I don't use this package much anymore, I am dropping back to co-maintainership and orphaning dblatex to let somebody else be the primary owner, see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/dblatex It's a pretty minimal package in terms of maintenance, mainly requires

orphaning bioperl/BioGraphics

Hi there, I don't use BioPerl nearly as much as I used to, so I'm looking for a new maintainer for perl-bioperl and some other related packages, e.g. perl-Bio-Graphics. PackageDB links here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-bioperl

orphaning bibus

I don't really use it anymore (replaced it with Zotero) and don't have time to maintain it, but it is still being developed upstream (as of late 2011): http://sourceforge.net/projects/bibus-biblio/ There is a 1.5.2 release available, see also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757675

Re: orphaning bibus

Pkgdb link: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/bibus I kept myself on as a co-maintainer, but it deserves a more proactive main owner. - Original Message - I don't really use it anymore (replaced it with Zotero) and don't have time to maintain it, but it is still being

orphaning blam: RSS feed reader

Don't currently use, don't have time to maintain it, feel free to take it (I kept myself as co-maintainer to help out the transition): https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/blam -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: retire referencer in Fedora 16+ ?

My sentiments exactly. Better not to keep known broken packages around; it's only going to cause grief for users if they find out they can't even install the package. Once it's fixed upstream to not rely on libgnomeuimm, it can easily be added back to Fedora. Alex, could you please

Re: retire referencer in Fedora 16+ ?

Hi Kalev, (Cc'ed to devel list to see if anybody else has suggestions). As you've noted libgnomeuimm has been obsoleted in f16 and higher, and referencer doesn't look like it's ported to use anything else. I filed a bug in what appears to be a (potentially) active (but slow) upstream to get some

Re: API change: bump mapnik to 2.0 in rawhide?

On 17/10/11, Tom Hughes wrote: On 17/10/11 20:02, Alex Lancaster wrote: Looking at the changelog, it isn't obvious whether this introduces any ABI/API changes or not, hence this e-mail. I just asked Dane on IRC and he confirms that they are not compatible so the soname needs to be bumped

Re: Some packages up for grabs

CB == Christopher Brown writes: CB Hi, It is with some regret that I am giving up ownership of the CB following packages as I simply don't have the time to do them CB justice. Thanks to my initial sponsors and reviewers who have helped CB along the way. Apologies to those who haven't had the

Re: orphaning dblatex

NB == Neal Becker writes: NB dblatex is up for grabs. -- devel mailing list I'll take dblatex. Doesn't seem to be orphaned in pkgdb yet, though. Alex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: geos soname bump in F-12 updates

JS == Jeff Spaleta writes: JS On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote: Looks like the geos update for F-12 bumped the soname: python-basemap-0:0.99.2-6.fc12.i686 JS Sigh thanks for the heads up. I'll push a rebuild now. JS -jefNot to be picky, but it

urgent help needed with Miro rebuild failure blocking security update

Hi there, I'm the Miro maintainer and the new xulrunner/firefox API bump causes a broken dep because Miro wasn't able to be rebuilt see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-1727 and: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566883 The proximate cause of this rebuild

retiring evolution-brutus from Fedora

I am retiring the evolution-brutus, it currently FTBFS against the current evolution and upstream is effectively dead, for more details see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511451 I have asked rel-eng to block the package: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3371 Anybody