Intent to bump SVT-AV1

2024-05-27 Thread Bob Mauchin
Hello, This week, I will rebuild svt-av1 and its dependencies in a side tag. Tests were done this weekend on COPR and compatibility with FFmpeg 6.1.1 was determined to be functional. I will need the help from RPM fusion people. Libheif and Libheif-freeworld will be updated during the process

Re: Node.js 22.x coming to Rawhide/F41

2024-05-27 Thread Bob Mauchin
Yes thanks, for some reason COPR pulled the release -1 during my build instead of -9. It works now. Best regards, Robert-André On Mon, May 27, 2024, 02:07 Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sun, 2024-05-26 at 21:29 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > On 21/05/2024 15:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >

Re: Packaging software for LulzBot Taz-6 3D printer

2023-08-20 Thread Bob Mauchin
On Sat, 19 Aug 2023, 19:30 W. Michael Petullo, wrote: > I am trying to package the software necessary to operate the LulzBot > Taz-6 3D printer. This seems to have been supported in previous versions > of Fedora [1], so I am trying to take ownership of retired packages. > Some of the

Re: RPM packaging help

2023-08-14 Thread Bob Mauchin
On Sun, 13 Aug 2023, 21:39 Maxwell G, wrote: > Hi Robert-André and Andrew, > > > On Sun Aug 13, 2023 at 11:23 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > On 8/10/23 15:43, Andrew Heath wrote: > > > All, > > > My name is Andrew, and I have been working with the Fedora Infra team > and we are trying to

Re: Disabling rawhide builds during branching

2023-08-08 Thread Bob Mauchin
On Mon, 7 Aug 2023, 23:19 Tomas Hrcka, wrote: > Hi All, > > Fedora Linux 39 is going to be branched from rawhide on 2023-08-08 at > 10:30 UTC > as per the previous discussion[1] we are going to disable new koji > builds for the duration of this event. > > All builds that will be running at that

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2023-07-17 Thread Bob Mauchin
Hi, I'm working on the Go situation due to my non responsive situation. I'm currently assessing what is needed by our binaries packages and will take packages needed that have been orphaned. The reminder will be thus retired. Some package are probably FTBFS and I will need time to get them

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo

2023-03-16 Thread Bob Mauchin
I'm here just very busy with work and being tired, I ll try to work on stuff this weekend. On Wed, Mar 15, 2023, 18:23 Mark E. Fuller wrote: > Thanks for the suggestion, but I do not use Twitter and don't want to > create an account. > > > On March 15, 2023 5:13:43 PM GMT+02:00, Fabio Valentini

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

2022-11-23 Thread Bob Mauchin
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022, 12:21 Miro Hrončok, wrote: > Hello. > > Based on my conversation with Fridolín Pokorný @fpokorny, I've removed > them > from their Fedora packages. > > They left Red Hat and are no longer interested in maintaining Fedora > packages. > > Co-maintainers BCC'ed. > > fpokorny is

Re: EPEL-9 terrible updates (dav1d, libavif...)

2022-11-17 Thread Bob Mauchin
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022, 10:09 Remi Collet, wrote: > It looks like EPEL-9 is managed like rawhide. > > > 1/ dav1d 1.0.0 update (also in F37) > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-40bb8ce9c5 > > This introduce a soname change breaking lot of stuff > including libavif (from

Re: SPDX - How to handle MIT and BSD

2022-11-15 Thread Bob Mauchin
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022, 12:24 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 14. 11. 22 20:53, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > 1) You can use https://github.com/spdx/spdx-license-diff and use it to > identify > > your license. This is a Chrome and Firefox plugin and allows you to > select the > > text; and in the context

Do we need a change proposal for this?

2022-07-02 Thread Bob Mauchin
Hello everyone, So, I and some Go fellows would like to drop i686 from Go supported arches (not for go itself but the libraries and binaries we build with it). Since technically Fedora isn't proposing the i686 variant to download anymore, does it make sense to need a change proposal? No-one

Re: [HEADS UP] Sphinx 5 and docutils 0.18.1 coming to Rawhide on July 11th

2022-06-30 Thread Bob Mauchin
On Thu, 30 Jun 2022, 17:35 Karolina Surma, wrote: > Hello packagers, > > The new major version of the popular documentation framework Sphinx has > been recently released[0]. It brings many changes, among which there is > support of docutils 0.18.1. We aim to update both packages together in >

Re: Can we start changing License to SPDX now?

2022-06-29 Thread Bob Mauchin
On Wed, 29 Jun 2022, 09:48 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek, wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 08:54:37AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > > > #2799 F38 Change proposal: SPDX License Phase 1 > > > APPROVED (+5,0,-0) > > > > Do I understand it correctly that we can change License tags in our spec > files > >

Re: F37 proposal: Golang 1.19 (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-06-27 Thread Bob Mauchin
On Sat, 25 Jun 2022, 16:46 Benjamin Beasley, wrote: > I imagine I could answer this myself by looking carefully at the history > of the golang package, but what happens if you end up doing the mass > rebuild with a pre-release version? Would you need to do a second mass > rebuild with the final

Re: debug_package when using go_generate_buildrequires

2021-12-20 Thread Bob Mauchin
On Mon, 20 Dec 2021, 14:09 Panu Matilainen, wrote: > On 12/20/21 01:39, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > On 12/6/21 12:42, Mikel Olasagasti wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I was updating some golang specs I've and switching them to use > >> go_generate_buildrequires. > >> > >> I realized that some

Re: The case of LTO when produced enlarged binaries

2020-08-31 Thread Bob Mauchin
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020, 05:32 Jeff Law wrote: > On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 14:42 +0200, Igor Raits wrote: > > On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 12:37 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > > > On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 21:31, Igor Raits < > > > ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> > > > wrote: > > > [..] > > > > > > > Well, I

Re: Help me bring AVIF to Fedora

2020-07-21 Thread Bob Mauchin
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020, 21:59 Andy Mender wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jul 2020 at 23:15, Robert-André Mauchin > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'd like some help to review: >> - libavif: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858419 >> >> - qt-avif-image-plugin: >>

Re: fedora-review broken?

2019-08-28 Thread Bob Mauchin
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019, 15:12 Richard Shaw wrote: > While I'm trying to use it for a review on RPM Fusion I don't think the > error is related... > > Just running fedora-review without any arguments produces this in the log: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File

Re: [HEADS UP] Unannounced soname bump of qrencode

2019-06-26 Thread Bob Mauchin
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019, 00:21 Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 11:21 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > qrencode was bumped from 3.4.4 to 4.0.2. > > > > It has a bumped soname from libqrencode.so.3 to libqrencode.so.4. > > This might be a good time to remind people that globbing out

Re: PSA: builds using forge macros with tags broken on rawhide

2018-10-24 Thread Bob Mauchin
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, 09:46 Nicolas Mailhot, wrote: > Le mercredi 24 octobre 2018 à 08:42 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : > > Le mercredi 24 octobre 2018 à 00:52 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin a > > écrit : > > > On mardi 23 octobre 2018 23:47:05 CEST you wrote: > > > > On mardi 23 octobre 2018

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

2018-08-28 Thread Bob Mauchin
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018, 00:04 Till Maas, wrote: > The following packages are orphaned or depend on an orphaned package > and will be retired, soon, unless someone adopts them. If you know for > sure that > the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: >

Re: Nonresponsive maintainer: Björn Esser (besser82)

2018-08-17 Thread Bob Mauchin
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018, 12:53 Leigh Scott wrote: > Besser82 hasn't answered any of my emails for months. > I saw him back in May for a couple of reviews, maybe he's in holidays. > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: Introduction/looking for a sponsorship

2017-08-06 Thread Bob Mauchin
Le 7 août 2017 04:04, "Matthew Miller" a écrit : Do the individual source files contain license information? Or is it otherwise documented? See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text for guidance on this. It is absolutely not

Re: Introduction/looking for a sponsorship

2017-08-06 Thread Bob Mauchin
I intend to package it for Fedora but I have no license file. I have contacted the developer awhile ago and I'm still waiting for an answer. It's based on a Larry Wall script under Perl license so there should not be any issue. Also I don't know if it's compatible with the guidelines but I renamed

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2017-08-06)

2017-08-06 Thread Bob Mauchin
python-jira should not depend on python-tlslite as this dependency has been removed upstream since August of 2016. ( https://github.com/pycontribs/jira/commit/1ab6709ea83f08ee0d2793331baf95c2d8b4fb3b ) Best regards, Robert-André Le 6 août 2017 02:02, a écrit : > The

Introduction/looking for a sponsor

2017-07-31 Thread Bob Mauchin
Hello, My name is Robert-André and I'm looking to become a packager for Fedora. I'm 33 years-old Frenchman. I first tried GNU/Linux in the late 90 with Debian and what was then Mandrake. Back then with no Internet, I remember It was tough to get set up and find help. After a Windows period, I