Downgrading from rawhide

2020-02-25 Thread Christophe de Dinechin
. -- Cheers, Christophe de Dinechin (IRC c3d) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct

Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages

2020-01-29 Thread Christophe de Dinechin
> On 29 Jan 2020, at 00:26, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > On Tuesday, 28 January 2020 10:03:09 CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> * committing to git should build the package >> >> Is there a reason why this wouldn't be the case? > > Please no. Sometimes you just fix a typo or add a comment

Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages

2020-01-29 Thread Christophe de Dinechin
> On 28 Jan 2020, at 10:03, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I always think that Fedora works fine if you maintain 1-5 packages. > It's possible to maintain 20 with a lot of work. And if you want to > maintain 100+ (things like the ocaml-* set that I help to maintain) > then you have to write

Re: Ideas for better development processes when maintaining hundreds of packages

2020-01-29 Thread Christophe de Dinechin
> On 28 Jan 2020, at 11:32, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > Il giorno mar 28 gen 2020 alle ore 10:04 Richard W.M. Jones > ha scritto: >> >> I always think that Fedora works fine if you maintain 1-5 packages. >> It's possible to maintain 20 with a lot of work. And if you want to >> maintain 100+

kata containers: adding a docker runtime

2019-09-25 Thread Christophe de Dinechin
Hi Lokesh, As you know, I have been working on bringing kata containers to Fedora. Since this adds a new runtime, the docker.service file would need to be modified in order to be able to accommodate extra --add-runtime options. Specifically, we would need something like added to the command

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

2019-08-29 Thread Christophe de Dinechin
t; https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Cheers, Christophe de Dinechin (IRC c3d) ___

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

2019-08-20 Thread Christophe de Dinechin
unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.f

Re: rawhide no longer recognizing autotool macros

2019-06-19 Thread Christophe de Dinechin
> On 19 Jun 2019, at 17:28, Philip Kovacs via devel > wrote: > > I notice I am still using the `__make` macro in my specs. While they still > work, should we proactively replace them with `make` ? Is there any downside in replacing it? > > The additional message I am getting here is that

New Repo failed with "The Pagure project already exists"

2019-03-26 Thread Christophe de Dinechin
I’m very new to Fedora packaging. When I requested a repo for a new project I’m submitting called “make-it-quick", I got the following response: “The Pagure project already exists” (see https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10703). The sources at

Self-introduction: Christophe de Dinechin

2019-03-15 Thread Christophe de Dinechin
Hello, My name is Christophe de Dinechin, and I’m writing this introduction per the recommendation here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers. I’m interested in becoming the Fedora maintainer for several projects I created, in order: 1. make-it-quick (https

Re: Packaging .c files in a non-devel package

2019-03-15 Thread Christophe de Dinechin
> On 14 Mar 2019, at 23:57, Felix Schwarz wrote: > > > Am 14.03.19 um 13:08 schrieb Fabio Valentini: >> I think there is (or at least, there used to be) a section in the packaging >> guidelines which explicitly mentions that including both .c and .h files in >> non-devel packages is fine (and

Packaging .c files in a non-devel package

2019-03-14 Thread Christophe de Dinechin
. But that seems more like obfuscation, and I don’t like doing that just to silence rpmlint. Can you suggest a good approach? Thanks Christophe de Dinechin ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le

Re: Chromium C++ help needed

2019-03-12 Thread Christophe de Dinechin
> On 11 Mar 2019, at 18:16, Tom Callaway wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I spent some time this weekend trying to get Chromium 72 building on Fedora, > but I kept running into a C++ issue that I was not able to resolve. This > happened with gcc-9.0.1-0.8.fc30.x86_64 and gcc-8.3.1-2.fc29.x86_64. >

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

2019-03-05 Thread Christophe de Dinechin
Note sure if you care about this test from F28, but this is a heavily loaded machine where I never find the time to upgrade. Just in case it's of any use: sudo dnf --releasever=30 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync Main config did not have a

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

2019-03-05 Thread Christophe de Dinechin
# sudo dnf --releasever=30 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 187 kB/s | 2.4 MB 00:12 Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 - Updates 35 B/s | 257 B 00:07 Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Test