On Sat, 8 Nov 2014 16:35:39 +0200
Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I'm trying to push a fresh build of spring.
Currently spring upstream is limited to x86_64 and i686.
The SPEC has ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 (following a suggestion
from -devel ML), but never the less,
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 08:52:25 +0100
Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build pinta but it fails due to timeout on F20 and F22:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8009403
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8009471
It built fine for
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 09:40:07 +0100
Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
hm, it's not the first case where Mono enters a deadlock or endless
loop ...
What is your host system and what is the kernel version?
$ cat /etc
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:45:43 +0100
Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Andrea Musuruane
musur...@gmail.com wrote:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8009403
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 19:10:41 +0100 (BST)
Peter Oliver lists.fedoraproject@mavit.org.uk wrote:
Koji build
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7840578 has been
running for over two hours, now. It only takes a few minutes in
Mock. Is there a process by which I can get
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 16:27:52 -0600
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com
wrote:
I posted about this 5 days ago on ppc list [1], but have had no
response. I tried to get some attention on #fedora-ppc today, also
with no
On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 10:51:10 -0600
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:44:59 +0200
Richard Fearn richardfe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've got a question about the last mass rebuild:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_Mass_Rebuild
For a couple of
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 21:11:50 +0200
Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote:
What is the recommended way to contact the Ocaml maintainers?
There is a systematic packaging bug which introduces unusable i686
packages into the x86_64 compose, and despite repeated messages to
ocaml-devel, I did
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 21:01:16 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 09:17:16PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 21:11:50 +0200
Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote:
What is the recommended way to contact the Ocaml maintainers
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:27:39 -0600
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Just thought I would drop a quick note to the list about the status of
various things, at least as I know them. ;)
First, astute readers will note that we were scheduled to go into
freeze for f21 yesterday and that we
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:38:09 -0300
Claudio Rodrigo elsupergo...@gmail.com wrote:
I need help to became packager, I talk with Xavier Lamien to sponsor
me. But he is busy.
I want see mono 3.4 in fedora officially. It is a great goal.
Additional I was father last week.
If someone sponsor my
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:33:27 +0200
Stefan Ringel linu...@stefanringel.de wrote:
Am 13.08.2014 um 10:43 schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:36:18AM +0200, Stefan Ringel wrote:
Can anybody help me? I have:
ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (build_from_srpm)
IIRC, only
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:46:53 +0200
Stefan Ringel linu...@stefanringel.de wrote:
Am 13.08.2014 um 13:42 schrieb Dan Horák:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:33:27 +0200
Stefan Ringel linu...@stefanringel.de wrote:
Am 13.08.2014 um 10:43 schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:36:18AM
On Mon, 04 Aug 2014 18:00:38 +0200
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos n...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
The protocol buffer-c package was orphaned, and due to a dependency
I'm now the maintainer. There is a request for 1.0.0 in F21 [0]. That
is the first stable release since 2011, which bumps the soname,
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 19:19:49 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 01:41:25PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar
There is however one change that the s/390
folks will find painful - s/390 broke ABI in 2.19
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 13:20:40 -0600
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Greetings.
I'm seeing a fun crash of the calibre application in rawhide. I'm not
fully sure when it started, but I'm not sure how to track it down
either:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/calibre,
On Fri, 04 Jul 2014 17:01:00 +0100
David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm seeing this message:
extracting debug info
from
/home/dhowells/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/cross-gcc-4.9.0-2.fc21.x86_64/usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/4.9.0/libcloog-isl.so.4
/usr/lib/rpm/debugedit:
-b arg has to be
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:53:08 -0500
Yaakov Selkowitz yselk...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2014-06-26 15:33, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:01:05 -0500 Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
This seems to be particularly needed around mass rebuilds, which
IMHO should be an all-hands-on-deck time. For
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 23:54:10 +0200
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
Please do not start deleting ppc32-only packages.
A few of us would like to resurrect ppc32, likely initially
as a Fedora Remix. Deleting
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:59:48 +0200
Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I was looking to build a package on epel7 that is relying on
jansson-devel.
The -devel subpackage is generated as normally from the main jansson
package, but in case of epel7 the resulting rpm is included
On Sun, 1 Jun 2014 11:24:09 +0200
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
The following packages did not build for two releases (no new build
since 2013-07-25) and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched,
unless someone successfully builds them till then. If you know for
sure that the
On Mon, 26 May 2014 17:11:44 +0200
Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi there,
the rebuilds are mostly over, thanks for everyone who chimed in. Some
packages may have been double-rebuilt, as there was no synchronization
between the partakers.
Maybe next year I'll publish the list
On Thu, 15 May 2014 12:16:25 +0200
Alejandro Álvarez Ayllón alejandro.alvarez.ayl...@cern.ch wrote:
Hello all,
I am having trouble recompiling one of the rpms I maintain because of
this error
DEBUG util.py:282:
On Thu, 1 May 2014 12:34:43 +0100
Jon Kent jon.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get a GnuBatch package into Fedora, which is currently
being reviewed. One of the points raised in the review was that I was
running make without any Fedora options. I've added these as requested
so the
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 13:44:02 +0200
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Mono 3.4 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mono_3.4
Change owner(s): Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra Diaz
elsupergo...@fedoraproject.org
Update the Mono stack in Fedora from 2.10
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:32:04 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 08:19:11AM -0400, Jens Petersen wrote:
Some OCaml spec files do the following:
ExclusiveArch: %{ocaml_arches}
This is always incorrect for several reasons:
Is
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 14:14:25 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 03:12:21PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:32:04 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 08:19:11AM -0400, Jens Petersen wrote
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:16:33 -0400
Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote:
On 04/11/2014 05:10 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:32:53AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 04/10/2014 05:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:23:07PM +0200,
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 10:56:32 +0200
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote:
The recent f20 version of OPNSSL is openssl-1.0.1e-37.fc20, so my
question is when a secure version is released?
Is this achieved by openssl-1.0.1e-37.fc20.1 I found on kojj?
yes,
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:37:51 + (UTC)
build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
libdmtx has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
libdmtx-utils-0.7.2-11.fc20.x86_64 requires
libMagickWand-6.Q16.so.1()(64bit)
libdmtx-utils-0.7.2-11.fc20.x86_64 requires
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:59:34 +0100
Jan Horak jho...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/06/2014 09:24 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/06/2014 10:24 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
Hi,
Will the subject packages be included in epel 7? I don't see them
listed on the web pages at
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:11:44 +0100
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Java 8 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java8
Change owner(s): Omair Majid oma...@redhat.com
Make Java 8 (provided by OpenJDK 8 which is java-1.8.0-openjdk) the
default
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:24:05 -0400 (EDT)
Omair Majid oma...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Dan Horák d...@danny.cz
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
Make Java 8 (provided by OpenJDK 8 which is java-1.8.0-openjdk)
the default Java runtime. The current
On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 13:53:24 +0100
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build qt-creator [1], but the builds fail due to the
arm build timing out. Is there anyway I can increase the timeout?
can you resubmit with parallel make disabled for ARM? Building heavy C++
code
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:29:12 +
Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 Feb 2014 19:51
OTOH important libraries that still break soname instead of using
symbol versioning in 2014 really make me frown loudly..
Is there a best practice guide here? I'm guilty of breaking soname in
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 02:51:36 -0600
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:47:51 -0700
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
What do I do about this?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6526911
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 08:10:49 -0500
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi,
I've sent two builds of linux-firmware to koji this morning and both
fail with a strange error in root.log/mock_output.log:
ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output.
# ['fedpkg', 'sources']
Downloading
://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/s390x
Thanks go out to everyone involved in making this happen!
Your Fedora/s390x Maintainers
--
Dan Horák, RHCE
Senior Software Engineer, Secondary architectures team
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99, 612 45 Brno
--
devel mailing list
devel
On Wed, 8 Jan 2014 08:27:42 -0500
Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com wrote:
I recently took over package maintenance for Audacity. So the first
thing I want to do is clone their development tree, create a branch
from the latest release and star tracking patches against it as
needed. The
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:14:28 -0600
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm working on updating the qsstv package for EL6 and ran into a
strange issue.
Building for x86_64 worked under mock fine, but when I tried the
offical build the ppc64 build couldn't find qmake-qt4.
Looking
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 17:23:33 +0200
Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I'm facing a weird issue when trying to build a new version of spring.
First and foremost, the spring.spec has ExcludeArch:ppc ppc64
%{arm}, which should exclude arm* and ppc* (both not supported by
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:56:22 +
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I had a bug filed that a Python package I'm maintaining cannot be
rebuilt using 'rpmbuild --rebuild'. The failure was that the *.pyc
and *.pyo files are missing.
After a lot of head-scratching and debugging it
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 19:51:48 -0700
Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm packaging odb ( http://codesynthesis.com/products/odb/ ) for
Fedora/RHEL and I've run into a bit of a problem. Everything worked
fine for f18 and f19, but when I try to build libdodb-boost for f20 I
get an
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 15:45:01 +0200
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 20:19:11 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello developers and packagers,
I recently received an email from the reporter[1] from rhbz
#913289.
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:19:13 +0200
Frantisek Kluknavsky fkluk...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/25/2013 09:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Frantisek Kluknavsky wrote:
People with interest in secondary architectures might oppose that.
Which architectures are the problem? OpenBLAS currently supports:
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:56:51 +0100
Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to build the new colord for F20. All the arches build file,
but the task fails with:
BuildError: mismatch when analyzing
colord-extra-profiles-1.1.2-1.fc20.noarch.rpm, rpmdiff output was:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 00:31:12 +0200
Dridi Boukelmoune dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have my first packaging issue on the numatop package[1].
During the review it appeared that I forgot the %{optflags}, and that
adding them breaks the i686 build. The upstream dev is very patient
On Mon, 09 Sep 2013 20:27:09 -0400
Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
I did a TC5 minimal install last night, which omitted mc, my most
used cmdline tool. So:
# yum install mc
... installing for dependencies:
gpm-libs (which I never ever use)
perl* (29 packages)...
Seriously?
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:20:12 -0500
Andrew McNabb amcn...@mcnabbs.org wrote:
I maintain the python-pexpect package, which is noarch. Koji is
trying to build the Fedora 20 packages on ARM machines, and for some
reason, one of the tests is failing. I've opened a report with
upstream, but
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:43:19 -0400
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:20:12 -0500
Andrew McNabb amcn...@mcnabbs.org wrote:
I maintain the python-pexpect package, which is noarch. Koji
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:05:32 +0200
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
The following packages did not build for two releases and will be
retired around 2013-08-26 unless someone rebuilds them or announces to
actively working on fixing them.
Note: If you received this mail directly you
Hello Brian,
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:59:10 +0200
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 15.8.2013 23:39, Brian Schonecker napsal(a):
Per request at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers?rd=PackageMaintainers/Join
I would like to introduce myself.
On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 21:35:19 -0500
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
we did make some changes on the x86 builders post f19 mass rebuild
which helped disk IO on them. but this is by far the fastest mass
rebuild to date. There is a large number of failures[1] that need to
be addressed.
are
On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 15:11:21 +0200
Than Ngo t...@redhat.com wrote:
we have now arm in F20 and it seems latex2html is broken on arm in
F20. It's why it's built fine in F19 for you but not in f20.
latex2html builds OK on the secondary arm koji
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 16:44:31 +0100 (BST)
Peter Oliver lists.fedoraproject@mavit.org.uk wrote:
I've had a build failure for a noarch package, arduino.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991988
This appears to be because the build.xml in the package assumes that
Java property
Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
--
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
a wiki so don't
hesitate to add your knowledge there.
More information about Fedora on IBM System z can be found at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/s390x
Thanks go out to everyone involved in making this happen!
Your Fedora/s390x Maintainers
--
Dan Horák, RHCE
Senior Software
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:56:40 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 04:17:47PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 08:28 -0400, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
I still have serious concerns regarding build times:
* arm -
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:41:37 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 18.06.2013 19:18, schrieb Panu Matilainen:
On 06/18/2013 04:21 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
can someone lokk at this?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975273
why are the hardening-macros not
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 08:44:52 +0200
Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 June 2013 03:13, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
we had updated dpkg some major versions sine bug opened, how I know
if dpkg is now ready for aarch64 ?
I've discovered you can trigger builds for
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:31:38 -0500
Jeffrey Bastian jbast...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 02:48:42PM -0400, Eric H. Christensen wrote:
I'm working on text in the Fedora Security Guide discussing GRUB.
There is a sentence that reads [Fedora] ships with the GRUB boot
loader on
On Sat, 25 May 2013 09:59:00 +0200
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 23/05/2013 15:25, Peter Oliver ha scritto:
Arduino is an electronics prototyping board, and also a GNU
GPL2-licenced IDE for writing and uploading code to such boards.
Fedora has packages for the IDE.
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:48:20 +0400
Eugene Pivnev ti.eug...@gmail.com wrote:
This problem was starting here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929256
And repeating again and again:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947049
Problem is: what flags I mast to add to %cmake ..
On Mon, 15 Apr 2013 12:08:24 +0200
Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Sun, 2013-04-14 at 15:28 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
It returns you to pkgdb to set acls and the relationships tab gives
an error. I was mainly looking at it to manage permissions (right
now).
Packages is
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 11:43:21 +0200
Juerg Haefliger jue...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a noarch package that has a requirement on another package
(qemu-img) that doesn't exist on i386 and ppc64. This results in
'broken dependency' errors from koji. How do I tell koji not to build
on these
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 13:01:36 +0200
Juerg Haefliger jue...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 11:43:21 +0200
Juerg Haefliger jue...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a noarch package that has a requirement on another
Fedora Rawhide Report píše v Út 05. 03. 2013 v 14:07 +:
[libgda]
1:libgda-tools-5.1.1-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libgraph.so.5()(64bit)
tracked as FTBFS in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914131 -
caused by a change in graphviz
Dan
--
devel mailing list
Josh Stone píše v Út 05. 03. 2013 v 09:44 -0800:
On 03/05/2013 07:59 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 14:07 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
So given that this library's use is pretty well contained, might it be
OK to go ahead and update in F18?
Yeah, that's fine.
In the
Dan Horák píše v Út 05. 03. 2013 v 18:57 +0100:
Josh Stone píše v Út 05. 03. 2013 v 09:44 -0800:
On 03/05/2013 07:59 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 14:07 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
So given that this library's use is pretty well contained, might it be
OK to go ahead
Mat Booth píše v Pá 01. 03. 2013 v 12:41 +:
The package libservicelog looks like it has not been built since Fedora 12:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7900
Yet it is still included in rawhide:
[mbooth@10-2-5-11 repo_test_area]$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide
Jan Zelený píše v St 30. 01. 2013 v 08:22 +0100:
On 29. 1. 2013 at 19:18:32, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
On 28. 1. 2013 at 14:28:06, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Michael Scherer (m...@zarb.org) said:
Le lundi 28 janvier 2013 à
Přeposlaná zpráva
Od: Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com
Reply-to: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora
packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Komu: packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Předmět: [Fedora-packaging] Orphaning my packages
Datum: Sun, 27
can be found at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/s390x
Thanks go out to everyone involved in making this happen!
Your Fedora/s390x Maintainers
--
Dan Horák, RHCE
Senior Software Engineer, BaseOS
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99, 612 45 Brno
--
devel mailing list
devel
Kevin Fenzi píše v St 23. 01. 2013 v 07:31 -0700:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:49:48 +0100
David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
all my attempts to build libreoffice for the past 2 weeks failed
because there was not enough disk space on the builder (actually the
last build that
Kevin Fenzi píše v St 23. 01. 2013 v 19:41 -0700:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 03:22:18 +0100
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
Well, I fully acknowledge that haveing the same sources for the
distros should not imply to have the same binaries. However, that's
really something to
Richard W.M. Jones píše v Út 22. 01. 2013 v 08:19 +:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/952/4890952/root.log
There's no conflict in dracut.spec. However mdadm.spec has the
following lines:
%if %{fedora} = 18
Conflicts: dracut 024-23
[...]
%endif
%if %{fedora} = 17
Alexander Bokovoy píše v Út 22. 01. 2013 v 19:59 +0200:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
Hi all,
I'm going to push update cyrus-sasl-2.1.26 into Rawhide soon. Part of this
update
is also SONAME bump to libsasl2.so.3.
Are there any reasons for soname bump? Could you please point
Richard Hughes píše v Pá 11. 01. 2013 v 09:01 +:
I've tried to build colord for f18 a few times now. It builds locally
fine, but when run on Koji it gets killed: make[3]: ***
[FOGRA28L_webcoated.icc] Killed
It only seems to happen when the print profiles are being created,
which do
Jakub Jelinek píše v Pá 04. 01. 2013 v 21:40 +0100:
sh-elf-binutils-2.21-5.fc19.src.rpm
packages built with -Werror, for which the new
-Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess warning included in -Wall warns
and -Werror makes a fatal error out of it
we can probably kill sh-elf-binutils
Tom Callaway píše v Út 13. 11. 2012 v 12:26 -0500:
Since the following packages seem to be unmaintained and have broken
deps in Fedora 18, I propose that they be retired and blocked before
release:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO
^^^ was rebuilt recently
Dan
--
devel mailing list
Jaroslav Reznik píše v Po 12. 11. 2012 v 04:52 -0500:
- Original Message -
Matthew Miller píše v Čt 08. 11. 2012 v 15:15 -0500:
So, here's a proposal for a semi-informal group linking different
stakeholders interested in curating the @core package selection:
Matthew Miller píše v Čt 08. 11. 2012 v 15:15 -0500:
So, here's a proposal for a semi-informal group linking different
stakeholders interested in curating the @core package selection:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Minimal_Core
Please comment and join if you're interested. This is
Jesse Keating píše v Út 06. 11. 2012 v 10:48 -0800:
On 11/06/2012 03:35 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
And rel-engs actively prohibits staging as much as they can [1], where
it should be encouraged IMO.
Vit
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4580
Additional tags have a
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:20:16 -0400
Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
For a while now I have not been able to login into
Koji... I can build packages but I can not login
to cancel any builds which is a bit annoying...
Here is what I'm doing:
* fedora-packager-setup
Troy Dawson píše v Po 08. 10. 2012 v 14:48 -0500:
On 10/05/2012 04:43 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hello,
I have updated mongodb from 2.0.7 to 2.2.0.
It is currently going through the normal channels for rawhide and Fedora 18.
10gen has a very good track record for being backwards
Martin Gansser píše v So 15. 09. 2012 v 20:00 +0200:
I am working on a package preview for guayadeque
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853553#c9
Brandon told me that i have to alk the devel list regarding 'bundled
libraries'
It seems that the guayadeque sources contains some
Richard W.M. Jones píše v St 05. 09. 2012 v 08:24 +0100:
$ bodhi --buildroot-override=febootstrap-3.20-1.fc18 --duration=5
--notes=Allow libguestfs to rebuild.
Error: buildroot override for u'febootstrap-3.20-1.fc18' already exists
It doesn't exist (according to 'bodhi --my-overrides').
commit 6837b8a0dadd0e307372ef2214232d65d9ac99d3
Author: Dan Horák d...@danny.cz
Date: Wed Jul 18 09:32:09 2012 +0200
valgrind is available only on selected arches and perl(Test::Valgrind) is
noarch
perl-Test-LeakTrace.spec | 16 +++-
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1
Hi all,
we have recently discovered on Fedora/s390x that webkitgtk3 produces a
very large static library ( 4GB) during build (some tests are linked
with it) and it fails later with malformed archive error [1]. Nick
Clifton told me there is a 4GB limit for the size of the archive so
other large
Fedora on IBM System z can be found at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/s390x
Thanks go out to everyone involved in making this happen!
Your Fedora/s390x Maintainers
--
Dan Horák, RHCE
Senior Software Engineer, BaseOS
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99, 612 45 Brno
--
devel mailing
Petr Pisar píše v Čt 14. 06. 2012 v 09:16 +:
On 2012-06-13, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Can a comps maintainer confirm that yum group used for installing
minimal build-root in F18 has been renamed from `buildsys-build' to
`build'?
I don't see that change here.
I had to use
john maclean píše v So 02. 06. 2012 v 06:07 +0100:
Setting up a private koji server. The keys and certs have been set up. Stuck
at psql stage. This command always bombs.
command
psql koji koji /usr/share/doc/koji*/docs/schema.sql
first this file is elsewhere
find / -iname
Mathieu Bridon píše v So 02. 06. 2012 v 19:34 +0800:
On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 10:14 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
john maclean píše v So 02. 06. 2012 v 06:07 +0100:
Setting up a private koji server. The keys and certs have been set up.
Stuck at psql stage. This command always bombs
Kevin Kofler píše v Út 10. 04. 2012 v 14:47 +0200:
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
I have seen of gdm and NetworkManager execing gdb on crash. You keep
saying other apps work like DrKonqi, can you give examples?
While unfortunately I don't know how all these work (i.e. whether they also
work by
Hans de Goede píše v Pá 30. 03. 2012 v 10:37 +0200:
Hi,
While working on updating the libusb1 package I noticed it still
provides a libusb1-static package. I would very much like to drop
this, so 2 questions:
1) Any objections?
2) I'm afraid my repoquery-foo is too weak to figure out if
drago01 píše v Út 20. 03. 2012 v 17:57 +0100:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Brendan Conoboy b...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/20/2012 09:37 AM, drago01 wrote:
I'm a big fan of cross compilation, but introducing it into Fedora in
order
to support ARM seems unlikely to succeed for too many
Chris Tyler píše v Út 20. 03. 2012 v 14:40 -0400:
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 18:21 +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
drago01 píše v Út 20. 03. 2012 v 17:57 +0100:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Brendan Conoboy b...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/20/2012 09:37 AM, drago01 wrote:
I'm a big fan
Stephan Bergmann píše v St 29. 02. 2012 v 09:38 +0100:
On 02/28/2012 09:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Are the same packages going to get automatically rebuilt in rawhide as
well as f17?
Btw, does anybody have a pointer to that ABI breakage in gcc 4.7 for
c++ (i.e., was it an inadvertent
in making this happen!
Your Fedora/s390x Maintainers
--
Dan Horák, RHCE
Senior Software Engineer, BaseOS
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99, 612 45 Brno
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Neal Becker píše v Út 29. 11. 2011 v 08:26 -0500:
I don't want to change my ssh key that I use for many other purposes. What
is
the suggested method to generate a new key to be used only for fedora?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cryptography should have the answers
Dan
Kevin Fenzi
501 - 600 of 654 matches
Mail list logo
