sha1... and all
forges like github refuse push if you try sha256.
So some conversion path for existing repos and platforms support must
come first, and there is none of that yet afaics, with work on the
former that apparently just started)
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
--
___
)
> both will be slow, but OR-searches are going to be slow anyway
(I've added a working mail this time; will let you (Christopher) argue
directly if you want to continue, I don't care enough)
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel
Christopher wrote on Fri, May 24, 2024 at 02:18:04AM -0400:
> Are you sure you have the correct address for the plocate developer and
> that it's still actively maintained? I just got an error that the
> destination email address didn't exist from their mail server when I
> replied just now.
) or all matches for each words (mlocate behaviour)?
Either way, it's something to report upstream so I've added Steinar in Ccs.
[1] https://git.sesse.net/?p=plocate
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
--
___
devel mailing list --
reak if we were to automatically
remove tests...)
(Anyway, I also think tests bring more benefits than risks in our case)
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an em
g e.g. nginx would run as www user and not be
as interesting), but in practice that could be bad enough.
(hm, well, your point about 'enabled by default' strikes home though -
we definitely could pay more attention to these first)
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
--
s-10.20-1.fc39.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
So calc, emacs-nox and network-scripts-teamd.
Didn't take the time to fill any bz; I might this weekend if nobody does
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
--
___
d
e
(although if it's a single package just having multiple maintainers to
it sounds enough to me)
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
der back is no guarantee that the disk is
always consistent, but it's probably possible to come up with a few
patterns that often fail when manually misconfiguring a disk)
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@list
ems I know how bad that
can get -- just don't undersell your shells :)
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct
systemd/systemd-coredump 1234 1000 1000 11 $(date +%s) $((2**31))
test < dump
(in order: pid, uid, gid, signal (11=SEGV on x86_64), timestamp of dump,
ulimit -c but I didn't take time to figure out unlimited, hostname)
I'll let you decide if that's better...
Happy hunting,
--
Dominique Martin
n alternative
config with lower priority would likely also work ; but that probably
requires modifying the dnf package first to avoid conflict.
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send a
the need for dynamic settings (e.g. laptop with wireless moving
around) or not)
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
(hmm, never seemed to get the first mail...)
Just recaping infos I got/researched for nixos.
Fabio Valentini wrote on Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 04:32:35PM +0100:
>> I was NOT able to build following packages with libbpf 1.0:
>>
>>- bcc (needs 0.25 update first)
note bcc upgrade in turns breaks
pact on CPython benchmarks can be anywhere from 1-10% depending
on the specific benchmark
* Redis benchmarks do not seem to be significantly impacted when built
with frame pointers
with details in https://github.com/DaanDeMeyer/fpbench
--
Dominique Mart
+Jiri in To
Dave Stux wrote on Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 09:39:23PM -:
> I have opened bugs relating to bcc, and I see no reply on them.
> Currently, at least in my testing, the state of ,pst pf the bcc dependent
> tools in F35 is broken.
> Examples:
>
't ask me how, I just
straced agetty) you'll see it complain that there is no /bin/login:
you just need to install util-linux (or possibly busybox) and you'll get
a prompt, login should work as well.
Maybe it used to be pulled automatically before...
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
_
thing malcious can write keys there they could also accept
the prompt for you so you wouldn't see it -- hence the prompt can be
said to be useless one way or the other...
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 10:44:12AM +0100:
> According to ICANN [1], there were 8.3 mln IDN domains worldwide. I admit
> that is more than I expected. According to verisgn [2], out of 364.6 mln
> total,
> i.e. around 2%.
> Apparently .рф is fairly popular, with
Demi Marie Obenour wrote on Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 10:55:43AM -0500:
> As an aside, can Linux and/or glibc please disallow passing a NULL
> argv[0]? I would honestly be okay with glibc just crashing the process
> during startup if argv[0] is NULL or empty.
FWIW a patch has already been sent
Chris Murphy wrote on Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 02:56:09PM -0700:
> Should be true, and if this nspawn container is running on the host
> then they should share the same btrfs file system. And even if nspawn
> is creating separate subvolumes for the mock build (?not sure if it
> does) then because it's
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 08:29:54AM +:
> $ sudo strace -efile dnf list
> ...
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/var/lib/rpm/rpmdb.sqlite-wal",
> O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_NOFOLLOW|O_CLOEXEC, 0644) = 4
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/var/lib/rpm/rpmdb.sqlite-shm",
>
Carlos O'Donell wrote on Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 11:07:42AM -0500:
> > So I guess we're just chasing after artifacts from the allocator, and
> > it'll be hard to tell which it is when I happen to see pipewire-pulse
> > with high memory later on...
>
> It can be difficult to tell the difference
Wim Taymans wrote on Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 09:09:30AM +0100:
> I can get it as high as that too but then it stays there and doesn't really
> grow anymore so it does not seem like
> it's leaking. Maybe it's the way things are done, there is a lot of ldopen
> and memfd/mmap.
Right, I've had a look
Wim Taymans wrote on Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:22:42AM +0100:
> There was a leak in 0.3.40 that could explain this, see
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pipewire/pipewire/-/issues/1840
>
> Upcoming 0.3.41 will have this fixed. At least I can't reproduce this
> anymore with the test you posted
over or I'll look into it further over
the next few days...
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedorap
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 09:23:37AM +:
> > The consequence of that is it takes much longer to complete because the
> > clock is down: what previously normally took ~55s real for ~27s of CPU
> > time now takes 7m10 for 85s of CPU time -- but honestly I don't
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 07:58:47AM +:
> My understanding is that in order to minimize the overall energy consumption,
> the scheduler will try to maximize the cpu frequency and minimize the total
> time of computation… So a cpu scheduler will not help much
(replying to myself as I got a message on irc from the author)
Dominique Martinet wrote on Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 07:28:25AM +0900:
> I see now that it has IOSchedulingClass=IDLE but nothing equivalent
> about CPU, but I don't think that'll help: if the computer is mostly
> idle it'll stil
Ben Cotton wrote on Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:18:56PM -0500:
> == Summary ==
> The venerable `mlocate` program is replaced by `plocate` — a
> compatible reimplementation that is faster and uses less disk space.
Thanks for doing this!
For what it's worth, I've been running plocate locally since it
e sense to keep llvm as the
system's llvm (12), and install the lvm snapshot as llvm14 instead?
That would let people keep using the system's trusted llvm by default,
and only use the snapshot when they explicitely require it.
Cheers,
--
Dominique Martinet
__
Frank Ch. Eigler wrote on Tue, May 25, 2021 at 02:57:54PM -0400:
> > [...] Most of these libraries are nothing I care about. [...] but
> > could it be possible to not download anything at this point and only
> > download debuginfos when they are really used [...]
>
> This sounds like a
Björn Persson wrote on Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 04:26:22PM +0200:
> It is however a good illustration of how a network problem can destroy
> the user experience. Five minutes is a long wait. I'm glad that we now
> have this information.
This is an old post but I just used debuginfod for the first
(added mlocate maintainer msekleta in Ccs; hopefully that's a still
valid address)
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 02:06:00PM +:
> Debian is apparently switching to plocate as the the default
> locate/mlocate provider [0], a bit faster and more disk-efficient.
>
Lyes Saadi wrote on Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:56:51PM +0100:
> It's a bit late to ask this question, but it emerged when I noticed that
> after upgrading my PC to Silverblue 34 and after compressing manually my
> files, and doing some snapshots, rpm-ostree began complaining about the
> absence of
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 08:25:30AM +:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 09:20:48AM +0100, Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
> > Understand, starting to work on delivering autoconf-2.69 compat package.
> > Have to investigate if it would be possible to install autoconf-2.69 and
> >
Michael Catanzaro wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 08:46:57PM -0600:
> We removed the fallbacks due to complaints from users who didn't want DNS
> ever going to Cloudflare or Google. So the lack of fallback is expected and
> should not be reported as a bug.
setting DNS= (or DNS="") explicitely
Steve Dickson wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 09:04:52PM -0500:
> > I think if no IP was successfully parsed the fallback ought to kick in,
> > so it's a systemd-resolved bug -- do you want to report this upstream or
> > shall I now I've had a look?
>
> Fedora bz or an upstream bz? If is the latter
Hi Steve,
Steve Dickson wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 08:40:17PM -0500:
> When I have DNS=67.207.67.3,67.207.67.2 I get
FWIW the man page states it is a space-separated list of IPs, you might
want to try DNS="67.207.67.3 67.207.67.2"
I quickly had a look at the code and I don't think anything
Wim Taymans wrote on Tue, Dec 15, 2020:
> > In particular I'm worried alsa programs will stop working.
>
> There is a pipewire-alsa package to support alsa programs
Aha! I had missed it, thanks.
> > Shouldn't the alsa-plugins-pulseaudio also be compatible with pipewire's
> > pulseaudio
Gary Buhrmaster wrote on Mon, Dec 14, 2020:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 9:49 PM Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> wrote:
>
> > # dnf swap pulseaudio pipewire-pulseaudio --allowerasing
>
> I needed to add --enablerepo=updates-testing
With updates-testing enabled here, it's much better than last month
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote on Sun, Nov 22, 2020:
> On 22.11.2020 12:36, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> >That removes stuff like gnome-shell.. (as dependent packages of pulseaudio)
> >Perhaps a missing provide?
>
> Some packages directly depends on the pulseaudio package inst
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote on Sun, Nov 22, 2020:
> On 22.11.2020 10:05, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> >I think the package name is wrong, it should be pipewire-pulseaudio.
> >However, it seems it doesn't correctly replace pulseaudio:
> >
> ># dnf install pipewire-pulseaudio
Ben Cotton wrote on Fri, Nov 20, 2020:
> == How To Test ==
> This change needs to be tested on as many different audio cards as
> possible. The same test plan applies here as with PulseAudio.
>
> To test, one needs to install the pipewire-pulse library (which
> removes the pulseaudio package).
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote on Tue, Nov 03, 2020:
> Do you know if some parts of the above already exist? I know Debian has
> automatic checks for latest upstream versions, but I haven't seen it in
> Fedora.
Fedora has "Upstream Release Monitoring"
Gordon Messmer wrote on Tue, Oct 13, 2020:
> On 10/13/20 5:38 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> >Rather than script hackery, why not just make vim-minimal and
> >vim-enhanced use the alternatives system? They are alternates for
> >providing a "vi like" editor.
>
> I think that's the best option, too.
Roberto Ragusa wrote on Mon, Sep 28, 2020:
> >I could imagine using kpartx to script a solution to (1) above, skipping
> >over the md headers. Some kind of shim may be needed to fool the kernel
> >to see a different UUID for each source volume so they can be mounted
> >simultaneously without md.
Jan Kratochvil wrote on Thu, Sep 24, 2020:
> > That talk doesn't load for me, sorry if I ask something answered in
> > there.
>
> I have added a title there now but the URL loads for me even in lynx+wget.
Yeah sorry it finally loaded after 10+ minutes, that was weird.
> Copy-pasted it at the
Ben Cotton wrote on Thu, Sep 24, 2020:
> ** If the 3.3% size increase is a concern I can implement a different
> optimization ([https://whova.com/embedded/session/llvm_202010/1193947/
> talk (2)]) as a GCC post-processing phase which would require no
> changes in any DWARF consumers.
That talk
Neal Becker wrote on Wed, Sep 09, 2020:
> I have tested kde/wayland on F32 but have hit a roadblock. We are all
> working from home and need to share screens. Using google chrome, on X11
> when I try to share an app window (which is my usual choice) there are no
> problems, but on wayland only
Matthew Miller wrote on Sat, Sep 05, 2020:
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 08:46:37AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > "BTRFS relatime vs. noatime - Huge Performance Difference - linux"
> > >
Fabio Valentini wrote on Fri, Aug 07, 2020:
> - waypipe / armv7hl:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48698713
See the "arm/neon LTO-related FTBS" thread on the list for that one; I
gave a short recap on the last message on Thursday (Aug 6)
I'm still unsure if I should
Dominique Martinet wrote on Tue, Aug 04, 2020:
> So I'd really need a way to have only that file compiled with the
> optimisations, and other files without it -- Jeff or someone else, could
> you please advise?
I could still use help with that, please.
To recap, waypipe:
- compiles
Dominique Martinet wrote on Tue, Aug 04, 2020:
> I would appreciate slightly less conflicting exchanges in the future;
> I'm happy to do things differently if I'm pointed at problems but there
> *is* a change of behaviour with LTO and that isn't wrong.
>
> I apprently proceeded to
Peter Robinson wrote on Tue, Aug 04, 2020:
> > The "fix" here is simple and upstream is reactive so I'll just resubmit
> > the package with -mfpu=neon appended to linker args as well, but this
> > might come bite other projects as well.
>
> NO! That is not the fix. We explicitly don't build with
Hi,
this is more of a head's up than a bug per se (well, I'm actually not
sure if it's a bug, is it?), but I've had a package fail to build due to
LTO and neon optimisations:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2576/48362576/build.log
Basically what they do is compile different .a
Jeff Law wrote on Fri, Jul 24, 2020:
> > Looks like somebody already did that and attached the .ii file to the RHBZ.
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859588
>
> Unfortunately neither Marek nor I can reproduce with the compilers we've
> tested.
> Is it possible the OOM killer is
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote on Sun, Jul 12, 2020:
> On 11.07.2020 14:20, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> > BTW, given the size gains ws. time difference for compression I would
> > advocate for default zstd compression instead of :1 -- I'd think another
> > 12% compression impr
Artem Tim wrote on Sat, Jul 11, 2020:
> BTRFS WA is ~8 times higher than ext4. Average profit from compression
> about 50% max. Not that hard arithmetic.
It's not that simple.
The pattern used in that paper is far from a standard workload (random
writes within a file with cow is just about as bad
Kamil Paral wrote on Wed, Jul 08, 2020:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 8:26 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> > D. Which directories? Some may be outside of the installer's scope.
> >
> > /usr
> > /var/lib/flatpak
> > ~/.local/share/flatpak
>
> I have a concern regarding games. Currently, we have a few a
Chris Murphy wrote on Wed, Jul 01, 2020:
> This is called 'dup' profile in Btrfs. Two copies of a block group. It
> can be set on metadata only, or both metadata and data block groups.
> It is the default mkfs option for HDDs. It is not enabled by default
> on SSDs because concurrent writes of
Thanks for the reply.
It feels a bit dismissive after the time I spent there, so I'll assume I
wasn't clear and my point didn't get across (I did send that mail at 1AM
and haven't slept much lately...):
I'm not complaining about any particular bug here, just that the overall
use & feel is way too
So, given this already has way too many answers I didn't want to reply,
but after spending ~4 hours to get my laptop back to bootable state
after a btrfs-convert I guess some people might be interested.
Overall thoughts for whoever doesn't want to read the rest is: I think
btrfs the FS is
Igor Raits wrote on Fri, Jun 05, 2020:
> zramctl shows ALGORITHM
>
> NAME ALGORITHM DISKSIZE DATA COMPR TOTAL STREAMS MOUNTPOINT
> /dev/zram0 lzo-rle 11.7G 4K 74B 12K 8 [SWAP]
>
> So it is lzo-rle by default, but it should be possible to override this
> algorithm. There is
Fabio Valentini wrote on Fri, Jun 05, 2020:
> Sorry for being off-topic, but can you (Jeff) please not respond to
> the mailing list digest and amend the Subject line manually?
> I think it screws up the In-Reply-To (?) header in emails, so every
> new email from you creates a new thread (for
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote on Sat, May 30, 2020:
> On 30.05.2020 11:51, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > What are the issues? I have full-disk encryption and
> > suspend-then-hibernate enabled (with secure boot disabled, of course),
> > and it resumes from hibernation without issues.
>
> Do you have
Kevin Fenzi wrote on Fri, May 22, 2020:
> So, just to clarify a confusing situation... :)
>
> a...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org should never have worked.
>
> If you have pkgs.fedoraproject.org it means you are using SSH, and are a
> packager. This is just due to the way pkgs was created. Packagers
Richard Shaw wrote on Mon, May 18, 2020:
> > Seems to work for me:
>
> Don't know what's wrong then...
I went back and re-read your first mail, it is possible it doesn't work
on one of your own projects?
I'm not sure how much sense there is in forking your own repo...
> Ok, so this is the
Richard Shaw wrote on Mon, May 18, 2020:
> I checked src.fp.o/settings and even though my key was still valid, it was
> going to expire this month so I went ahead and generated a new api token
> and saved it in the specified location:
> ~/.config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf
I actually hadn't used it yet, so
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on Mon, May 18, 2020:
> > > How should I go about with that? Open bz bugs to all the packages I
> > > listed?
> >
> > I would suggest to directly create pull requests on pagure (with a
> > reference to this thread), as that will make it more likely that this
> >
Samuel Sieb wrote on Sat, May 16, 2020:
> On 5/16/20 3:56 AM, Dominique Martinet wrote:
>> - down to 0.130s after moving /etc/bash_completion.d/* to
>> /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/
>
> I thought that generally, the /etc versions of config directories
> were
Vascom wrote on Sat, May 16, 2020:
> Are you use SSD?
>
> I have 0.087s on it.
Yes, I have a SSD. The bottleneck here really is cpu speed; I have my
laptop's frequency limited to 1GHz in normal circumstances (when not
building code or similar activities) so the fan doesn't turn up
With max
Hi,
once in a while I get annoyed at how slow bash is to startup; using a
tiling wm poping a new shell is supposed to be quite fast but I'm
staring at a new empty window for ~1s everytime and it gets annoying...
According to https://xkcd.com/1205/ wasting 1s 50+ times a day is worth
spending
Hi,
Ankur Sinha wrote on Sat, May 16, 2020:
> As subject says:
> https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/comparing-fedora-centos-security-fix-lag/7117
>
> (I looked around a bit and couldn't find any documentation on this).
I've tried for a bit (~10 mins) but I really can't get discourse to let
me
Hi Dan,
Dan Čermák wrote on Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:58:27PM +0200:
> Thanks for the offer to sponsor Dominique Kevin!
Yes! Thanks Kevin, I was able to take waypipe just now.
> Dominique, would you be interested in joining the sway SIG as waypipe
> fits quite well into our maintained packages
>
y grumpy,
but don't speak up much unless I have good reasons to.)
[5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
[6]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/WFMUCQO65M3YGE2NTV4WUXVNN6UBLLN7/
Thanks for guidance
Miro Hrončok wrote on Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 04:32:27PM +0100:
> If I understand this properly, your package requires (in Fedora):
>
> - /usr/bin/python3
> - python3.8dist(setuptools)
Yes, on Fedora 31 the current requires for clustershell (to continue
with that example) contain these:
$ rpm -q
Hi,
Some context first, skip to the end if you want.
We have a few python packages at $work with setuptools entry_points
console scripts - basically setuptools creates a small python script for
you loading a module and calling the function you specified.
For example, clustershell here defines
David Kaufmann wrote on Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 11:13:15AM +0100:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 09:45:44AM +0100, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> > FWIW this has happened at an association I help at -- they had VMs with
> > no root password set, and users created by puppet some of who
Samuel Sieb wrote on Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 01:38:51AM -0800:
> >FWIW this has happened at an association I help at -- they had VMs with
> >no root password set, and users created by puppet some of whom have
> >sudo.
> >They just expected no root password = no login possible, but it turns
> >out
Adam Williamson wrote on Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 03:55:28PM -0800:
> I gotta say +1 too. I don't buy that there's a significant 'hardening'
> benefit worth all the effort mentioned in the Change *plus* the
> additional consequences Kevin and Martin pointed out. At minimum I'd
> like to see a much
Tomasz Torcz wrote on Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 04:45:31PM +0200:
> Actually, I don't think systemd touch the kernel default here.
> See consoleblank= parameter
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.2/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.html
> Some years ago it was set to be disabled by default, previously
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote on Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:31:33AM +0200:
> On 19.08.2019 8:18, Joseph D. Wagner wrote:
> > It is intended to display the same image on the screen continuously
>
> Yes. User must enter LUKS password to continue booting. System cannot be
> booted until all drives
Vít Ondruch wrote on Thu, May 16, 2019 at 08:28:45AM +0200:
> >> This was removed on my request, triggered by this PR [1]. Nevertheless I
> >> concur that this should happen just in Rawhide and never be backported
> >> into stable releases.
> >
> > I don't see why this is a problem. Removing an
Michal Schorm wrote on Wed, May 15, 2019 at 05:14:23PM +0200:
> Another possible cause came up my mind.
>
> Another package in the buildroot could have brought it as a
> dependency, but does not bring it anymore ?
Yeah, it used to come with openssl-devel, but got removed very recently:
Joe Doss wrote on Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 03:43:59PM +:
> I know what akmods are and I don't have the bandwidth on my end to
> switch to them with WireGuard coming in the 5.0 kernel.
It's the second time I read wireguard would be coming in the 5.0 kernel
here - what makes you folk say that?
I
Thank you two for the answer.
YOUNG, MICHAEL A. wrote on Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 12:53:18PM +:
> The problem is your gcc build requires libgcc_s.so.1 which is the i386
> version; the x86_64 version is libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) . So something has
> gone wrong in your build process.
Eh, even after
Jonathan Wakely wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 05:06:09PM +:
>> I think it would help having more people test things, and if there are
>> build failures would help package owners fix these - it's not always
>> obvious to fix a build failure by repeatedly submitting a new package to
>> build,
Hi,
Ben Cotton wrote on Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:16:56PM -0500:
> == Detailed Description ==
> GCC 9 is currently in stage4 since January 7th, in prerelease state
> with only regression bugfixes and documentation fixes allowed. The
> release will happen probably in the middle of April.
> rpms
n be used... and headers are in -devel packages, so they would
need to be pulled as they currently are.
--
Dominique Martinet
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code o
Rex Dieter wrote on Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 10:14:13AM -0500:
> Dominique Martinet wrote:
> > In practice, `pkg-config --cflags foo` will only fetch cflags for
> > dependencies listed in Requires, not Requires.private
>
> pkg-config --cflags foo
> fetches cflags of Requires
ld have
expected.
Am I missing something?
--
Dominique Martinet
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List
anything better right now,
and pkg-config is by far not the worst solution to handling
dependencies...
--
Dominique Martinet
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedo
Dominique Martinet wrote on Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 09:04:46AM +0100:
> In principle this should be fine, VLC does that too -- libvlc (the core)
> is LGPL and vlc itself with the gui is GPL.
(It occured to me that VLC isn't in fedora so that doesn't help much
with regards to packaging, but I
Hi,
Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote on Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 01:16:35PM -0500:
> The LizardFS FSAL is GPLv3. NFS-Ganesha is LGPLv3+.
>
> From a Fedora packaging standpoint is it acceptable to build a GPLv3
> plug-in for an otherwise LGPLv3+ binary?
>
> If the licenses were reversed, I'd be reasonably
hellcheck.net/
--
Dominique Martinet
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
Lennart Poettering wrote on Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:48:04PM +0200:
> Again, this isn't just work-arounds around broken programs. It's a
> security thing. It's privileged code (logind, PID 1) that enforces a
> clear life-cycle on unprivileged programs.
>
> Any scheme that relies on
will be able to prepare to avoid most of the chaos that
will come if this stays like this...
Thanks for reading,
--
Dominique Martinet
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
to.
I haven't seen any discussion about this, has it ever been brought up?
Do the admins have any opinion on it?
(I don't care, I don't use gmail and $work doesn't enforce spf strictly
at the moment)
--
Dominique Martinet
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
If we can't get to a compromise just make it an option and everyone will
be happy (except maybe for the nagging of what should be the default,
but people can just make a poll for that -- I personally don't care as
long as it's possible without having to hack code and rebuild)
--
Domi
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
