[EPEL-devel] Re: Mate desktop environment update

2020-06-05 Thread Greg Bailey
On 6/5/20 10:35 AM, H wrote: On June 5, 2020 11:21:07 AM EDT, Greg Bailey wrote: On 6/5/20 2:21 AM, Menanteau wrote: Hi there, is there a plan to update Mate in EPEL ? There was a demand to update to Mate 1.8 years ago but I didn't see any answer.  Mate 1.24 is currently available. Thanks

[EPEL-devel] Re: Mate desktop environment update

2020-06-05 Thread Greg Bailey
On 6/5/20 2:21 AM, Menanteau wrote: Hi there, is there a plan to update Mate in EPEL ? There was a demand to update to Mate 1.8 years ago but I didn't see any answer.  Mate 1.24 is currently available. Thanks I run Mate on both CentOS 7 and CentOS 8. For CentOS 7, I run Mate 1.20 using

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

2018-11-15 Thread Greg Bailey
On 11/13/2018 04:36 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: Hi everyone! Let's talk about something new and exciting. Since its first release fifteen years ago, Fedora has had a 13-month lifecycle (give or take). That works awesomely for many cases (like, hey, we're all here), but not for everyone. Let's talk

[EPEL-devel] Re: %_pkgdocdir in EPEL

2016-12-07 Thread Greg Bailey
On 12/06/2016 03:55 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: %_pkgdocdir was added in RHEL7.3, but incorrectly - see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392354 I've added a fixed version to epel-rpm-macros - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/epel-rpm-macros-7-11 And went ahead and added it