Re: Fedora's GPG key in DNS(SEC)

On 3/10/21 1:32 PM, Petr Menšík wrote: I think Björn's point is valid note. Because DNSSEC is used to verify email of used key, but fedora.repo does not contain any hint about how email in GPG key should look like. Also does not contain fingerprint of such key. It would be nice to include email

Re: Firefox crashes at Rawhide

On 03/12/19 13:29 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote: > Just FYI, Firefox is recently crashing on Rawhide due to two independent > issues as rawhide gets all builds automatically: > > 1) PGO mis-compilation/Firefox bug > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779082). Please use 'npgo' > builds

Re: Encrypted DNS in Fedora

On 04/11/19 10:40 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > IMHO, this should be our number one priority over modules, new > spins, or whatever paint color the bike shed needs to be today. > I would like to see DNS over TLS (DoT) with DTLS at the very least. I may be wrong, but it seems to me the usual

Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10

On 29/09/19 16:24 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > I wrote: >> I'm planning to push asciidoctor-2.0.10 to rawhide in the >> next few days. > > This has now been built and should show up in the next > rawhide compose. Tried rebuilding booth to see if there will be any differences in the generated

Laptop powerdown when early boot incl. bootloader phase stuck (Was: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt)

On 20/08/19 20:59 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > There is no good reason for the current behavior, in particular on a > laptop. And it's fail danger, not fail safe. The very simple work > around for the computer shutting off in 3 minutes of inactivity and > you don't like that? Power it back on and

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Set skip_if_unavailable default to false

On 25/04/19 09:35 +0200, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > Also please note that fedora-cisco-openh264.repo ships with > "skip_if_unavailable=true". off-topic: which in fact doesn't matter much, since you'll, sooner or later and whether you want or not, receive non-free (in a sense) binaries over the

Re: kronosnet - PRs and package maintenance

On 25/04/19 10:53 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > I tried make contact directly a couple of weeks ago via email, > with no luck. > > I currently have a number of Pull Requests (PR) against the package > and further updates to do if allowed. > > I am not sure if the package is going to be orphaned or

Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant

On 22/03/19 19:17 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 6:04 PM Japheth Cleaver > wrote: >> IMO the situation that we're in now ("Assume you're running in >> bash, but called as -/bin/sh") is a worst-of-both-worlds middle >> ground, somewhat akin to mandating webpages be

Re: sway SIG

On 18/03/19 16:22 +0100, Till Hofmann wrote: > there's been a rising number of people interested in sway, the > i3-compatible Wayland compositor. At the same time, with the recent sway > 1.0 release, the packaging work is also increasing, as more and more > components are split into separate

Re: Updating Rawhide vs GPG keys

On 11/03/19 18:05 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 11/03/19 15:01 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote: >> On 11/03/19 12:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> Can somebody please enlighten me, how to update Rawhide after branching >>> and not using --nogpgcheck? >> >> Good qu

Re: Updating Rawhide vs GPG keys

On 11/03/19 15:01 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 11/03/19 12:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Can somebody please enlighten me, how to update Rawhide after branching >> and not using --nogpgcheck? > > Good question; have observed this over several (if not all since > to-be-

Re: Updating Rawhide vs GPG keys

On 11/03/19 12:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Can somebody please enlighten me, how to update Rawhide after branching > and not using --nogpgcheck? Good question; have observed this over several (if not all since to-be-f26 based Rawhide) jumps like that, and always have solved this inconvenience

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

On 16/11/18 22:07 +, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > The core idea behind zchunk is that a file is split into independently > compressed chunks and the checksum of each compressed chunk is stored > in the zchunk header. When downloading a new version of the file, you > download the zchunk header

Re: /etc/nssswitch.conf is supposed to be a symlink now?

On 28/11/18 11:48 -0400, Robert Marcano wrote: > There is another thing I found wrong. The backed up nsswitch.conf has these > lines appended (ckey and incomplete aliases line) after the real end of the > original file (aliases: files): > > aliases:files > ckey: files > > aliases:

Re: Last dbus upgrade issues

On 26/11/18 20:58 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 26/11/18 15:12 +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:36 AM Tomasz Kłoczko >> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 at 11:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < >>> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:

Re: Last dbus upgrade issues

Hello , On 26/11/18 15:12 +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:36 AM Tomasz Kłoczko > wrote: > >> On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 at 11:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < >> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 02:36:31AM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: After last

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

On 19/11/18 13:13 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le 2018-11-19 12:28, Martin Kolman a écrit : > >> Many people might think RAM would not be an issue in 2018, but in >> practice there are >> and likely always will be memory constrained installation targets, >> such as massive deployments >> of

Fedora's OpenH264 repo issue

Not sure where to report this for the Fedora side, but there seems to be some synchronization issue regarding the built artifacts hosted at http://ciscobinary.openh264.org, since older packages can be obtained just fine: https://github.com/cisco/openh264/issues/3037#issuecomment-436932562 -- Jan

Re: Enabling powerline theme system wide by default

On 01/11/18 09:53 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le mercredi 31 octobre 2018 à 17:13 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga a écrit : >> It will be nice to enable powerline theme by default system and user >> wide. Simple reason is refresh the look of terminal while also >> providing >> useful information

Re: Nonresponsive maintainer: Björn Esser (besser82)

On 01/11/18 08:30 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 01. 11. 18 7:48, Jan Pokorný wrote: >> I'd be interested in (co)maintenance of one of his packages, >> tried contacting him over email (less than a day ago), then >> realized I could check this ML. > > Claim the package

Re: Nonresponsive maintainer: Björn Esser (besser82)

On 27/08/18 08:41 +0200, Matthias Runge wrote: > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 03:48:12PM +0200, Bob Mauchin wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018, 12:53 Leigh Scott >> wrote: >> >>> Besser82 hasn't answered any of my emails for months. >>> >> >> I saw him back in May for a couple of reviews, maybe he's

Re: raise fileno limit to make Steam Proton / Wine+esync work well in Fedora

On 08/10/18 18:28 -0500, Zebediah Figura wrote: > On 08/10/18 16:43, John Reiser wrote: >> On 10/8/18 2026 UTC, Zebediah Figura wrote: >>> On 08/10/18 2000 UTC, John Reiser wrote: Allowing 1M open files per unprivileged process is too many. Megabytes of RAM are precious.  A hard

Re: /etc/profile.d/lang.sh -- still needed?

On 14/05/18 17:19 +0200, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > does anybody know if the files /etc/profile.d/lang.{csh,sh} > are still used these days, and what for? > Do we still need them in Fedora? > Should they be installed by default these days? > > Any info is appreciated! :) Frankly, had no

Re: Sliming down kernel and provide more as modules

On 09/04/18 13:38 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On 09/04/18 13:01 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: >> 8) If someone is using Linux working in VM or headless HW .. > > Actually a lot of VMs have mice mapped by default. > >> -CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV=y >> +CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV=m >> >>

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Binutils version 2.29.1

On 09/01/18 16:16 +0100, Tomasz Torcz ️ wrote: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:11:31PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: >> = System Wide Change: Binutils version 2.29.1 = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS2291 >> >> Change owner(s): >> * Nick Clifton >> >> Rebase the binutils package from

Re: [SO-NAME BUMP] libjson-c.so.3 comes to Rawhide

On 13/12/17 12:05 +0100, Ondrej Kozina wrote: > On 12/12/2017 06:41 PM, Jan Pokorný wrote: >> On 11/12/17 01:05 +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: >>> I'll update json-c to v0.13 for Rawhide. This will bump libjson-c so- >>> name from 2 to 3 and will remove some de

Re: [SO-NAME BUMP] libjson-c.so.3 comes to Rawhide

On 11/12/17 01:05 +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > I'll update json-c to v0.13 for Rawhide. This will bump libjson-c so- > name from 2 to 3 and will remove some deprecated stuff from its API. Looks like json-c is not that compatible between 0.12 and 0.13 to rush with changes like this:

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Reduce Initial Setup Redundancy

On 04/12/17 16:09 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: > === Language and Keyboard Layout === > > Although we do not propose it at this time, language and keyboard > layout selection should be presented to the user *before* entering the > live session, as it is currently too difficult for users to change >

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

Hello Ville, On 23/10/17 22:24 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > The following packages are looking for new maintainers, ping me if > you're able to help out. > > 1) No co-maintainers at the moment: > > [...] > - jing-trang still somewhat interested in that package, would help to keep it in Fedora

Re: Updates not getting pushed to stable

On 07/06/17 23:36 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: >> I've got a couple of updates which are stuck waiting to get pushed to >> stable: >> >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e46ec0bbe8 >>

Re: Reminder: GitHub etc. auto-generated archives are not stable in time

On 25/05/17 00:28 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 05:22:43PM +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: >> On 24/05/17 09:58 -0500, Jorge Gallegos wrote: >>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:19:05PM +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: >>>> tod

Re: Reminder: GitHub etc. auto-generated archives are not stable in time

On 24/05/17 09:58 -0500, Jorge Gallegos wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:19:05PM +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: >> today, I've accidentally attested there are no stability guarantees >> with the on-demand archives from common git hosting sites when preparing >> a new pacemaker

Reminder: GitHub etc. auto-generated archives are not stable in time

Hello, today, I've accidentally attested there are no stability guarantees with the on-demand archives from common git hosting sites when preparing a new pacemaker update, redownloading "spectool -s 0 pacemaker.spec" of the original (-0.1.rc1, from 2 weeks ago) spec and comparing the hashes,

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2017-02-10)

On 11/02/17 02:08 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Justin Forbes wrote: >> * AGREED: Allow the update, encourage everyone to work through the >> process better next time (7,0,0) (jforbes, 16:51:10) > > The context: > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1675 > #1675 Libglvnd update breaking F25 > is

Re: The glvnd + mesa update for F25

- Jan > Christian > > > > - Original Message - >> From: "Jan Pokorný" <jpoko...@redhat.com> >> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Sent: Monday, February 6, 2017 2:32:35 PM >> Subject: Re: The glvnd + mesa update for F25 >> >>

Re: The glvnd + mesa update for F25

On 06/02/17 05:06 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Hans de Goede wrote: >> libglvnd is a solution for this it is a vendor neutral >> implementation of libGL.so.1 which acts as a dispatcher >> to one or more glvnd enabled libGL implementations >> installed on the systems. > > By doing so, it decreases

Re: Fedora 25 Koji buildroots broken…

On 30/01/17 14:44 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 30/01/17 00:53 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> This is the result of 4 very poor decisions, by different people/groups: >> >> 1. the decision to enable libglvnd in an update to a stable release. IMHO, >>such a c

Re: Fedora 25 Koji buildroots broken…

On 30/01/17 00:53 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > This is the result of 4 very poor decisions, by different people/groups: > > 1. the decision to enable libglvnd in an update to a stable release. IMHO, >such a change is totally unsuitable for a stable release update and >should have been

Re: drop obsolete static uid/gid allocations

On 15/01/17 00:13 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > == No need for static allocation, afaict > games, man, slocate, squid, named, postgres, mysql, nscd, > rpcuser, rpc, rpm, ntp, mailman, gdm, utempter, apache, smmsp, > tomcat, frontpage, nut, beagleindex, avahi, tcpdmp, privoxy, radvd,

Re: Autogenerating Koschei groups's contents

On 23/05/16 10:22 +0200, Michael Šimáček wrote: > few people who have groups defined in Koschei have asked whether they could > automate maintentance of the package list with something like repoquery > rule Are you talking about "Global groups" or "Your groups" kind of groups? Or are these the

Re: python F23 update testing needed

On 07/04/16 09:41 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:28:37 +0200 > Jan Pokorný <jpoko...@redhat.com> wrote: > > ...snip... > >> Does bodhi allow to specify several builds as a means of an atomic >> (non-racy) override? Should I file a RFE for t

Re: python F23 update testing needed

On 02/04/16 13:58 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 02/04/16 12:26 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: >> On 31/03/16 21:28 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: >>> I've just submitted >>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dcddcc1f06 >>> >>> This upda

Re: python F23 update testing needed

On 02/04/16 12:26 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 31/03/16 21:28 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> I've just submitted >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dcddcc1f06 >> >> This update does two things: >> >> - Updates python to version 2

Re: python F23 update testing needed

On 31/03/16 21:28 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > I've just submitted > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dcddcc1f06 > > This update does two things: > > - Updates python to version 2.7.11 > - Splits out the python macros into separate packages > > It would be helpful if

Re: nss_myhostname as default in Fedora

On 25/01/16 19:43 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > I think that the "gateway" override should not be conflated with > always letting the gethostname(2) return value resolve. > > I also think that the whole gethostname(2) mechanism is terminally > screwed up. We abuse the hostname for multiple

Re: Slight change to the review process for new contributors

On 18/11/15 15:55 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > After FESCo approval of https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1499 I > have modified the review process document: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process > to indicate that any packager is welcome to complete the initial

Re: No emails about bodhi updates

On 26/10/15 17:36 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Seems like I'm no longer getting emails about significant bodhi > events, particularly when a package has spent days in testing and > can be pushed to stable. > > Example update that I never got email about: > >

Re: Mouse focus stealing bug

On 31/08/13 09:36 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 01:19:54PM +0200, Maros Zatko wrote: Hello dear Fedora comunity, I've hit very weird bug which happen to get very urgent now. Something (very likely GTK{2,3} but not sure at all) is stealing my mouse focus so that I

Re: F20 release name election?

On 23/08/13 17:49 -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: Or how about None. It even fits with the lineage -- just like the Schrodinger's cat, it's neither False nor True. It's None. That would be a worthy tribute to the pythonista and the release-name hater. +1 -- Jan -- devel mailing list

Re: Orphaning Blueman

On 01/08/13 12:52 -0500, Juan Rodriguez wrote: I've recently been approached about one of the packages I maintain, Blueman, an alternative Bluetooth Manager. At the time I packaged it, it was actively being developed, however development has stopped for over a year [1]. The project's domain

Re: Default libkrb5 ccache location

On 26/07/13 14:58 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 13:57 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: One kind of nontrivial approach, but at least worth thinking about, is changing cron to keep a zygote process around (with a session) for users with active cron jobs. Futhermore if this

Re: Multirelease effort: Moving to Python 3

On 23/07/13 03:16 -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: - Original Message - On 19/07/13 02:41 -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: - Original Message - On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:24:22AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: FAQ: Q: Why do we need to switch to Python 3? A: Because Python 2 is

Re: Multirelease effort: Moving to Python 3

On 19/07/13 02:41 -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: - Original Message - On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:24:22AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: FAQ: Q: Why do we need to switch to Python 3? A: Because Python 2 is old, slower, less pythonic, doesn't get any more functionality and it won't be

Re: Expanding the list of Hardened Packages

On 15/04/13 10:10 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: I would say there is a place for SE Linux even if we compiled everything with all because FORTIFY_SOURCE coverage is not absolute. For example, about a month ago i ran the following test: procs=`ls /proc | grep '^[0-9]' | sort -n` for p in