Re: Release monitoring for stable releases only

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 1:09 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 7:02 AM Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > it seems Anitya correctly distinguishes stable and pre-release > > releases but where to set that I want Fedora bugs only for

Release monitoring for stable releases only

Hi, it seems Anitya correctly distinguishes stable and pre-release releases but where to set that I want Fedora bugs only for the stable releases? IIRC Pagure had a switch for it, but I am unable to find it on the https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/. There is only "No-Monitoring", "Monitoring",

Re: Bootstrapping package with circular dependencies in koji

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:13 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 25. 01. 23 11:50, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Reading the thread, I was afraid this will be the end result. Nevertheless, > > given this would be used just for side-tags, is there a chance to exclude > > side > > tags from the policy? Who

Re: Bootstrapping package with circular dependencies in koji

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 9:37 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:00 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 07:54:29PM +0100, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > > > > > I initially thought about: > > > release bump > &

Re: Bootstrapping package with circular dependencies in koji

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:42 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 1:39 PM Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I need to bootstrap package which has bootstrap support written > > according to the [1]. I am able to boot

Bootstrapping package with circular dependencies in koji

Hi, I need to bootstrap package which has bootstrap support written according to the [1]. I am able to bootstrap it locally (rpmbuild, mock, ...) with the "--with bootstrap" or "-D '_with_bootstrap 1'". Is there support for it in koji? E.g. something like: koji build SIDE-TAG PACKAGE --bootstrap?

Re: BuildError: error building package (arch s390x), mock exited with status 245

I am encountering the same problem since yesterday. All my builds are failing on s390x this way e.g. [1], [2]. Could somebody fix it? thanks & regards Jaroslav [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=60132339 [2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=60132333

Re: Self Introduction: Jan Zerdik

- Original Message - > > > Le 1/13/21 à 4:25 PM, Jan Zerdik a écrit : > > Hi. My name is Jan and I'm a new red hatter. I'll be a TuneD co-maintainer. > > My experience with open source projects is mostly just as a user, but I'm > > looking forward to joining the community. > > > >

Re: Fedora 33 Mass Rebuild

- Original Message - > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 01:30:56PM -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > > > Most of my FTBFSs are in form: > > BuildrootError: Requested repo (1785390) is DELETED > > > > Wtf? > > > > E.g.: > > https://bu

Re: Fedora 33 Mass Rebuild

- Original Message - > On 8/3/2020 9:42 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:32 PM Gary Buhrmaster > > wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 3:15 PM Richard Hughes wrote: > >> > >>> Most of those are the libcroco->gettext breakage, no? > >> From a very cursory scan (not at

Re: Outdated programs in rawhide

> pidgin: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1856866 Hi, pidgin maintainer here. I really don't understand what are you trying to achieve by this. I am maintaining/co-maintaining over 100 packages in Fedora and if you think the reaction time for bugzillas should be less than 24 hours feel free to help

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

- Original Message - > > -1 for the change. If the so called 'end-user' (whatever does it mean) > > can learn git, she or he can also learn 'vi' or at least how to enable > > the preferred editor. Personally, I can see nothing special on the > > nano, for me it qualifies as very poor

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

- Original Message - > Jaroslav Skarvada 于2020年6月26日周五 下午9:41写道： > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > > > > > > Adam Williamson < adamw...@fedoraproject.org > 于 2020年6月26日周五 上午9:32写道： > > > > > &g

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

- Original Message - > > > Adam Williamson < adamw...@fedoraproject.org > 于 2020年6月26日周五 上午9:32写道： > > > On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 08:44 +0800, Qiyu Yan wrote: > > What about to provide a prompt to the user telling them the difference > > between editors? > > For example, when a new user

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

- Original Message - > El jue., 25 jun. 2020 a las 21:45, Qiyu Yan (< yanq...@fedoraproject.org >) > escribió: > > > What about to provide a prompt to the user telling them the difference > between editors? > For example, when a new user to fedora first invokes git commit > without

Re: protobuf update coming to rawhide

- Original Message - > I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.12. It requires a rebuild > of all dependencies and of the 55 dependencies currently 10 fail to > rebuild. The following packages are failing: > > clementine > closure-compiler > fawkes > gazebo > hidviz > kismet >

Re: Many packages unnecessarily link to libpython

> jskarvad gnuradio gr-air-modes gr-fcdproplus gr-hpsdr gr-iqbal gr-osmosdr > gr-rds hamlib pidgin pidgin - it calls Py_Initialize, so I kept is as is hamlib - fixed & forwarded upstream gnuradio stuff - it doesn't seem it calls Py_Initialize, but linking without -python failed: /usr/bin/ld:

Re: fedrepo-req is complaining about cookies

- Original Message - > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 13:18 -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > Hi, > Hi, > > > > I am trying to add new package to fedora, I did: > > > > $ fedrepo-req wsjtx -t

Re: fedrepo-req is complaining about cookies

- Original Message - > Hi, > > I am trying to add new package to fedora, I did: > > $ fedrepo-req wsjtx -t 1487776 -m monitoring > Error: The Bugzilla ticket could not be verified. The following error was > encountered: have expired. You may login again to get new cookies or a new

fedrepo-req is complaining about cookies

Hi, I am trying to add new package to fedora, I did: $ fedrepo-req wsjtx -t 1487776 -m monitoring Error: The Bugzilla ticket could not be verified. The following error was encountered: My token was valid, but I requested new one and it still doesn't work. fedrepo-req-1.6.0-3.fc25.noarch Also

Re: How to request new branch?

- Original Message - > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 06:16:20PM -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > According to the fedrepo doc linked from [1] I did: > > > > $ fedrepo-req-branch preeny f26 > > > > And the ticket [2] was closed with a message: > >

How to request new branch?

According to the fedrepo doc linked from [1] I did: $ fedrepo-req-branch preeny f26 And the ticket [2] was closed with a message: "The branch in PDC was created. You may now create the branch in Pagure using git." I did: $ git checkout -b f26 Switched to a new branch 'f26' $ git push -u

How to change upstream release monitoring in pagure?

How to change upstream release monitoring, i.e. how to switch the states between disabled, monitoring, and monitoring with build? I didn't find anything related in [1], so I tried: $ fedrepo-req preeny -m monitoring -t 1479022 But the request [2] was closed as invalid? What's the correct

Re: pagure-over-dist-git: traceback in receive-hook when pushing to new repo

- Original Message - > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 04:55:34AM -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > > > I see the following when pushing to new repo: > > > > $ fedpkg push > > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py:48: > > Deprecati

Re: pagure-over-dist-git: traceback in receive-hook when pushing to new repo

- Original Message - > On 08/10/2017 03:01 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > I've just pushed an import commit to my first repository that was created > > with fedrepo_req on pagure, and I got the following traceback from the > > remote when it obviously failed to run a post-receive hook: >

Re: Is there something wrong with the Koji builders?

- Original Message - > I've done two builds for rawhide this morning. > > On the first the armv7hl and ppc64le builds failed because the source > tar file could not be unpacked. > > On the second the aarch64 build failed because the source tar file could > not be unpacked. > > All the

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

- Original Message - > > > - Original Message - > > Hi, > > > > Jaroslav wrote: > > > It still doesn't work for me: > > > > > > $ fedpkg scratch-build > > > Could not execute scratch_build: (-1765328370, 'KDC has no support for > > > encryption > > > type') > > > > > >

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

- Original Message - > Mike McLean wrote: > > > 1) make sure your krb5.conf has: > > includedir /etc/krb5.conf.d/ > > Should there be something in there other than a crypto-policies symlink? > > David > ___ > devel

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

- Original Message - > Hi, > > Jaroslav wrote: > > It still doesn't work for me: > > > > $ fedpkg scratch-build > > Could not execute scratch_build: (-1765328370, 'KDC has no support for > > encryption > > type') > > > > $ klist > > Default principal:

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

- Original Message - > Greetings. > > As previously announced, releng has made a number of changes as part of > it's 2016 "flag day". > > All package maintainers will want to make sure they have updated to > the > following package versions (some may be in testing as of this email): >

Re: 3D printing SIG

- Original Message - > Hi Fedorains, > > I was thinking about creating a 3D printing SIG in Fedora. Would anyone > be interested in that? > > Miro > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > +1

Re: Unable to push into memtest86+/master

- Original Message - > > > - Original Message - > > On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 11:12:37 -0500 (EST) > > Jaroslav Skarvada <jskar...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > $ git push -v > > > Pushing to ssh://jskar...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org

Re: Unable to push into memtest86+/master

- Original Message - > On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 11:12:37 -0500 (EST) > Jaroslav Skarvada <jskar...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > $ git push -v > > Pushing to ssh://jskar...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/memtest86+ > > WARNING: 'memtest86+' is an alias for 'rpms/memte

Unable to push into memtest86+/master

$ git push -v Pushing to ssh://jskar...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/memtest86+ WARNING: 'memtest86+' is an alias for 'rpms/memtest86+' FATAL: W any memtest86+ jskarvad DENIED by fallthru (or you mis-spelled the reponame) fatal: Could not read from remote repository. Please make sure you have the

pkgdb branches requests

Hi, I received mail that EPEL-7 branch was requested for PowerTOP in [1]. Is there any way how to cancel (or at least comment) such requests? Because this request is apparently invalid, PowerTOP is already included in RHEL-7 thanks & regards Jaroslav [1]

Re: Dealing with rolling release versioning

- Original Message - > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Till Maas < opensou...@till.name > wrote: > > > On Mo, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:28:57 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > Is there any reason not to use the date as the version? It's in MMDD > > format so there shouldn't be a upgrade

Re: hibernation support - lack of distro-wide coordination between systemd, dracut, anaconda, pm-utils and maybe more?

- Original Message - On 01.04.2015 10:29, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: pm-hibernate is obsolete as others already mentioned. Do the pm-utils maintainers/upstream know this? Hi, I am pm-utils maintainer. I own some other legacy packages and I am retiring them only

Re: hibernation support - lack of distro-wide coordination between systemd, dracut, anaconda, pm-utils and maybe more?

pm-hibernate is obsolete as others already mentioned. Do the pm-utils maintainers/upstream know this? Hi, I am pm-utils maintainer. I own some other legacy packages and I am retiring them only if there are good reasons for it (e.g. unfixed security bugs, breakage, etc.), because there may

Postfix - switching to dynamically loaded database plugins

Hi, dynamically loaded database plugins has been supported in Debian by downstream patch for a while. This patch went finally upstream, so I am also introducing this feature in Fedora Rawhide (f23). Previously, all database map support libraries were linked to the Postfix binary, which required

Re: Power consumption with Fedora

- Original Message - - Original Message - On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 14:44:59 -0700 Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca wrote: On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 21:47 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 06:30:57 +0100, Nathanael d. Noblet wrote: I don't know

Re: Unable to connect to https://admin.fedoraproject.org with firefox, error is ssl_error_no_cypher_overlap

Same problem with https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/ I am pretty sure it worked on Friday, Fedora 20 with latest updates, firefox-32.0.2-1.fc20.x86_64 with default configuration, nothing changed on my side, opened ticket [1] thanks regards Jaroslav [1]

tcl/tk 8.6 update

Hi, tcl/tk 8.6.1 is in rawhide. There is f21-tcl tag for seamless handling of the update. If your package depends on tcl/tk there are two options: a) update it and build it to tag f21-tcl. E.g. the following command can be used: $ fedpkg build --target=f21-tcl b) let it on me, I will start

Re: Formal request: non-responsive maintainer Gavin Romig-Koch for squeak-vm

If anyone would like to take over any of these packages, please let me know. I will also take squeak-image thanks regards Jaroslav -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Test-Announce] Fedora 18 Power Management testday on Thursday (2012-10-11) also on-site

Hi, I'm glad to announce Power management testday, date: 2012-10-11 (Thursday), link: [1] During this event suspend/hibernate/resume, backlight control as well as tuned daemon will be tested. You can also measure compare power consumption with others. As a new F18 kernel feature suspend to

F17 PM Test day late :) recap

Hi, thanks all for attending F17 PM Test day, late :) recap follows. General results: Number of attendees: 39 Reports received: 52 Unique machines tested: 49 Bugs reported (all trackers counted): 21 Bugs closed so far: 13 Test cases (TC) results (in braces are F16 results): TC passed: 82.48 %

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

On 07/06/2012 09:55 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package raptor (orphan) I have taken raptor regards Jaroslav -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: /tmp on tmpfs

The wiki page says: By implementing this we, by default, generate less IO on disks. This increases SSD lifetime, saves a bit of power and makes things a bit faster. Any numbers to support these claims? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: memtest from F17 beta DVD images

- Original Message - I booted the F17 beta ISO (x86_64, if it matters) on two laptops and tried the provided memtest. In both cases it reported insane amounts of errors in test 7 after running successfully through tests 1..6. The reported error addresses are in the 120 MB area. I

espeak - portaudio drop?

Hi, there is F17 espeak bug: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799137 requesting drop of portaudio from espeak to lower the number of deps. Is anybody against? Thanks regards Jaroslav -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Provenpackager? Want to help out?

3 - we got this message on /var/log/message systemd[1]: PID file /run/sendmail.pid not readable (yet?) after start. Probably: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748171 IMHO this message should be harmless because there is inotify workaround in systemd. I thing we want read

Power Management Test day (2011-09-29) Stats

Hi, thanks all who attended the Power Management Test day, the feedback was really great. Stats follows thanks regards Jaroslav P.S.: If you missed the event you can still post your results at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-09-29_PowerManagement --- Power Management Test Day

Re: Power Management Test day (2011-09-29) Stats

- Original Message - Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: thanks all who attended the Power Management Test day, the feedback was really great. Stats follows On the topic of power management: Is there anything being done to address the regressions[1] in 2.6.38+ kernels? I cannot

F16 power management test day will start this Thursday (2011-09-29)

Fedora 16 power management test day will start this Thursday (2011-09-29). The event will be mainly focused on laptops, but even desktop machines can be tested. Everybody is welcome to attend this event and your attendance will help us to make the PM in Fedora better. Special LiveCD was prepared

Re: Heads up: cpuspeed removed from f16+

- Original Message - To avoid some confusion: I removed cpuspeed from Rawhide about 10 days ago. It no longer serves any purpose in Fedora and has been effectively replaced by kernel cpufreq stack. All cpufreq modules should now be built-in, with ondemand being the default

Re: Heads up: cpuspeed removed from f16+

- Original Message - On 07/19/2011 09:59 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: - Original Message - To avoid some confusion: I removed cpuspeed from Rawhide about 10 days ago. It no longer serves any purpose in Fedora and has been effectively replaced by kernel cpufreq

Re: Heads up: cpuspeed removed from f16+

- Original Message - On 07/19/2011 10:23 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: On 07/19/2011 11:07 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: On 07/19/2011 09:59 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: Sad that the daemon gone. It was able to dynamically switch speed (and save power) on systems that have CPUs

Re: Heads up: cpuspeed removed from f16+

I would suggest getting a wattmeter and measuring it... probably the simplest way to know for sure. I'm pretty sure I measured it directly with a kill-a-watt meter, but I no longer have a P4, so can't retest. -Eric -- Measured P4 on default F15 install. In active idle the overall power

Re: Packages that will be orphaned

Hi, if no other is interested, I can provide new home for these: espeak libax25 demorse linpsk LinLog regards Jaroslav -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: memtest86+

- Original Message - On 06/01/2011 09:59 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: Best I can tell the current version of memtest86+ in Fedora is v4.10 which is too old for Sandy Bridge which needs version v4.20. Anyone know if there is some reason we haven't updated to the current

License change for graphviz

The graphviz license changed to EPL (from CPL) since graphviz-2.28 (rawhide) Jaroslav -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: How to debug a broken suspend/hibernate ?

- Original Message - Under Fedora 14, my computer, an Asus U31J, cannot suspend/hibernate. It attempts both, but hangs and has to be hard powered off. (I have only tried F14.) How do you debug something like this? I guess I'd need to have some tracing through the shutdown sequence

Power Management Test Day (2011-03-24) recap

Hi, thanks all for participation in Power Management Test Day - we received great response. If you missed the event, you can still participate (all feedback is very valuable for us): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-03-24 PM Test Day Stats: 28 unique participants 27 unique

Re: powertop2 vs powertop

Hi, powertop 2.0 is currently in beta (aka 1.97) and was proposed and approved as feature for F15: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PowerManagementF15 regards Jaroslav -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Power Management SIG meeting

Hi, I would like to re-introduce the Power Management (PM) SIG meetings. The PM SIG (http://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=SIGs/PowerManagement) is a group of Fedora contributors that wants to improve the current state of power management and savings across the whole Fedora distribution.

Re: Non-responsive maintainer - Chris Ricker

I'll approve it and orphan rrdtool. Were you going to take the EPEL branches as well? Thanks, taken all Jaroslav -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Non-responsive maintainer - Chris Ricker

I have to second someone taking over rrdtool. I handed it off to Chris a while back, but have still done far more work on it since then than he has, and I've not seen him touch an rrdtool bz in ages. :( (And no, I don't want maintainership back.) I am ready to take it (I already own it in

Non-responsive maintainer - Chris Ricker

Hi, I was unsuccessful in all attempts to contact Chris Ricker (kaboom AT oobleck.net). He seems non-responsive for a long time, I did not receive any reply from him at least from February. Tracker bug: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554334 Previous attempt to contact through

Re: Orphaning a few packages

powertop I took powertop, thanks Jaroslav -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Does anybody know how to contact Chris Ricker?

Does anybody know how to contact Chris Ricker (kaboom AT oobleck.net)? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554334 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631825 and more Jaroslav -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Package review template

I plan to put up some scripts to automate part of the review process as soon as I have the time to finish them. Great idea. I hacked a little script some time ago. It may be a little outdated now, non optimally designed, but maybe something could be reused in your project:

Re: docbook and glibc breakage [STILL BREAKING EVERYTHING]

To clear the confusion, there is no change in the RE syntax in grep-2.7. The old grep silently interprets all these REs the way that probably nobody intended to, e.g. The [:space:] match: ac:eps You can force grep-2.7 to silently process it (above mentioned way, same as with older

Re: docbook and glibc breakage?

All three of my newly released GNOME 2.32.0 projects failed to build on koji (f14) today: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2491737name=build.log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2491754name=build.log

Re: New fedpkg build coming to an update repo near you!

Thanks, but I have following problem: $ fedpkg co -B xterm Cloning into bare repository /home/yarda/git-fedora/xterm/fedpkg.git... remote: Counting objects: 657, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (333/333), done. remote: Total 657 (delta 274), reused 657 (delta 274) Receiving objects: 100%

Re: F14 Question: AVerMedia AVerTV Volar Black HD/-A850 availability

So I copied dvb-usb-af9015.fw from some UBUNTU installation to /lib/firmware, and I could watch digital TV with kaffeine. So my question: would it be possible to support that stick in = F15 versions? AFAIK this firmware seems not to be free. Nice query. I have a AVerTV Hybrid Volar

Re: Transfer to git breaks my package?

Thanks everybody for info and sorry for missing the original thread. Please could Jesse or somebody also fix this for me? Thanks regards Jaroslav - Original Message - From: Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2010 10:37:30

Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read

[jskarvad] sendmail: sendmail-milter-8.14.4-8.fc14.x86_64 license added to sendmail-milter-8.14.4-9.fc14 regards Jaroslav -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: tcl/tk 8.5.8 update for F13?

/ Vienna Subject: Re: tcl/tk 8.5.8 update for F13? Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: From the repoquery only the tk seems to have exact version dependency on tcl. Also from my test with several packages requiring libtcl/libtk - they worked without rebuild. I don't like to break anything, thus please let