The same problem exists in fc36.
No such problems if doing the same procedure in a Cinnamon session.
Anybody made the similar experience?
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
Fedora release 37 (Thirty Seven)
Kernel-5.19.13-300.fc37.x86_64
Joachim Backes
https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.
Could somebody please stop the chinese junkmail flood from sender "w
w"
to devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ?
Thanks
--
Fedora release 36 (Thirty Six)
Kernel-5.18.3-200.fc36.x86_64
Joachim Backes
https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.
Hi guys,
my question: is it planned to make and release kernel-4.13 for F26? I
saw that it has been declared as mainline and stable on kernel.org.
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 26 (Twenty Six)
Kernel-4.12.9-300.fc26.x86_64
Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl
?
Additionally I see a file called /null with zero length!
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five)
Kernel-4.8.1-1.fc25.x86_64
Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de>
http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/
___
file locks (-x) unlimite
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four)
Kernel-4.7.4-200.fc24.x86_64
Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de>
http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/
___
devel maili
when you update it after having launched it).
What if you updating the bash? It's always running :-;
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four)
Kernel-4.5.7-300.fc24.x86_64
Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de>
http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/
--
devel mailin
e package generation
or the time when the generation has *finished* (with/without error), so
one could guess the remaining time of package generation.
I would be grateful for such an improvement.
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three)
Kernel-4.2.3-300.fc23.x86
/x86_64/os/images/boot.iso],
as indicated on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_23_Final_RC3_Installation?rd=Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Running cmp shows that the contents are identical, and the sizes are
identical too!
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora
installed nedit on my F23 box, and this pkg needs lesstif,
and it won't install with motif!
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three)
Kernel-4.2.2-300.fc23.x86_64
Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de>
http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/
--
devel mailin
grace" needing lesstif.
--
Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three)
Kernel-4.2.2-300.fc23.x86_64
Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de>
http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/d
-deprecated shows a lot of updates to be done!
Why that difference? dnf bug?
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three)
Kernel-4.2.1-300.fc23.x86_64
Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de>
http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/
--
devel mailing list
T
and not to STDERR.
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three)
Kernel-4.2.0-0.rc8.git3.1.fc23.x86_64
Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de>
https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
On 31.08.2015 09:54, Michal Luscon wrote:
Would you mind filling a proper bugzilla report on bugzilla.redhat.com?
Regards,
Michal Luscon
On 08/31/2015 08:16 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Some dnf messages are not relevant to me, so I redirect STDERR to
/dev/null if using dnf. But this has
obsolete, I removed the
extension, but then I get rid totally from the calendars. So my
question: how t get the calendars running in TB without installing
lightning from the moz. extension pages?
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 22 (Twenty Two)
Kernel-4.0.7-300.fc22.x86_64
Joachim Backes joachim.bac
On 04/22/2015 05:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 16:52:54 +0200
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote:
As yum has been replaced by dnf, there is a question for me: will
yumdownloader (installed by yum-utils.rpm) be replaced by something
like dnfdownloader
As yum has been replaced by dnf, there is a question for me: will
yumdownloader (installed by yum-utils.rpm) be replaced by something like
dnfdownloader (installed for example by (a new) dnf-utils.rpm)?
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 22 (Twenty Two)
Kernel-4.0.0-1.fc22.x86_64
Hi all,
because of the fact that the autocorr-* packages belong to libreoffice,
why not rename them to libreoffice-autocorr-*? So this would reflect the
connectivity with libreoffice.
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 21 (Twenty One)
Kernel-3.18.2-200.fc21.x86_64
Joachim Backes
Hi all,
anybody knows if the webrtc support in firefox will be released in F21?
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 21 (Twenty One)
Kernel-3.17.6-300.fc21.x86_64
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
--
devel mailing list
devel
.fc21.x86_64
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 09/13/2014 03:53 PM, Florian Müllner wrote:
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Joachim Backes
joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote:
In gnome-sudoku (gnome-sudoku-3.13.90-3.fc21.x86_64) for F21 I'm missing
the feature allowing to print multiple unsolved sudokus.
You should use a user list
The recent f20 version of OPNSSL is openssl-1.0.1e-37.fc20, so my
question is when a secure version is released?
Is this achieved by openssl-1.0.1e-37.fc20.1 I found on kojj?
(See:
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/bits/2014/04/08/openssl-heartbleed/1)
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora
of this
technology is discontinued in Fedora Linux. Therefore you can't make
any successfuls builds for pdftk on Fedora Linux anymore.
And what about pdfchain?
Joachim Backes
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
___
devel-announce mailing list
devel-annou
to duplicate any existing efforts.
Michael
+1
pdftk is a very important package, so new (co)maintainers shouldn't be
hard to find.
+++1
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)
Kernel-3.13.5-202.fc20.x86_64
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de
regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat): Kernel-3.9.9-302.fc19.x86_64
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
. will download *all* and not only the
locally installed pkgs.
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat): Kernel-3.9.4-302.fc19.x86_64
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
--
devel mailing list
devel
On 06/05/2013 02:37 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 10:58 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
---
Package x-4.1.0.0-4.beta1.fc19:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository,
* should be available
Is it planned to provide F19 with xv? Actually it's not found.
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat): Kernel-3.9.0-0.rc6.git0.1.fc19.x86_64
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
--
devel mailing list
devel
On 04/11/2013 04:57 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
Is it planned to provide F19 with xv? Actually it's not found.
It should be available in rpmfusion-nonfree.
rob
Thanx Rob, I found it.
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat): Kernel-3.9.0
regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 18 (Spherical Cow): Kernel-3.8.6-203.fc18.x86_64
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
.
Intentionally, or bug?
Kind regards
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
PGP key ID: 0x1BB12F9E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRB++CAAoJEKzGLy0bsS+eQD4H/RNrBekkbE0ulez45bi/M70n
g8gf
On 10/24/2012 01:19 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTIxNDQ
I got hit by this EXT4 bug with F18, kernel-3.6.3-2.x86_64.fc18 from koji.
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
--
devel mailing list
devel
On 07/23/2012 08:03 AM, Brendan Jones wrote:
On 07/23/2012 07:56 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
#include unistd.h
#include stdio.h
main () {
fprintf (stderr,L_cuserid = %d,L_cuserid);
}
Do you need to add -D_GNU_SOURCE to your compile line?
Yes, it compiles too with -D_GNU_SOURCE
:34: error: ‘L_cuserid’ undeclared (first use in this function)
x.c:4:34: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for
each function it appears in
The source compiles correctly if I use -D_XOPEN_SOURCE
Kind regards
--
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
https://www
Hi,
trying to run usbview in F17 (alpha) fails because of
Cannot open /proc/bus/usb/devices
I think, usbview should be reorganized by using /sys/bus/usb
--
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On 03/25/2012 05:06 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/25/2012 02:04 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi,
trying to run usbview in F17 (alpha) fails because of
Cannot open /proc/bus/usb/devices
I think, usbview should be reorganized by using /sys/bus/usb
So why not just file a bug against
there is a tendency for creating more and more such tools.
It would be very helpful for the user if such tools could be aggregated
to a *homogenous* and gui based tool so I have not to think about which
one to use.
All comments are welcome.
Kind regards
--
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni
Hi,
since days it's not possible to update my F16 system fully (a lot of
updates are refused because of dependency problems [see BZ 731617]).
Anybody knows if the problem will be solved?
All help is welcome.
Kind regards
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
http://www.rhrk.uni
Hi,
in F15 I could install pdfedit by yum. Anybody knows when this will be
possible in F16?
Kind regards
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
devel mailing list
devel
://..., but then it is fully operable.
Additionally, no splix package available in F15.
On the other hand, the attach process in *Ubuntu 11.04* leaves a fully
operable printer without any need for interaction.
Why this difference?
--
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
) is not found in the database, so it is
not operable, although I had loaded the kernel module usblp.ko.
Sorry.
Kind regards
--
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
devel mailing list
devel
.
==
So I copied dvb-usb-af9015.fw from some UBUNTU installation to
/lib/firmware, and I could watch digital TV with kaffeine.
So my question: would it be possible to support that stick in = F15
versions?
Kind regards
--
Joachim Backes joachim.bac
.
My impression: it worked in F12. See
http://fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=236155
Kind regards
--
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
the DVD (means: can I start the media check from that
freshly burned DVD?)
Proposal: If not, it would be nice if the media checker would be placed
on the DVD for running in normal mode after the DVD has burned - perhaps
allowing to check both an i386 and x86_64 install DVD.
Kind regards
--
Joachim
On 08/13/10 10:32, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi,
having the following question: What does the DVD/CD media check exactly
if booting a Fedora DVD/CD? Is it the sha256sum? If yes, why this media
check, because it could be done after having burned the DVD?
If not, is it possible to perform
something wrong.
--
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 08/06/10 09:19, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 08/05/10 15:37, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 08/05/2010 09:06 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way around this problem?
I'm trying to install from DVD the TC2 image on the laptop (HP DV6
2113SA). When I click to trash the HD, the installer
.
Thomas
I wrote a bug report (620354). Python seems to be: python 2.7.
--
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
48 matches
Mail list logo
